Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Especificación de requisitos de desempeño en el diagrama de clases

dc.contributor.authorSerna, Sergio; Centro de Investigación Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano,Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorArango, Fernando; Escuela de Sistemas Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional, Medellínspa
dc.date.issued2010-06-30spa
dc.identifierhttp://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/ITECKNE/article/view/356spa
dc.identifier10.15332/iteckne.v7i1.356spa
dc.descriptionLa especificación de requisitos no funcionales en sistemas software, ha presentado múltiples retos a académicos investigadores interesados en el tema. Las cada vez más crecientes exigencias de los sistemas en atributos catalogados, dentro de los que se denominan requisitos no funcionales, como desempeño, seguridad, escalabilidad, entre otros, ha permitido diversos enfoques a la hora de construir los planos software del sistema deseado por el cliente. Este trabajo se enmarca dentro de la especificación formal de requisitos temporales no funcionales, utilizando el lenguaje de modelado unificado para la construcción de los planos software. El trabajo no trata sobre requisitos funcionales o no funcionales que no están relacionados con tiempo. La especificación se hace sólo sobre diagramas de clase UML, y se apoya en métodos existentes durante las primeras etapas de desarrollo, lo que le permite elicitar los requisitos e ir llevándolos de manera consistente a través de todos los diagramas del modelo, hasta llegar a un nuevo diagrama de clases. Este nuevo diagrama de clases relaciona elementos del modelo con los del metamodelo, logrando una mayor expresividad y permitiendo tomar decisiones de implementación que antes no era posible en esta etapa del desarrollo. Para lograr esto, es necesario realizar una variante a la semántica del diagrama de clases, permitiendo relacionar metaclases que antes no estaban relacionadas. Igualmente, se introduce una nueva simbología para expresar la nueva metarelación presente en el diagrama de clases.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás. Seccional Bucaramangaspa
dc.relationhttp://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/ITECKNE/article/view/356/318spa
dc.relation/*ref*/E. Hull, K. Jackson, and J. Dick, Requirements Engineering, 2nd ed. Springer, 2005spa
dc.relation/*ref*/B. Nuseibeh and S. Easterbrook, “Requirements engineering: a roadmap,” in ICSE ’00: Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000, pp. 35–46spa
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Arango and C. M. Zapata, UN-Método para la elicitación de requisitos de software, C. M. Zapata, Ed. Escuela de Sistemas Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 2006spa
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, Nonfunctional requirements in software engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, 2000spa
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Xu, H. Ziv, and D. Richardson, “Towards modeling non-functional requirements in software architecture,” in Early Aspects 2005: Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering and Architecture Design, in conjunction with AOSD’2005, Chicago, Illinois, USA, March 2005spa
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Botella, X. Burgues, X. Franch, M. Huerta, and G. Salazar, “Modelling non-functional requirements,” in Proceedings of Jornadas Ingeniera de Requisitos Aplicados (JIRA), Sevilla, Spain, 2001spa
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Dinkel and U. Baumgarten, “Modeling nonfunctional requirements: a basis for dynamic systems management,” in SEAS ’05: Proceedings of the second international workshop on Software engineering for automotive systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 1–8spa
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Burge and D. Brown, “Nfrs: Fact or fiction?” Computer Science Technical Report Worcester Polytechnic University, Tech. Rep. WPICS-TR-02-01, 2002spa
dc.relation/*ref*/IEEE, “IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications,” Tech. Rep., 1998spa
dc.relation/*ref*/E. D. Lazowska, J. Zahorjan, G. S. Graham, and K. C. Sevcik, Quantitative system performance: computer system analysis using queueing network models. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984spa
dc.relation/*ref*/Q. Wang, J.-J. Yang, Y.-Z. Xu, and C.-X. Xing, “A method for semantic performance modeling in extended enterprise,” in Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009. IE&EM ’09. 16th International Conference on, Oct. 2009, pp. 1437–1441spa
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Menasce and H. Gomaa, “A method for design and performance modeling of client/server systems,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1066–1085, Nov 2000spa
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Bagchi, “A study on managing the performance requirements of a distributed service delivery software system,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 735 – 746, 2005spa
dc.relation/*ref*/B. Nixon, “Management of performance requirements for information systems,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1122–1146, Dec 2000spa
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Kiesel and M. Scharf, “Modeling and performance evaluation of transport protocols for firewall control,” Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3232 – 3251, 2007spa
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Jingbai, H. Keqing, W. Chong, and L. Wei, “A context awareness non-functional requirements metamodel based on domain ontology,” in Semantic Computing and Systems, 2008. WSCS ’08. IEEE International Workshop on, July 2008, pp. 1–7spa
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Dobson, S. Hall, and G. Kotonya, “A domain-independent ontology for non-functional requirements,” in e-Business Engineering, 2007. ICEBE 2007. IEEE International Conference on, Oct. 2007, pp. 563–566spa
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Wang, Y.-T. Song, and L. Chung, “From software architecture to design patterns: a case study of an nfr approach,” in Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2005 and First ACIS International Workshop on Self-Assembling Wireless Networks. SNPD/SAWN 2005. Sixth International Conference on, May 2005, pp. 170–177spa
dc.relation/*ref*/Object Management Group, “UML profile for MARTE: Modeling and analysis of real-time embedded systems, version 1,” Tech. Rep., 2009spa
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Graf, I. Ober, and I. Ober, “A real-time profile for uml,” Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 113–127, 2006spa
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Flake and W. Mueller, “An ocl extension for real-time constraints,” in Object Modeling with the OCL, The Rationale behind the Object Constraint Language. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 150 – 171spa
dc.relation/*ref*/——, “A uml profile for real-time constraints with the ocl,” in UML ’02: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on The Unified Modeling Language. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 179–195spa
dc.relation/*ref*/M. V. Cengarle and A. Knapp, “Towards ocl/rt,” in FME ’02: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Formal Methods Europe on Formal Methods - Getting IT Right. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 390 –409spa
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Lavazza, S. Morasca, and A. Morzenti, “A dual language approach to the development of time-critical systems,” Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 116, pp. 227–239, 2005, proceedings of the International Workshop on Test and Analysis of Component Based Systems (TACoS 2004)spa
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Serna, “Especificación formal de requisitos temporales no funcionales,” Master’s thesis, Escuela de Sistemas, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2010spa
dc.relation/*ref*/“IEEE std 1012 - 2004 ieee standard for software verification and validation,” Tech. Rep., 2005spa
dc.relation/*ref*/“The standard performance evaluation corporation (spec),” http://www.spec.org/, January 2010spa
dc.relation/*ref*/ZigBee Alliance, “ZigBee Specification,” Tech. Rep., January 2008. San Ramon, CA.spa
dc.relation/*ref*/“Part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (wpans),” Tech. Rep., September 2006spa
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2018 ITECKNEspa
dc.titleEspecificación de requisitos de desempeño en el diagrama de clasesspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalDiagrama de clases, Metamodelo, Requisitos no funcionales, UML.spa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.citationissueITECKNE; Vol. 7, núm. 1 (2010); 83-97spa
dc.relation.citationissue2339-3483spa
dc.relation.citationissue1692-1798spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Indexado por: