Constructing Critical Thinking Scenarios in Online Legal English Classes

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorHerreño Contreras, Yomaira Angélica
dc.contributor.authorArias Rodríguez, Gladis Leonor
dc.contributor.authorRoberto Flórez, Eliana Edith
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001615980
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000971626
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000665274
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=rUi9OoAAAAAJ&hl=en
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=LRBDCrkAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=Ck5Q9PoAAAAJ
dc.contributor.gruplachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000020502
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-9222
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-3103
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-2670
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-09T15:51:27Z
dc.date.available2022-11-09T15:51:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-28
dc.descriptionEste artículo reporta una investigación cualitativa sobre la construcción de escenarios de pensamiento crítico en clases de inglés legal, en línea, en una universidad privada en Colombia. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo mejorar el desarrollo de las habilidades de pensamiento crítico de los estudiantes de derecho en clases de EFL (inglés como lengua extranjera) a través de herramientas virtuales mediante la implementación de un análisis de caso descriptivo. Los datos se recopilaron a través de un diario, una encuesta y un grupo de enfoque. Se demostró que cuando los estudiantes se capacitan en pensamiento crítico, aprenden a desarrollar habilidades específicas como razonar, hacer propuestas, identificar y resolver problemas, hacer inferencias, tomar decisiones de acuerdo con sus conocimientos previos y las necesidades del contexto. Además, las estrategias contribuyeron a mejorar las habilidades comunicativas de los estudiantes, en la lengua extranjera.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports qualitative research on constructing critical thinking scenarios in online legal English classes at a private university in Colombia. This study aimed to enhance law students’ critical thinking skills development in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) classroom through virtual tools by implementing a descriptive case analysis. Data were gathered through a journal, a survey and a focus group. It was demonstrated that when students are trained in critical thinking, they learn to develop specific abilities such as reasoning, making proposals, identifying and solving problems, making inferences, making decisions according to their prior knowledge and the context needs. Furthermore, the strategies contributed to improving students’ communication skills in the foreign language.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacionspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationRoberto Florez, E. E., Arias-Rodríguez, G. L. ., & Herreño-Contreras, Y. A. . (2022). Constructing Critical Thinking Scenarios in Online Legal English Classes. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 24, 119–140.spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1339spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/47903
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Villavicenciospa
dc.relation.annexedhttps://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/1339spa
dc.relation.annexedhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/362086836_Constructing_Critical_Thinking_Scenarios_in_Online_Legal_English_Classesspa
dc.relation.referencesAltrichter, H., & Holly, M.L ( 2005). Research diaries. I n B. Somekh y C.Lewin. Research Methods in the Social Sciences (24–32). Sage Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnnink, A. (2017). Using the research journal during qualitative data collection in a cross-cultural context. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1), 73-99.spa
dc.relation.referencesArias-Rodríguez, G.L., Roberto, E., & Rivera, A. (2014). Increasing critical thinking awarenessspa
dc.relation.referencesthrough the use of task based learning approach. Hallazgos ,11 (21), 189-205spa
dc.relation.referencesArias-Rodríguez, G. L. (2014). Reading through ESP in an undergraduate law program. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 16(1), 105-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesArias-Rodríguez , G. L. (2017). Students’ Language Skills Development through Short Stories. Íkala, 22(1), 103–118.spa
dc.relation.referencesAstleitner, H. (2011). Teaching Critical Thinking Online. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(2), 53-76.spa
dc.relation.referencesBilová, S. (2016) Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric. Case Briefs in Legal English Classes. Masaryk University. Czech Republic.spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas-Claros, M., & Oyanedel, M. (2016). Teachers’ implicit theories and use of ICTs in the language classroom. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 25, 207–225spa
dc.relation.referencesEnnis, R. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.spa
dc.relation.referencesMontiel-Chamorro, M. (2018). Comparing Online English Language Learning and Face-to-Face English Language Learning at El Bosque University in Colombia [Tesis de doctorado. Virginia Commonwealth University.spa
dc.relation.referencesCompton, L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at risks, roles and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 166-185spa
dc.relation.referencesGuichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop online tutors. ReCALL, 21(2), 166–185spa
dc.relation.referencesHampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2015). Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Palgrave-McMillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández Urrego, Sandra Cecilia. (2019). A Virtual Learning Object (VLO) to Promote Reading Strategies in an English for Specific Purposes Environment. How, 26(2), 106-122.spa
dc.relation.referencesHerreño-Contreras, Y.A., & Huertas, J.A. (2019). Empowering HOTS in EFL Settings: A Lesson on Child Prostitution. Humanising Language Teaching, 21 (3).spa
dc.relation.referencesHerreño-Contreras, Y.A. (2021). Clases de inglés como escenarios para un pensamiento superior y autonomía. Shimmering Words: Research and Pedagogy E-Journal, 10(1), 99-112.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuda, M. (2017). The use of authentic materials in teaching English: Indonesia teachers’ representative EFL classes. PEOPLE: international Journal of social sciences 3 (2), 1907–1927.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Open University. (2008). Thinking Critically. Skills for OU Study. Thanet Press. https://www.openuniversity.edu/sites/www.openuniversity.edu/files/brochures/Critical-thinking-Open-University.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesKitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16, 103–119spa
dc.relation.referencesKuimova, M. V. (2010). The use of case study method in teaching English as a foreign language in technical university. Text, 2 (13), 82-86. https://moluch.ru/archive/13/1176/spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDonough, I. (2010). English for specific purposes: a survey review of current materials. ELT Journal, 64(4), 462–477.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcIntyre, L. J. (1999). The practical skeptic: Core concepts in sociology. Mayfield Publishingspa
dc.relation.referencesMedina, R. (2012). Critical thinking Inside Law Schools: An Outline. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) - Departamento de Historia del Derecho, 2(5). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2115429spa
dc.relation.referencesPaul, R. y Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking competency standards. Standards, principles, performance, indicators, and outcomes with a critical thinking. Master Rubric. The foundation for critical thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/SAM_Comp%20Stand_07opt.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesNyumba, T.O.,Wilson, K., Derrick, CJ. y Mukherjee N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evol, 9, 20–32.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeeraer, J. &., Van Petegem, P. (2011). ICT in teacher education in an emerging developing country: Vietnam’s baseline situation at the start of “The Year of ICT. Computers and Education, 56 (4), 974–982.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlasow, P. (2005). Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology. MITRE. https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/pdf/05_0638.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesRico, D.A. (2014). TV Series and Movies in the Teaching of Legal English Vocabulary [Master thesis, Universidad de La Sabana]. https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10818/10811/Dar%c3%ado%20Alejandro%20Rico%20Rodriguez%28TESIS%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yspa
dc.relation.referencesRoell, C. (2019). Using a Case Study in the EFL Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 57(4), 24-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1236098.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSalant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. John Wiley and Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesVanicheva, T., Kah, M., &Ponidelko, L. (2015). Critical thinking within the current framework of ESP curriculum in technical universities of Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 199, 657 – 665.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, X., & Zhenh, H. (2016). Reasoning Critical Thinking: Is It Born or Made? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(6), 1323 – 1331.spa
dc.relation.referencesYazan, B. (2015). Three Approaches to Case Study methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report,20(2), 134-152.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordLegal Englishspa
dc.subject.keywordCritical thinkingspa
dc.subject.keywordOnline English Teachingspa
dc.subject.keywordOnline English Learningspa
dc.subject.keywordprior knowledgespa
dc.subject.lembEnseñanza aprendizaje - Ingles legalspa
dc.subject.lembIngles - Enseñanza superiorspa
dc.subject.lembPensamiento criticospa
dc.subject.lembMedios de enseñanza - Aprendizaje en líneaspa
dc.subject.lembIngles - Investigación cualitativaspa
dc.subject.proposalIngles legalspa
dc.subject.proposalpensamiento criticospa
dc.subject.proposalensenanza de ingles en lineaspa
dc.subject.proposalaprendizaje de ingles en lineaspa
dc.subject.proposalconocimientos previosspa
dc.titleConstructing Critical Thinking Scenarios in Online Legal English Classesspa
dc.type.categoryApropiación Social y Circulación del Conocimiento: Documento de trabajo (working papers)spa

Archivos

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

DRIE - Doing Research to Improve Education