La objeción presidencial a actos legislativos en Colombia
Cargando...
Fecha
Autores
Director
Enlace al recurso
DOI
ORCID
Google Scholar
Cvlac
gruplac
Descripción Dominio:
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramanga
Compartir
Descripción
En el 2012, luego de que el presidente de turno Juan Manuel Santos Calderón objetara el Acto Legislativo de Reforma a la Justicia, se abrió uno de los debates constitucionales más importantes del momento, el cual fue conocido por los altos tribunales como los son la Corte Constitucional y el Consejo de Estado. En el presente artículo se hace un análisis histórico de la competencia de objeción a reformas constitucionales, se observa en un ejercicio de análisis de referentes las disposiciones constitucionales de algunos países de América Latina sobre dicha atribución, se desarrolla una carga argumentativa de las razones de improcedencia, además de examinar sentencias de los tribunales antes mencionados en lo que respecta al tema de investigación.
In 2012, after the President of the day objected to the Legislative Act of Reform of Justice, one of the most important constitutional debates of the moment was opened, which was known by the high court’s such as the Constitutional Court and the Council. of State. In the present article, a historical analysis of the competence of objection to constitutional reforms is made, it is observed in an exercise of analysis of referents the constitutional dispositions of some Latin American countries on said attribution, an argumentative load of the reasons of inadmissibility, in addition to examining judgments of the aforementioned Courts with regard to the subject of investigation.
In 2012, after the President of the day objected to the Legislative Act of Reform of Justice, one of the most important constitutional debates of the moment was opened, which was known by the high court’s such as the Constitutional Court and the Council. of State. In the present article, a historical analysis of the competence of objection to constitutional reforms is made, it is observed in an exercise of analysis of referents the constitutional dispositions of some Latin American countries on said attribution, an argumentative load of the reasons of inadmissibility, in addition to examining judgments of the aforementioned Courts with regard to the subject of investigation.
Abstract
Idioma
Palabras clave
Objeción presidencial, actos legislativos, competencia, constitución, improcedencia, Presidential Objection, legislative acts, competence, constitution, unlawful
Citación
Colecciones
Licencia Creative Commons
Derechos de autor 2020 IUSTITIA