Diálogos entre las experiencias con realidad virtual y las actividades prácticas para favorecer el pensamiento de diseño

dc.contributor.advisorAcosta Gutiérrez, Joselín
dc.contributor.authorRocha Valbuena, Jimmy Raúl
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001012347
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001179942
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-8931
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T20:02:55Z
dc.date.available2025-06-04T20:02:55Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionEn esta investigación se estudiaron los tipos de diálogos entre la realidad virtual y las experiencias materiales que son necesarios para favorecer el pensamiento de diseño, frente a la resolución de problemas del entorno de los estudiantes en bachillerato. El pensamiento de diseño promueve que los estudiantes integren los conocimientos para la resolución de problemas, promoviendo la confianza en la resolución creativa ante los problemas de manera innovadora (Li, 2022). Sin embargo, en las escuelas públicas de los países latinoamericanos es limitada la disponibilidad de laboratorios de tecnología y de materiales para las prácticas y el diseño de prototipos (Reveduc, 2019). Por otro lado, la realidad virtual es una tecnología que ya ha sido estudiada en diferentes aplicaciones educativas con resultados bastante promisorios, (Samar, 2022). Esta investigación permitió aportar al conocimiento sobre cómo el pensamiento de diseño se puede favorecer con las experiencias que incluyen realidad virtual y las actividades prácticas, en el entorno de las escuelas públicas de los países en vía de desarrollo, como es el caso de Colombia. Además, se diseñó una propuesta didáctica con experiencias de realidad virtual y actividades prácticas incluidas en las cinco fases del modelo de pensamiento de diseño de D.school (2023). De ese modo, se implementó la propuesta didáctica en la población seleccionada, para posteriormente evaluar si se favoreció el pensamiento de diseño. La población de la investigación fueron 238 estudiantes de escuelas públicas de nivel bachillerato en Colombia y 5 docentes del área de tecnología e informática. La investigación se fundamentó en el paradigma constructivista, con un enfoque mixto, con una metodología de investigación basada en diseño (Plomp, 2010). Se utilizaron instrumentos cuantitativos y cualitativos. Los instrumentos cuantitativos empleados fueron la escala de pensamiento de diseño, aplicado a los estudiantes, instrumento diseñado por Luecha (2021), y validada por 138 docentes en el campo STEM en el continente asiático, y un cuestionario de rúbrica de seguimiento diligenciada por los docentes participantes. Con relación a los instrumentos cualitativos se utilizó un cuestionario de preguntas para las entrevistas semiestructuradas realizadas a los docentes y un cuestionario de preguntas abiertas a los estudiantes. Los resultados evidenciaron un aporte significativo de la realidad virtual para promover el pensamiento convergente en el diseño, en los procesos de visualización de propuestas, modelos y prototipos 3D, que facilitan las iteraciones o cambios en las soluciones, además de promover la generación de ideas. Las experiencias con realidad virtual permiten compensar en algunos procesos la falta de habilidades de los estudiantes para realizar dibujos, bocetos y modelos en 3D. Sin embargo, se requiere en el proceso de diseño de las actividades prácticas, esenciales para promover el trabajo en equipo, la empatía, la comunicación y los procesos de pensamiento convergente para concretar el proceso de diseño. Las dimensiones que se vieron más favorecidas con la intervención realizada fueron las de atención plena en el proceso, la orientación al aprendizaje y la confianza creativa.
dc.description.abstractIn this research, we studied what types of dialogues between virtual reality and material experiences were necessary to promote design thinking, in relation to problem solving in the environment of high school students. Design thinking encourages students to integrate knowledge for problem solving, promoting confidence in creative problem solving in an innovative way (Li,2022). However, in public schools in Latin American countries, the availability of technology laboratories and materials for practices and prototype design is limited, (Reveduc,2019). On the other hand, virtual reality is a technology that has already been studied in different educational applications with quite promising results, (Samar, 2022). This research contributed to the knowledge about how design thinking can be promoted with virtual reality experiences and practical activities, in public school environments in developing countries such as Colombia. In the research, a didactic proposal was designed with virtual reality experiences and practical activities included in the five phases of the D.school design thinking model (2023). The didactic proposal was implemented in the selected population, to later evaluate whether design thinking was favored. The research population was 238 students from public high schools in Colombia and 5 teachers from the technology and computer science area. The research was based on the constructivist paradigm, with a mixed approach, with a design-based research methodology, (Plomp, 2010). Quantitative and qualitative instruments were used. The quantitative instruments used were the design thinking scale, applied to students, an instrument designed by Luecha (2021), and validated by 138 teachers in the STEM field on the Asian continent, and a follow-up rubric questionnaire completed by the participating teachers. Regarding the qualitative instruments, a questionnaire was used for the semi-structured interviews with teachers and a questionnaire with open questions for students. The dimensions with the best results were those of full attention in the process, where convergent and divergent thinking processes were carried out to find solutions to. the identified problems. Positive results were also observed in the dimension of learning orientation, where the realization of learning experiences was promoted. And a favorable result was achieved in the dimension of creative confidence related to the processes of creating models and changes in them, through iterations in the solutions. Likewise, teachers showed a positive contribution of virtual reality, especially in the stages of prototyping and evaluation of solutions.
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Eduaciónspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationRocha Valbuena, J. R. (2025). Diálogos entre las experiencias con realidad virtual y las actividades prácticas para favorecer el pensamiento de diseño. [Trabajo de Doctorado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomáspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/67710
dc.languagespaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programDoctorado en Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAbrahams, I. & Millar, R. (2008) Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969
dc.relation.referencesAdams, T. E., & Holman, S. (2008). Autoethnography is queer. In. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.) Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. (pp. 373-390). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesAflatoony, L. Wakkary, R., & Neustaedter, C. (2018). Becoming a design thinker: assessing the learning process of students in a secondary level design thinking course. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 438-453.
dc.relation.referencesAhtiainen, R. (2023). Leadership in educational contexts in Finland: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37604-7
dc.relation.referencesAllcoat, D., & A Von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, (26). http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2140.
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez J. (2020). Un modelo de evaluación métrica para garantizar la generación de modelos de negocio basados en innovación disruptiva. [Tesis doctoral ]. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, G. & Bassa, L. (2013). TIC y aprendizaje colaborativo: el caso de un blog de aula para mejorar las habilidades de escritura de los estudiantes preuniversitarios. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). 10(2), 5- 19. http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v10n2-alvarez-bassa/v10n2-alvarez-bassa es
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, J.L. (2003). Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y metodología. Paidós.
dc.relation.referencesAndalib, S. Y., & Monsur, M. (2024). Co-Created Virtual Reality (VR) Modules in Landscape Architecture Education: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of VR. Education Sciences, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060553
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, T. (2005). Design-based research and its application to a call center innovation in distance education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 69-84. http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/18/552
dc.relation.referencesAnfara, V. A., Brown, K.M. & Mangione, T.L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
dc.relation.referencesAranda, M. (2024). Análisis documental, un proceso de apropiación del conocimiento. Revista digital universitaria, 25(6). DOI: http://doi.org/10.22201/ceide.16076079e.2024.25.6.1
dc.relation.referencesArksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
dc.relation.referencesBaceviciute, S. (2021). Designing Virtual Reality for Learning. [Tesis doctoral]. University of Copenhagen. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349313006_PhD_Dissertation_Designing_Virtual_Real ity_for_Learning.
dc.relation.referencesBailey, L. W. (2019). Educational Technology and the New World of Persistent Learning. IGI Global.
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (2010). Self-Efficacy. In Weiner, I., & Craighead, W.E. (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. (4th ed., pp 1-3). John Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.referencesBanks, J. (2020). Exploring Design Thinking for Instructional Practice. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/19fa204a-b047-42a4-a9c9- 7813d72e4fc4/content
dc.relation.referencesBauman, Z. (2012, agosto 20). Nos han dicho que hay que ser mejor que el otro, que hay que competir constantemente. Farodevigo. http://www.farodevigo.es/sociedad cultura/2012/08/20/bauman-han-dicho-hay-mejor/675624.html
dc.relation.referencesBequett J., & Bequett, B.B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education. 65(2), 40-47.
dc.relation.referencesBereczki, E. O., & Karpati, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791.
dc.relation.referencesBirt, J., & Vasilevski, N. (2021). Comparison of single and multiuser immersive mobile virtual reality usability in construction education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 93– 106. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.713718
dc.relation.referencesBlack, E. R. (2017). Learning then and there: an exploration of virtual reality in k-12 history education. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. The University of Texas
dc.relation.referencesBlikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and “making” in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs Mach. Mak. Invent., 4, 245–263.
dc.relation.referencesBogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon
dc.relation.referencesBoggs, W. (2019). Beyond the classroom. Harvard Political Review. https://harvardpolitics.com/united states/beyond-the-classroom/.
dc.relation.referencesBoland, R.J. & Collopy, F. 2004. Design Matters for Management. In Boland, R.J. & Collopy, F. (Eds.). Managing as designing (pp. 3–18). Stanford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBotthof, A. & Hartmann, E. A. (2015). Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. Springer Vieweg. https://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=1002234
dc.relation.referencesBowen, M. (2018). Effect of Vir ect of Virtual Reality on Motiv tual Reality on Motivation and Achie action and Achievement of Middle- emend of Middle School Students. [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Memphis. https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3033&context=etd
dc.relation.referencesBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
dc.relation.referencesBrenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In Brenner, W. & Uebernickel, F. (Eds.). Design thinking for innovation: research and practice. (pp. 3-21). Springer International Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesBrewer, J. & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Sage.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86 (6), 84-92
dc.relation.referencesBorgianni, Y., Maccioni, L., Fiorineschi, L., & Rotini, F. (2020). Forms of stimuli and their effects on idea generation in terms of creativity metrics and non-obviousness. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 8(3), 147–164. https://doi. org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1766379
dc.relation.referencesBourgeois, S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J.M., Frantz, B., & Lubart, T. (2021). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. In V. P. Glăveanu, I. J.
dc.relation.referencesNess, & C. de Saint Laurent (Eds.), Creative learning in digital and virtual environments: Opportunities and challenges of technology-enabled learning and creativity (pp. 96–117). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094630-6.
dc.relation.referencesBrubacher, J.W., Case, C.W. & Reagan, T.G. (2000). Cómo ser un docente reflexivo. La construcción de una cultura de la indagación en las escuelas. Gedi
dc.relation.referencesBruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805
dc.relation.referencesBrownridge, P. (2020). From chalkboards to virtual reality: Exploring the development and implementation of virtual reality in United States History classrooms. Rowan Digital Works. https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3762&context=etd.
dc.relation.referencesBuhl, A., Schmidt, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schafer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019). Design thinking for sustainability: Why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1248–1257. https://doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2019. 05. 259.
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems Thinking in Design. Design Issues, 8, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637.
dc.relation.referencesBurkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.
dc.relation.referencesBuhl, A., Schmidt, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schafer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019). Design thinking for sustainability: Why and how design thinking canfoster sustainability-oriented innovation development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1248–1257. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2019. 05. 259.
dc.relation.referencesChai, C., Zhang, X., Chai, Q., Yin, Y., Li, W., Shi, J., et al. (2023). Immersive 2D versus 3D: How does the form of virtual reality inspirational stimuli affect conceptual design? The Design Journal, 26(6), 856–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14606925.2023.2248815
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. (2024). Research on the Application of Three- Dimensional Virtual Reality Technology in Landscape Architecture Design. J. Electrical Systems, 20 (6s), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.339203.
dc.relation.referencesCasakin, H., & Georgiev, G. V. (2021). Design creativity and the semantic analysis of conversations in the design studio. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 9(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1838331.
dc.relation.referencesCabrera, A. & Rojas, M.T. (2018). Virtuality and Digital Culture in Children’s School Experiences: A Visual Ethnography in Context of Poverty. Revista Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana 2020, 57(1), 1-18.
dc.relation.referencesCabero, J. (2004). La investigación en Tecnologías de la Educación. Bordón, 56 (3-4), 617-634.
dc.relation.referencesCarroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein M. (2010). Destination, imagination & the fires within: design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.
dc.relation.referencesCastañares, W. (2011). Realidad virtual, mímesis y simulación CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 16 (2011), 59-81 Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, M., Álvarez, A. & Cabana, R. (2014). Design thinking: cómo guiar a estudiantes, emprendedores y empresarios en su aplicación. Ingeniería Industrial, 35 (3), 301-311. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317518909_Design_thinking_como_guiar_a_estudiant es_emprendedores_y_empresarios_en_su_aplicacion
dc.relation.referencesChalmers, D.J., Manley, D. & Wasserman, R. (Eds.). (2005). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesChang, C., Kuo, H. & Du Z (2023). The role of digital literacy in augmented, virtual, and mixed reality in popular science education: a review study and an educational framework development. Virtual Reality, 27(4), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00817-9
dc.relation.referencesChesson, D. (2017). Design thinker profile: Creating and validating a scale for measuring design thinking capabilities [Master's thesis, Antioch University]. AURA: Antioch University Repository and Archive. https://aura.antioch.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1398&context=etds.
dc.relation.referencesChevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique. Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. (2nd ed., M.-A. Joshua, Ed.). La Pensée Sauvage
dc.relation.referencesChirico, A., Serafini, F., Pizzolante, M., Malvezzi, R., Gianotti, E., Micucci, C., Manduca, E., Carvelli, C., Vago, F., Renda, M., Cascio, E., & Gaggioli, A. (2022). Inspiring awe in high school teachers: Design and preliminary test of a virtual training on AltspaceVR. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 20, 31-35.
dc.relation.referencesChon, H., & Sim, J. (2019). From design thinking to design knowing: an educational perspective. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 18(2), 187-200.
dc.relation.referencesCipresso P., Giglioli I.A.C., Raya M.A., & Riva, G. (2018) The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: a network and cluster analysis of the literature. front. Psychol, 9(2086). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086
dc.relation.referencesÇiftçi, A., & Topçu, M. S. (2020). Design thinking: Opinions and experiences of middle school students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 10(3), 961–1000. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.030.
dc.relation.referencesColeman, H., & Unrau, Y. A. (2005). En R. M. Grinnell & Y. A. Unrau (Eds.). Social work: Research and evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches (7th ., pp. 403-420). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesColeman, H., & Unrau, Y. A. (2005). En R. M. Grinnell & Y. A. Unrau (Eds.). Social work: Research and evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches (7th ., pp. 403-420). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293884.
dc.relation.referencesCubillo, J., Martín, S., Castro, M., & Colmenar, A. (2014). Recursos Digitales Autónomos Mediante Realidad Aumentada. RIED, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 17 (2), 241-274.
dc.relation.referencesD.school. (2023). An Introduction to Design Thinking Process Guide. https://web.stanford.edu/~mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesDe Benito, C. (2016). La investigación basada en diseño en tecnología educativa. Revista Interuniversitaria de educación en Tecnología Educativa RIITE, 0, 44-59 https://doi.org/10.6018/riite/2016/260631
dc.relation.referencesDemerath, P. (2006). The science of context: modes of response for qualitative researchers in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19 (1), 97-113.
dc.relation.referencesDeNoyelles, A., & Reyes, B. (2015). Using Word Clouds in Online Discussions to Support Critical Thinking and Engagement. Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.528.
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Prentice Hal
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Prentice Hal
dc.relation.referencesDean, D., Hender, J., Henley Management College, Rodgers, T., Consultant College Station, T., Santanen, E., et al. (2006). Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646–699. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00106
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1967). Experiencia y Educación. Losada
dc.relation.referencesDey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A user friendly guide for social science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203412497.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, F. (2006). Enseñanza situada: Vínculo entre la escuela y la vida. McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, F. (2006). Enseñanza situada: Vínculo entre la escuela y la vida. McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesDrigas, A., Mitsea, E., and Skianis, C. (2022). Virtual reality and metacognition training techniques for learning disabilities. Sustainability, 14(16), Article 10170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610170
dc.relation.referencesDuncan, A. K. & Breslin, M. A. (2009). Innovating health care delivery: the design of health services. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2/3), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910942427.
dc.relation.referencesDjamil, M. (2024). Utilization of Leonardo AI in developing teaching materials for islamic religious. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic and Interdisciplinary Studies (ICIIS), ISSN: 2963-5489. https://jurnal.uindatokarama.ac.id/index.php/iciis/issue/archive
dc.relation.referencesEfeoglu, A., Møller, C., Sérié, M., & Boer, H. (2013). Design thinking: characteristics and promises. In Business Development and Co-creation: Proceedings of the 14th International CINet Conference (pp. 241-256). Nijmegen, Netherlands
dc.relation.referencesEklund, A. R., Aguiar, U. N., & Amacker, A. (2022). Design thinking as sense-making: Developing a pragmatist theory of practice to (re)introduce sensibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39, 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12604.
dc.relation.referencesElhussein, G., Leopold, T. A., & Zahidi, S. (2020). Schools of the Future Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Issue January).
dc.relation.referencesEyler, J. (2009). The power of experiential education. Liberal Education, 95(4), 24–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ871318.
dc.relation.referencesFaria, M., Novo, C., Lopes, A., Moura, A., Tsalapatas, H., Heidmann, O., & Vaz de Carvalho, C. (2023). A utilização de Design Thinking para promover a adoção de práticas sustentáveis no Ensino Básico e Secundário. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias. E57, 217–230.
dc.relation.referencesFernández, M. (2017). Augmented virtual reality: how to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1-15. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150087.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFeuer, M., Towne, L., Shavelson, R.J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31 (8), 4-14.
dc.relation.referencesForlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. DIS2004 - Designing Interactive Systems: Across the Spectrum, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013152
dc.relation.referencesFlick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
dc.relation.referencesFraser, H. M. A. (2009). Designing Business: New Models for Success. Design Management Review, 20(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2009.00008.x
dc.relation.referencesFriese, S. (2014). Qualitative Date Analysis with ATLAS.ti. Sage publications.
dc.relation.referencesFriese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (3rd ed.). Sage publications. http://surl.li/jzqml
dc.relation.referencesFriese, S. (2021b). ATLAS.ti windows: User manual. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1343492. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1343492
dc.relation.referencesFurr, D. (2023). Boys & Girls Club Members Find VR Career Exploration Engaging and Informative. Transfr Inc. https://transfrinc.com/resources/efficacy-studies/boys-girls-club-members-find-vr career-exploration-engaging-and-informative/
dc.relation.referencesGarzón, A. & Gil, J. (2017). El papel de la procrastinación académica como factor de la deserción universitaria. Revista Complutense de Educación, 28 (1), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2017.v28.n1.49682
dc.relation.referencesGergen, K. (1998). Realidades y relaciones: aproximaciones a la construcción social. Paidós.
dc.relation.referencesGeorgiev, G. V., & Casakin, H. (2019). Semantic measures for enhancing creativity in design education. En Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1, 369– 378. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.4
dc.relation.referencesGeorge, B. H., Sleipness, O. R., & Quebbeman, A. (2017). Using virtual reality as a design input: Impacts on collaboration in a university design studio setting. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2017(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.14627/537629026
dc.relation.referencesGhiso, A. (2013). De una lógica tecnoburocrática al encuentro educativo. En: El asombro de la educación: perspectivas, experiencias y propuestas para desarrollar nuevos paradigmas de aprendizaje. Editorial Universidad Bolivariana S.A.
dc.relation.referencesGlasersfeld, E. (1994). Despedida de la objetividad. En El ojo del observador. Contribuciones al constructivismo. (p. 27)
dc.relation.referencesGoldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549–569. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002.
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2013). Inspiration peak: Exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(4), 215–232. https://doi. org/10.1080/21650349.2013.799309.
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35 (1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001.
dc.relation.referencesGong, Z., Wang, M., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, VG. V. (2022). Instrumenting virtual reality for priming cultural differences in design creativity. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3527927.3535205
dc.relation.referencesGong, Z., Wang, M., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, G.V. (2023). Effects of digital technologies on cultural factors in creativity enhancement. En A. Chakrabarti & V. Singh (Eds.), Design in the era of Industry 4.0 (Vol. 3, pp. 383–394). Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0428-0_32
dc.relation.referencesGoldman, S. (2012). Assessing learning: Capturing the journey of becoming a design thinker. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. J. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research: Measuring performance in context. (pp. 13-33). Sage Publications
dc.relation.referencesGonzáles, R. (1997), Epistemología cualitativa y subjetividad. Educación.
dc.relation.referencesGreene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 11(3), 255-274.
dc.relation.referencesGuba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions & emerging confluences in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. (3rd ed.) Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesGuerra, C. R. (2023). The Impact of Immersion through Virtual Reality in the Learning Experiences of Art and Design Students: The Mediating Effect of the Flow Experience. Education Sciences, 13(2), Artículo 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020185
dc.relation.referencesGwendolin, A. (2021). Fostering Deep Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality: Interplay of Learner’s Characteristics with Internal and External Support. https://d-nb.info/1264214537/34.
dc.relation.referencesHaara, F. O., & Smith, K. (2009). Practical activities in mathematics teaching-mathematics teachers knowledge-based reasons. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 33–54. https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/148208
dc.relation.referencesHammady, R., Ma, M., Al-Kalha, Z., & Strathearn, C. (2021). A framework for constructing and evaluating the role of MR as a holographic virtual guide in museums. Virtual Reality, 25, 895-918. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00497-9.
dc.relation.referencesHarpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001.
dc.relation.referencesHasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford (2020). Miniguía: una introducción Design Thinking. https://web.stanford.edu/~mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesHawes, D., & Arya, A. (2022). VR-based context priming to increase student engagement and academic performance. In 2022 8th International Conference of The Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.23919/ iLRN55037.2022.9815929
dc.relation.referencesHehn, J. (2020). The Use of Design Thinking for a Human-centered Requirements Engineering Approach. https://ux-tauri.unisg.ch/EDIS/Dis4992.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesHenriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. (p.714). Editorial Mc Graw Hill
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ta ed.). Mc Graw Hill / Interamericana Editores.
dc.relation.referencesHill, D., George, B. H., & Johnson, T. (2019). How Virtual Reality Impacts the Landscape Architecture Design Process During the Phases of Analysis and Concept Development at the Master Planning Scale. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2019(4), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.14627/537663029
dc.relation.referencesHodder, I. (2000). The interpretation of documents and material culture. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 703-717.) Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesHo, L.-H., Sun, H., & Tsai, T.-H. (2019). Research on 3D painting in virtual reality to improve students’ motivation of 3D animation learning. Sustainability, 11(6), Article 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061605
dc.relation.referencesHonebein, P. C. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In Wilson, B. G. (Ed.). Constructivist learning environments: case studies in instructional design. Educational Technology Publications.
dc.relation.referencesHorne, M., & Thompson, E. M. (2008a). The Role of Virtual Reality in Built Environment Education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2008.03010005
dc.relation.referencesHoward, Z. (2015). Understanding design thinking in practice: A qualitative study of design led professionals working with large organizations. [Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia]. http://mayestra.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/bibliografc3ada-de referencia-investigacic3b3n-cualitativa-juan-luis-alvarez-gayou-jurgenson.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesHuang, H.T., & Chang, Y.S. (2023). Effects of virtual reality on creative performance and emotions: A study of brainwaves. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, Article 107815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107815.c
dc.relation.referencesHuang, H., & Lee, C.F. (2022). Factors affecting usability of 3D model learning in a virtual reality environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1691605
dc.relation.referencesIDEO.org. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design. IDEO.org
dc.relation.referencesIDEO.org. (2015). Design Thinking for Educators. (2012). http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/
dc.relation.referencesJanhagen, V. (2019). Larga vida al design thinking. Cómo nutrir y hacer crecer el design thinking en tu organización. Idean part of Capgemini Invent. Afanías Gráficas y Manipulados S.L.U. https://asociaciondec.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Idean-Capgemini.pdf
dc.relation.referencesJagtap, S. (2019). Design creativity: Refined method for novelty assessment. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7(1–2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 21650349.2018.1463176.
dc.relation.referencesJanesick, V.J. (1998). The dance of qualitative research design: metaphor, mechanolatry, and meaning. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. (pp. 35-85). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesJeelani, I. (2020). Development of virtual reality and stereo-panoramic environments for construction safety training. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(8), 1853–1876 https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2019-0391
dc.relation.referencesJensen, L. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head mounted display mounted displays in education and training. Education and information Technologies 23(3), 1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0
dc.relation.referencesJohansson, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121- 146
dc.relation.referencesJorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985376.
dc.relation.referencesKalender, M. (2007). Applying the subject cell through constructivist approach during science lessons and the teacher’s view. Journal of Environmental & Science Education 2 (1), 3–13.
dc.relation.referencesKang, S. (2019). Augmented Reality Systems and User Interaction Techniques for STEM Learning. https://doi.org/10.13016/xhns-zyph
dc.relation.referencesKaplan AD, Cruit J, Endsley M, Beers SM, Sawyer BD, Hancock PA. (2021). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 63(4), 706–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820904229
dc.relation.referencesKeane, L., & Keane, M. (2016). STEAM by design. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 21(1), 61-82.
dc.relation.referencesKelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Currency
dc.relation.referencesKickmeier, M.D., Hann P., & Leitner M. (2019) Increasing Learning Motivation: An Empirical Study of VR Effects on the Vocational Training of Bank Clerks. In Van der Spek, E., Göbel S., Do E., Clua E., & Baalsrud J. (Eds.) Entertainment Computing and Serious Games. ICEC-JCSG 2019. (pp. 173–186). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11863. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesKim, P. (2006). Effects of the 3d virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth-grade students' achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 25-34.
dc.relation.referencesKim, P. (2006). Effects of the 3d virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth-grade students' achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 25-34.
dc.relation.referencesKoh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Concepts and applications in teaching and learning. Spring
dc.relation.referencesKohn, A. (2014). Competir atenta contra el aprendizaje. El Tiempo. http://www.eltiempo.com/estilo-de vida/educacion/entrevista-con-alfie-kohn-experto-en-educacion/14240918.
dc.relation.referencesKolk, M. (2012). Build 21st century skills with design thinking. An Interview-Dr_Maureen_Carroll. Creative Educator. https://creativeeducator.tech4learning.com/2012/articles
dc.relation.referencesKrauss, S. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The qualitative report, 10 (4), 758-770. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1831
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. CRC Press.
dc.relation.referencesKuhn, S. (2021). Transforming learning through tangible instruction: the case for thinking with things. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesKuo, Y.T., García Bravo, E., Whittinghill, D. M., & Kuo, Y.-C. (2023). Walking into a modern painting: the impacts of using virtual reality on student learning performance and experiences in art appreciation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2278929
dc.relation.referencesLaboratorio de Innovación y Coparticipación del Tribunal de Cuentas Federales (2021). Design thinking toolkit. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/instituto-serzedello-correa/colab-i#design-thinking-toolkit
dc.relation.referencesLahtero, T. J., Ahtiainen, R. S., & Lång, N. (2019). Finnish principals: Leadership training and views on distributed leadership. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(10), 340–348. 10.5897/ERR2018.3637.
dc.relation.referencesLake, D., Motley, P., Casner, M., and Flannery, K. (2022). Design thinking community health and well being: creating with and for community capacities. Design Research Society Proceeding,1-13. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.210
dc.relation.referencesLandvogt, S. (2020 septiembre/octubre). Prototyping with Microsoft Maquette: A New Virtual Reality Tool. CODE Magazine. https://www.codemag.com/Article/2009071/Prototyping-with Microsoft-Maquette-A-New-Virtual-Reality-Tool.
dc.relation.referencesLanier, J. (1988). A Vintage Virtual Reality Interview. Whole Earth Review Magazine. http://www.well.com/user/jaron/vrint.html.
dc.relation.referencesLapadat, J.C. (2009). Writing our way into shared understanding: Collaborative autobiographical writing in the qualitative methods class. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 955-979.
dc.relation.referencesLaursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2019). The Shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designedly thinking. The Design Journal, 22(6), 813-832
dc.relation.referencesLaursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2019). The Shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designedly thinking. The Design Journal, 22(6), 813-832
dc.relation.referencesLawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified (4th ed.). Elsevier/ Architectural Press.f
dc.relation.referencesLeavy, B. 2010. Design Thinking – A New Mental Model of Value Innovation. Strategy and Leadership, 38(3), 5-14
dc.relation.referencesLevy, P. (1999). ¿Qué es lo virtual? Editorial Paidós
dc.relation.referencesLewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
dc.relation.referencesLewis, J. (2016). Using ATLAS.ti to Facilitate Data Analysis for a Systematic Review of Leadership Competencies in the Completion of a Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers. 67. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/fac_staff_pub/67
dc.relation.referencesLi J, Goei S and Huang R (2024) Unveiling maker mindsets: a journey of formation and transformation through design thinking-making pedagogy within a lesson study context. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1343492. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1343492
dc.relation.referencesLi, T. (2022). A Systematic Review on Design Thinking Integrated Learning in K-12 Education. Applied Sciences,12 (16), 8077. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168077
dc.relation.referencesLiedtka, J., & Bahr, K. J. (2019). Assessing design thinking’s impact: report on the development of a new instrument (No. 19–13). Darden Working Paper Series
dc.relation.referencesLin, L., & Shen, S. (2019). Study on the taking design thinking to school’s project in America. International and Comparative Education, 354(7), 67–74.
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.
dc.relation.referencesLissette, A. (2021). Examining the Impact of Virtual Reality Integration into a Social Studies
dc.relation.referencesLiu, R., Wang, L., Lei, J., Wang, Q., and Ren, Y. (2020). Effects of an immersive virtual reality-based classroom on students’ learning performance in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2034–2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13028
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y., Castronovo, F., Messner, J., & Leicht, R. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of Virtual Reality on Design Review Meetings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000856
dc.relation.referencesLofland, J., Snow, D.A., Anderson, L. & Lofland, A.L.H. (2005). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont.
dc.relation.referencesLong, H., & Wang, J. (2022). Dissecting reliability and validity evidence of subjective creativity assessment: A literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1399–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09679-0.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, E. (2018). El método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XX1, 21 (1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20169
dc.relation.referencesLuecha, L. (2021). Validation of a design thinking mindset questionnaire with Thai elementary teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 012088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1835/1/012088
dc.relation.referencesLuna, N. (2020) ¿Qué son las TICS? Entrepreneur. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/308917
dc.relation.referencesMakransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. J. Educ. Psychol, 113, 719–735. doi: 10.1037/edu0000473
dc.relation.referencesMarks, J. (2017). The Impact of a Brief Design Thinking Intervention on Students’ Design Knowledge, Iterative Dispositions, and Attitudes Towards Failure. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8X92PN2.
dc.relation.referencesMárquez, P. (2006). El papel de las TIC en el proceso de lecto-escritura: leer y escribir en la escuela a golpe de click. Editorial Planeta.
dc.relation.referencesMartin, A. (2021). Perspectivas sobre la creatividad y sus vinculaciones con la educación escolar. Un estudio relacional con maestras y estudiantes de educación infantil [Tesis doctoral, Universitat cde Barcelona]. Universitat dede Barcelona]. Universitat de Barcelona. https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/671537/AMM_TESIS.pdf?sequence=5.xml.
dc.relation.referencesMartin, R. (2009). The Design of Business. Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review Press.
dc.relation.referencesMartín, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe, B., & González, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a
dc.relation.referencesMaturana, H. (2003). El árbol del conocimiento las bases biológicas del entendimiento humano. Editorial Lumen.
dc.relation.referencesMc Millan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2005). Investigación Educativa. Pearson Addison Wesley
dc.relation.referencesMcKernan, J. (2001). Investigación-Acción y Currículum. Ediciones Morata.
dc.relation.referencesMcLuhan M. (1985). Guerra y paz en la aldea global. Planeta De Agostin
dc.relation.referencesMeinel, C., Leifer, L., Plattner, H., & Meinel, D. (2017) Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice. Berlin/Heidelberg
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (MEN). (2022). Orientaciones curriculares para el área de tecnología e informática en educación básica y media.
dc.relation.referencesMertens, D.M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. (3rd ed.). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage
dc.relation.referencesMiller, J.P. (2020). Immersive medicine: an investigation of a virtual reality intervention for simulation based medical education. [Tesis doctoral, Johns Hopkins University]. Johns Hopkins Institutional Repository. https://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/63718.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de educación del Perú (2016). Design Thinking y el reto de la innovación en el sector público. Programa INNOVA. https://es.scribd.com/document/500849647/guia-design-thinking-minedu compress.
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, A. (2022). Storyboard That: El uso de guiones gráficos para el aprendizaje. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y de Formación del Profesorado. https://intef.es/wp content/uploads/2019/03/Storyboard-That.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesMorgan, D.L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48- 76.
dc.relation.referencesMoss, P. (1996). Enlarging the Dialogue in Educational Measurement: Voices from Interpretive Research Traditions. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 20-29.
dc.relation.referencesNana, G. (2021). Diffusion of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Pre-K to 12 Education: Experiences and Perceptions of Pioneer Teachers. [Tesis doctoral, Seton Hall University]. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2906/
dc.relation.referencesNoguchi, Y. (2019). Virtual reality goes to work, helping train employees, National Public Radio. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 33 ‐54.
dc.relation.referencesNovo, M., Dochshanov, A. M., Tuparova, D., Garkova, B., Eroglan, F., Uğraş, T., Yücel-Toy, B., & Vaz de Carvalho, C. (2023). Design Thinking in Secondary Education: Required Teacher Skills. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100969
dc.relation.referencesObeid, S., & Demirkan, H. (2023). The influence of virtual reality on design process creativity in basic design studios. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 1841–1859. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1858116
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-e
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2022). How are education systems integrating creative thinking in schools? Programmer for International Student Assessment. PISA in Focus. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f01158fb-en
dc.relation.referencesOlmos, E., Cavalcanti, J. F., Soler, J., Contero, M., & Alcaniz, M. (2018). Mobile virtual reality: A promising technology to change the way we learn and teach. In Yu, S., Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (Eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education. (pp. 95-106). Springer Nature Singapore.
dc.relation.referencesOnwuegbuzie, A. J., & Dickinson, W. B. (2008). Mixed Methods Analysis and Information Visualization: Graphical Display for Effective Communication of Research Results. The Qualitative Report, 13(2), 204-225. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1595.
dc.relation.referencesOrtega, D. (2023). ¿Cómo investigar en Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales? Fundamentos metodológicos, técnicas e instrumentos de investigación. Horizontes Universidad
dc.relation.referencesOtero, A., & Flores, J. (2011). Realidad virtual: Un medio de comunicación de contenidos. Aplicación como herramienta educativa y factores de diseño e implantación en museos y espacios públicos. Revista ICONO14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 9(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v9i2.28
dc.relation.referencesOwen, C. (2007). Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27
dc.relation.referencesÖztürk, A (2020). Co-developing STEM activities through design thinking approach for fifth graders. [Tesis de maestría, Middle East Technical University]. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12625483/index.pd
dc.relation.referencesPande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637.
dc.relation.referencesPapanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23, 425–436. doi: 10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2
dc.relation.referencesPapert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In Harel, I. & Pappert, S. (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays (pp. 1-11). Ablex.c
dc.relation.referencesPapert, S. (1999). Logo Philosophy and Implementation. Lcsi. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 0149.1994.tb02396.
dc.relation.referencesPapert, S. (1995). La máquina de los niños. Ediciones Paidós.
dc.relation.referencesPark, N. K., Chun, M. Y., & Lee, J. (2016). Revisiting individual creativity assessment: Triangulation in subjective and objective assessment methods. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1125259
dc.relation.referencesParong, J. (2019). Cognitive and Affective Mechanisms of Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environments. [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de California, Santa Bárbara]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/16d1s50g.
dc.relation.referencesPineda, M. (2019). Design thinking. Universidad Oberta de Catalunya. https://openaccess.uoc.edu/bitstream/10609/149075/3/DesignThinking.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPirker, J. (2017). Immersive and Engaging Forms of Virtual Learning New and improved approaches towards engaging and immersive digital learning. [Tesis doctoral, Graz University of Technology]. https://jpirker.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/dissertation-pirker.compressed.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPirker, J,& Dengel, A. (2021). The Potential of 360° Virtual Reality Videos and Real VR for Education A Literature Review. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,41(4),76-89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2021.3073955
dc.relation.referencesPlomp, T. (2010). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. En Plomp, T. & Neveen, N. (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China).
dc.relation.referencesPortman, M. E., Natapov, A., & Fisher, D. (2015b). To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.001.
dc.relation.referencesPosner, G. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum. (3ª ed.). McGraw-Hill
dc.relation.referencesPotvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784-802.
dc.relation.referencesPunch, K. (2005). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage Publications
dc.relation.referencesQuéau, P. (1993). Le virtuel. Vertus et vertiges
dc.relation.referencesRahman S. (2019). The Effect of 3D Virtual Reality Technologies on Learning: A Qualitative Research. [Tesis doctoral, American College of Education] ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/effect-3d-virtual-reality technologies-on/docview/2315325882
dc.relation.referencesRamón, F. (2008). El modelo dialógico de la pedagogía: un aporte desde las experiencias de comunidades de aprendizaje. Estudios pedagógicos, 1, 41-61
dc.relation.referencesRauschenberger, R. (2020). Health and Safety of VR Use by Children in an Educational Use Case. Conference: 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). (pp. 239– 248). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00010
dc.relation.referencesRauth, I., K¨oppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity.
dc.relation.referencesRayala, C. (2022). Empowerment by Design: Classroom Innovation and Inquiry Through Design Thinking and Action Research. [Tesis doctoral, University of the Pacific]. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/3800
dc.relation.referencesRieuf, V., Bouchard, C., & Aoussat, A. (2015). Immersive moodboards, a comparative study of industrial design inspiration material. Journal of Design Research, 13(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2015.067233.
dc.relation.referencesRieuf, V., Bouchard, C., Meyrueis, V., & Omhover, J.F. (2017). Emotional activity in early immersive design: Sketches and moodboards in virtual reality. Design Studies, 48, 43–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.11.001
dc.relation.referencesRevista de Educación Chile. (2019). ¡Sorprendente!: Un Laboratorio científico gratuito en el celular. http://www.revistadeeducacion.cl/sorprendente-un-laboratorio-cientifico-gratuito-en-el-celular/.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, E. (2024). Manual de creatividad. Secretaria de Educación Pública de México y el Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (UNICEF). https://educacionbasica.sep.gob.mx/wp ontent/uploads/2024/12/CREATIVIDAD_logo.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, H. (2007). Del constructivismo al construccionismo: implicaciones educativas. Revista Educación y Desarrollo Social, II (1).
dc.relation.referencesRothbauer, P. (2008). Triangulation. In Given, L.M. (Ed.),The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 892-894). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesRothbauer, P. (2008). Triangulation. In Given, L.M. (Ed.),The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 892-894). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesRowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. MIT Press
dc.relation.referencesRoyalty, A., Oishi, L. N., & Roth, B. (2014). Acting with creative confidence: Developing a creative agency assessment tool. In Leifer, L. Plattner, H. & Meinel, C. (Eds.), Design thinking research: Building innovation eco-systems (pp. 79–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01303-9_6
dc.relation.referencesRüssmann, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries. In Bost. Consult. Gr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4.
dc.relation.referencesSabariego, M., Vilà, R. & Sandín, M. P. (2014). El análisis cualitativo de datos con ATLAS.ti. REIRE, Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educación, 7 (2), 119-133. http://www.ub.edu/ice/reire.htm
dc.relation.referencesSalazar, C. (2012). Escuela o empresa: ¿Galton en las aulas?. Yo estudié en la pública. Ciudadan@s por la educación pública. https://www.yoestudieenlapublica.org/descargas/5articuloEscuelaEmpresa.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesSamar, Q. (2022). Using Virtual Reality to Improve STEM Education. [Tesis doctoral en curso, Carleton University].
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, V. (2022). Pensamiento de diseño en las competencias genéricas de estudiantes en Educación para el Trabajo de una institución pública del Callao – 2021. https://core.ac.uk/download/520216765.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesSandín, M.P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación. Fundamentos y tradiciones. Mc Graw Hill Interamericana.
dc.relation.referencesSarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity. Design Studies, 32(4), 348–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002.
dc.relation.referencesShah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X (02)00034-0
dc.relation.referencesShe, J., & MacDonald, E. (2014). Priming designers to communicate sustainability. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025488
dc.relation.referencesSun, R., Wu, Y. J., & Cai, Q. (2019). The effect of a virtual reality learning environment on learners’ spatial ability. Virtual Reality, 23, 385–398. doi: 10.1007/s10055-018-0355-2.
dc.relation.referencesSavin, M., & Major, C. (2013) Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge,
dc.relation.referencesSchön, E.M., Thomaschewski, J., & Escalona, M.J. 2017. “Agile requirements engineering: A Systematic literature review. Computer Standards & Interfaces (49),79-91
dc.relation.referencesSCORE (2009a). Getting practical: a framework for practical science in schools. DCSF. www.scoreeducation. org/downloads/practical_work/framework.pdf
dc.relation.referencesServicio de Innovación Educativa de la UPM (2020). Guía de Design Thinking. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. https://innovacioneducativa.upm.es/guias_pdi.
dc.relation.referencesShenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63 – 75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
dc.relation.referencesSilver, C. & Lewins, A. (2014). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide (2ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesSilverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. Sage.
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesSonta, M. (2019). Virtually there: A phenomenological study of secondary students and their engagement with virtual reality field trips [Tesis doctoral, University of Mississippi]. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1700
dc.relation.referencesSriworapong, S., Pyae, A., Thirasawasd, A., & Keereewan, W. (2022). Investigating students’ engagement, enjoyment, and sociability in virtual reality-based systems: A comparative usability study of Spatial.io, Gather.town, and Zoom. En H. Li, M. Ghorbanian Zolbin, R. Krimmer, J. Kärkkäinen, C. Li, & R. Suomi (Eds.), Well-being in the information society: When the mind breaks (Vol. 1626, pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14832-3_1
dc.relation.referencesStarrett, M. J., McAvan, A. S., Huffman, D. J., Stokes, J. D., Kyle, C. T., Smuda, D. N., Kolarik, B. S., Laczko, J., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2021). Landmarks: A solution for spatial navigation and memory experiments in virtual reality. Behavior Research Methods, 53(3), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01481-6
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures
dc.relation.referencesStringer, E. (1999). Action Research. Sage
dc.relation.referencesTavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfp
dc.relation.referencesTecpan, S. (2014). Rúbrica para evaluar secuencias didácticas en competencia científica. Revista del primer Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa.
dc.relation.referencesThe Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design. https://www.designkit.org/resources/1
dc.relation.referencesTimón, E. (2007). Los problemas epistemológicos de la realidad virtual. En C. Moreno Márquez, R. Lorenzo Alquézar & A. M. de Mingo Rodríguez (Eds.), Filosofía y realidad virtual. (pp. 215– 228). Editorial Universidad de Zaragoza. ISBN 978-84-7733-940-3
dc.relation.referencesToulouse Thinking. (2021). Guía metodológica y herramientas para innovar. Documento diseñado de acuerdo con la aplicación de la metodología en talleres con docentes y estudiantes de la Escuela. Dirección de Innovación y Desarrollo. https://uploads ssl.webflow.com/63fd105fc7c8a935273083bd/644195afac48d617ccb9d17a_TLSThinking22.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTran, N. (2017). Design thinking playbook for change management in K12 schools. Stanford d.school. https://dschool old.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/k12/wiki/ad2ce/attachments/3946e/DESIGN%20THINKING% 20PLAYBOOK%20(1).pdf
dc.relation.referencesTripodoro, V., & de Simone, G. (2015). Nuevos paradigmas en la educación universitaria. Medicina, 75, 113-118.
dc.relation.referencesTsai, C.A. , Song, M., Lo, Y. & Lo, C. (2023). Design thinking with constructivist learning increases the learning motivation and wicked problem-solving capability. An empirical research in Taiwan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101385
dc.relation.referencesTschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation. XXIII ISPIM Conference: Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience. Barcelona, Spain.
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO (2023). Reduciendo la brecha de género en STEM en América Latina ¿Pasando a la acción? Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386722
dc.relation.referencesVan Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage.
dc.relation.referencesVan Merriënboer, J.J., Clark, R.E., & de Croock, M. (2002) Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-64.
dc.relation.referencesVan den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. En Van den Akker, J. Nieveen, N., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K.L. & Plomp, T. (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1-14). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesVargas, G. (2020). Virtualización de contenidos académicos en entornos a distancia de aprendizaje, 61(2), 65-72.
dc.relation.referencesVaz de Carvalho, & Bauters, M. (2021). Technology to Support Active Learning in Higher Education. In Carvalho, C., & Bauters, M. (Eds). Technology supported active learning. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesVink, J. (2019). In/visible– Conceptualizing service ecosystem design. [Tesis Doctoral dissertation, Karlstad University] Karlstad University Studies, 17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-01-2022-0053
dc.relation.referencesVo, H. (2022). Design creativity in Industry 4.0: Gravity Sketch and 3D printing in a Luminaire design project. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-01-2022-0053
dc.relation.referencesWalker, W. S., Moore, T. J. Guzey, S. S., & Sorge, B. H. (2018). Frameworks to develop integrated STEM curricula. K-12 STEM. Education, 4(2), 331-339.
dc.relation.referencesWang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
dc.relation.referencesWang, P., Miller, M. R., Han, E., DeVeaux, C., & Bailenson, J. N. (2024). Understanding virtual design behaviors: A large-scale analysis of the design process in virtual reality. Design Studies, 90, Article 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. destud.2023.101237
dc.relation.referencesWang, P., Wu, P., Wang, J., Chi, H. L., & Wang, X. (2018). A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204.
dc.relation.referencesWass, T. (2015). Design thinking: Next steps and implementation into middle school social studies. Paper presented at the Georgia Independent School Association, Johns Creek, GA
dc.relation.referencesWass, T.W. (Ed.). (2018). Students experiences of design thinking and distributed scaffolding in a middle school social studies classroom. [Tesis doctoral, Georgia State University]. https://doi.org/10.57709/11231094
dc.relation.referencesWatzlawick, P. (1979). ¿Es real la realidad? confusión, desinformación, comunicación. Herder.
dc.relation.referencesWatzlawick, P. (1995). El ojo del observador contribuciones al constructivismo. Gedisa.
dc.relation.referencesWertsch, J. (1988). Vygotski y la formación social de la mente. Paidós.
dc.relation.referencesWee, C., Yap, K. M., & Lim, W. N. (2021). Haptic interfaces for virtual reality: challenges and research directions. IEEE Access 9, 112145–112162. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3103598.
dc.relation.referencesWIPO (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022 What is the future of innovation driven growth?
dc.relation.referencesWIPO (2022). IP Facts and Figures 2022. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.4718
dc.relation.referencesWolcott, M. D., & Mclaughlin, J. E. (2020). Promoting creative problem-solving in schools of pharmacy with the use of design thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(10), 1271– 127.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4626
dc.relation.referencesWu, W. L., Hsu, Y., Yang, Q. F., & Chen, J. J. (2021). A spherical video-based immersive virtual reality learning system to support landscape architecture students’ learning performance during the COVID-19 era. Land, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060561.
dc.relation.referencesYang, E. K., Lee, J. H., & Lee, C. H. (2023). Virtual reality environment-based collaborative exploration of fashion design. CoDesign, 1–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15710882.2022.2162547
dc.relation.referencesYang, E. K., & Lee, J. H. (2020). Cognitive impact of virtual reality sketching on designers’ concept generation. Digital Creativity, 31(2), 82–97.
dc.relation.referencesYang, E. K., Lee, J. H., & Lee, C. H. (2023). Virtual reality environment-based collaborative exploration of fashion design. CoDesign, 1–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15710882.2022.2162547.
dc.relation.referencesYildirim, B., Sahin-Topalcengiz, E., Arikan, G., & Timur, S. (2020). Using virtual reality in the classroom: Reflections of STEM teachers on the use of teaching and learning tools. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health,6(3), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.71177
dc.relation.referencesYildirim, G., Alban, M., & Yildirim, S. (2018). Analysis of the use of virtual reality technologies in history education: a case study. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 62-69
dc.relation.referencesYu, A., & Xu, Z. (2024). On the Application of Digitized Virtual Reality Technology in the Teaching of Landscape Architecture Design. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.339203
dc.relation.referencesYu, D. Z. (2020). Interior Landscape Design and Research based on Virtual Reality Technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1533(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/3/032038.
dc.relation.referencesZhao, Y., Luh, D., Sun, Y., & Sun, F. (2022). A design thinking technique of letting problems solved by self. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2022/3265351.
dc.relation.referencesZhou, Y., Ji, S., Xu, T., & Wang, Z. (2018). Promoting knowledge construction: a model for using virtual reality interaction to enhance learning. Procedia Computer Science, 130(2018), 239-246. 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.035.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordDesign thinking
dc.subject.keywordVirtual reality
dc.subject.keywordPractical activities
dc.subject.keywordCreativity
dc.subject.keywordInnovation
dc.subject.keywordExperiential learning
dc.subject.lembEducación
dc.subject.lembRealidad virtua
dc.subject.lembEscuelas públicas
dc.subject.lembTecnología e informática en educación
dc.subject.proposalPensamiento de diseño
dc.subject.proposalRealidad virtual
dc.subject.proposalActividades prácticas
dc.subject.proposalCreatividad
dc.subject.proposalInnovación
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje experiencial
dc.titleDiálogos entre las experiencias con realidad virtual y las actividades prácticas para favorecer el pensamiento de diseño
dc.typedoctoral thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.localTesis doctoralspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025jimmyrocha.pdf
Tamaño:
6.67 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
295.99 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025cartaderechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
91.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta derechos de autor