English Classes as Scenarios for Higher Thinking and Autonomy

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorHerreño Contreras, Yomaira Angélica
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001615980
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=rUi9OoAAAAAJ&hl=en
dc.contributor.gruplachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000020502
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-9222
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T14:57:19Z
dc.date.available2021-08-03T14:57:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionEste documento describe los hallazgos preliminares de un proyecto de investigación en torno a la implementación de metas SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-based) en contextos de EILE (Enseñanza del Inglés como Lengua Extranjera) con el fin de fomentar habilidades de pensamiento superior (Analizar, Evaluar, Crear). El estudio se realizó en la Universidad Santo Tomás (Villavicencio-Colombia), bajo el enfoque de la investigación cualitativa e implementó el ciclo de investigación- acción. Luego, los instrumentos de recolección de datos fueron el diario de los estudiantes, una rúbrica para evaluar la habilidad de habla y una encuesta. Los resultados revelaron que la población (estudiantes de sexto semestre de derecho) adquirió destrezas en el análisis, la evaluación y la creación a partir del estudio de problemáticas actuales. Además, dieron los primeros pasos hacia interacciones comunicativas más elaboradas, y avanzaron en la senda hacia la autonomía.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper outlines the preliminary findings of a research Project on the implementation of SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bases) goals in TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) sttings in order to Foster Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). This study was carried out at Universidad Santo Tomás (Villavicencio-Colombia) under the framework of the qualitative research approach, and the action research cycle was implemented. Thus, the instruments used to collect data were student’ journals, a speaking rubric and a survey. The results show that the simple population (sixth semester law students) became quite skilled in analyzing, evaluating and creating base don the study of current problematics Furthermore, ther took the first steps toward a more elaborate speaking performance, and advanced along the path toward autonomy.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacionspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationHerreño Contreras, Y. A. (2021). Clases de inglés como escenarios para un pensamiento superior y autonomía. Shimmering Words: Research and Pedagogy E-Journal, 10(1), 99-112. http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/shimmering/article/view/2106spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/35216
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Villavicenciospa
dc.relation.annexedhttp://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/shimmering/article/view/2106spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.spa
dc.relation.referencesAddison Wesley Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesAriza Ariza, J. A. (2008). Unveiling students’ understanding of autonomy: puzzling out a path to learning beyond the EFL classroom. PROFILE Issues in Teachers` Professional Development, (10), 47-74. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902008000200004&lng=en&tlng=en.spa
dc.relation.referencesBloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E, Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. David McKay.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuendía Arias, X. P. (2015). A comparison of Chinese and Colombian university EFL students regarding learner autonomy. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 35-53. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.41821.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 289-297). Cambridge.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, M. (2016). Theoretical framework for integrating higher-order thinking into L2 speaking. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2). 17-226. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.01.spa
dc.relation.referencesCirocki, A. (2016). Developing learner autonomy through tasks: theory, research, practice. Lingua Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Silva, R. (2014). Rubrics for assessment: their effects on ESL students’ authentic task performance. [Conference]. 4th CELC Symposium. Alternative Pedagogies in the English Language & Communication Classroom, Singapore, National University of Singapore. Retrieved from: http://www.nus.edu.sg/celc/research/books/4th%20Symposium%20proceedings/19).%20 Radhikda%20De%20Silva.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDe Vaus, D. (2014). Surveys in social research. 6th ed. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhanizadeh, A. (2017). The Interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education High Educ, 74. 101–114. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-| 016-0031-yGlaser, B., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), Article 4.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.spa
dc.relation.referencesLazarus, A. (2004). Reality check: is your behavior aligned with organizational goals? The Physician Executive, 30(5). 50-52.spa
dc.relation.referencesLewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32 (3), 131-137.spa
dc.relation.referencesMills, G. E. (2003). Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher: Merrill/Prentice Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesPineda, D. (2014). The feasibility of assessing teenagers’ oral English language performance with a rubric. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(1), 181-198. Retrieved from:https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/43203/44484.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubin, J. (2015). Using goal setting and task analysis to enhance task-based language learning and teaching. [Conference]. SCOLT, Decatur,spa
dc.relation.referencesGeorgia State University. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080303.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMoeller, A., Theiler, J., & Wu, C. (2012). Goal setting and student achievement: Alongitudinal study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 153-169. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41684067?seq=1spa
dc.relation.referencesVollstedt M., & Rezat, S. (2019) An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. In G. Kaiser & N.spa
dc.relation.referencesPresmeg (eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_4spa
dc.relation.referencesWalton D. (2018). Legal reasoning and argumentation. In G. Bongiovanni.,spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Postema., A. Rotolo., G. Sartor., C. Valentini., & D. Walton (eds.), Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation. Springer, Dordrecht. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.crai-ustadigital.usantotomas.edu.co/10.1007/978-90-481-9452-0_3spa
dc.relation.referencesWijetunge, T. (2019). Promoting speaker autonomy and language confidence through Bloom’s taxonomy-based lessons. Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Education, 2(1), 73-84. Retrieved from:https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2019.2108spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordSMART Goal-settingspa
dc.subject.keywordHOTSspa
dc.subject.keywordSpeakingspa
dc.subject.keywordAutonomyspa
dc.subject.keywordTEFLspa
dc.subject.lembEducación superior - Clases de inglesspa
dc.subject.lembIngles - Enseñanzaspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigación - Habilidades de comunicaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalMetas SMARTspa
dc.subject.proposalHabilidades de pensamiento de orden superiorspa
dc.subject.proposalHabilidad de hablaspa
dc.subject.proposalAutonomíaspa
dc.titleEnglish Classes as Scenarios for Higher Thinking and Autonomyspa
dc.type.categoryApropiación Social y Circulación del Conocimiento: Documento de trabajo (working papers)spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
2106-Texto del artículo-5914-2-10-20210301.pdf
Tamaño:
24.71 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
formato artículo English classes as scenarios for higher thinking.pdf
Tamaño:
860.84 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia de Obra
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

DRIE - Doing Research to Improve Education