Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga

dc.contributor.advisorRojas, Juliospa
dc.contributor.authorGuayán Perdomo, Oscar Eduardospa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Duadspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T01:10:08Zspa
dc.date.available2020-07-01T01:10:08Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-06-30spa
dc.descriptionEl presente proyecto de investigación parte de la comprensión que la educación debe fomentar espacios de aprendizaje en múltiples entornos, y contribuir con el desarrollo social de las comunidades. Es así como evaluando los índices de cooperación de los actores de la triada Universidad-Empresa-Estado del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga para el fomento de la competitividad regional, se detectan dificultades como: reducidos lazos de confianza, poca sostenibilidad de las redes a través del tiempo, lenguajes dispares entre actores y reducida gestión de aprendizaje, entre otros. Es así, que bajo la propuesta teórica de la sociedad del conocimiento articulado con el aprendizaje (conectado, distribuido y a lo largo de la vida) y la mediación de la innovación; se propone el diseño de un modelo de red social, de aprendizaje e innovación, que promueva la cooperación entre actores Universidad-Empresa-Estado para fomentar la competitividad del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga. A partir de un diseño metodológico mixto (cuantitativo-cualitativo), utilizando entrevistas a los actores más relevantes de la región asociados al tema de la competitividad, encuestas a integrantes de redes regionales y caracterización de la dinámica de interacción utilizando Análisis de Redes Sociales; fue posible generar un modelo con estrategias específicas, estructuradas en componentes asociados a dimensiones propias del trabajo en red. La propuesta se encuentra constituida por cuatro elementos principales: Generales (marco de referencia), las componentes estructurales (desde lo teórico), las componentes integradores y las estrategias operativas (desde lo metodológico). La iniciativa aporta un desarrollo innovador en la búsqueda de pertinencia de escenarios de aprendizaje en la sociedad, proponiendo una red estructurada a la medida de la región y con acciones de alta pertinencia y coherencia con las necesidades y caracterización generada.spa
dc.description.abstractThis research work is part of the current perspective of education that offers new identities to learning when it is enriched by technological influence, wider social connections and innovation, and its relevance for the socio-economic development of a region. For this reason, counting on the fact that learning and innovation are the foundations of the new social and educational theories, the design of a social network model of learning and innovation that promotes cooperation among Universities, Corporations and the State is proposed to promote competitiveness in the Metropolitan Area of Bucaramanga. After evaluating the competitiveness indicators of this region and contrasting cooperation among Universities, Corporations and the State, the reduced number of strategies for generating learning and innovation are evident. Based upon a mixed methodological design (quantitative-qualitative), using interviews with the most relevant actors in the region linked to the issue of competitiveness, surveys to members of regional networks and the characterization of the dynamics of interaction through the analysis of social networks, it was possible to present a social network model with specific and well-defined strategies that will contribute to regional competitiveness generating learning and innovation. The proposal is made up of four main elements: General (frame of reference), structural components (from the theoretical), integrating components and operational strategies (from the methodological). The initiative provides innovative development in the search for relevance of learning scenarios in society, proposing a structured network tailored to the region and with actions of high relevance and coherence with the needs and characterization generated.spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Eduaciónspa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustadistancia.edu.co/?page_id=3956spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationGuayan Perdomo, O. E. (2020) Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Santo Tomás] Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/27563
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programDoctorado en Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta-Valdeleón, W., & Carreño-Manosalva, C. (2013). Modo 3 de producción de conocimiento- Implicaciones para la Universidad de hoy. Revista de La Universidad de La Salle, 61, 67–86.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlag, S. (2008). Collective intelligence in action. Manning Publications Co.spa
dc.relation.referencesARS-CHILE. (2014). Manual Tutorial de UCINET 6. Retrieved from http://www.arschile.cl/ucinet2014/index.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesBalconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2spa
dc.relation.referencesBarabasi, A. (2002). The New Science of Networks (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Perseus Books Group. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033300spa
dc.relation.referencesBereiter, C. (2002). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200773143_Education_and_Mind_in_the_Knowledge_Agespa
dc.relation.referencesBerlanga, A., García-Peñalvo, F., & Sloep. (2010). Towards eLearning 2.0 University. Guest Editorial, Special Issue, 8(3), 199–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.500498spa
dc.relation.referencesBinz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems - Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002spa
dc.relation.referencesBorgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=VjS6NAEACAAJspa
dc.relation.referencesBoschma, R. A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2007). Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy. Industry & Innovation, 14(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253441spa
dc.relation.referencesBroekel, T. (2012). Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach. Industry & Innovation, 19(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650884spa
dc.relation.referencesBroekel, T., & Brachert, M. (2015). The Structure and Evolution of Intersectoral Technological Complementarity in R&D in Germany from 1990 to 2011. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25, 755–785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0415-7spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). Education, Globalization and Economic Development. In A. Bolder, W. R. Heinz, & G. Kutscha (Eds.), Deregulierung der Arbeit --- Pluralisierung der Bildung? (pp. 31–53). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97487-7_3spa
dc.relation.referencesBurbules, N. C. (2014). Los significados de “aprendizaje ubicuo.” Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22, 1–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesCabero-Almenara, J. (2016). Tendencias educativas para el siglo XXI (1st ed.). Madrid: UDIMA.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampos-Freire, F., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). La presencia e impacto de las universidades de los países andinos en las redes sociales digitales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 571–592. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/069/paper/1025_USC/28es.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesCantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesCantner, U., Meder, A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2010). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation, 30(9–10), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2010.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesCarayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2spa
dc.relation.referencesarson, D. A., Carson, D. B., & Hodge, H. (2014). Understanding local innovation systems in peripheral tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.868030spa
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda, L., & Gutiérrez, I. (2010). Redes sociales y otros tejidos online para conectar personas. Aprendizaje Con Redes Sociales. Tejidos Educativos Para Los Nuevos Entornos, 17–39.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, M. (2000a). Internet y la sociedad red. In Conferencia de Presentación del Programa de Doctorado sobre la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Vol. 7, pp. 1–13).spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, M. (2000b). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408spa
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2009). Innovación abierta: nuevos imperativos para la creación y el aprovechamiento de la tecnología. Plataforma editorial.spa
dc.relation.referencesClark, L. (2006). Manual para el mapeo de redes como una herramienta de diagnóstico. Retrieved from http://revista-redes.rediris.es/webredes/textos/Mapeo_redes_LC06.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCobo, C., & Pardo, H. (2007). Planeta Web 2.0. Inteligencia Colectiva o Medios Fast Food, 27–117.spa
dc.relation.referencesColl, C. (2013). El currículo escolar en el marco de la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 219, 31–36. https://doi.org/1131-995Xspa
dc.relation.referencesColl, C., & Monereo, C. (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual. Aprender y enseñar con las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación. Madrid: Morata.spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Privado de Competitividad. (2019). Índice Departamental de Competitividad. Retrieved from https://idc.compite.com.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesCope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019- Creating Healthy Lives—The Future of Medical Innovation. Ginebra-Suiza. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCsizmadia, Z. (2008). Co-operation and ability for innovation. Relationship network foundations of the regional innovation system. Szociologiai Szemle (Sociological Review), 18(2), 22–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Bono, E., & Zimbalist, E. (1970). Lateral thinking. Penguin London, UK.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Kerckhove, D. (1997). The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality. (Gedisa, Ed.). Taylor & Francis US.spa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento de Hacienda y Economía del Gobierno Vasco. (2017). Ekonomiaz. In Papel de la Universidad en el desarrollo regional (pp. 8–12). San Sebastian. Retrieved from http://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2reveko/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=88&registro=1spa
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, P. (2014). Huila Construyendo Mundo: desarrollo social a través de la apropiación de ciencia y tecnología en el departamento del Huila, Colombia. In Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos. Retrieved from https://www.oei.es/historico/congreso2014/memoriactei/1252.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Innovation systems as patent networks: The Netherlands, India and Nanotech. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.311spa
dc.relation.referencesDoran, J., & Jordan, D. (2016). Cross-sectoral differences in the drivers of innovation. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(5), 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2014-0171spa
dc.relation.referencesDownes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 6.spa
dc.relation.referencesDownes, S. (2017). New models of open and distributed learning. In Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs (pp. 1–22). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrabenstott, M. (2008). Universities, Innovation and Regional Development (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v20-art10-enspa
dc.relation.referencesDriscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society.spa
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6spa
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H. (2018). Chapter 8 : Innovation Governance: From the “Endless Frontier” to the Triple Helix. In Springer (Ed.), Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 291–310). Nottingham.spa
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a29_3ay_3a2000_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-123.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org///dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4spa
dc.relation.referencesFantoni, J. (2016). La ecología de la acción: conflicto y responsabilidad The ecology of the action: conflict and responsibility.spa
dc.relation.referencesFischer, M. M., & Varga, A. (2002). Technological Innovation and Interfirm Cooperation An exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, (10679).spa
dc.relation.referencesFlores, R. L., Belaud, J.-P., Le Lann, J.-M., & Negny, S. (2015). Using the Collective Intelligence for inventive problem solving: A contribution for Open Computer Aided Innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9340–9352.spa
dc.relation.referencesFritsch, M. (2001). Co-operation in Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 35(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400124434spa
dc.relation.referencesFritsch, M., & Graf, H. (2011). How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00364.xspa
dc.relation.referencesFromhold-Eisebith, M., & Werker, C. (2013). Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: A geographical perspective. Annals of Regional Science, 51(3), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0559-zspa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía de León, G. (2009). El concepto de competitividad sistémica. Revista de La Universidad de Sonora, 25, 29–31.spa
dc.relation.referencesGergen, K. (1996). Realidades y relaciones. Aproximaciones a la construcción social. Barcelona: Paidos.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoddard, J. (2018). Chapter 11- The Civic University and the City. In Springer (Ed.), Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 355–373). Nottingham.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Sánchez, R., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2011). Innovación abierta: Un modelo preliminar desde la gestión del conocimiento. Intangible Capital, 7(1), 82–115.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., Souto-Seijo, A., & Blanco, E. (2018). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la Era Digital: desafíos para la Educación Superior.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraca, P., & Camarinha, L. (2016). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems. Literature review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesGros, B., & Maina, M. (2015). The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuan, J. C., Zuo, K. R., Chen, K. H., & Yam, R. C. M. (2016). Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure? Research Policy, 45(4), 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.01.003spa
dc.relation.referencesGuan, J., Zhang, J., & Yan, Y. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.007spa
dc.relation.referencesHadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments.spa
dc.relation.referencesHanneman, R. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales.spa
dc.relation.referencesHansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: cross-border collaboration in the Øresund Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.781306spa
dc.relation.referencesHansen, T. (2015). Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120spa
dc.relation.referencesHernandez-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza-Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación - Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana. Retrieved from https://www.ebooks7-24.com:443/?il=6443spa
dc.relation.referencesHervas-Oliver, J.-L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.933489spa
dc.relation.referencesHervas-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., de-Miguel, B., & Hidalgo, A. (2012). The role of a firm’s absorptive capacity and the technology transfer process in clusters: How effective are technology centres in low-tech clusters? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(7–8), 523–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710256spa
dc.relation.referencesHu, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A semantic model for academic social network analysis. In 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014) (pp. 310–313). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921602spa
dc.relation.referencesHuggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2010). Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(5), 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903171350spa
dc.relation.referencesInkinen, T., & Kaakinen, I. (2016). Economic Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Technology Clusters: Lessons from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1090196spa
dc.relation.referencesInkinen, T., & Suorsa, K. (2009). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems. High-technology enterprise survey from Northern Finland. Nordia Geographical Publications, 38(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903491556spa
dc.relation.referencesInstance, D. (2012). DEBATES DE EDUCACIÓN: DAVID ISTANCE “CREAR ENTORNOS INNOVADORES PARA MEJORAR EL APRENDIZAJE.” Retrieved from https://www.macba.cat/es/educacion-debates-david-istancespa
dc.relation.referencesJames, R, Mcinnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities : ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. (Richard James, Ed.). Melbourne : Centre for the Study of Higher Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesKop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesKozma, R. (2012). Las TIC y la transformación de la educación en la economía del conocimiento. Retrieved from http://www.debats.cat/es/debates/las-tic-y-la-transformacion-de-la-educacion-en-la-economia-del-conocimientospa
dc.relation.referencesKustepeli, Y., Gulcan, Y., & Akgungor, S. (2012). The innovativeness of the Turkish textile industry within similar knowledge bases across different regional innovation systems. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412448088spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, P. C., & Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26spa
dc.relation.referencesLevy, P. (2010). Cibercultura. (Anthropos, Ed.). Barcelona: Editora 34.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez, M., Marulanda, C., & Castaño, J. (2015). Competir y colaborar con conocimiento e innovación. (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ed.). Manizales.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoveless, A., & Williamson, B. (2017). Nuevas indentidades de aprendizaje en la era digital. Creatividad. Educación. Tecnología. Sociedad. Ministerio de Educación.spa
dc.relation.referencesLundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). Sistemas nacionales de innovación y aprendizaje institucional. Comercio Exterior, 44(8), 695–704.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaggioni, M. A., Uberti, T. E., & Usai, S. (2011). Treating patents as relational data: Knowledge transfers and spillovers across Italian provinces. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.528928spa
dc.relation.referencesMakkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626spa
dc.relation.referencesMalerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(4), 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.005spa
dc.relation.referencesMarek, D., & Blažek, J. (2016). The challenge of breaking the academia–business firewall in Czechia: comparing the role of differentiated knowledge bases in collaborative R&D projects. European Planning Studies, 24(4), 809–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1121204spa
dc.relation.referencesMartin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411427326spa
dc.relation.referencesMiguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2015). Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Research Policy, 44(4), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016spa
dc.relation.referencesMinguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012a). Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross‐sectoral interactions reflected on the web. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716spa
dc.relation.referencesMinguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012b). Mapping the network structure of science parks. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716spa
dc.relation.referencesMisión Internacional de Sabios 2019. (2019). Colombia hacia una sociedad del conocimiento. Retrieved from https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/paginas/191205_informe_mision_de_sabios_2019_vpreliminar.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMisseri, V. (2013). Local Ecosystem versus Digital Ecosystem: A Different Purpose Than Multiple Innovation Platforms (pp. 688–694). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.117spa
dc.relation.referencesMorales-Gualdrón, S. T., & Giraldo-Gómez, A. S. (2015). Análisis de una innovación social: el Comité Universidad Empresa Estado del Departamento de Antioquia (Colombia) y su funcionamiento como mecanismo de interacción. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 25(56), 141–152. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24329636spa
dc.relation.referencesMuscio, A. (2013). University-industry linkages: What are the determinants of distance in collaborations? Papers in Regional Science, 92(4), 715–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00442.xspa
dc.relation.referencesNiu, X. S. (2014). International scientific collaboration between Australia and China: A mixed-methodology for investigating the social processes and its implications for national innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.014spa
dc.relation.referencesÓ Huallacháin, B., & Kane, K. (2015). Regional Aspects of Collaborative Invention Across National Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2227–2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.942602spa
dc.relation.referencesOerlemans, L., & Meeus, M. (2005). Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320896spa
dc.relation.referencesOnrubia, J. (2016). ¿Por qué aprender en red? El debate sobre las finalidades de la educación en la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. In B. Gros-Salvat & C. Suárez-Guerrero (Eds.) (pp. 13–36). España.spa
dc.relation.referencesPadilla‐Meléndez, A., & Garrido‐Moreno, A. (2013). Open innovation in universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552551211239474spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, S. O. (2003). Economic spaces in the Pacific Rim: A paradigm shift and new dynamics. Papers in Regional Science, 82(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101100200144spa
dc.relation.referencesPerkmann, M. (2006). Extraregional linkages and the territorial embeddedness of multinational branch plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol region in northeast Italy. Economic Geography, 82(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00324.xspa
dc.relation.referencesPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. (Oxford, Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlechero, M., & Chaminade, C. (2016). The role of regional sectoral specialisation on the geography of innovation networks: a comparison between firms located in regions in developed and emerging economies. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2016.077106spa
dc.relation.referencesPrats, L., Guia, J., & Molina, F. X. (2008). How tourism destinations evolve: The Notion of Tourism Local Innovation System. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.24spa
dc.relation.referencesQuatraro, F. (2009). Diffusion of regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from Italian patent data. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1333–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802195162spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintella, R. H., da Silva Monteiro de Freitas, E. J., Ventura, A. C., Santos, M. A., de Melo, D. R. A., da Silva Motta, G., & Jucá, S. (2012). Scientific knowledge networks in peripheral regions and local innovation systems: The case of chemistry in the state of Bahia. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 85–103.spa
dc.relation.referencesR., J. M., M., M. J., & A., S. (2009). El análisis de redes en el estudio de la colaboración científica. Redes. Revista Hispana Para El Análisis de Redes Sociales, 17, 39–47. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93112847002spa
dc.relation.referencesRadosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Martínez, J. B., & Rodríguez-Fernandez, E. (2017). Ecologías de Aprendizaje: Educación Expandida en.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, E. F., & Martínez, R. A. (2015). Aprendizajes invisibles en contextos de educación expandida. Retos y oportunidades en la sociedad hiperconectada. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 19(2), 1–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubach, S. S. (2013). Collaborative Regional Innovation Initiatives: A Booster for Local Company Innovation Processes? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9270-8spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Corbella, M., & Bautista-Cerro, M. J. (2016). La responsabilidad social en la universidad española. Teoría de La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28(1), 159–188.spa
dc.relation.referencesRusso, M., & Rossi, F. (2009). Cooperation Networks and Innovation. Evaluation, 15(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097872spa
dc.relation.referencesSalavisa, I., Sousa, C., & Fontes, M. (2012). Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties. Technovation, 32(6), 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003spa
dc.relation.referencesSaleh, M.-H. A. M., & Misseri, V. (2015). Investigating the similarity between collaboration systems and digital ecosystems (p. 30). Piscataway: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709535508spa
dc.relation.referencesSalinas, J. (2000). El aprendizaje colaborativo con los nuevo canales de comunicación (pp. 199–228).spa
dc.relation.referencesSaltzberg, S., & Polyson, S. (1995). Distributed learning on the world wide web. Syllabus, 9(1), 10–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchøtt, T., & Jensen, K. W. (2016). Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.006spa
dc.relation.referencesSchüßler, E., Decker, C., & Lerch, F. (2013). Networks of Clusters: A Governance Perspective. Industry and Innovation, 20(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.805929spa
dc.relation.referencesShapiro, M. A., So, M., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511158spa
dc.relation.referencesSiemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 15.spa
dc.relation.referencesSiemens, G., & Downes, S. (2008). Connectivism & connective knowledge. Universidad de Manitoba.spa
dc.relation.referencesSohn, D. W., Kim, H., & Lee, J. H. (2009). Policy-driven university - Industry linkages and regional innovation networks in Korea. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(4), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0890bspa
dc.relation.referencesSolleiro, J. L., Luna, R. C. K., Herrera, A., & Montiel, M. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy in Mexico, Spain, Chile and Korea. In PICMET ’07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 392–400). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349353spa
dc.relation.referencesStantchev, V., Prieto-González, L., & Tamm, G. (2015). Cloud computing service for knowledge assessment and studies recommendation in crowdsourcing and collaborative learning environments based on social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.11.092spa
dc.relation.referencesSteinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesSternberg, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.xspa
dc.relation.referencesStiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. C. N. (2015). Creating a learning society. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1089748spa
dc.relation.referencesStuck, J., Broekel, T., & Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1074984spa
dc.relation.referencesSu, H. N., Lee, P. C., & Chan, T. Y. (2010). Bibliometric assessments of network formations by keyword-based vector space model. PICMET ’10 - Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings - Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 230–238.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuárez-Guerrero, C., & Gros-Salvat, B. (2013). Aprender en red. De la interacción a la colaboración (Primera ed, Vol. 52). Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/24389/spa
dc.relation.referencesTakeda, Y., Kajikawa, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2008). An analysis of geographical agglomeration and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster: A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan. Technovation, 28(8), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2007.12.006spa
dc.relation.referencesTeixeira, A. A. C., Santos, P., & Delgado, A. (2013). International regional patterns of R & D networks involving low tech SMEs. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2), 1–20.spa
dc.relation.referencesTödtling, F., Grillitsch, M., & Höglinger, C. (2012). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation in Austrian ICT Companies-How Does Geography Matter? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.694678spa
dc.relation.referencesTsai, H.-T. T., Huang, S.-Z. Z., & Wang, C.-H. H. (2015). Cross-border R&D alliance networks: An empirical study of the umbilical cord blood banking industry in emerging markets. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2015.1120502spa
dc.relation.referencesValkering, P., Beumer, C., de Kraker, J., & Ruelle, C. (2013). An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.09.010spa
dc.relation.referencesvan der Valk, T., & Gijsbers, G. (2010). The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies. Innovation-management Policy & Practice - INNOV-MANAG POLICY PRACT (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.5spa
dc.relation.referencesVelázquez, A., & Aguilar, N. (2005). Manual introductorio al análisis de redes sociales. México.spa
dc.relation.referencesvon Proff, S., & Brenner, T. (2014). The dynamics of inter-regional collaboration: An analysis of co-patenting. Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0573-1spa
dc.relation.referencesWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1999). Social Network Analysis- Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2008). The Internet in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2015). Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. Ginebra-Suiza. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesYan, J. (2011). A study on consulting network of university research team. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC) (pp. 1871–1874). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6011215spa
dc.relation.referencesYokura, Y., Matsubara, H., & Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: A social network analysis of joint research projects in Japan. Area, 45(4), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12055spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, S. L., Cacciolatti, L., Lee, S. H., & Song, W. (2015). Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.014spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.subject.keywordSocial Networkspa
dc.subject.keywordInnovationspa
dc.subject.keywordLearningspa
dc.subject.keywordCollaborative Learningspa
dc.subject.keywordCollective Intelligencespa
dc.subject.keywordCompetitivenessspa
dc.subject.lembRedes socialesspa
dc.subject.lembMétodo de casosspa
dc.subject.lembEstrategias de aprendizajespa
dc.subject.lembDidácticaspa
dc.subject.proposalRed Socialspa
dc.subject.proposalAprendizajespa
dc.subject.proposalInnovaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje Colaborativospa
dc.subject.proposalInteligencia Colectivaspa
dc.subject.proposalCompetitividadspa
dc.titleDiseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramangaspa
dc.typedoctoral thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.localTesis doctoralspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2020GuayanOscar.pdf
Tamaño:
2.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2020GuayanOscar1.pdf
Tamaño:
446.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2020GuayanOscar2.pdf
Tamaño:
271.33 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: