La co-producción del objeto biobanco: el derecho y la tecnociencia biomédica
Cargando...
Fecha
Director
Enlace al recurso
DOI
ORCID
Google Scholar
Cvlac
gruplac
Descripción Dominio:
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramanga
Compartir
Descripción
El derecho colombiano hace parte de los Estados que han decidido confeccionar una pieza normativa específica para la regulación de los biobancos de investigación biomédica, biotecnológica y epidemiológica. Sin embargo, los biobancos son “objetos” que ya han sido definidos, usados, ensamblados en identidades, instituciones, discursos y representaciones, desde otras áreas del conocimiento social y científico. En el mundo tecnocientífico el derecho no tiene la única palabra. Para tal fin, este artículo propone un diálogo co-productivo entre lo que imagina el derecho que debe ser un biobanco, en un Estado del Sur-Global y lo que describen los estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología (ESCT), así como el cuidado que una epistemología normativa o prescriptiva como el derecho debería tener con las prácticas de calidad, estandarización y normalización de procesos, propias de la administración de empresas y la ingeniería industrial, que compiten con el derecho respecto a cómo gobernar los biobancos.
Colombian law is part of the States that have decided to draft a specific regulatory framework for the regulation of biobanks in biomedical, biotechnological, and epidemiological research. However, biobanks are “objects” that have already been defined, used, and assembled into identities, institutions, discourses, and representations from other areas of social and scientific knowledge. In the technoscientific world, law does not have the only word. For this purpose, this article proposes a co-productive dialogue between what law imagines a biobank should be, in a Global South State, and what social studies of science and technology (STS) describe, as well as the care that a normative or prescriptive epistemology like law should take with quality practices, standardization, and normalization of processes, typical of business administration and industrial engineering, which compete with law regarding how to govern the biobanks.
Colombian law is part of the States that have decided to draft a specific regulatory framework for the regulation of biobanks in biomedical, biotechnological, and epidemiological research. However, biobanks are “objects” that have already been defined, used, and assembled into identities, institutions, discourses, and representations from other areas of social and scientific knowledge. In the technoscientific world, law does not have the only word. For this purpose, this article proposes a co-productive dialogue between what law imagines a biobank should be, in a Global South State, and what social studies of science and technology (STS) describe, as well as the care that a normative or prescriptive epistemology like law should take with quality practices, standardization, and normalization of processes, typical of business administration and industrial engineering, which compete with law regarding how to govern the biobanks.
Abstract
Idioma
Palabras clave
Biobank, Co-production, Epistemological sovereignty, Dialogic governance, Biobanco, Co-producción, Soberanía epistemológica, Gobernanza dialógica
Citación
Colecciones
Licencia Creative Commons
Derechos de autor 2026 Iustitia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0