Ética de la inteligencia artificial, marcos globales y sus limitaciones

dc.contributor.advisorSoler Galindo, Harrizon Alexander
dc.contributor.authorCuervo Martinez, Duban Fernando
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002351384
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6422-8429
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-17T22:51:35Z
dc.date.available2026-07-17T22:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-10
dc.descriptionActualmente, la gobernanza mundial está experimentando un desafío inusual: la evolución creciente de los Modelos Lingüísticos de Gran Escala (MLGE). Los logros de estos sistemas han avanzado desde una concepción teórica hasta convertirse en factores vitales del ámbito político global e institucional. Actualmente, la mayoría de las empresas más prestigiosas utilizan estas herramientas. La reglamentación relacionada con valores y principios, basada en nuestra legislación existente, resulta difícil de aplicar. Este estudio desarrolla una evaluación crítica de la literatura relacionada con este problema, en conformidad con las directrices PRISMA, para analizar cómo corporaciones como OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google y la empresa de inteligencia Intel controlan su comportamiento interno y cumplen con sus responsabilidades ante las otras empresas en sus plataformas comerciales. La recolección de datos se efectuó utilizando las bases de datos Scopus e IEEE Xplore, utilizando diez diferentes métodos. Después de un análisis inicial de 959 documentos, fueron eliminados 871 de los cuales quedaron 88 trabajos. Según este estudio final, los informes éticos de las empresas difieren drásticamente de su comportamiento real. Al respecto, el Artículo Europeo sobre el Derecho de la Inteligencia Artificial es una regulación que carece de defectos estructurales cuando intenta regular prácticas intrínsecas a la opacidad e impredecibilidad. En cuanto al Sesgo literario, se observa que la información disponible se basa predominantemente en la parte norte del mundo, lo que resulta inquietante porque la tecnología está tomando impulso en América Latina, donde existe gran oportunidad para su implementación. El artículo concluye con recomendaciones prácticas para robustecer la ética corporativa en el desarrollo de LLM, aterrizando el análisis en las realidades regulatorias de Colombia y la región.
dc.description.abstractInternational governance is undergoing an extraordinary shift as large language models (LLMs) transition from simple theoretical concepts to crucial geopolitical and regulatory players. At present, a small group of dominant corporations leads the global rollout, highlighting the shortcomings of current regulatory systems in addressing underlying ethical concerns. Utilizing a systematic literature review under the PRISMA protocol, this study provides a critical examination of how dominant firms OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, and Microsoft manage transparency, internal governance, and corporate accountability within their commercial systems. Data collection spanned the specialized Scopus and IEEE Xplore databases across eight structured search strategies; after screening 959 initial records, a definitive corpus of 69 articles published between 2017 and 2026 was curated. The primary findings expose a profound disconnect between corporate ethical rhetoric and actual operational practices. Moreover, ambitious legal initiatives such as the European Union AI Act exhibit structural blind spots when attempting to oversee models that are inherently opaque and probabilistic. A critical bias also emerges in current literature: the systematic marginalization of the Global South, a deeply concerning trend given the swift, unmonitored integration of these tools across Latin America. This paper concludes with actionable recommendations to anchor corporate ethics firmly within LLM development, tailoring the analysis to the distinct regulatory landscapes of Colombia and the broader region.
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameIngeniero Informáticospa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustatunja.edu.co/investigacion
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationCuervo Martinez, D. F. (2026). Ética de la inteligencia artificial, marcos globales y sus limitaciones [Trabajo de Grado, Universidad Santo Tomás].Repositorio Institucional
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73271
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Tunja
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería de Sistemasspa
dc.publisher.programIngeniería Informáticaspa
dc.relation.references[1] Abueid, A. I., & Jazzar, M. M. (2025). Generative AI and the Ethics of Innovation: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Futures. International Conference on Computer and Applications, ICCA 2025 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCA66035.2025.11430745
dc.relation.references[2] Aguilar Antonio, J. M. (2024). Path and governance model of artificial intelligence (AI) policies in North American countries[Trayectoria y modelo de gobernanza de las políticas de inteligencia artificial (IA) de los países de América del Norte]. Justicia (Barranquilla), 29(45). https://doi.org/10.17081/just.29.45.7162
dc.relation.references[3] Ahi, K., & Valizadeh, S. (2025). Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies. 2025 Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Conference, SVCC 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/SVCC65277.2025.11133642
dc.relation.references[4] Ahmad, A., Vallès, Y., & Idaghdour, Y. (2026). Bias in AI systems: integrating formal and socio-technical approaches. Frontiers in Big Data, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2025.1686452
dc.relation.references[5] Alaswad, S., Kalganova, T., & Awad, W. (2025). Trustworthiness of Legal Considerations for the Use of LLMs in Education. 2025 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA68193.2025.11498739
dc.relation.references[6] Albaroudi, E., Mansouri, T., Hatamleh, M., & Alameer, A. (2026). HitHire: The future of ethical, fair, and sustainable AI recruitment - A governance framework. Array, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100592
dc.relation.references[7] Al-Billeh, T., Hmaidan, R., Al-Hammouri, A., & al Makhmari, M. (2024a). The Risks of Using Artificial Intelligence on Privacy and Human Rights: Unifying Global Standards. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(2), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v31i2.23480
dc.relation.references[8] Ali, E., McOwen, B. K., Ashraf, A., & Kim, D. (2025). Navigating the AI Ethics Frontier: A Cross-national Comparison of AI Policy Documents for Developing Responsible AI Workforce. ASEE Annual Confe
dc.relation.references[9] Al-Kaswan, A., & Izadi, M. (2023). The (ab)use of Open Source Code to Train Large Language Models. Proceedings - 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Natural Language-Based Software Engineering, NLBSE 2023, 9-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/NLBSE59153.2023.00008
dc.relation.references[10] Alyami, N. M., Badawood, S., Alomari, K. M., Al-Ababneh, H. A., al Adwan, M. N., Khader, J. A., & Zawaideh, F. H. (2026). ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF DIGITAL MARKETING, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 8(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv8i2p6
dc.relation.references[11] Anand, S., Gopinath, A., & Periyasami, K. (2026). Evaluating Bias Detection and Mitigation Approaches Across Classical and Large Language Models. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3669650
dc.relation.references[12] Baldassarre, M. T., Caivano, D., Fernández Nieto, B., & Ragone, A. (2025). Ethics-Driven Incentives: Supporting Government Policies for Responsible Artificial Intelligence Innovation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40(4), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2025.3583222
dc.relation.references[13] Bang, J., Lee, B. T., & Park, P. (2023). Examination of Ethical Principles for LLM-Based Recommendations in Conversational AI. 2023 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service, PlatCon 2023 - Proceedings, 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1109/PlatCon60102.2023.10255221
dc.relation.references[14] Bawamohiddin, A. B., & Arshad, N. I. (2025). Contextualized Hybrid Model for AI Ethics Governance in Malaysia’s TVET Sector. Proceedings of 2025 IEEE International Conference on Data and Software Engineering, ICoDSE 2025, 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSE68111.2025.11351672
dc.relation.references[15] Beg, M. H. R., & Mehndiratta, V. (2024a). The Ethics of Generative AI: Analyzing ChatGPT’s Impact on Bias, Fairness, Privacy, and Accountability. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Innovative Computing, Intelligent Communication and Smart Electrical Systems, ICSES 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSES63760.2024.10910483
dc.relation.references[16] Benraouane, S. A. (2024). AI Management System Certification According to the ISO/IEC 42001 Standard: How to Audit, Certify, and Build Responsible AI Systems. In AI Management System Certification According to the ISO/IEC 42001 Standard: How to Audit, Certify, and Build Responsible AI Systems. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003463979
dc.relation.references[17] Berengueres, J. (2024). How to Regulate Large Language Models for Responsible AI. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5(2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3403681
dc.relation.references[18] Bhardwaj, N., Bhardwaj, A., & Garg, L. (2025). Controlling Bias in Generative AI: Techniques for Fair and Equitable Data Generation in Socially Sensitive Applications. 3rd International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Communication Systems, ICICACS 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICACS65178.2025.10967861
dc.relation.references[19] Boutsikaris, L., & Polykalas, S. (2025). Ethical Analysis of Large Language Models: A Comparison of GPT, DeepSeek, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, and Qwen. International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS65609.2025.11269621
dc.relation.references[20] Buchicchio, E., Angelis, A. de, Moschitta, A., Santoni, F., Marco, L. S., & Carbone, P. (2024). Design, Validation, and Risk Assessment of LLM-Based Generative AI Systems Operating in the Legal Sector. ISSE 2024 - 10th IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE63315.2024.10741134
dc.relation.references[21] Bunzel, N. (2025). Compliance Made Practical: Translating the EU AI Act into Implementable Security Actions. Proceedings - 2025 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Responsible AI Engineering, RAIE 2025, 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAIE66699.2025.00016
dc.relation.references[22] Choudhary, T. (2025). Political Bias in Large Language Models: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4, Perplexity, Google Gemini, and Claude. IEEE Access, 13, 11341-11379. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3523764
dc.relation.references[23] Coen Collins, A. (2026). Garbage in, garbage out? How the monster of AI art reflects human fault, bias, and capitalism in contemporary culture. AI and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02799-5
dc.relation.references[24] Ferrara, E. (2023). Should ChatGPT be biased? Challenges and risks of bias in large language models. First Monday, 28(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i11.13346
dc.relation.references[25] Ferreira, A. H., Trevisan, A. C., Baptista, C. M., Ramos-Antón, R., Comin, Á. A., Carvalho, H. F., Vendrell, S., & Sá, V. O. (2026). Meta-Identity and Algorithmic Mediation on Digital Platforms: A Comparative Analysis of AI-Human Content Categorization. Societies, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16040132
dc.relation.references[26] Gaurav, Khan, H., Pandey, S., Kumar, B. V., Akram, S. V., & Pal, P. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings - 2024 3rd International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning, ICSADL 2024, 164-168. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSADL61749.2024.00033
dc.relation.references[27] Haidemariam, T., & Gran, A. B. (2026). On the problems of training generative AI: towards a hybrid approach combining technical and non-technical alignment strategies. AI and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02445-0
dc.relation.references[28] Jonnala, S., Parida, P. K., & Thomas, N. M. (2025). EU AI Act Underrepresented and Insufficient to Address the Risk and Vulnerabilities of Generative AI. International Journal of Business Analytics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJBAN.388757
dc.relation.references[29] Joshi, H., Hassani, S., Gandhi, D., & Hartman, L. (2025). Approaches to Responsible Governance of GenAI in Organizations. International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS65609.2025.11269657
dc.relation.references[30] Kataria, V., Khan, S. A., & Gupta, S. (2025). Leveraging AI for Governance: Navigating Ethical Challenges and Enhancing Democratic Values in Public Services. 2025 International Conference on Intelligent and Secure Engineering Solutions, CISES 2025, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISES66934.2025.11265150
dc.relation.references[31] Khalifa, M., & Sabry, M. (2024). The Role of AI in Shaping Modern Legal Frameworks: A Political Science Perspective. 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications, DASA 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA63652.2024.10836624
dc.relation.references[32] Kim, S. Y., Lim, J. H., Lee, D. W., Min, S. H., Kim, I. J., Jo, M. il, Shin, J. Y., & Kim, W. G. (2025). Selective LLM Unlearning via SAE-Based Token Importance Score. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/isncc66965.2025.11250473
dc.relation.references[33] Kovari, A., Ghafourian, Y., Hegedus, C., Naim, B. A., Mezei, K., Varga, P., & Tauber, M. (2025). Let’s Have a Chat with the EU AI Act. Proceedings of IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium 2025, NOMS 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS57970.2025.11073655
dc.relation.references[34] Kulothungan, V., & Gupta, D. (2025). Towards Adaptive AI Governance: Comparative Insights from the U.S., EU, and Asia. Proceedings - 2025 IEEE 11th Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud, BigDataSecurity 2025, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataSecurity66063.2025.00018
dc.relation.references[35] Kumar, R., Kumar, H., & Shalini, K. (2025). Detecting and Mitigating Bias in LLMs through Knowledge Graph-Augmented Training. 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, AIDE 2025 - Proceedings, 608-613. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIDE64228.2025.10987418
dc.relation.references[36] Lee, I. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence for Enterprises: Ecosystem, Typology of Applications, and Challenges. IT Professional, 27(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2025.3544261
dc.relation.references[37] Liu, J. Y. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Challenges and Trust Mechanisms. IT Professional, 27(6), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2025.3589384
dc.relation.references[38] Mavani, V. K. (2026). An Autonomous Governance Framework for Generative AI: Real-Time PII Redaction and Compliance in LLM-Driven Data Pipelines. 2026 IEEE 5th International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIC67076.2026.11395823
dc.relation.references[39] McIntyre, J. H. (2026). The Right to Restrict AI Training. Philosophy and Technology, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-01032-x
dc.relation.references[40] Meza, J., Saltos, M. F. L., Campoverde, E. U. V., Cejas, M. C. N., & Castro, V. C. A. (2025). AI Regulation for Ecuador. International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG, (2025), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG65568.2025.11081572
dc.relation.references[41] Mhatre, A. (2023). Detecting the presence of social bias in GPT-3.5 using association tests. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications, ICACTA 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACTA58201.2023.10392776
dc.relation.references[42] Mitsunaga, T. (2023). Heuristic Analysis for Security, Privacy and Bias of Text Generative AI: GhatGPT-3.5 case as of June 2023. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Computing, ICOCO 2023, 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOCO59262.2023.10397858
dc.relation.references[43] Murugesan, G. S., & Viswanathan, S. A. (2024). Enhancing Human-Machine Interaction: A Study on Deployment of LLM and Gen AI Hybrid Models in Responsible Humanoids for Human Assistance. 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT61001.2024.10724819
dc.relation.references[44] Narayan, M., Pasmore, J., Sampaio, E., Raghavan, V., Maity, S., Waters, G., & Howard, A. M. (2025). Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models Through Culturally-Relevant LLMs. ETHICS 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology: Emerging Technologies, Ethics, and Social Justice. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS65148.2025.11098204
dc.relation.references[45] Obeng, C. P., Narasinghe, N. M., Striker, R., & Vazquez, E. A. (2025). Security Framework for Agentic Home AI in Preventive Healthcare: Cyber Threats Worth Noting. 2025 Cyber Awareness and Research Symposium, CARS 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/CARS67163.2025.11337832
dc.relation.references[46] Pawana, I. W. A. J., Purnama, F., Linawati, Kim, Y. J., & You, I. (2025). Generative AI for Cybersecurity: LLM-Driven Attack Dataset Augmentation in Web API Detection. 2025 1st International Conference on Consumer Technology, ICCT-Pacific 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT-Pacific63901.2025.11012893
dc.relation.references[47] Perera, H., Lee, S. U., Liu, Y., Xia, B., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Cairns, J., & Nottage, M. (2026). Achieving Responsible AI through ESG: Insights and Recommendations from Industry Engagement. IEEE Software, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2026.3689573
dc.relation.references[48] Pleskach, M. (2025). Legal Loopholes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Addressing Disinformation and Human Rights Protection - The Need for Further Refinement. Proceedings - International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT, 852-858. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT65614.2025.11185881
dc.relation.references[49] Sachan, S., Miller, T., & Nguyen, M. P. (2025). Responsible LLM Deployment for High-Stake Decisions by Decentralized Technologies and Human-AI Interactions. ICHMS 2025 - 5th IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems: AI and Large Language Models: Transforming Human-Machine Interactions, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS65439.2025.11154208
dc.relation.references[50] Samadhiya, V., Sagar, R., Sinha, M., & Menon, S. (2025). Findings from Building AI Risk Mitigation Platform for Enterprise-Grade Solutions. International Conference on Electrical, Computer, and Energy Technologies, ICECET 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECET63943.2025.11472138
dc.relation.references[51] Sankaran, S. (2025). Enhancing Trust Through Standards: A Comparative Risk-Impact Framework for Aligning ISO AI Standards with Global Ethical and Regulatory Contexts. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences, and Applications, ACDSA 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACDSA65407.2025.11166403
dc.relation.references[52] Saqib, H. M., & Amin, H. (2026). Comparative analysis of AI regulation for fintech cybersecurity and privacy in the European Union and Qatar. Discover Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00736-5
dc.relation.references[53] Sas, M. (2024). Unleashing Generative Non-Player Characters in Video Games: An AI Act Perspective. 2024 IEEE Gaming, Entertainment, and Media Conference, GEM 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM61861.2024.10585442
dc.relation.references[54] Shah, S. B., Thapa, S., Acharya, A., Rauniyar, K., Poudel, S., Jain, S., Masood, A., & Naseem, U. (2025). Navigating the Web of Disinformation and Misinformation: Large Language Models as Double-Edged Swords. IEEE Access, 13, 169262-169282. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3406644
dc.relation.references[55] Shenoy, P., & Saarela, M. (2026). AI Literacy and Governance in Indian Education: Mapping Policy Approaches and Institutional Initiatives. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences, and Applications, ACDSA 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACDSA67686.2026.11467788
dc.relation.references[56] State, G., & Olar, D. (2025). Bias Detection in AI Recruitment. Transparency, Accountability and Empirical Assessment Using Synthetic CVs and Rapid Testing. Proceedings - RoEduNet IEEE International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/RoEduNet68395.2025.11208334
dc.relation.references[57] Tabassum, A., Elmahjub, E., Padela, A. I., Zwitter, A., & Qadir, J. (2025). Generative AI and the Metaverse: A Scoping Review of Ethical and Legal Challenges. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 6, 348-359. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2025.3536082
dc.relation.references[58] Tran, Q., Salg, J., Shpileuskaya, K., Wang, Q., Putzar, L., & Blankenburg, S. (2025). Bridging AI and Regulation: Large Language Models for Documentation Compliance Check. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11229064
dc.relation.references[59] Turaga, V. S. A. I. P., Pahi, T., Tjoa, S., Siami-Namini, S., & Namin, A. S. (2025). CO2 (Co-Compliance Officer): An LLM-Based Ontology-Driven Methodology for Generating Knowledge Graphs and AI Compliance Checking. IEEE Access, 13, 210576-210606. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3639228
dc.relation.references[60] Tuzov, V., & Lin, F. (2024). Two paths of balancing technology and ethics: A comparative study on AI governance in China and Germany. Telecommunications Policy, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102850
dc.relation.references[61] Vagnoni, S., & Palmirani, M. (2025). Detecting Transitional Provisions in EU Legislation with Hybrid AI for Better Regulation. International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG, (2025), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG65568.2025.11081693
dc.relation.references[62] Vanam, L., Kundurthy, O. H., & Ghadiyaram, R. (2025). A Framework for Quantifying Ethical and Regulatory Risks in Big Data Analytics and AI-Assisted Banking Software Development. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/asiancon66527.2025.11280739
dc.relation.references[63] Voria, G., Scala, B., Todisco, L., Venditto, C., Giordano, G., Catolino, G., & Palomba, F. (2026). Fair and square? Evaluating fairness of LLM-generated synthetic datasets. Information and Software Technology, 191, 107980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107980
dc.relation.references64] Xavier, S., Yogarajah, P., Incorvaia, G., & Chaurasia, P. (2025). Towards Responsible AI: Evaluating Large Language Models Across Trustworthy Dimensions. Irish Signals and Systems Conference: Signalling Our Strength, ISSC 2025, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSC67739.2025.11290002
dc.relation.references[65] Yamani, A., Baslyman, M., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Are We Aligned? A Preliminary Investigation of the Alignment of Responsible AI Values between LLMs and Human Judgment. Proceedings - 2025 2nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software, AIware 2025, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIware69974.2025.00022
dc.relation.references[66] Yin, R., & Liu, X. (2025). From Technological Alienation to Value Regression: Ethical Regulation of Algorithmic Bias in the Post-Truth Era. Proceedings - 2025 IEEE 10th International Conference on Smart Cloud, SmartCloud 2025, 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartCloud66068.2025.00008
dc.relation.references[67] Zhu, H., Liang, S., Chen, B., Wang, S. L., Zhang, Z., & Ding, W. (2026). Auditing Partial Dataset Usage in Large Language Models via Fuzzy Membership Aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2026.3665818
dc.relation.references[68] Zhuang, X., & Wu, Y. (2025). Large Language Models in Corporate Investment: An Analysis of ChatGPT’s Transformative Applications, Strategic Impacts, and Future Opportunities. IT Professional, 27(2), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2025.3543555
dc.relation.references[69] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Gluud, C., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
dc.relation.references[70] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.subject.keywordAI ethics frameworks
dc.subject.keywordlarge language models
dc.subject.keywordAI governance
dc.subject.keywordcorporate accountability
dc.subject.keywordPRISMA systematic review
dc.subject.keywordartificial intelligence regulation.
dc.subject.proposalética en inteligencia artificial
dc.subject.proposalmodelos de lenguaje LLM
dc.subject.proposalgobernanza de tecnología
dc.subject.proposalempresas y responsabilidad
dc.subject.proposalrevisión sistemática con PRISMA
dc.subject.proposalleyes de inteligencia artificial
dc.titleÉtica de la inteligencia artificial, marcos globales y sus limitaciones
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026DubanCuervo.pdf
Tamaño:
496.41 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorización estudiante
Tamaño:
970.35 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorización facultad
Tamaño:
410.75 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: