Consideraciones clínicas y técnicas que contribuyen a la fractura de sistemas rotatorios utilizados en terapia endodóntica. Revisión sistemática 2015-2020

dc.contributor.advisorVerjel, Martha Patricia
dc.contributor.authorJaimes Osorio, Lady Paola
dc.contributor.authorPedroza Capacho, Jasidh Andrés
dc.contributor.authorPeñaloza Mora, Eliana Yolanda
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomasspa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-18T15:53:35Z
dc.date.available2021-05-18T15:53:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-11
dc.descriptionEl objetivo principal de esta revisión fue establecer la evidencia en la literatura científica publicada entre 2015-2020, sobre condiciones clínicas y técnicas que contribuyen a la fractura de sistemas rotatorios durante la terapia endodóntica. Se realizó la búsqueda en las diferentes bases de datos como Google scholar, Scopus, Springer Link, Web Of Science, Dentistry Oral, Scielo, Embase, PubMed, y Science Direct en idioma inglés, utilizando las siguientes palabras claves: Preparación del conducto radicular, endodoncia, fractura, separación de lima, Glide Path, curvatura radicular, fatiga cíclica, fatiga torsional, reúso, experiencia del operador, limas rotatorias. A partir de éstas, se creó la estrategia de búsqueda y de acuerdo con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión establecidos, ochenta y nueve artículos fueron incluidos en la revisión sistemática. Las condiciones clinicas que contribuyen a la fractura de instrumentos son la fatiga cíclica y torsional, ángulo y radio de curvatura radicular, experiencia del operador, el reúso de instrumentos, la temperatura y las diferentes propiedades de los sistemas rotatorios. Fatiga cíclica fue la condición clínica con más reporte de separación de limas de NiTi en esta revisión, muchos factores afectan la resistencia de esta condición. Reciproc, Hyflex EDM, R- Pilot, Reciproc Blue, Wave One Gold, Protaper Next, Hyflex CM y Wave One son los sistemas rotatorios reportados con mejor resistencia a la fractura. Es importante conocer las propiedades de los diferentes sistemas para aplicar en cada caso, puesto que el riesgo de separación del instrumento dentro del conducto no se elimina, sino que se contribuye a minimizar. La anatomía del conducto radicular es el punto de partida en la selección de instrumentos rotatorios por sus variaciones complejas, principalmente la curvatura radicular. Los molares inferiores, molares y premolares superiores reportan un mayor riesgo de generar fractura de los sistemas rotatorios en endodoncia.spa
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this review was to establish the evidence in the scientific literature published between 2015-2020, on clinical and technical conditions that contribute to rotational system fracture during endodontic therapy. The search was carried out in the different databases such as Google scholar, Scopus, Springer Link, Web Of Science, Dentistry Oral, Scielo, Embase, PubMed, and Science Direct in English, using the following keywords: Root canal preparation, Endodontics, Fracture, File Separation, Glide Path, Root Curvature, Cyclic Fatigue, Torsional Fatigue, Reuse, Operator Experience, Rotary Files. Based on these, the search strategy was created and, according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, eighty-nine articles were included in the systematic review. The clinical conditions that contribute to instrument fracture are cyclical and torsional fatigue, root angle and radius of curvature, operator experience, instrument reuse, temperature, and different properties of rotary systems. Cyclic fatigue was the clinical condition with the most reported NiTi file separation in this review, many factors affect the resistance of this condition. Reciproc, Hyflex EDM, R-Pilot, Reciproc Blue, Wave One Gold, Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and Wave One are the rotary systems reported with the best resistance to fracture. It is important to know the properties of the different systems to apply in each case, since the risk of separation of the instrument within the canal is not eliminated but rather helps to minimize it. The root canal anatomy is the starting point in the selection of rotary instruments due to its complex variations, mainly root curvatures. Lower molars, upper molars and premolars are reported as higher risk of fracturing rotary systems in endodontics.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Endodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationJaimes Osorio, L. P. Pedroza Capacho, J.A. y Peñaloza Mora, E.Y. (2021). Consideraciones clínicas y técnicas que contribuyen a la fractura de sistemas rotatorios utilizados en terapia endodóntica. Revisión sistemática 2015-2020 [Tesis de especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/34144
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Endodonciaspa
dc.relation.referencesYamalik N, Perea Pérez B. Patient safety and dentistry: what do we need to know? Fundamentals of patient safety, the safety culture and implementation of patient safety measures in dental practice. Int Dent J 2012;62(4):189-196.spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson SA. An overview of nickel–titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000;33(4):297-310.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14(7):346-351.spa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez-Ortiz JL, Porras ANC, Tello-García B, Navarro HMH. Instrumentos rotatorios: su uso, separación y efecto en complicaciones endodónticas postoperatorias. Revista odontológica mexicana 2014;18(1):27-31.spa
dc.relation.referencesSattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26(3):161-165spa
dc.relation.referencesParashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2004;30(10):722-725.spa
dc.relation.referencesParashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32(11):1031-1043.spa
dc.relation.referencesMadarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough A. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files. Br Dent J 2008;204(5):241spa
dc.relation.referencesMartha Patricia Castañeda Villamizar, Aitza Vivian Castañeda Solano. Definición y clasificación de los eventos adversos en ortodoncia, desde la perspectiva de la norma técnica Gestión del riesgo ISO 31000. Signos 2014 Jul 1,;6(2):15-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170(11):1678-1686.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerea-Pérez B, Labajo-González E, Santiago-Sáez A, Albarrán-Juan E, Villa-Vigil A. Analysis of 415 adverse events in dental practice in Spain from 2000 to 2010. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 2014;19(5):e500.spa
dc.relation.referencesFonseca GM, Mira K, Beltrán H, Peña K, Yendreka V, FONSECA GM, et al. Eventos adversos y demandas por mala praxis en endodoncia. Int.J.Med.Surg.Sci. 2015;2(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Flores–García V, Perea-Pérez B, Labajo-González E, Santiago-Sáez A, Cisneros-Cabello R. Proposal of a “Checklist” for endodontic treatment. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2014;6(2):e104.spa
dc.relation.referencesGallego MCT, Alonso LDC, Morales SHM, Moncada JG, De Hoyos, María Fernanda Huertas. Frecuencia de eventos adversos de la terapia endodóntica y seguimiento de pacientes atendidos en el Posgrado de Endodoncia de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (2007-2008). Universitas Odontológica 2014;33(71):19-28.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuertas MF, Gonzalez J, Camacho S, Sarralde AL, Rodríguez A. Analysis of the adverse events reported to the office of the clinical director at a dental school in Bogotá, Colombia. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2017;30(1):19-25spa
dc.relation.referencesTrujillo-Hoyos M, Gil-Alzate DA, Agudelo-Suárez AA. Characterization of unsafe acts in dentistry (UAD) in a teaching-service institution, Medellín (Colombia), 2015-2017. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia 2018;30(1):80-91.spa
dc.relation.referencesCandelaria María Pabuena Betancourt, Arrieta Novoa, Ramón de Jesús, Zoila Carbonell Muñoz, Demetrio Alfonso Barcha Barreto. Análisis de eventos adversos que ocurren en clínicas odontológicas de la Universidad de CartagenaUniversidad de Cartagena; 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaura Margarita Corredor Sarmiento. Frecuencia de eventos adversos reportados en las historias clínicas del posgrado de endodoncia de la universidad Santo Tomás durante el periodo 2014 - 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesMadarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod 2013;39(5):569-581.spa
dc.relation.referencesPanitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C, Messer HH. Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010;36(5):775-780.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005;31(12):845-850.spa
dc.relation.referencesHülsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Dental Traumatology 1999;15(6):252-258.spa
dc.relation.referencesJenny Alexandra Ramírez, Sergio Andres Yañez Villamizar, Santiago Mejía, Juliana González, María Fernanda Huertas. Frecuencia de los eventos adversos que se presentaron en el area de endodoncia de las clinicas de pregrado de la Facultad de Odontología de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana durante el año 2013Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesVásquez D. Evaluación de la frecuencia de eventos adversos y monitoreo de aspectos claves relacionados con la seguridad del paciente [Internet].spa
dc.relation.referencesWebber J. Risk management in clinical practice. Part 4. Endodontics. Br Dent J 2010;209(4):161.spa
dc.relation.referencesCanalda Sahli C, Aguadè B. Endodoncia: Técnicas clínicas y bases científicas. Endodoncia: Técnicas clínicas y bases científicas 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorabinejad M, Walton R. E.(2010) Endodoncia Principios y Práctica.spa
dc.relation.referencesLevin HJ. Access cavities. Dent Clin North Am 1967:701.spa
dc.relation.referencesZehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G, Kühl S. Guided endodontics: accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int Endod J 2016;49(10):966-972.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaria Gabriela Avendaño Ruiz. Prevalencia de errores y accidentes durante la terapéutica endodontica. Postgrado de endodoncia FOUC período 2011 – 2017.; 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía AG, Navarro JT. Obturación en endodoncia-Nuevos sistemas de obturación: revisión de literatura. Revista Estomatológica Herediana 2011;21(3):166-174.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro Bramante, C., Berbert, A., Gomes de Moraes, I., Bernardineli, N., & Brandao Garcia, R. .Accidentes y Complicaciones en el Tratamiento Endodóntico. . 1/2009 ed. Brasil: Livraria Santos; 2009spa
dc.relation.referencesDuigou C. Discuss the prevention and management of procedural errors during endodontic treatment. Australian Endodontic Journal 2004;30(2):74-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesCouncil on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Revised ANSI/ADA specifications no. 28* for root canal files and reamers, type K, and no. 58 for root canal files, type H (Hedstrom). J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118(2):239.spa
dc.relation.referencesOunsi HF, Nassif W, Grandini S, Salameh Z, Neelakantan P, Anil S. Evolution of Nickel-titanium Alloys in Endodontics. The journal of contemporary dental practice 2017;18(11):1090-1096.spa
dc.relation.referencesGavini G, Santos Md, Caldeira CL, Machado, Manoel Eduardo de Lima, Freire LG, Iglecias EF, et al. Nickel–titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Brazilian oral research 2018;32.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerreira MdA, Luersen MA, Borges PC. Nickel-titanium alloys: A systematic review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2012;17(3):71-82.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2009;35(11):1469-1476.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeters OA, Paque F. Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) 2010;41(6):479-488.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma N, Raj T, Jangra K. Applications of nickel-titanium alloy. Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015;5(1):1.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaber SEM. Factors influencing the fracture of rotary nickel titanium instruments. Endodontic Practice Today 2008;2(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesPruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes Jr DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23(2):77-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2009;35(11):1469-1476.spa
dc.relation.referencesTzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG, Maurikou DV, Marzelou MP. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study. J Endod 2008;34(6):675-678.spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Mejia, E. Ordoñez, A. Perez, M. Rosales. “Instrumental utilizado en el trabajo biomecanico en endodoncia. Investigacion bibliografica”Universidad de El Salvador; 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesSergio Morelló Castro. Variables que influyen en la fractura de instrumentos rotatorios de níquel titanio en conductos radiculares instrumentados por operadores inexpertos. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya; 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesWolcott S, Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, et al. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation. J Endod 2006;32(12):1139-1141.spa
dc.relation.referencesYared GM, Dagher FB, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of Profile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. Int Endod J 1999;32(2):115-119.spa
dc.relation.referencesYared GM, Dagher FB, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. Int Endod J 2000;33(3):204-207spa
dc.relation.referencesGambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with low-and high-torque endodontic motors. J Endod 2001;27(12):772-774spa
dc.relation.referencesBooth JR, Scheetz JP, Lemons JE, Eleazer PD. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip. J Endod 2003;29(1):55-57.spa
dc.relation.referencesYared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002;35(1):7-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeltrán OA. Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Revista colombiana de gastroenterología 2005;20(1):60-69.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorales AR. Investigación clínica: epidemiología clínica aplicada. : Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesManterola C, Astudillo P, Arias E, Claros N, MINCIR G. Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Qué se debe saber acerca de ellas. Cirugía Española 2013;91(3):149-155.spa
dc.relation.referencesVandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración. Gaceta sanitaria 2009;23(2):158. e1-158. e28.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Declaración de la Iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales. Gaceta Sanitaria 2008;22(2):144-150.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuschieri Sarah. The CONSORT statement. . Saudi journal of anaesthesia 2019;13(Suppl 1):S27–S30spa
dc.relation.referencesCobos-Carbo A, Augustovski F. Declaración CONSORT 2010: actualización de la lista de comprobación para informar ensayos clínicos aleatorizados de grupos paralelos. Medicina clìnica 2011;137(5):213-215.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.[Article]. Br Med J 2010;340:698-702.spa
dc.relation.referencesÖzyürek T, Keskin NB, Furuncuoğlu F, İnan U. Comparison of cyclic fatigue life of nickel-titanium files: an examination using high-speed camera. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2017;42(3):224.spa
dc.relation.referencesNagi SE, Khan FR, Rahman M. Comparison of fracture and deformation in the rotary endodontic instruments: Protaper versus K-3 system. JPMA: Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 2016;66(10):S-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesHiguera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015;41(6):913-915.spa
dc.relation.referencesde Almeida-Gomes F, de Matos, Humberto Ramah Menezes, Nunes, Rodrigo Ferreira Lopes Arrais, Arrais AM, Ferreira-Maniglia C, de Morais Vitoriano M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of different continuous rotation and reciprocating endodontic systems. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2016;27(3):278.spa
dc.relation.referencesHa J, Kim S, Versluis A, Cheung GS, Kim J, Kim H. Elastic limits in torsion of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2015;41(5):715-719.spa
dc.relation.referencesÖzyürek T, Gündoğar M, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and Genius files in a double (S-shaped) curved canal. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects 2017;11(4):241.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuke F, Shen Y, Zhou H, Ruse ND, Wang Z, Hieawy A, et al. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile Vortex and Vortex Blue nickel-titanium files in single and double curvatures. J Endod 2015;41(10):1686-1690spa
dc.relation.referencesTopçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc files in an S-shaped canal. J Endod 2017;43(10):1679-1682.spa
dc.relation.referencesMadarati AA. Factors influencing incidents of complications while using nickel-titanium rotary instruments for root canal treatment. BMC oral health 2019;19(1):1-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesÇelik G, Kısacık FÖ, Yılmaz EF, Mersinlioğlu A, Ertuğrul İF, Orhan H. A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education. PeerJ 2019;7:e7419.spa
dc.relation.referencesManiglia-Ferreira C, de Almeida Gomes F, Ximenes T, Neto MAT, Arruda TE, Ribamar GG, et al. Influence of reuse and cervical preflaring on the fracture strength of reciprocating instruments. European journal of dentistry 2017;11(1):41.spa
dc.relation.referencesÖzyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Effect of adaptive motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of a nickel titanium instrument designed for retreatment. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2017;42(1):34.spa
dc.relation.referencesHieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, Wang Z, Shen Y. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod 2015;41(7):1134-1138spa
dc.relation.referencesTopçuoğlu HS, Demirbuga S, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating files (Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and SmartTrack) in two different curved canals. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry 2018;9(3):e12344spa
dc.relation.referencesScelza P, Harry D, SILVA LEd, Barbosa IB, Scelza MZ. A comparison of two reciprocating instruments using bending stress and cyclic fatigue tests. Brazilian oral research 2015;29(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesUslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R‐Pilot, HyFlex EDM and PathFile nickel‐titanium glide path files in artificial canals with double (S‐shaped) curvature. Int Endod J 2018;51(5):584-589.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G, Castagnola R, Rossetti A, et al. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium reciprocating files at different environmental temperatures. J Endod 2018;44(10):1549-1552.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrande NM, Plotino G, Silla E, Pedullà E, DeDeus G, Gambarini G, et al. Environmental temperature drastically affects flexural fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2017;43(7):1157-1160.spa
dc.relation.referencesElnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Mechanical properties of ProTaper Gold nickel‐titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49(11):1073-1078.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties. J Endod 2016;42(12):1840-1843spa
dc.relation.referencesUygun AD, Unal M, Falakaloglu S, Guven Y. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of hyflex EDM, vortex blue, protaper gold, and onecurve nickel–Titanium instruments. Nigerian journal of clinical practice 2020;23(1):41.spa
dc.relation.referencesIandolo A, Amato A, Martina S, Pantaleo G. Management of Severe Curvatures in Root Canal Treatment with the New Generation of Rotating Files Using a Safe and Predictable Protocol. The Open Dentistry Journal 2020;14(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesde Barros, Sandrini Gomes de Oliveira, de Lima CO, Vieira VTL, de Almeida Neves A, Accorsi-Mendonça T, da Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal. Bending resistance and quantitative transportation assessment after multiple uses of a reciprocating instrument. ENDO (Lond Engl) 2018;12(4):251-256.spa
dc.relation.referencesde Menezes, Sílvio Emanuel Acioly Conrado, Batista SM, Lira JOP, de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz. Cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, ProDesign R and ProDesign Logic files in curved canals in vitro. Iranian endodontic journal 2017;12(4):468.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Obaida MI, Merdad K, Alanazi MS, Altwaijry H, AlFaraj M, Alkhamis AA, et al. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 heat-treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems in canals with single and double curvatures. J Endod 2019;45(10):1237-1241.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Feky HM, Ezzat KM, Bedier MMA. Cyclic fatigue resistance of M-Pro and RaCe Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments in artificial curved canals: a comparative in vitro study. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2019;44(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesVarghese NO, Pillai R, Sujathen U, Sainudeen S, Antony A, Paul S. Resistance to torsional failure and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Mtwo files in continuous and reciprocating motion: An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD 2016;19(3):225.spa
dc.relation.referencesPirani C, Iacono F, Generali L, Sassatelli P, Nucci C, Lusvarghi L, et al. HyFlex EDM: superficial features, metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of innovative electro discharge machined NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49(5):483-493.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Vasconcelos RA, Murphy S, Carvalho CAT, Govindjee RG, Govindjee S, Peters OA. Evidence for reduced fatigue resistance of contemporary rotary instruments exposed to body temperature. J Endod 2016;42(5):782-787.spa
dc.relation.referencesTopçuoğlu HS, Demirbuga S, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating files (Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and SmartTrack) in two different curved canals. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry 2018;9(3):e12344.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, Villarino LS, Vieira VTL, Accorsi-Mendonça T, dos Santos Antunes H, De-Deus G, et al. Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc, Unicone, and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2016;42(12):1789-1793.spa
dc.relation.referencesPedullà E, Ambu E, Rovai F, Chang S, Campedelli F, Corsentino G, et al. Influence of proper or reciprocating optimum torque reverse kinematics on cyclic fatigue of four single files. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry 2019;10(3):e12409.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlotino G, Grande NM, Porciani PF. Deformation and fracture incidence of R eciproc instruments: a clinical evaluation. Int Endod J 2015;48(2):199-205.spa
dc.relation.referencesHa J, Kwak SW, Kim S, Kim H. Screw-in forces during instrumentation by various file systems. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2016;41(4):304.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlcay K, Eyüboǧlu TF, Erkan E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of waveone gold, protaper next and 2shape nickel titanium rotary instruments using a reliable method for measuring temperature. 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesElsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape and WaveOne instruments using different angles of curvature. Dent Mater J 2015;34(3):358-363.spa
dc.relation.referencesTopçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Kafdağ Ö, Balkaya H. Effect of two different temperatures on resistance to cyclic fatigue of one Curve, EdgeFile, HyFlex CM and ProTaper next files. Australian Endodontic Journal 2020;46(1):68-72.spa
dc.relation.referencesBueno CRE, Cury MTS, Vasques AMV, Sivieri-Araújo G, Jacinto RC, Gomes-Filho JE, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of novel Genius and Edgefile nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments. Brazilian oral research 2019;33.spa
dc.relation.referencesArslan H, Alsancak M, Doğanay E, Karataş E, Davut Çapar İ, Ertas H. Cyclic fatigue analysis of R eciproc R 25® instruments with different kinematics. Australian Endodontic Journal 2016;42(1):22-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesGündoğar M, Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2017;43(7):1192-1196.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, Hecksher F, dos Santos Antunes H, De-Deus G, Elias CN, Vieira VTL. Torsional fatigue resistance of blue-treated reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2018;44(6):1038-1041.spa
dc.relation.referencesNabavizadeh MR, Sedigh-Shams M, Abdolrasoulnia S. Cyclic fatigue life of two single file engine-driven systems in simulated curved canals. Iranian endodontic journal 2018;13(1):61.spa
dc.relation.referencesTopçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017;50(7):713-717.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuedes OA, da Costa, Marcus Vinícius Corrêa, Dorilêo, Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati, de Oliveira HF, Pedro FLM, Bandeca MC, et al. Detection of procedural errors during root canal instrumentation using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of international oral health: JIOH 2015;7(3):28.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaballero‐Flores H, Nabeshima CK, Binotto E, Machado M. Fracture incidence of instruments from a single‐file reciprocating system by students in an endodontic graduate programme: a cross‐sectional retrospective study. Int Endod J 2019;52(1):13-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesYılmaz K, Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue life of Tango-Endo, WaveOne GOLD, and reciproc NiTi instruments. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2017;42(2):134.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhalil WA, Natto ZS. Cyclic fatigue, bending resistance, and surface roughness of ProTaper Gold and EdgeEvolve files in canals with single-and double-curvature. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2019;44(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesÖzyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Effect of adaptive motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of a nickel titanium instrument designed for retreatment. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2017;42(1):34.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrados-Privado M, Rojo R, Ivorra C, Prados-Frutos JC. Finite element analysis comparing WaveOne, WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and Reciproc Blue responses with bending and torsion tests. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2019;90:165-172.spa
dc.relation.referencesYılmaz K, Uslu G, Özyürek T. In vitro comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of HyFlex EDM, One G, and ProGlider nickel titanium glide path instruments in single and double curvature canals. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2017;42(4):282.spa
dc.relation.referencesÖzyürek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2016;42(10):1536-1539.spa
dc.relation.referencesHa J, Kim SK, Cheung GS, Jeong SH, Bae YC, Kim H. Effect of alloy type on the life‐time of torsion‐preloaded nickel‐titanium endodontic instruments. Scanning 2015;37(3):172-178.spa
dc.relation.referencesKawakami DAS, Candeiro, George Táccio de Miranda, Akisue E, Caldeira CL, Gavini G. Effect of different torques in cyclic fatigue resistance of K3 rotary instruments. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 2015;14(2):122-125.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordEndodonticsspa
dc.subject.keywordFracturespa
dc.subject.keywordRoot curvaturespa
dc.subject.keywordCyclic fatiguespa
dc.subject.keywordTorsional fatiguespa
dc.subject.keywordReusespa
dc.subject.keywordRotary filesspa
dc.subject.lembEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.lembEndodoncia-cargas dinámicasspa
dc.subject.lembNuevos materialesspa
dc.subject.lembOdontología-materialesspa
dc.subject.lembInstrumentos odontológicosspa
dc.subject.proposalEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.proposalFracturaspa
dc.subject.proposalCurvatura radicularspa
dc.subject.proposalFatiga cíclicaspa
dc.subject.proposalFatiga torsionalspa
dc.subject.proposalReúsospa
dc.subject.proposalLimas rotatoriasspa
dc.titleConsideraciones clínicas y técnicas que contribuyen a la fractura de sistemas rotatorios utilizados en terapia endodóntica. Revisión sistemática 2015-2020spa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2021JaimesPaola.pdf
Tamaño:
1.06 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2021JaimesPaola1.pdf
Tamaño:
231.66 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Aprobación de facultad
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2021JaimesPaola2.pdf
Tamaño:
405.83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Autorización de publicación

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: