Evaluación de la microfiltracion microbiana de Enterococcus faecalis y Cándida albicans en dientes tratados endodonticamente obturados con Bioroot y Ahplus

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorLancheros Bonilla, Soniaspa
dc.contributor.advisorJiménez, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Marín, Angélica Maríaspa
dc.contributor.authorPlazas Ortegón, Lina Maríaspa
dc.contributor.authorMurcia Moreno, Andrea Yinethspa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-13T21:46:52Zspa
dc.date.available2020-07-13T21:46:52Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-06-06spa
dc.descriptionObjetivo: Evaluar la microfiltración microbiana del cemento Bioroot en comparación con el AHPlus. Materiales y Método: Se utilizaron 30 dientes uniradiculares los cuales fueron instrumentados con limas Wave One Gold, irrigando con hipoclorito de sodio al 5,25% entre cada instrumento. Se realizó irrigación final con hipoclorito de sodio y EDTA al 17%. Los dientes fueron divididos aleatoriamente en dos grupos experimentales Grupo1 Bioroot condensación lateral y Grupo 2 AH Plus condensación lateral. Los dientes fueron esterilizados a vapor, se realizó montaje de doble cámara y se inoculó con suspensión microbiana de 1x10 5 con de E Faecalis y 1x10 5 C albicans, cada 24 horas durante 60 días. Resultados: Los resultados de este estudio muestran que los valores extremos son aproximadamente cero, lo que confirma que no existen diferencias significativas entre los dos sellantes, dando como resultado un nivel de confianza del 99% con un valor p- valor de 0.7053. Conclusiones: no hay diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la microfiltración de los dos cementos estudiados.spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the microbial microfiltration of Bioroot cement compared to AHPlus. Materials and Method: 34 uniradicular teeth were used, each one were instrumented with Wave One Gold files, irrigating with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite between each instrument. Final irrigation was performed with sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups Group1 Bioroot lateral condensation and Group 2 AH Plus lateral condensation. The teeth were steam sterilized, a double chamber assembly was made and inoculated with 1x105 microbial suspension with E Faecalis and 1x105 C albicans, every 24 hours for 60 days. Results: The results of this study shows that the extreme values are approximately zero, confirming that there are no significant differences between the two sealants, resulting in a 99% confidence level with a p-value of 0.7053. Conclusions: there is no statistically significant difference in the microfiltration of the two cements studied.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Endodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationDíaz Marín, A. M., Plazas Ortegón, L. M. y Murcia Moreno, A Y. (2020). Evaluación de la microfiltracion microbiana de Enterococcus faecalis y Cándida albicans en dientes tratados endodonticamente obturados con Bioroot y Ahplus [Tesis de posgrado]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/28017
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Endodonciaspa
dc.relation.referencesINGLE JI. Root canal obturation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1956;53(1):47–55.spa
dc.relation.referencesSridhar LP, Moses J, Rangeeth BN, Sivakumar S. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(9):ZC01–4.spa
dc.relation.referencesRangel Cobos Octavio Manuel, Luna Lara Carlos Alberto, Tellez Garza Alejandro LFMT. Obturación del sistema de conductos radiculares. Una revisión de la literatura. Revista ADM. 2018;269–72.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva-Herzog Daniel, García Lazcano Claudia Cecilia, Rodríguez Arreguín Mario Hugo GAAM. Invasión por Candida albicans y Enterococcus faecalis en dentina humana. Revista Nacional de Odontológica Año 3- Vol VIII. 2011;spa
dc.relation.referencesAktemur Türker S, Uzunoğlu E, Purali N. Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12(4):294–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesMamootil K, Messer HH. Penetration of dentinal tubules by endodontic sealer cements in extracted teeth and in vivo. Int Endod J. 2007;40(11):873–81.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero F, Berástegui E, Aspiazu K. Porosity analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate Fillapex and BioRoot cements for use in endodontics using microcomputed tomography. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(5):491–4.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlsubait S, Albader S, Alajlan N, Alkhunaini N, Niazy A, Almahdy A. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis. Odontology [Internet]. 2019;107(4):513–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00425-7spa
dc.relation.referencesTorabinejad Mahmoud WR. Endodoncia. Principios y práctica 4th Edition. In: Elsevier 2009. p. 496.spa
dc.relation.referencesde Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, Marquis V, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, et al. Treatment Outcome in Endodontics: The Toronto Study-Phases 3 and 4: Orthograde Retreatment. J Endod. 2008;34(2):131–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesNair PNR. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Vol. 15, Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2004. 348–381 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBernal-Treviño A, González-Amaro AM, Méndez González V, Pozos-Guillen A. Frecuencia de Candida en conductos radiculares de dientes con infección endodóntica primaria y persistente. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2018;35(2):78–82.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollado-González M, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Lozano A, Forner L, et al. Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells. Int Endod J. 2017;50(9):875–84.spa
dc.relation.referencesCamps J, Jeanneau C, El Ayachi I, Laurent P, About I. Bioactivity of a Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Cement (BioRoot RCS): Interactions with Human Periodontal Ligament Cells In Vitro. J Endod [Internet]. 2015;41(9):1469–73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.011spa
dc.relation.referencesKakoura F, Pantelidou O. Retreatability of root canals filled with Gutta percha and a novel bioceramic sealer: A scanning electron microscopy study. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(6):632–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesXuereb M, Vella P, Damidot D, Sammut C V, Camilleri J. In situ assessment of the setting of tricalcium silicate-based sealers using a dentin pressure model. J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):111–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesLanglais RP, Rodriguez IE, Maselle I. Principles of radiographic selection and interpretation. Dent Clin North Am. 1994 Jan;38(1):1–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaicedo R, von Fraunhofer JA. The properties of endodontic sealer cements. J Endod. 1988 Nov;14(11):527–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesFigueiredo J, Braga C, Kappel E, Charão E, Mildner M CR. Comparative analysis of the quality of root fillings using taper 0.04 and 0.06 master cones. Brazilian Endod J. 2001;5(1–2):23–31.spa
dc.relation.referencesKazemi RB, Safavi KE, Spångberg LS. Dimensional changes of endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 Dec;76(6):766–71.spa
dc.relation.referencesBranstetter J, von Fraunhofer JA. The physical properties and sealing action of endodontic sealer cements: a review of the literature. J Endod. 1982 Jul;8(7):312–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesJainaen A, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. The effect of a resin-based sealer cement on micropunch shear strength of dentin. J Endod. 2008 Oct;34(10):1215–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiletić I, Jukić S, Anić I, Željezić D, Garaj-Vrhovac V, Osmak M. Examination of cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of AH26 and AH Plus sealers. Int Endod J. 2003;36(5):330–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeyhausen G, Heil J, Reifferscheid G, Waldmann P, Geurtsen W. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of the epoxy resin-based root canal sealer AH plus. J Endod. 1999 Feb;25(2):109–13.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchweikl H, Schmalz G, Stimmelmayr H, Bey B. Mutagenicity of AH26 in an in vitro mammalian cell mutation assay. J Endod. 1995 Aug;21(8):407–10spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Ávila G, García Aranda RL, Perea Mejía LM. Comparación in vitro de la actividad antimicrobiana de AhPlus, RSA y Ledermix contra Enterococcus faecalis . Vol. 17, Revista odontológica mexicana . scielomx ; 2013. p. 156–60spa
dc.relation.referencesArikatla SK, Chalasani U, Mandava J, Yelisela RK. Interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of bioceramic endodontic sealers. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(4):373–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuneser MB, Akman M, Kolcu İB, Eldeniz AU. Fracture resistance of roots obturated with a novel calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer (BioRoot RCS). J Adhes Sci Technol [Internet]. 2016 Nov 16;30(22):2420–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1184403spa
dc.relation.referencesViapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, Wesselink PR, Tanomaru Filho M, Camilleri J. Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J. 2016;49(8):774–82.spa
dc.relation.referencesUrban K, Neuhaus J, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Solubility and pH Value of 3 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Long-term Investigation. J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1736–40.spa
dc.relation.referencesVouzara T, Dimosiari G, Koulaouzidou EA, Economides N. Cytotoxicity of a New Calcium Silicate Endodontic Sealer. J Endod. 2018 May;44(5):849–52.spa
dc.relation.referencesKebudi Benezra M, Schembri Wismayer P, Camilleri J. Interfacial Characteristics and Cytocompatibility of Hydraulic Sealer Cements. J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):1007–17.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhalil I, Naaman A, Camilleri J. Properties of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers. J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1529–35.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrüllage R-K, Urban K, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Material Properties of a Tricalcium Silicate-containing, a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-containing, and an Epoxy Resin-based Root Canal Sealer. J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1784–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesMente J, Ferk S, Dreyhaupt J, Deckert A, Legner M, Staehle HJ. Assessment of different dyes used in leakage studies. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):331–8spa
dc.relation.referencesDOW PR, INGLE JI. Isotope determination of root canal failure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955 Oct;8(10):1100–4.spa
dc.relation.referencesWu M, Wesselink paul. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J. 1993 Feb 1;26:37–43.spa
dc.relation.referencesAminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Bolhari B, Shokouhinejad N, Ghabraei S, Assadian H, et al. Coronal microleakage in root canals obturated with lateral compaction, warm vertical compaction and guttaflow system. Iran Endod J. 2010;5(2):83–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimpawat S, Amornchat C, Trisuwan WR. Bacterial coronal leakage after obturation with three root canal sealers. J Endod. 2001;27(1):36–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1990;16(12):566–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonardes Cortés H, Abarca Reveco J, Castro Hurtado P. Microfiltración Apical de Dos Cementos Selladores: Un Estudio in vitro. Int J Odontostomatol. 2014;8(3):393–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesStuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32(2):93–8spa
dc.relation.referencesParadella TC, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AOC. Enterococcus faecalis: considerações clínicas e microbiológicas. Rev odontol UNESP. 2007;36(2):163–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Haddad A, Aziz ZACA. Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesSundqvist G. Associations between microbial species in dental root canal infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1992;7(5):257–62.spa
dc.relation.referencesPourhajibagher M, Ghorbanzadeh R, Parker S, Chiniforush N, Bahador A. The evaluation of cultivable microbiota profile in patients with secondary endodontic infection before and after photo-activated disinfection. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther [Internet]. 2017;18:198–203. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.02.013spa
dc.relation.referencesLeonard JE, Gutmann JL, Guo IY. Apical and coronal seal of roots obturated with a dentine bonding agent and resin. Int Endod J. 1996;29(2):76–83.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeríssimo DM, do Vale MS. Methodologies for assessment of apical and coronal leakage of endodontic filling materials: a critical review. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(3):93–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesYanpiset K, Banomyong D, Chotvorrarak K, Srisatjaluk RL. Bacterial leakage and micro-computed tomography evaluation in round-shaped canals obturated with bioceramic cone and sealer using matched single cone technique. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(3):1–12spa
dc.relation.referencesBouillaguet S, Shaw L, Barthelemy J, Krejci I, Wataha JC. Long-term sealing ability of Pulp Canal Sealer, AH-Plus, GuttaFlow and Epiphany. Int Endod J. 2008;41(3):219–26.spa
dc.relation.referencesMobarak A, Moussa S, Zaazou A, Abdelfattah H. Comparison of Bacterial Coronal Leakage Between Different Obturation Materials (an in Vitro Study). Alexandria Dent J. 2015;40(1):1–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesSurya Raghavendra S, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in Endodontics – a Review. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(0):128–37.spa
dc.relation.referencesReszka P, Nowicka A, Lipski M, Dura W, Droździk A, Woźniak K. A Comparative Chemical Study of Calcium Silicate-Containing and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, Watson TF. Dentin-cement interfacial interaction: Calcium silicates and polyalkenoates. J Dent Res. 2012;91(5):454–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesDu T, Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Cao Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of long-term exposure to endodontic disinfecting solutions on young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod [Internet]. 2014;40(4):509–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.026spa
dc.relation.referencesChivatxaranukul P, Dashper SG, Messer HH. Dentinal tubule invasion and adherence by Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2008;41(10):873–82.spa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subject.keywordMicrofiltrationspa
dc.subject.keywordEndodonticsspa
dc.subject.keywordEndodontic sealerspa
dc.subject.keywordBioRootspa
dc.subject.keywordAH plusspa
dc.subject.lembEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.lembAdhesivos dentalesspa
dc.subject.lembCanal radicular - Tratamientospa
dc.subject.lembCultivos bacteriológicosspa
dc.subject.proposalMicrofiltraciónspa
dc.subject.proposalEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.proposalCemento obturadorspa
dc.subject.proposalBiorootspa
dc.subject.proposalAH plusspa
dc.titleEvaluación de la microfiltracion microbiana de Enterococcus faecalis y Cándida albicans en dientes tratados endodonticamente obturados con Bioroot y Ahplusspa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
2020DiazAngelica,MurciaAndrea,PlazasLina.pdf
Tamaño:
671.75 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo principal
Descargar
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2020DiazAngelica, MurciaAndrea, PlazasLina1.pdf
Tamaño:
147.15 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de la facultad
Descargar
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2020DiazAngelica,MurciaAndrea,PlazasLina2.pdf
Tamaño:
561.6 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Autorizacipon de publicación
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Especialización Endodoncia