Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBecerra, Patricia
dc.contributor.advisorHernández La Rotta, Johanna
dc.contributor.advisorParra, Diana
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda Ruíz, Sandra Patricia
dc.contributor.authorEslava, Myriam Lorena
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Paola
dc.contributor.authorPinzón Charry, Leidy Lorena
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-11T16:34:33Z
dc.date.available2022-06-11T16:34:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-15
dc.identifier.citationCastañeda Ruíz, S.P., Eslava, M. L., González, P., Pinzón Charry, Leidy L. (2017). Comparación de la eficacia de la técnica PIPS y LAI en la remoción del barrillo dentinario en el tercio apical usando el láser ER, CR: YSGG. [Tesis de Especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás. Bucaramanga, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/44883
dc.descriptionEl Láser es un método de activación que ayuda a la limpieza y desinfección del conducto radicular, con diferentes longitudes de onda que permiten la eliminación de la capa de barrillo dentinario. Se han utilizado dos técnicas para activar el irrigante con el uso del Láser, una de ellas es la técnica PIPS genera un flujo turbulento del irrigante y la Irrigación Activada con Láser (LAI). Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia de la técnica irrigación Láser activada (LAI) y Corriente Foto acústica inducida por Fotones (PIPS) en la remoción del barrillo dentinario en el tercio apical usando el Láser Er, Cr: YSGG. Método: Se realizó un estudio experimental in vitro. Se evaluaron 25 dientes unirradiculares premolares mandibulares, los cuales se dividieron en 5 grupos de 5 dientes cada uno incluyendo el grupo control. Todas las muestras fueron instrumentadas con el sistema rotatorio Mtwo, seccionadas longitudinalmente y observadas bajo microscopia electrónica de barrido (SEM) a 2000X. Resultados: se observó que en el 67% de los casos no hay barrillo dentinal en la superficie del conducto en el 20% de los casos se observó moderado barrillo dentinal y en el 13 % restantes se observó gran cantidad de barrillo dentinal. Los grupos 1 (control), 2 (NaOCL- EDTA) presentaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas con los demás grupos. Por el contrario, para el grupo 3 (ultrasonido), grupo 4 (LAI) y grupo 5 (PIPS) la diferencia registrada no es estadísticamente significativa.spa
dc.description.abstractThe laser is an activation method that helps to clean and disinfect the root canal, with different wavelengths that allow the elimination of the smear layer. Two techniques have been used to activate the irrigant with the use of the laser, one of which is the PIPS technique that generates a turbulent flow of the irrigator and the Laser Activated Irrigation (LAI). Objective: To compare the efficacy of the technique Activated Laser Irrigation (LAI) and Current Photon-induced Acoustic Photo (PIPS) in the removal of the dentinal smear in the apical third using the Er Laser, Cr: YSGG. Method: An in vitro experimental study was carried out. Twenty-five uni-mandibular mandibular premolar teeth were evaluated, which were divided into 5 groups of 5 teeth each, including the control group. All samples were instrumented with the Mtwo rotary system, sectioned longitudinally and observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 2000X. Results: Statistically significant difference was found for groups 1 (p = 0.00), 2 (p = 0.29), on the contrary groups 3 (p = 0.317) and 4 (p = 0.04) and 5 (p = 0.708) presented normalityspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleComparación de la eficacia de la técnica PIPS y LAI en la remoción del barrillo dentinario en el tercio apical usando el láser ER, CR: YSGG.spa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Endodonciaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Endodonciaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.subject.keywordLaserspa
dc.subject.keywordPIPSspa
dc.subject.keywordTHE Ispa
dc.subject.keywordEDTAspa
dc.subject.keywordDentinal tubulesspa
dc.subject.keywordSmear layerspa
dc.subject.lembOdontologíaspa
dc.subject.lembEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.lembDinámica de fluidos - Medicionesspa
dc.subject.lembDentinaspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades - Prevención y controlspa
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.references1 Lui J, Guan Kuah H, and Nah Chen N, Effect of EDTA with and without Surfactants or ultrasonics on Removal of Smear Layer. J. Endo. 2006; 12.007.spa
dc.relation.references2 Schmidt T, Teixeira C, Felipe M, Felipe W, Pashley D, Bortoluzzi E. Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal. J.Endod 2015;41(8):1359-63.spa
dc.relation.references3 Divito E. Pips with laser activated irrigation, Photoacoustic shockwave with irrigant debries areas of root canal files can’t reach. Pacific Dental Conference. 2015. [en línea]. [consultado el 3 de octubre de 2017] disponible en: file:///C:/Users/1/Downloads/799fc264ecf18692a30780472926bdf0_8-10.pdf.spa
dc.relation.references4 Van der Sluis L.W.M, Versluis M, Wu M.K, and Weselink P.R. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literatura. Int Endodontic Journal, 2007; 40, 415–426spa
dc.relation.references5 Jaramillo, D., et al. Root canal disinfection comparing conventional irrigation vs photon induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) using a buffered 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution. Evidence Based Endodontics; 2016:1 (1). p. 6.spa
dc.relation.references6 Peeters, H, Suardita, K. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser. Journal of endodontics. 2011; 37(11): 1585-1589spa
dc.relation.references7 Scandium, Gallium Garnet Laser.J.Endod; 2011, (11):1585-9.spa
dc.relation.references8 Zehnder M, Root Canal Irrigants, J. Endod; 2006;32(5):389-98.spa
dc.relation.references9 Basrani B, Malkhassian G. Update of Endodontic Irrigation Solutions. En: Basrani Endodontic Irrigation. 2015.spa
dc.relation.references10 Nusstein, John M. "Sonic and ultrasonic irrigation." Endodontic Irrigation. Springer International Publishing, 2015. 173 197.spa
dc.relation.references11 Akyuz Ekim S, Erdemir A, Comparison of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal: An in vitro Study. Microsc Res Tech. 2015;78(3):230-9spa
dc.relation.references12 Deleu E, & Meire M, & De Moor R,Efficacy of laser-based irrigan activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities. Lasers Med Sci . 2015 ;30(2):831-5.spa
dc.relation.references13 Zhu X, Yin X, Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect and Smear Layer Removal Using Photon-Initiated Photoacoustic Streaming Aided Irrigation Versus a Conventional Irrigation in Single-Rooted Canals:An In Vitro Study. Laser Surgery 2013 Volume 31, Number 8: 371–377spa
dc.relation.references14 Uroz D,Gonzales M,andFerrer M, Effectiveness of the endoactivador system in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. J. Endod 2009; 10.029.spa
dc.relation.references15 De Moor R, Meire Maarten and Verdaasdonk Rudolf, Laser Induced Explosive Vapor and Cavitation Resulting in Effective Irrigation of the Root Canal Parte 1: A Visualization Study. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine; 2009: (41): 514-519.spa
dc.relation.references16 De Moor R, Blanken J, Meire Maarten and Gobarkhay, Moritz A, and Vanobbergen, J.Efficacy of ultrasonic versus Laser-activated irrigation to remove Artificially Placed Dentin Debris Plus.J. Endod 2010;(36): 1580-1583.spa
dc.relation.references17 De Moor R, Blanken J, Meire Maarten and Verdaasdonk Rudolf, Laser Induce Explosive Vapor and Cavitation Resulting in Effective Irrigation of the Root Canal Parte 2: Evaluation of the Efficacy, Láseres in Surgery and Medicine. 2009;(41): 520-523.spa
dc.relation.references18 Chopra S, Murray P, and Namerow K, A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the f-file versus ultrasonic activation of a k-file to remove smear layer. J. Endodo. 2008; 07.006.spa
dc.relation.references19 De Moor R, Meire Maarten and Verdaasdonk Rudolf, Laser Induced Vapor and Cavitation Resulting in Effective Irrigation of the Root Canal Parte 2: Evaluation of the efficacy. Láseres in Surgery and Medicine 2009 (41): 520-523spa
dc.relation.references20 Arnabat A,Berini A, Gay L, Aplicaciones del láser en odontología.Rcoe. 2004;9(5):497-511.spa
dc.relation.references21 De Costa Lima G, Aguiar C Comparison of smear layer removal using the Nd:YAG laser, ultrasound, ProTaper Universal system, and CanalBrush methods: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2015:41(3):400-404spa
dc.relation.references22 Olivi G, Laser use in endodontics : Evolution fromdirect laser irradiation to laser-activated irrigation.J laser dent, 2013; 21(2)58-71.spa
dc.relation.references23 Arslan H, Capar g. Effect of photon – initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris,J. Endodoctic international. 2014;(47):1072-1077.spa
dc.relation.references24 Mancini, M., Cerroni, L., Iorio, L., Armellin, E., Conte, G., Cianconi, L. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. Journal of endodontics. 2013; 39(11): 1456-1460.spa
dc.relation.references25 Madhusudhana K, Swapna S, Suneelkumar C, Lavanya A, Deepthi M. Effect of endoactivator and Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation: An in vitro study. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2016;5:24-8.spa
dc.relation.references26 De Moor, R. J., Meire, M., Goharkhay, K., Moritz, A., & Vanobbergen, J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. Journal of endodontics. 2010; 36(9).spa
dc.relation.references27 Bolhari, B., Ehsani, S., Etemadi, A., Shafaq, M., Nosrat, A. Efficacy of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser in Removing Smear Layer and Debris with Two Different Output Powers. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2014; 32(10): 527–532.spa
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.proposalLáserspa
dc.subject.proposalPIPSspa
dc.subject.proposalLAIspa
dc.subject.proposalEDTAspa
dc.subject.proposalTúbulos dentinalesspa
dc.subject.proposalBarrillo dentinariospa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia

Indexado por: