Las categorías epistemológicas arquitectónicas. Una aproximación para la flexibilización del pensamiento proyectual
Cargando...
Fecha
Autores
Director
Enlace al recurso
DOI
ORCID
Google Scholar
Cvlac
gruplac
Descripción Dominio:
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Santo Tomás - Seccional Bucaramanga
Compartir
Descripción
La creatividad se alimenta del razonamiento; aunque no se pueda controlar voluntariamente si se puede entrenar con preguntas epistemológicas3 que estimulan la cognición. La validación del proceso proyectual radica en acciones que demuestran coherencia entre lo pensado y lo hecho. Esta acción despierta ideas almacenadas en la memoria, aparentemente olvidadas4. Para potenciar lo proyectual, y su intrínseca creatividad, es necesario establecer orden cognoscitivo. Meta alcanzable al categorizar el conocimiento, lo que hará más fácil la recordación o activación y asociación de este por estudiantes, docentes y/o profesionales del diseño. Kuhn habla de categorías del conocimiento (1962) para explicar los avances en los modos de ver la ciencia y la realidad de la cual se ocupa. Para Kuhn un paradigma es una concepción de la realidad. ¿Si se cambia el paradigma, cambia la realidad? Sí. No hay una definición absoluta para ella. Miramos la realidad a través de ventanas particulares que luego se universalizan para convertirse en premisas culturales; en lugares comunes que permiten su argumentación. Es por ello por lo que se plantea, dentro del ámbito académico y trasladable al profesional, un acercamiento a la realidad proyectual a partir de varias ventanas: la compleja, la postestructural y la semiótica. Entre ellas se configura un modelo no definitivo, ni exhaustivo, pero sí amigable y flexible para realizar dicho acercamiento.
The creativity is fueled by reasoning; although it cannot be controlled voluntarily, it can be trained with epistemological questions that stimulate cognition. The validation of the projectual process lies in actions that demonstrate coherence between what is thought and what is done. This action awakens ideas stored in memory, apparently forgotten. To enhance the projectual, and its intrinsic creativity, it is necessary to establish cognitive order. Achievable goal by assigning categorical places to knowledge, which will make it easier to remember or activate and associate it. Kuhn speaks of categories of knowledge (1962) to explain the advances in the ways of seeing science and the reality with which it deals. For Kuhn, a paradigm is a conception of reality. If the paradigm is changed, does reality change? Yes. There is no absolute definition for it. We look at reality through particular windows that are then universalized to become cultural premises; commonplaces that allow for argumentation. This is why, within the academic field and transferable to the professional, an approach to projectual reality is proposed from several windows: the complex, the post-structural and the semiotic. Among them, a model is configured that is neither definitive nor exhaustive, but is friendly and flexible to carry out this approach.
The creativity is fueled by reasoning; although it cannot be controlled voluntarily, it can be trained with epistemological questions that stimulate cognition. The validation of the projectual process lies in actions that demonstrate coherence between what is thought and what is done. This action awakens ideas stored in memory, apparently forgotten. To enhance the projectual, and its intrinsic creativity, it is necessary to establish cognitive order. Achievable goal by assigning categorical places to knowledge, which will make it easier to remember or activate and associate it. Kuhn speaks of categories of knowledge (1962) to explain the advances in the ways of seeing science and the reality with which it deals. For Kuhn, a paradigm is a conception of reality. If the paradigm is changed, does reality change? Yes. There is no absolute definition for it. We look at reality through particular windows that are then universalized to become cultural premises; commonplaces that allow for argumentation. This is why, within the academic field and transferable to the professional, an approach to projectual reality is proposed from several windows: the complex, the post-structural and the semiotic. Among them, a model is configured that is neither definitive nor exhaustive, but is friendly and flexible to carry out this approach.
Abstract
Idioma
Palabras clave
Epistemología arquitectónica, Pensamiento proyectual, Complejidad, Flexibilidad, Autonomía decisoria, Architectural epistemology, Projectual thinking, Complexity, Flexibility, Decision-making autonomy
Citación
Colecciones
Licencia Creative Commons
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista M