Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática

dc.contributor.advisorEspinosa Becerra, Adriana Patriciaspa
dc.contributor.authorPerilla Gamboa, Paola Andreaspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-15T12:57:49Zspa
dc.date.available2019-07-15T12:57:49Zspa
dc.date.issued2019-07-11spa
dc.identifier.citationPerilla Gamboa, P. A. (2019). Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática. Trabajo de grado especialización. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/17682
dc.descriptionLa simulación de síntomas ha sido una estrategia utilizada por los seres humanos a lo largo de la historia para la obtención de beneficios en diferentes aspectos, siendo así, un fenómeno común y frecuente en la evaluación psicológica en el ámbito forense. Su difícil detección y prevalecía varía según el contexto, y la importancia de evaluación radica en que acarrea consecuencias judiciales, financieras y de seguridad sobre la sociedad. Por lo tanto, el presente trabajo de grado propone una revisión sistemática de la literatura e investigación adelantada en los últimos diez años (2008-2018) sobre simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. El objetivo de este estudio, es identificar los avances y vacíos teóricos, así como los métodos, técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación de este constructo. Como fuentes de datos se indagó en revistas indexadas de las bases de datos Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycArticles, Scielo, Redalyc y Psychology Database ProQuest, teniendo en cuenta los criterios de inclusión y exclusión empleados, así como un protocolo de selección y categorización de las fuentes. Ahora bien, los resultados indican que: a) la descripción utilizada por los manuales diagnósticos está permeada por el modelo criminológico; b) no hay un consenso frente a la conceptualización de este constructo; y, c) no hay precisión respecto a la metodología de evaluación. Por consiguiente, se propone una definición y se justifica la motivación de un abordaje multi-método para la evaluación de tan importante constructo.spa
dc.description.abstractMalingering has been a strategy of human beings throughout history to obtain benefits in different aspects, and it is thus, a common and frequent phenomenon in the psychological assessment in the forensic field. Its difficult detection and its prevalence are based on the context, and the importance of evaluation lies in the fact it enjails judicial, financial and security consequences on society. Therefore, the present degree work proposes a systematic review of the literature and the research carried out in the last ten years (2008-2018) on malingering in the forensic context. The objective of this study is to identify the advances and theoretical gaps, as well as the methods, techniques and instruments of evaluation of this construct. As sources of data, it was investigated in endexed journals of the databases ProQuest, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycArticles, Scielo, Redalyc and Psychology Database, taking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as a protocol for the selection and categorization of sources. However, the results indicate that: a) the description provided by the diagnostic manuals is permeated by the criminological model; b) there is no consensus regarding the conceptualization of this construct; and, c) there is no precision regarding the evaluation methodology. Therefore, a definition is proposed and the motivation of a multi-method approach for the evaluation of such an important construct is justified.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleSimulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemáticaspa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista En Psicología Jurídicaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Psicología Jurídica y Forensespa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Psicologíaspa
dc.subject.keywordSistematic reviewspa
dc.subject.keywordForensic psychologyspa
dc.subject.keywordMalingeringspa
dc.subject.keywordAssessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordTestsspa
dc.subject.keywordResearch projects -- psychologyspa
dc.subject.keywordLaw - Psychological aspectsspa
dc.subject.keywordSimulation (Civil law)spa
dc.subject.lembProyectos de investigación -- Psicologíaspa
dc.subject.lembDerecho-Aspectos psicológicosspa
dc.subject.lembSimulación (Derecho)spa
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-862Xspa
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=f3SQqzkAAAAJ&hl=esspa
dc.contributor.cvlachttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000509264spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV.TR®). American Psychiatric Pub.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlwes, Y. R., Clark, J. A., Berry, D. T., & Granacher, R. P. (2008). Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(2), 133-140.spa
dc.relation.referencesArce, R., Fariña, F., & Buela, G. (2008). Assessing and detecting the ability to faking psychological injury as a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on the MMPI-2 using mock victims. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 485-496.spa
dc.relation.referencesArce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2015). Daño psicológico en casos de víctimas de violencia de género: estudio comparativo de las evaluaciones forenses. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 6(2), 72-80.spa
dc.relation.referencesÁvila-Espada, A., & Jiménez-Gómez, F. (1999). Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnessota-2 (MMPI-2). Madrid: TEA Ediciones, SA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBen-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoysen, G. A., & VanBergen, A. (2014). Simulation of multiple personalities: a review of research comparing diagnosed and simulated dissociative identity disorder. Clinical psychology review, 34(1), 14-28.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrand, B. L., & Chasson, G. S. (2015). Distinguishing simulated from genuine dissociative identity disorder on the MMPI-2. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 7(1), 93.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., & Frankel, A. S. (2016). Assessment of complex dissociative disorder patients and simulated dissociation in forensic contexts. International journal of law and psychiatry, 49, 197-204.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., Snyder, B. L., & Kaliush, P. R. (2018). Detecting clinical and simulated dissociative identity disorder with the Test of Memory Malingering. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice and policy.spa
dc.relation.referencesBush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., ... & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419-426.spa
dc.relation.referencesButcher, J.N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesChmielewski, M., Zhu, J., Burchett, D., Bury, A. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2017). The comparative capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI–2) and MMPI–2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales to detect suspected malingering in a disability claimant sample. Psychological assessment, 29(2), 199.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen, A. K., & Vincent, J. P. (2012). Assessment of litigation context, suggestion, and malingering measures among simulated personal injury litigants. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(3), 238-258.spa
dc.relation.referencesDandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771-783.spa
dc.relation.referencesDay, R. A. (2005). Cómo escribir y publicar trabajos científicos (Tercera edición). Washington DC. Organización Panamericana de Salud.spa
dc.relation.references*Franklin, K. (2008). Malingering as a dichotomous variable: Case report on an insanity defendant. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 95-107.spa
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, T., Powell, M., & Kimbrell, T. (2008). Measuring symptom exaggeration in veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research, 158(3), 374-380.spa
dc.relation.referencesGaines, M. V., Giles, C. L., & Morgan, R. D. (2013). The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: A new index. Assessment, 20(4), 437-447.spa
dc.relation.referencesGer, M. C., LJOHIY, N. D., ÖNCÜ, F., Keyvan, A., ÖZGEN, G., & TÜRKCAN, A. (2016). Clinical Characteristics of Malingering Among Arrested and Convicted Male Cases That are Sent For Treatment. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 27(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesGottfried, E., & Glassmire, D. (2016). The relationship between psychiatric and cognitive symptom feigning among forensic inpatients adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. Assessment, 23(6), 672-682.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Belfi, B. (2013). New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Assessment, 20(2), 210-218.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 534-544.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrossi, L. M., Green, D., Einzig, S., & Belfi, B. (2017). Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Psychological assessment, 29(5), 531.spa
dc.relation.referencesHawes, S. W., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 112.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoover, S., Zottoli, T. M., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2014). ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(2), 139-146.spa
dc.relation.referencesIngram, P. B., & Ternes, M. S. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 473-496.spa
dc.relation.referencesJelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 850-855.spa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez Gómez, F., Sánchez Crespo, G., & Ampudia Rueda, A. (2008). Utilidad de la escala Odecp de Nichols & Greene, (1991) en el MMPI-2. ODECP Y MMPI-2. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(26).spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, A. (2016). Cutoff scores for MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF cognitive-somatic validity scales for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(7), 786-801.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, S. M. (2017). Dissimulation strategies on standard neuropsychological tests: A qualitative investigation. Brain injury, 31(8), 1131-1141.spa
dc.relation.referencesKing, J., & Sullivan, K. A. (2009). Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(1), 35-49.spa
dc.relation.referencesKosheleva, E., Spadoni, A. D., Strigo, I. A., Buchsbaum, M. S., & Simmons, A. N. (2016). Faking bad: The neural correlates of feigning memory impairment. Neuropsychology, 30(3), 377.spa
dc.relation.referencesLande, R. G., & Williams, L. B. (2013). Prevalence and characteristics of military malingering. Military medicine, 178(1), 50-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesLange, R. T., Sullivan, K. A., & Scott, C. (2010). Comparison of MMPI-2 and PAI validity indicators to detect feigned depression and PTSD symptom reporting. Psychiatry Research, 176(2-3), 229-235.spa
dc.relation.referencesLove, C. M., Glassmire, D. M., Zanolini, S. J., & Wolf, A. (2014). Specificity and false positive rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test among forensic inpatients with intellectual disabilities. Assessment, 21(5), 618-627.spa
dc.relation.referencesMachado, R., Tamames, S., López, M., Mohedano, L., D´agostino, M., & Veiga, J. (2009). Revisiones sistemáticas Exploratorias, Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 55(216), 12-19.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarion, B. E., Sellbom, M., Salekin, R. T., Toomey, J. A., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2013). An examination of the association between psychopathy and dissimulation using the MMPI-2-RF validity scales. Law and human behavior, 37(4), 219.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarter, R. J., Walton, N. H., Brooks, D. N., & Powell, G. E. (2009). Effort testing in contemporary UK neuropsychological practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(6), 1050-1066.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, H. A. (1991). Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST).spa
dc.relation.referencesMogge, N. L., Lepage, J. S., Bell, T., & Ragatz, L. (2010). The negative distortion scale: A new PAI validity scale. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(1), 77-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory (PAI).spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, W. C., Hall, R. C., & Tolou-Shams, M. (2013). Prevalence and assessment of malingering in homicide defendants using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Rey 15-Item Memory Test. Homicide studies, 17(3), 314-328.spa
dc.relation.referencesNijdam-Jones, A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2017). Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse samples. Psychological assessment, 29(11), 1321.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtega, A., Labrenz, S., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of a Bayesian latent group analysis for the detection of malingering-related poor effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1019-1042.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Review of Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide (Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 244). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesPierson, A. M., Rosenfeld, B., Green, D., & Belfi, B. (2011). Investigating the relationship between antisocial personality disorder and malingering. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 146-156.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Berry, D. T., & Granacher, R. P. (2011). Effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales for feigned mental disorders and cognitive impairment: A known-groups study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33(3), 355-367.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Kenneth, W., Sewell, K. W., & Nathan, D., Guillard, M. S. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, 2nd Edition (SIRS) (SIRS-2)spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Sewell, K. W., Goldstein, A., & Leonard, K. (1998). A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and human behavior, 22(4), 353-367.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Goldstein, A. M. (1994). Explanatory models of malingering. Law and human behavior, 18(5), 543-552.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Robinson, E. V., & Gillard, N. D. (2014). The SIMS screen for feigned mental disorders: The development of detection‐based scales. Behavioral sciences & the law, 32(4), 455-466.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez Crespo, G., Jiménez Gómez, F., & Ampudia Rueda, A. (2008). Detectando el perfil simulador en el MMPI-2: una propuesta basada en la investigación. Revista de Psicología (Lima), 26(2), 277-298.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchenk, K., & Sullivan, K. A. (2010). Do warnings deter rather than produce more sophisticated malingering? Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 32(7), 752-762.spa
dc.relation.referencesSellbom, M., Toomey, J. A., Wygant, D. B., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2010). Utility of the MMPI–2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 22.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 441-455.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, S. T., Cox, J., Mowle, E. N., & Edens, J. F. (2017). Intentional inattention: Detecting feigned attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological assessment, 29(12), 1447.spa
dc.relation.references*Soliman, S., & Resnick, P. J. (2010). Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(5), 614-629.spa
dc.relation.referencesSollman, M. J., Ranseen, J. D., & Berry, D. T. (2010). Detection of feigned ADHD in college students. Psychological assessment, 22(2), 325.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoria, M. Á., Yepes, M., & Armadans, I. (2011). Effectiveness of clinical assessment in Spanish forensic practice: detecting malingered psychological sequelae in victims of intimate partner violence. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 25(1), 8-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesSteffan, J. S., Morgan, R. D., Lee, J., & Sellbom, M. (2010). A comparative analysis of MMPI-2 malingering detection models among inmates. Assessment, 17(2), 185-196.spa
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, K. A., & Elliott, C. (2012). An investigation of the validity of the MMPI-2 response bias scale using an analog simulation design. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(1), 160-176.spa
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, K. A., Lange, R. T., & Edmed, S. L. (2016). Utility of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Validity-10 index to detect symptom exaggeration: An analogue simulation study. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23(5), 353-362.spa
dc.relation.referencesTombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering: TOMM. New York/Toronto: MHS.spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Niesten, I. J., Jelicic, M., Huhnt, B., & Campo, J. A. (2017). Biased symptom reporting and antisocial behaviour in forensic samples: A weak link. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(4), 530-548.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Oorsouw, K. I. M., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Detecting malingered memory problems in the civil and criminal arena. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 97-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesVitacco, M. J., Jackson, R. L., Rogers, R., Neumann, C. S., Miller, H. A., & Gabel, J. (2008). Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: A confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions. Assessment, 15(1), 97-103.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeiss, P. A., Bell, K. J., & Weiss, W. U. (2010). Use of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales in detecting criminal malingering. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(1), 49-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeiss, R. A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2017). Identifying feigning in trauma-exposed African immigrants. Psychological assessment, 29(7), 881.spa
dc.relation.referencesWidows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. PAR.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, J. M. (2011). The malingering factor. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(3), 280-285.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoxall, J., Bahr, M., & O'Neill, T. (2017). Faking bad in workers compensation psychological assessments: elevation rates of negative distortion scales on the personality assessment inventory in an Australian sample. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(5), 682-693.spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmadi, K., Lashani, Z., Afzali, M. H., Tavalaie, S. A., & Mirzaee, J. (2013). Malingering and PTSD: Detecting malingering and war related PTSD by Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). BMC psychiatry, 13(1), 154.spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez-Bello, F. J. (2013). El control del engaño en la evaluación psicológica forense de la violencia de género: posibilidades y limitaciones en el contexto chileno. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 23.spa
dc.relation.referencesArce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2006). Evaluación del daño moral en accidentes de tráfico: Desarrollo y validación de un protocolo para la detección de la simulación. Psicothema, 18(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesArce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2009). Creación y validación de un protocolo de evaluación forense de las secuelas psicológicas de la violencia de género. Psicothema, 21(2), 241-247.spa
dc.relation.referencesArce, R., Fariña, F., & Seijo, D. (2013). ¿Disimulan los progenitores en litigio por la custodia en el 16 PF-5? Anuario de psicología jurídica, 23.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A. P., Miller, L. J., & Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7-8), 909-916.spa
dc.relation.referencesBianchini, K. J., Etherton, J. L., Greve, K. W., Heinly, M. T., & Meyers, J. E. (2008). Classification accuracy of MMPI-2 validity scales in the detection of pain-related malingering: A known-groups study. Assessment, 15(4), 435-449.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlasco Saiz, J. L., & Pallardó Durá, L. (2013). Detección de exageración de síntomas mediante el SIMS y el MMPI-2-RF en pacientes diagnosticados de trastorno mixto ansioso-depresivo y adaptativo en el contexto medicolegal: un estudio preliminar. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 177-183.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Marchi, B., & Balboni, G. (2018). Detecting malingering mental illness in forensics: Known-Group Comparison and Simulation Design with MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM. PeerJ, 6, e5259.spa
dc.relation.referencesFranklin, K. (2008). Malingering as a dichotomous variable: Case report on an insanity defendant. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 95-107.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Cortés, A., Pérez-Fernández, F., Corbí-Gran, B., & Martín-Moreno-Blasco, C. (2017). Estudio de caso: ¿simulación o trastorno de personalidad múltiple? Clínica y Salud, 28(1), 39-45.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeurten, M., Meulemans, T., & Seron, X. (2018). Detecting over-reporting of symptoms: the French version of the self-report symptom inventory. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(sup1), 164-181.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, D., Rosenfeld, B., Dole, T., Pivovarova, E., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). Validation of an abbreviated version of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings. Law and human behavior, 32(2), 177-186.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeyvan, A., Mehmet Can, G. E. R., Ertürk, S. G., & Türkcan, A. (2015). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi, 52(3), 296.spa
dc.relation.referencesKocsis, R. N. (2011). The structured interview of reported symptoms 2nd edition (SIRS-2): The new benchmark towards the assessment of malingering. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(1), 73-81.spa
dc.relation.referencesKunst, M. J. J., Aarts, M., Frolijk, J., & Poelwijk, R. (2016). Exploring the residual effects of malingering in mock victims of violent crime: an experimental vignette study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(3), 238-251.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, C., Liu, Z., Chiu, H. F., Carl, T. W. C., Zhang, H., Wang, P., & Wang, Y. (2013). Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2. BMC psychiatry, 13(1), 254.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez, R. V., Aparicio, M., Río, M. G., & García, M. P. (2013). Utilidad de los índices de memoria verbal para detectar simulación en población española. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 169-176.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDermott, B. E., & Sokolov, G. (2009). Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(5), 753-765.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcLaughlin, J. L., & Kan, L. Y. (2014). Test usage in four common types of forensic mental health assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(2), 128.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerckelbach, H., Smeets, T., & Jelicic, M. (2009). Experimental simulation: Type of malingering scenario makes a difference. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(3), 378-386.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Schmandd, B. A., Santamaríae, P., & González-Ordi, H. (2013). Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 129-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerten, T., & Rogers, R. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral sciences & the law, 35(2), 97-112.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorales, M. I. C., & Laguna-Bonilla, S. (2017). Trastorno de síntomas somáticos: de la sospecha de simulación al tratamiento cognitivo-conductual. Clínica y Salud, 28(3), 131-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesMossman, D., Wygant, D. B., Gervais, R. O., & Hart, K. J. (2018). Trial 1 versus Trial 2 of the Test of Memory Malingering: Evaluating accuracy without a “gold standard”. Psychological assessment, 30(1), 74.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, W. C., Hall, R., Marshall, R., Tolou-Shams, M., & Wooten, K. (2016). Frequency and Detection of Malingering in Homicide Defendants Undergoing Criminal Responsibility Evaluations Using the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality: A Feasibility Study. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016638131.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiesten, I. J., Nentjes, L., Merckelbach, H., & Bernstein, D. P. (2015). Antisocial features and “faking bad”: A critical note. International journal of law and psychiatry, 41, 34-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesNijdam-Jones, A., Rivera, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Arango-Lasprilla, J. C. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering among Latin American Spanish-speaking adults. Law and human behavior, 41(5), 422.spa
dc.relation.referencesNovo, M., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., & Arce, R. (2013). Eficacia del MMPI-A en casos forenses de acoso escolar: Simulación y daño psicológico. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(1), 33-40.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtega, A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Lee, M. D., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2012). A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in the assessment of malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 453-465.spa
dc.relation.referencesOsuna, E., López-Martínez, M., Arce, R., & Vázquez, M. J. (2015). Analysis of response patterns on the MMPI-2 in psychiatric prison inmates. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 29-36. 9spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, P. C., Ordi, H. G., Morales, M. I. C., Santamaría, P., & Nieto, M. A. P. (2013). Fibromialgia: ¿exageración o simulación? Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 185-195.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Wooley, C. N., & Ross, C. A. (2012). The detection of feigned disabilities: The effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory in a traumatized inpatient sample. Assessment, 19(1), 77-88.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Vitacco, M. J., & Kurus, S. J. (2010). Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: Patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 38(1), 109-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, G., Ampudia, A., Jiménez, F., & Amado, B. G. (2017). Contrasting the efficacy of the MMPI-2-RF overreporting scales in the detection of malingering. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 51-56.spa
dc.relation.referencesSantamaría, P., Capilla Ramírez, P., & González Ordi, H. (2013). Prevalencia de simulación en incapacidad temporal: percepción de los profesionales de la salud. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 139-151.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoliman, S., & Resnick, P. J. (2010). Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(5), 614-629.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpringman, R. E., & Vandenberg, B. R. (2009). The effects of test-strategy coaching on measures of competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9(3), 179-198.spa
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, K., & King, J. (2010). Detecting faked psychopathology: A comparison of two tests to detect malingered psychopathology using a simulation design. Psychiatry research, 176(1), 75-81.spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1336-1365.spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & à Campo, J. (2018). Antisocial features are not predictive of symptom exaggeration in forensic patients. Legal and Criminological Psychology.spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Niesten, I. J., & à Campo, J. (2017). Differentiating Factitious from Malingered Symptomatology: the Development of a Psychometric Approach. Psychological injury and law, 10(4), 341-357.spa
dc.relation.referencesVetter, S., Forces, S. A., Gallo, W. T., Rossler, W., & Lupi, G. G. (2009). The pattern of psychopathology associated with malingering tendencies at basic psychiatric screening of the Swiss Armed Forces. Military medicine, 174(2), 153-157.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalters, G. D., Rogers, R., Berry, D. T., Miller, H. A., Duncan, S. A., McCusker, P. J., ... & Granacher Jr, R. P. (2008). Malingering as a categorical or dimensional construct: The latent structure of feigned psychopathology as measured by the SIRS and MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 238.spa
dc.relation.referencesWisdom, N. M., Callahan, J. L., & Shaw, T. G. (2010). Diagnostic utility of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology to detect malingering in a forensic sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(2), 118-125.spa
dc.relation.referencesWooley, C. N., & Rogers, R. (2015). The effectiveness of the personality assessment inventory with feigned PTSD: An initial investigation of Resnick’s model of malingering. Assessment, 22(4), 449-458.spa
dc.relation.referencesWygant, D. B., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., Berry, D. T., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 671-680.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, G. (2017). PTSD in Court III: Malingering, assessment, and the law. International journal of law and psychiatry, 52, 81-102.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, S., Jacobson, R., Einzig, S., Gray, K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2016). Can we recognise malingerers? The association between malingering, personality traits and clinical impression among complainants in civil compensation cases. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 235-238.spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.proposalRevisión sistemáticaspa
dc.subject.proposalSimulación de síntomasspa
dc.subject.proposalEvaluaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalPsicología forensespa
dc.subject.proposalSimulación de síntomasspa
dc.subject.proposalEvaluaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalInstrumentosspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
2019paolaperilla.pdf
Tamaño:
652.5Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
cartaderechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
421.3Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
cartadeaprobacion.pdf
Tamaño:
37.37Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
811bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia

Indexado por: