Promoting Spoken Interactive Communication in Workshops at A2+-B1 CEFR Level

Gonzalez Guzman, Wilson Emilio

Promoting Spoken Interactive Communication in Workshops at A2+-B1 CEFR Level

dc.contributor.advisor	Lopez, Dixon
dc.contributor.author	Gonzalez Guzman, Wilson Emilio
dc.contributor.corporatename	Universidad Santo Tomas	spa
dc.coverage.campus	CRAI-USTA Bogotá	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-25T15:33:58Z
dc.date.available	2021-10-25T15:33:58Z
dc.date.issued	2021-10-01
dc.description	Este estudio de investigación describe los resultados de la implementación de talleres que se enfocan en la comunicación interactiva oral y su impacto en la experiencia de aprendizaje de un grupo de estudiantes de nivel A2 + - B1 en un instituto privado de idiomas en Villavicencio, Meta. La implementación pedagógica consistió en nueve talleres llevados a cabo en dos ciclos de investigación-acción, y los datos fueron recolectados a través de grabaciones de voz y video, diarios de maestros y autoevaluaciones de los estudiantes. Los hallazgos sugieren que la implementación influyó en la experiencia de aprendizaje de los estudiantes en el sentido de que la comunicación interactiva se utilizó como modelo de uso del lenguaje; los estudiantes comenzaron a utilizar estrategias de interacción para una comunicación efectiva; y tanto el maestro como los estudiantes usaron L1 para compensar las brechas de comunicación y aprendizaje en las interacciones.	spa
dc.description.abstract	This research study describes the results of implementing workshops that focus on spoken interactive communication and their impact upon the learning experience of a group of students at A2+ - B1 level at a private language institute in Villavicencio, Meta. The pedagogical implementation consisted of nine workshops carried out over two cycles of action research, and the data was collected through voice and video recordings, teacher journals, and students’ Self-assessments. The findings suggest the implementation influenced the students’ learning experience in the sense that interactive communication was used as a model of language use; the students started to use interaction strategies for effective communication; and both teacher and students used L1 to compensate for communication and learning gaps in interactions.	spa
dc.description.degreelevel	Pregrado	spa
dc.description.degreename	Licenciado en Lengua Extranjera - Inglés	spa
dc.format.mimetype	text/html	spa
dc.identifier.citation	Gonzalez, G. W. (2021). Promoting Spoken Interactive Communication in Workshops at A2+-B1 CEFR Level. Villavicencio.	spa
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co	spa
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11634/38137
dc.language.iso	spa	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Educación	spa
dc.publisher.program	Pregrado Licenciatura en Lengua Extranjera - Inglés	spa
dc.relation.references	Arévalo Balboa, F., & Briesmaster, M. (2018). “Claim – Support – Question” Routine to Foster Coherence Within Interactive Oral Communication Among EFL Students. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(2), 143-160. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n2.63554	spa
dc.relation.references	ASW. (2016). Proyecto Educativo Institucional (PEI). Bogota.	spa
dc.relation.references	Cambridge Assessment English. (2020). A2 Key Handbook for Teachers. Retrieved from Cambridge Assessment English: https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/504505-a2-key-handbook-2020.pdf	spa
dc.relation.references	Council of Europe. (2018, February). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Retrieved from Council of Europe: https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/the-cefr-descriptors	spa
dc.relation.references	Gómez, L. J. (2011). Peer Interaction: A Social Perspective towards the Development of Foreign Language Learning. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 13(1), 189-203. Retrieved from Retrieved from https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/20576	spa
dc.relation.references	Gutierrez, G. D. (2005). Developing Oral Skills through Communicative and Interactive Tasks. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 83-96, jan. 2005. ISSN 2256-5760. Retrieved from https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/11127	spa
dc.relation.references	Herazo, R. J. (2010). Authentic Oral Interaction in the EFL Class: What It Means, What It Does not. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(1), 47-61. Retrieved from Retrieved from https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/13833	spa
dc.relation.references	Ho, B., & Richards, J. (1993). Reflective Thinking Through Teacher Journal Writing: Myths and Realities. Perspectives. 5.	spa
dc.relation.references	Kasper, G., & Kelleman, E. (2014). Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Routledge.	spa
dc.relation.references	Kemmis, S., & Mc Taggar, R. (2000). Participatory Action Research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.: Sage.	spa
dc.relation.references	Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. ProQuest Ebook Central. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bibliotecausta-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1657789	spa
dc.relation.references	Lindsay, C., & Knight, P. (2011). Learning and Teaching English A Course For Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.	spa
dc.relation.references	Medina, R. R. (2009). Interaction in Online Tutoring Sessions: An Opportunity to Knit English Language Learning in a Blended Program. Retrieved from Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 117-134	spa
dc.relation.references	Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 18 November 2014.	spa
dc.relation.references	Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (n.d.). Making English Unforgettable. Top Notch P´rofessional Development Series, 1-8.	spa
dc.relation.references	Suarez, R. I., & Rodriguez, S. M. (2018). Language Interaction Among EFL Primary Learners and Their Teacher Through Collaborative Task-Based Learning. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 95-109, july 2018. ISSN 2256-5760. Retrieved from <https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/63845/66609	spa
dc.relation.references	Velocity Global. (2020, March 30). Globalization Benefits and Challenges. Retrieved from Velocity Global: https://velocityglobal.com/blog/globalization-benefits-and-challenges/	spa
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia	*
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.coar	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.rights.local	Acceso cerrado	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/	*
dc.subject.keyword	Interactive Communication	spa
dc.subject.keyword	Action Research	spa
dc.subject.keyword	English Foreign Language (EFL)	spa
dc.subject.keyword	Spoken Interaction	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Comunicacion Interactiva	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Investigacion Accion	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Ingles como Lengua Extranjera	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Interaccion Oral	spa
dc.title	Promoting Spoken Interactive Communication in Workshops at A2+-B1 CEFR Level	spa
dc.type	bachelor thesis
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.drive	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.local	Tesis de pregrado	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion