Logo USTALogo CRAI

Impacto de la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) y la sostenibilidad ambiental en el desempeño financiero: Estudio de caso Gravicon S.A.

dc.contributor.advisorOrtega Sánchez, Beatriz Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorDiaz Dasa, Lina Margarita
dc.contributor.authorMarroquin, Lisa Catalina
dc.contributor.authorCardona Nieves, Oscar Camilo
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001692642
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=_GnUfgcAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.gruplachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000018849
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-6407
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-23T19:30:40Z
dc.date.available2026-07-23T19:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-12
dc.descriptionEn un entorno corporativo caracterizado por las exigencias regulatorias, los altos impactos ambientales y la presión social, las decisiones estratégicas deben ser tomadas con base en una gestión responsable de los recursos, sin perder de vista los objetivos de rentabilidad económica. En este contexto, el presente trabajo analiza las prácticas de responsabilidad social corporativa y sostenibilidad ambiental que deben implementar las empresas de materiales de construcción para fortalecer con éxito su desempeño financiero. Con el fin de lograr este objetivo, se realizó una revisión sistemática de literatura extraída de bases de datos indexadas y un estudio de caso aplicado a la empresa Gravicon S.A. (2018-2025). Los resultados demuestran que el diálogo comunitario, la educación ambiental y el mantenimiento vial trascienden la obligación legal para convertirse en estrategias que mitigan riesgos y consolidan la legitimidad social. Si bien el incremento del gasto ambiental puede tensionar la rentabilidad inmediata, su internalización resultó ser un habilitador indispensable para el éxito financiero futuro. Asimismo, se evidenció que el Retorno sobre los Activos (ROA) obedece a ciclos de inversión intensiva (CAPEX) y fluctuaciones macroeconómicas. Frente a esta volatilidad, la integración vertical y la innovación comercial fueron determinantes para sostener el crecimiento de los ingresos. En definitiva, la competitividad en este sector exige resiliencia financiera, poder de fijación de precios y una sólida licencia social. Articular el bienestar del territorio con la planeación a largo plazo es la clave gerencial para garantizar la viabilidad operativa y rentabilidad en la industria de la construcción.
dc.description.abstractIn a corporate environment characterized by regulatory demands, high environmental impacts, and social pressure, strategic decisions must be based on responsible resource management without losing sight of economic profitability objectives. In this context, this study analyzes the corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability practices that construction materials companies must implement to successfully strengthen their financial performance. To achieve this objective, a systematic literature review drawn from indexed databases and a case study applied to the company Gravicon S.A. (2018-2025) were conducted.The results demonstrate that community dialogue, environmental education, and road maintenance transcend legal obligations to become strategies that mitigate risks and consolidate social legitimacy. Although the increase in environmental expenditure may strain immediate profitability, its internalization proved to be an indispensable enabler for future financial success. Furthermore, it was evidenced that the Return on Assets (ROA) responds to intensive capital expenditure (CAPEX) cycles and macroeconomic fluctuations. Faced with this volatility, vertical integration and commercial innovation were decisive in sustaining revenue growth.Ultimately, competitiveness in this sector demands financial resilience, pricing power, and a solid social license. Articulating the well-being of the local territory with long-term planning is the managerial key to guaranteeing operational viability and profitability in the construction industry.
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Finanzasspa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacion
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationDiaz Dasa, L. M., Marroquín, L. C., Cardona Nieves, O. C., y Ortega Sánchez, B. A. (2026). Impacto de la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) y la sostenibilidad ambiental en el desempeño financiero: Estudio de caso Gravicon S.A. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73439
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Villavicencio
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administración de Empresasspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Finanzasspa
dc.relation.referencesAlhajjeah, D., Besim, M., & Al-Hajieh, H. (2025). Mitigating crisis impact: The influence of corporate social responsibility on non-financial firms’ financial performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 101(104180), 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104180
dc.relation.referencesAmarasinghe, I., Stewart, R. A., Sahin, O., & Liu, T. (2025). Enhancing construction material circularity: An integrated participatory systems model. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 57, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.05.012
dc.relation.referencesAydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
dc.relation.referencesBarrero, M. S. R., Mejía, A. B., García, R. Q., & Hernández, P. I. (2025). Gestión de la sostenibilidad en empresas del sector construcción en Colombia. REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA, 14(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.22567/rep.v14i1.1035
dc.relation.referencesBot detection. (n.d.). Edu.Co. Retrieved June 4, 2026, from https://revistas.unilasallista.edu.co/index.php/pl/article/view/3862
dc.relation.referencesBhat, A. A., Mir, A. A., Allie, A. H., Ahmad Lone, M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Jamali, D., & Riyaz, I. (2024). Unlocking corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Mediating role of green strategy, innovation, and leadership. Innovation and Green Development, 3(2), 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100112
dc.relation.referencesCámara Colombiana de la Construcción (CAMACOL). (2025). Tendencias de la construcción y prospectiva edificadora 2025–2026. CAMACOL. Recuperado de https://camacol.co/sites/default/files/descargables/Tendencias%20de%20la%20Construcci%C3%B3n%20y%20Prospectiva%20Edificadora%202025.pdf
dc.relation.referencesChen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345(118829), 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
dc.relation.referencesDANE - PIB Información técnica. (n.d.). Gov.co. Retrieved June 4, 2026, from https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/cuentas-nacionales/cuentas-nacionales-trimestrales/pib-informacion-tecnica
dc.relation.referencesFarooq, U., Tabash, M. I., Al-Matari, E. M., Alhebri, A., Khudoykulov, K., & Al-haddad, L. (2025). Does it pay to invest in environmental sustainability? Green innovation and costs of production. Central Bank Review, 25(3), 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2025.100202
dc.relation.referencesHan, Q., Gao, H., & Guo, X. (2026). Heterogeneous paths to sustainability: How formal and informal environmental regulations shape corporate sustainability. SAGE Open, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251415128
dc.relation.referencesHoang, B. A., & Tran, T. T. H. (2022). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance of construction enterprises: Evidence from Vietnam. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (pp. 1505–1514). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7160-9_152
dc.relation.referencesIbishova, B., Misund, B., & Tveterås, R. (2024). Driving green: Financial benefits of carbon emission reduction in companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96(103757), 103757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103757
dc.relation.referencesKiran, S., Zhu, Y., & Salman, M. (2025). Dynamics of post-pandemic: Understanding the influence of company size and financial performance on corporate social responsibility through regulatory environment and employee engagement. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251358067
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Wu, T., Hu, B., Pan, D., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102(104036), 104036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104036
dc.relation.referencesLiliana, S., & Murcia, R. (n.d.). Barreras e impulsores de la construcción sostenible en Colombia. Un enfoque en Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) y desde Estrategias Organizacionales (EO). Edu.Co. Retrieved June 4, 2026, from https://bffrepositorio.unal.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/b559a6ea-1803-4877-b8a1-9d8bc9a2d8f3/content
dc.relation.referencesLu, J., Li, W., & Huang, W. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and stock resilience to COVID-19: A contract theory perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.001
dc.relation.referencesMustafi, M. A. A., Dong, Y.-J., Roy, I., Mony, F. K., & Arefin, M. S. (2026). Enhancing environmental performance through green supply chain management practices: A mediated moderation model. SAGE Open, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251412196
dc.relation.referencesNurrasyidin, M., Meutia, M., Bastian, E., & Yulianto, A. S. (2024). The effect of green accounting and corporate social responsibility implementation on the profitability of mining companies. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 5(3), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv5i3art1
dc.relation.referencesOwusu, E. A., Zhou, L., Kwasi Sampene, A., Sarpong, F. A., & Arboh, F. (2024). Fostering environmental performance via corporate social responsibility and green innovation initiatives: Examining the moderating influence of competitive advantage. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241242847
dc.relation.referencesPeng, X., Tang, P., Yang, S., & Fu, S. (2020). How should mining firms invest in the multidimensions of corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Resources Policy, 65(101576), 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101576
dc.relation.referencesRipoll Concepción, D., Briones-Peñalver, A. J., de Nieves-Nieto, C., & Bernal-Conesa, J. A. (2023). Influence of corporate social responsibility in the Dominican mining sector: A comparative study of extractive and auxiliary industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406(137024), 137024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137024
dc.relation.referencesSai, A. K., Devi, S. L. T., & Azad, S. (2026). Do good, do well? A comparative study of CSR engagement and financial metrics in Indian construction firms and other sectors. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 31(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-06-2024-0040
dc.relation.referencesSebastián, J., & Téllez, M. (n.d.). Factores críticos de éxito en la implementación de estrategias de sostenibilidad en empresas de construcción de edificaciones en Bogotá (Colombia). Edu.Co. Retrieved June 4, 2026, from https://bffrepositorio.unal.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/5434720c-7c70-4330-8244-e4a9f06dc654/content
dc.relation.referencesShirasu, Y., & Kawakita, H. (2021). Long-term financial performance of corporate social responsibility. Global Finance Journal, 50(100532), 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100532
dc.relation.referencesTaha, O. S., Alshibani, A., AlTuraik, A. S., Mahmoud, M. A., Mohammed, A., & Hassanain, M. A. (2025). Digital technologies and sustainability barriers in heavy construction: A structural equation modeling study on triple-bottom-line outcomes. Results in Engineering, 28(107808), 107808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107808
dc.relation.referencesVilla Castaño, L. E., Perdomo-Ortiz, J., & Pedraza, C. E. (2021). Responsabilidad social empresarial en empresas de la industria colombiana: Una aproximación comprensiva. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(95), 918–942. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.26.95.29
dc.relation.referencesXue, Y., Jiang, C., Guo, Y., Liu, J., Wu, H., & Hao, Y. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and high-quality development: Do green innovation, environmental investment and corporate governance matter? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(11), 3191–3214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2022.2034616
dc.relation.referencesZaiane, S., Ben Moussa, F., & Ouallani, Y. (2025). The relationship between CSR and firm performance in Europe: do industries and CSR categories matter? EuroMed Journal of Business, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-10-2024-0268
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Q., Oo, B. L., & Lim, B. T. H. (2022). Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and organizational performance in the construction industry: A resource collaboration network. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 179(106113), 106113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106113
dc.relation.referencesZhang, N., Indiran, L., Sulaiman, Z., & Anityasari, M. (2025). Factors influencing CSR in the practice of “Zero-Waste City” and its impact on Eco-innovation and environmental performance. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251365439
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordCorporate social responsibility
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental sustainability
dc.subject.keywordFinancial performance
dc.subject.keywordReturn on assets
dc.subject.keywordESG criteria
dc.subject.keywordConstruction materials
dc.subject.lembResponsabilidad Social - Empresas
dc.subject.lembEmpresas - Sostenibilidad ambiental
dc.subject.lembFinanzas - Criterios ESG
dc.subject.lembTesis y Disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.proposalResponsabilidad social corporativa
dc.subject.proposalSostenibilidad ambiental
dc.subject.proposalDesempeño financiero
dc.subject.proposalRentabilidad sobre activos
dc.subject.proposalCriterios ESG
dc.subject.proposalMateriales de construcción
dc.titleImpacto de la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) y la sostenibilidad ambiental en el desempeño financiero: Estudio de caso Gravicon S.A.
dc.typeinternal report
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026linadiaz.pdf
Tamaño:
846.19 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorización Coordinación
Tamaño:
430.77 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Licencia de uso
Tamaño:
646.86 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: