Practices and normativity: Philosophy of Science, Agency and Epistemic Normativity

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorFonseca Martínez, Miguelen
dc.date2024-04-21
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T16:56:38Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T16:56:38Z
dc.descriptionThe present work aims to present the notion of eidetic agency as a novel account for the understanding of an epistemic normativity based on practices. The eidetic agency (Fonseca, 2020) and (Fonseca, 2023)   is a modality of material agency that, scaffolded and extensively, delegates epistemic agency to formal artifacts that become evident in the materiality of the signifiers of artificial languages. Such eidetic artifacts constitute an epistemic normativity that, although it is based on implicit practices and norms of scientific practices, overcome certain problems derived from that reading. The first section of the text presents a definition and general analysis of the project of a normative epistemology based on practices. In the second part, the relationship between practices in science and scientific regulations is deeply analyzed, based on the premises of Martínez and Huang (2011). Finally, a possible solution to the theoretical problems derived from such reading is proposed, with the approach of an epistemic normativity based on eidetic agents.en
dc.descriptionThe present work aims to present the notion of eidetic agency as a novel account for the understanding of an epistemic normativity based on practices. The eidetic agency (Fonseca, 2020) and (Fonseca, 2023)   is a modality of material agency that, scaffolded and extensively, delegates epistemic agency to formal artifacts that become evident in the materiality of the signifiers of artificial languages. Such eidetic artifacts constitute an epistemic normativity that, although it is based on implicit practices and norms of scientific practices, overcome certain problems derived from that reading. The first section of the text presents a definition and general analysis of the project of a normative epistemology based on practices. In the second part, the relationship between practices in science and scientific regulations is deeply analyzed, based on the premises of Martínez and Huang (2011). Finally, a possible solution to the theoretical problems derived from such reading is proposed, with the approach of an epistemic normativity based on eidetic agents.es
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/cfla/article/view/9585
dc.identifier10.15332/25005375.9585
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/61437
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombiaes
dc.relationhttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/cfla/article/view/9585/8288
dc.relation10.15332/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es
dc.sourceCuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana; Vol. 45 No. 130 (2024): Pragmatism in Latin America; 246-262en
dc.sourceCuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana; Vol. 45 Núm. 130 (2024): Pragmatismo en América Latina; 246-262es
dc.source2500-5375
dc.source0120-8462
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Science, practices, normativity, epistemic normativity, agency, eidetic agency.en
dc.subjectFilosofía de la ciencia, prácticas, normatividad, normatividad epistémica, agencia, agencia eidética.es
dc.titlePractices and normativity: Philosophy of Science, Agency and Epistemic Normativityen
dc.titlePractices and normativity: Philosophy of Science, Agency and Epistemic Normativityes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana