Analyzing the Incidence of the CTL Approach of English regarding the Writing and Speaking Skills in 11th grade and A1 level students in Colombia

dc.contributor.advisorRodríguez, Sandra Milena
dc.contributor.authorGarzón Vargas, Laura Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorHiguera Carvajal, Ingrid Johanna
dc.contributor.authorMorelo Vargas, Daniela Patricia
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002206706
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002206609
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=bNVo-L0AAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-412X
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-4951-3846
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-3492-4252
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-26T19:36:04Z
dc.date.available2024-06-26T19:36:04Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionEste documento representa una investigación acción que exploró la implementación de una intervención pedagógica utilizando CTL para mejorar las habilidades de producción de los estudiantes de 11º grado de una escuela pública y estudiantes del centro de idiomas A1. El enfoque principal de este enfoque incluye la vinculación con escenarios prácticos, el aprendizaje proactivo, la introspección, el trabajo en equipo, la evaluación genuina y la mejora continua. Estos fomentan un entorno educativo comprometido, significativo y centrado en el estudiante que anima a los alumnos a comprender su propio proceso de aprendizaje y les permite relacionarlo con circunstancias del mundo real. Este estudio de investigación-acción cualitativa se llevó a cabo en dos contextos diferentes: una escuela y un centro de idiomas. Los datos se recopilaron a través de notas de campo (observaciones), cuestionarios y artefactos hablados y escritos pre/postintervención. Los resultados indicaron que la implementación de CTL mejora las habilidades de producción de los estudiantes al mostrar un buen desempeño y lograr los criterios establecidos para las tareas propuestas. Además, se encontró que CTL fomenta el proceso de aprendizaje de los estudiantes al aumentar su participación en las clases de inglés y promover el trabajo colaborativo; esto crea un ambiente seguro donde los estudiantes están ansiosos por aprender y participar activamente.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper represents action research that explored the implementation of a pedagogical intervention using CTL to improve students’ production skills in 11th grade students of a public school and A1 language center students. The primary focus of this approach includes linking to practical scenarios, proactive learning, introspection, teamwork, genuine evaluation, and ongoing enhancement. These foster an engaged, significant, and learner-focused educational setting that encourages students to comprehend their own learning journey and enables them to relate it to real-world circumstances. This qualitative action research study was carried out in two different contexts: a school and a language center. Data were gathered through field notes (observations), questionnaires and pre- / post-intervention spoken-written artifacts. The results indicated that the implementation of CTL improves students’ production skills by showing good performance and achievement of criteria set for the tasks proposed. Moreover, it was found that CTL fosters students' learning process as it increases their engagement in the English lessons and promotes collaborative work; this creates a safe environment where students are eager to learn and actively participate.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ambientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationGarzón Vargas, L., Higuera Carvajal, I. y Morelo Vargas, D. (2024). Analyzing the Incidence of the CTL Approach of English regarding the Writing and Speaking Skills in 11th grade and A1 level students in Colombia. [Trabajo de Ma estría, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/55934
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría Ambientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Khawaldeh, N. N., & Ahmed Mustafa Ahmed, A. (2018). Communicative Language Teaching in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Context: Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions. Arab World English Journal, 9(3), 36-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesBayat, N. (2014). The effect of the process writing approach on writing success and anxiety. Theory and Educational Sciences in Practice.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerns, R. G. & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. Ohio: Career and Technical Education National Dissemination Center.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesÇetin, Y. (2011). Reliability of raters for writing assessment: analytic-holistic, analytic-analytic, holistic–holistic. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 471–486. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mkusbed/issue/19554/208359spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sagespa
dc.relation.referencesDerakhshan, A., Khalili, A., & Beheshti, F. (2016). Developing EFL Learner’s Speaking Ability, Accuracy and Fluency. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n2p177spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Smedt, F., Merchie, E., Barendse, M., Rosseel, Y., De Naeghel, J., & Van Keer, H. (2018). Cognitive and motivational challenges in writing: studying the relation with writing performance across students’ gender and achievement level. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.193spa
dc.relation.referencesDewi, N. K. C., & Suarni, I. M. (2021). The Effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) on EFL Writing Ability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(4), 43-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z., & Dewaele, J. M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesEkholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2018). Clarifying an elusive construct: A systematic review of writing attitudes. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017- 9423-5spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesFadillah, A., Dewi, N., Ridho, D., Majid, A., & Prastiwi, M. (2017) The effect of application of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model-based on lesson study with mind mapping media to assess student learning outcomes on chemestry on colloids systems. International Journal of Science and Applied Science. Conference Series, 1(2), 101.spa
dc.relation.referencesFredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516061spa
dc.relation.referencesGadd, M., Parr, J., Robertson, J., Carran, L. Ali, Z., Gendall, L., and Watson K. (2019). Portrait of the student as a young writer: Some student survey findings about attitudes to writing and self-efficacy as writers. Literacy, 53 (4), 226-235.spa
dc.relation.referencesGee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbons, P. (2009). English Learners, Academic Literacy, and Thinking: Learning in the Challenge Zone. Heinemann.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, S. (2018). A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406spa
dc.relation.referencesGuapacha Chamorro, M. E., & Chaves Varón, O. (2023). EFL writing studies in Colombia between 1990 and 2020: A qualitative research synthesis. PROFILE Issues in 68 Teachers Professional Development, 25(1), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n1.94798spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, E. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It's Here to Stay. Corwin Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, L., Allen, B., Dunn, P., & Brooker, L. (2017). Demystifying the rubric: A five-step pedagogy to improve student understanding and utilization of marking criteria. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07294 360.2016.1177000spa
dc.relation.referencesKayi, H. (2006). Teaching speaking: Activities to promote speaking in a second language. The internet TESL journal, 12(11), 1-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesKellogg, R. T., & van de Ven, S. J. P. (2020). The psychology of writing: An introduction. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.spa
dc.relation.referencesLightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcFarland, K.P., & Stansell, J.C. (1993). Historical perspectives. In L. Patterson, C.M. Santa, C.G. Short, & K. Smith (Eds.) Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillippi J, and Lauderdale J. (2018) A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research 28(3): 381-388. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102spa
dc.relation.referencesRilling, S., & Ortmeier-Hooper, C. (2015). The Social Dimension of Second Language Writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (Vol. 3, pp. 137-152). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoyani, E., Sulistyarini, N., & Tukimun, T. (2023). Teaching Speaking strategies. Amerta Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuban, T. S. (2021). Teaching speaking: activities to promote speaking skills in EFL classrooms. Lectio: Journal of Language and Language Teaching, 1(1), 41-50spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwandt, Thomas A. (2015) The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.spa
dc.relation.referencesUline, C. L., Wolsey, T. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Lin, C. H. (2009). The walls still speak: The stories occupants tell. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 400-426.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillis, D. and Willis, J. R. (2011) Doing task-based teaching. 5. print. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press (Oxford handbooks for language teachers).spa
dc.relation.referencesWulandari et al., (2020). Developing English-speaking Material Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) for Junior High School Students. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210825.081spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, R., & Ferguson, F. (2020). Real-world writers: A handbook for teaching writing with 7-11 year olds (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429268960spa
dc.relation.referencesZarandi, S. Z. A., & Rahbar, B. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability through Intervening Scaffolding Strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2191.https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.177spa
dc.relation.youtubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP8ciGTb1YIspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordContextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)spa
dc.subject.keywordSpeaking and Writing Skillsspa
dc.subject.keywordImprovementspa
dc.subject.keywordEngagementspa
dc.subject.lembAmbientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.subject.lembIntervención pedagógicaspa
dc.subject.lembEvaluación auténticaspa
dc.subject.lembProceso de aprendizajespa
dc.subject.proposalEnseñanza y Aprendizaje Contextualizado (CTL)spa
dc.subject.proposalHabilidades de Expresión Oral y Escritaspa
dc.subject.proposalMejoramientospa
dc.subject.proposalCompromisospa
dc.titleAnalyzing the Incidence of the CTL Approach of English regarding the Writing and Speaking Skills in 11th grade and A1 level students in Colombiaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesis de maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024cartadederechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
168.43 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
26.62 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024lauragarzon.pdf
Tamaño:
827.28 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: