Análisis de la presencia y composición de los residuos de cemento biocerámico en el tratamiento secundario de conductos

dc.contributor.advisorOrtiz Castro, Vicky Constanza
dc.contributor.advisorHernandez La Rotta, Johanna Eugenia
dc.contributor.authorBonilla Vega, Yissel Andrea
dc.contributor.authorGómez Zambrano, Daniela Maria
dc.contributor.authorOlivares Acosta, Bleydi Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T23:21:04Z
dc.date.available2019-12-06T23:21:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-30
dc.descriptionIntroducción: El fracaso del tratamiento endodóntico primario se encuentra en un rango de 14-16% y requiere de una nueva intervención de tratamiento de conductos radiculares. La eliminación completa de los materiales obturadores es muy importante ya que debe garantizar nuevamente la desinfección y conformación del conducto. Objetivo: Analizar la presencia y composición de los residuos del cemento Bio Root™ RCS, en los periodos de 1 semana, 6 meses y 1 año (tiempo total de fraguado) simulados mediante termociclado en los tercios coronal, medio y apical mediante Microscopia Electrónica de barrido (SEM) y Energía Dispersa Espectrocospica, medidos por Auto CAD®. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio cuasi experimental in vitro en 30 conductos radiculares. Se dividieron en 3 grupos: 1 semana, 6 meses y 1 año, se les realizó obturación de los conductos y fueron sometidos a ciclos de termociclado, posteriormente se realizó la desobturación y los cortes transversales (tercio coronal, medio y apical) en total 90 muestras analizadas bajo Microscopio Electrónico de barrido (SEM). Resultados: En el análisis no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la presencia de residuos de los 3 tercios radiculares, el tercio apical presentó un mayor porcentaje de residuos comparado con el tercio coronal y medio. Se observó la presencia del material de obturación Silicio (Si) y Zinc (Zn). El corte que contiene mayores residuos de silicio es el coronal, seguido del corte medio y el corte apical. Además, se pudo determinar que no hubo diferencias significativas entre los tercios analizados a través del tiempo; no obstante, se observa una disminución de los residuos a los 6 meses en los tres tercios en comparación con los resultados a la semana y al año. Conclusiones: no se logró remover todo el material de obturación. El calcio fue el elemento más encontrado en todas las muestras.spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The failure of primary endodontic treatment ranges from 14 to 16% and requires a new root canal treatment intervention. The complete elimination of sealing materials is very important because it has to reassurance the disinfection and the canal shaping. Objective: Analyze the presence and composition of Bio Root RCS ™ cement residues, in 1-week, 6-month and 1-year increments (total setting time) simulated thermocycling in the coronal, middle and apical thirds by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Spectrum Dispersed Energy, measured by Auto CAD®. Methodology: A quasi-experimental in vitro study was conducted on 30 root canals. They were divided into 3 groups: 1 week, 6 months and 1 year, the canals were filled and subjected to thermocycling, then the deobturation and cross sections (coronal, middle and apical) were carried out in total 90 samples analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: In the analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in the presence of residues of three radicular thirds, the apical third presented a higher percentage of waste compared to coronal and middle third. Calcium was the element most found in all samples. The presence of the sealing material Silicon (Si) and Zinc (Zn) was observed. The cut that contains the highest silicon residues is the coronal, followed by the middle and the apical cut. In addition, it was determined that there were no significant differences between the thirds analyzed over time; however there is a decrease in waste at 6 months in three thirds compared to results at 1 week and 1 year. Conclusion: It was not possible to remove all the sealing material. Calcium was the most found element in all samples.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Endodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBonilla Vega, Y. A., Gómez Zambrano, D. M. y Olivares Acosta, B. A. (2019). Analisis de la presencia y composición de los residuos de cemento bioceramico en el tratamiento secundario de conductos [Tesis de Especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/20217
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Endodonciaspa
dc.relation.references1. Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001; 34(1):1-10.spa
dc.relation.references2. Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review.J Endod. 2009;35(7):930-7spa
dc.relation.references3. Kakoura F, Pantelidou O. Retreatment Efficacy of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealers: A Review of the Literature.-ODOVTOS-Int. J. Dental Sc, 20-2 (May-August): 39-50.spa
dc.relation.references4. Ørstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing. Endod Top. 2005; 12 (3): 25-38.spa
dc.relation.references5. Han L, Okiji T. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2011; 44 (12):1081-7.spa
dc.relation.references6. Kim Y, Kim BS, Kim YM, Lee D, Kim SY.The Penetration Ability of Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealers into Dentinal Tubules Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(3): 531.spa
dc.relation.references7. Silveira SB, Alves FRF, Marceliano MF, Sousa JCN, Vieira VTL, Siqueira JF, et al. Removal of Root Canal Fillings in Curved Canals Using Either Mani GPR or HyFlex NT Followed by Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation. J Endod. 2018; 44 (2):299-303.spa
dc.relation.references8. Kim K, Kim DV, Kim SY, Yang S. A micro-computed tomographic study of remaining filling materials of two bioceramic sealers and epoxy resin sealer after retreatment. Restor Dent Endod. 2019 May; 44 (2): e18.spa
dc.relation.references9. Jara LB, Zubiate JA. Retratamiento endodóntico no quirúrgico. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2011; 21(4): 231-236.spa
dc.relation.references10. Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42 (1):19-26.spa
dc.relation.references11. Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, He J. Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material.J Endod. 2011; 37 (11):1547-9.spa
dc.relation.references12. Kim H, Kim E, Lee SJ, Shin SJ. Comparisons of the Retreatment Efficacy of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin- based Sealers and Residual Sealer in Dentinal Tubules. J Endod. 2015; 41(12):2025-30.spa
dc.relation.references13. Uzunoglu E, Yilmaz Z, Sungur DD, Altundasar E.Retreability of Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-Percha with Bioceramic, MTA and Resin- Based Sealers. Iran Endod J. 2015; 10(2): 93–98.spa
dc.relation.references14. Simsek N, Ahmetoglu, Ocak M Yologlu S. Comparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers:a scanning electron microscopic study. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28(1):1-7spa
dc.relation.references15. Reddy S, Neelakantan P, Saghiri MA, Lotfi M, Subbarao CV, Garcia-Godoy F. Removal of Gutta- Percha Zinc- Oxide- Eugenol Sealer or Gutta- Percha Epoxy Resin Sealer from Severely curved canals: an invitro study. Int J Dent. 2011; 2011: 541831.spa
dc.relation.references16. Neelakantan P, Grotra D, and Sharma S. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod. 2013 Jul; 39 (7):893-6.spa
dc.relation.references17. Obeid M, Elgendy A, Efficacy of three Ni–Ti rotary systems for removal of filling materials from root canal system of extracted teeth. 2015. Vol 12: 259- 264.spa
dc.relation.references18. Hegde V, Murkey L. Evaluation of residual root canal filling material after retreatment of canals filled with hydrophilic and hydrophobic obturating system: An in vitro scanning electron microscopy study.endodontology. Endodontology, vol. 29, no. 1, 2017, p. 47.spa
dc.relation.references19. Rossi-Fedele G, Ahmed HM. Assessment of Root Canal Filling Removal Effectiveness Using Micro–computed Tomography: A Systematic Review. J Endodod. 2016; 46: 520- 526.spa
dc.relation.references20. Siboni F, Taddei P, Zamparini F, Prati C, Gandolfi MG. Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int Endod J. 2017 Dec; 50 (2):e120-e136.spa
dc.relation.references21. Amador, L. Serpa, M. Bohórquez, L. Enciso, M. Salas, A. Estudio De La Eficacia De Dos Sistemas Para La Remoción De Materiales De Obturación Del Conducto Radicular. (2015). Trabajo de grado. Universidad Santo Tomas.spa
dc.relation.references22. Daokar S, Kalekar A. Endodontic Failures- a Review. 2013; 4(5): 5-10.spa
dc.relation.references23. Song M, Kim HC, Lee W, Kim E. Analysis of the cause of failure in nonsurgical endodontic treatment by microscopic inspection during endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2011 Nov; 37(11):1516-9.spa
dc.relation.references24. Roda R, y Bradley H. Retratamiento no quirúrgico. En: Stephen Cohen. Editor. Caminos de la pulpa. España: Elsevier; 2011: p. 890- 947.spa
dc.relation.references25. American Association of Endodontics. Guide to Clinical endodontics. Sexta edición. Disponible en: www. Aae.org.spa
dc.relation.references26. Daokar S, Kalekar A. Endodontic Failures- a Review. 2013; 4(5): 5-10.spa
dc.relation.references27. William T. Johnson y James C. Obturación del Sistema de conductos radiculares limpios y conformados En: Stephen Cohen. Editor. Caminos de la pulpa. España, Elsevier; 2011, p. 349-370.spa
dc.relation.references28. Núñez, C, Botia, A., de Temiño P, Macorra J. Técnicas de obturación en endodoncia. Rev. Esp. Endodoncia. 1987; 5 (111): 91-104.spa
dc.relation.references29. Martínez, E., Matarredona, M. Evaluación de la filtración apical de dos sistemas de obturación mediante diafanización. Cient. Dent. 2009; 6 (3): 217-222.spa
dc.relation.references30. Zevallos Quiroz, Burgos Ponce. Evaluación de la obturación de dos sistemas de cono único vs condensación lateral. 2013; 51(2): 1 – 5.spa
dc.relation.references31. Gordon MPJ, Love RM, Chandler NP. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals. International Endodontic Journal. 2005; 38: 87-96.spa
dc.relation.references32. Wu MK, Bud MG, Wesselink PR. The quality of single cone and laterally compacted gutta-percha fillings in small and curved root canals as evidenced by bidirectional radiographs and fluid transport measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108 (6): 946-951.spa
dc.relation.references33. DeLong, He J. The Effect of Obturation Technique on the Push-out Bond Strength of Calcium Silicate Sealers. JOE 2015; 41(3):385-8.spa
dc.relation.references34. Chybowski E., Glickman G., et al. Clinical outcome of non -surgical root canal treatment using a single cone Technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: A Retrospective Analysis. 2018; 44 (6): 941 – 945.spa
dc.relation.references35. Pradnya V, Bansode A. A Review of Bioceramic Sealers in Endodontic. JDMS 2018; 17 (5): 82-86.spa
dc.relation.references36. Erdemir, Adanir. In vitro evaluation of the dissolving effect of solvents on root canal sealers. Journal of Oral Science. 2003; 45 (3): 123-126.spa
dc.relation.references37. Prüllage RK, Urban K, Schäfer. Material Properties of a Tricalcium Silicate- containing, a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and an Epoxy Resin -based Root Canal Sealer. JOE 2016; 42 (12):1784-1788.spa
dc.relation.references38. Simon S, Flouriot A. BioRoo RCS a new biomaterial for root canal filling. Disponible en: http://www.septodontusa.com/sites/default/files/2016-10/BioRootspa
dc.relation.references39. Benezra Kebudi. Interfacial characteristics and cytocompatibility of hydraulic sealer cements. JOE 2018; 44 (6):1007-1017.spa
dc.relation.references40. Vishwanath V and Rao Murali. Gutta-percha in endodontics. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22(3): 216–222.spa
dc.relation.references41. López V, Mogollón J, Molina Y, Quiroz J. Comparación de la interfase generada en el conducto radicular obturado con técnica de cono único de gutapercha y cono hidrófilo. 2017. Universidad Santo Tomas.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.subject.keywordEndodonticsspa
dc.subject.keywordRetreatmentspa
dc.subject.keywordBioRoot RCS®spa
dc.subject.keywordTricalcium Silicate cementspa
dc.subject.keywordGutta Perchaspa
dc.subject.keywordTermocyclingspa
dc.subject.keywordSEMspa
dc.subject.lembEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.lembCerámica dentalspa
dc.subject.lembOclusión (Odontología)spa
dc.subject.lembGutaperchaspa
dc.subject.lembMicroscopia electrónicaspa
dc.subject.proposalEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.proposalRetratanientospa
dc.subject.proposalCemento silicato tricálcicospa
dc.subject.proposalBio Root™ RCSspa
dc.subject.proposalGutaperchaspa
dc.subject.proposalTermocicladospa
dc.subject.proposalSEMspa
dc.titleAnálisis de la presencia y composición de los residuos de cemento biocerámico en el tratamiento secundario de conductosspa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2019GomezDaniela.pdf
Tamaño:
9.55 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2019GomezDaniela1.pdf
Tamaño:
152.19 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta aprobación facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2019GomezDaniela2.pdf
Tamaño:
223.18 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Autorización de publicación

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: