Adding figure procedural separation of trials under the Law in Mexico
Fecha
Director
Enlace al recurso
DOI
ORCID
Google Scholar
Cvlac
gruplac
Descripción Dominio:
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramanga
Compartir
Resumen
El presente ensayo surge con motivo de la reforma a la Ley de Amparo en México, publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación, el 2 de abril de 2013, de la cual se abrogó la figura procesal de la acumulación prevista en los artículos 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 y 65, fundamentos que servían de base a contrario sensu a la jurisprudencia que establece la procedencia de la separación de juicio en materia de amparo, la cual se da en los casos en que en una demanda de amparo se reclamen actos emanados de juicios diversos, desvinculados entre sí, y dicha demanda ha sido admitida por el juez de Distrito, o bien, tal circunstancia es advertida durante la tramitación del juicio (hasta antes de la celebración de la audiencia constitucional), con motivo de los informes justificados que rindan la o las autoridades responsables. En tales condiciones resulta beneficiosa la figura procesal de la separación de juicios en materia de amparo y no ir en contra de los criterios de la nueva Ley de Amparo. Se propone la integración de la separación de juicios en Ley de Amparo vigente, con el objetivo de crear certidumbre jurídica, eliminar denegación justicia pronta y expedita a quien acude a solicitar la protección de la Justicia Federal, así como para evitar el dictado de una sentencia incongruente consigo misma y consecuente una problemática en llevar su cumplimiento.
This trial arises in connection with the amendment to the Law of Amparo in Mexico, published in the Official Journal of the Federation on 2 April two thousand thirteen of which the procedural figure of cumulation under Article 57 was repealed , 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 and 65 foundations forming the basis contrary to the jurisprudence of the origin of the separation of judgment on amparo, which occurs in cases that, in a claim for protection act emanating from various trials, unrelated to each other they are claimed, and this demand has been supported by the District Judge or such circumstance is noticed during the conduct of the trial (even before the celebration the constitutional court), the justified because of the reports rendered or the responsible authorities. In such conditions it is beneficial to the procedural figure separation judgments on amparo and not go against the criteria of the new Law on Amparo, the integration of the separation of trials proposed under current law, the objective of creating legal certainty, eliminate denial prompt and expeditious justice who comes to seek the protection of the federal courts, and to avoid issuing a statement inconsistent with it a problematic same and consistent in taking compliance.
This trial arises in connection with the amendment to the Law of Amparo in Mexico, published in the Official Journal of the Federation on 2 April two thousand thirteen of which the procedural figure of cumulation under Article 57 was repealed , 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 and 65 foundations forming the basis contrary to the jurisprudence of the origin of the separation of judgment on amparo, which occurs in cases that, in a claim for protection act emanating from various trials, unrelated to each other they are claimed, and this demand has been supported by the District Judge or such circumstance is noticed during the conduct of the trial (even before the celebration the constitutional court), the justified because of the reports rendered or the responsible authorities. In such conditions it is beneficial to the procedural figure separation judgments on amparo and not go against the criteria of the new Law on Amparo, the integration of the separation of trials proposed under current law, the objective of creating legal certainty, eliminate denial prompt and expeditious justice who comes to seek the protection of the federal courts, and to avoid issuing a statement inconsistent with it a problematic same and consistent in taking compliance.
Abstract
Idioma
Palabras clave
Proceso, separación de juicio, amparo., Process, separation of judgment, amparo.
Citación
Colecciones
Licencia Creative Commons
Derechos de autor 2018 IUSTITIA