Diplomacia digital, un nuevo modelo de acción exterior: Estudio de caso Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorZamora Escobar, Jairo Camilo
dc.contributor.authorMancera Pérez, Paula Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Melo, Diego Oswaldo
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomasspa
dc.contributor.corporatenameManceraspa
dc.contributor.cvlachttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001526877spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZDw_wlIAAAAJ&hl=esspa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-8311spa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Villavicenciospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T21:25:01Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T21:25:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-13
dc.descriptionLa diplomacia digital nace como herramienta de política exterior transformando la manera tradicional que hasta entonces conocíamos. En cuestión de años y como un nuevo modelo, nuevas herramientas digitales han sido puntos clave para aportar aún más el desarrollo de las comunicaciones, la política y las actividades económicas, con una capacidad de mediación entre individuos y estados. El presente artículo, analiza la diplomacia digital desde su eclosión y evolución ligada a las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC) y redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter). Elegimos como caso de estudio el Estado Colombiano, puesto que es un país que posee antecedentes suficientes al proporcionar lo necesario para introducirse en el mundo de las TIC y las redes sociales, al garantizar mayor avance en las relaciones exteriores entre estados. Para esto se diseñó un cuestionario dirigido al GIT Prensa y Comunicación Corporativa del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores (Cancillería) colombiana como herramienta de investigación.spa
dc.description.abstractDigital diplomacy was born as a foreign policy tool transforming the traditional way that we knew until then. In a matter of years and as a new model, new digital tools have been key points to further contribute to the development of communications, politics and economic activities, with a capacity for mediation between individuals and states. This article analyzes digital diplomacy since its emergence and evolution linked to information and communication technologies (ICT) and social networks (Facebook, Twitter). We chose the Colombian State as a case study, since it is a country that has sufficient antecedents to provide what is necessary to enter the world of ICT and social networks, by guaranteeing greater progress in foreign relations between states. For this, a questionnaire was designed for the GIT Press and Corporate Communication of the Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Chancellery) as a research tool.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameProfesional en Negocios Internacionalesspa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacionspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationMancera Pérez, P. & García Melo, D. (2021). Diplomacia digital, un nuevo modelo de acción exterior: Estudio de caso Colombia. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositoriospa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/33859
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Negocios Internacionalesspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Negocios Internacionalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAdesina, O. (2016). Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy. African Journal for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues, 19, 169-189. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1297175spa
dc.relation.referencesAdesina, O. S. (2017). Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy. Cogent Social Sciences, 3, 1297175. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1297175spa
dc.relation.referencesAdler-Nissen, R., & Drieschova, A. (2019). Track-change diplomacy: Technology, affordances, and the practice of international negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 63(3), 531-545. doi:10.1093/isq/sqz030spa
dc.relation.referencesAguirre, D., & Erlandsen, M. (2018). Digital public diplomacy in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.149spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmejo, J. d. J. (2009). Diplomacia digital y su vigencia en las relaciones internacionales. Norteamérica, 4(2), 187-196. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5265533spa
dc.relation.referencesArsenault, A. (2009). Toward a new public diplomacy: Redirecting U.S. foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan, 135-154. doi:10.1057/9780230100855spa
dc.relation.referencesBarder, A. D. (2016). Barbed wire. In M. B. Salter (Ed.), Making things international 2 (pp. 32-48) University of Minnesota Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b9s0d9.6spa
dc.relation.referencesBátora, J. (2009). Foreign ministries and the information revolution: Going virtual? Brill Nijhoff. https://brill.com/view/title/14859spa
dc.relation.referencesBjola, C. (2015). Introduction: Making sense of digital diplomacy. Taylor & Francis Group, , 15-24. doi:10.4324/9781315730844-8spa
dc.relation.referencesBjola, C. (2018). Diplomacia digital 2.0: Tendencias y resistencias. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327800781_Diplomacia_digital_20_tendencias_y_resistenciasspa
dc.relation.referencesBjola, C., Cassidy, J., & Manor, I. (2019). Public diplomacy in the digital age. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 83. doi:10.1163/1871191X-14011032spa
dc.relation.referencesBjola, C., & Jiang, L. (2015). Social media and public diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU, us and japan in china. (pp. 71-88). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286268365_Social_media_and_public_diplomacy_A_comparative_analysis_of_the_digital_diplomatic_strategies_of_the_EU_Us_and_Japan_in_Chinaspa
dc.relation.referencesBloodgood, E., & Masson, T. (2018). Digital technology and the changing face of diplomacy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325430409_Digital_technology_and_the_changing_face_of_diplomacyspa
dc.relation.referencesBorda G, S. (1997). Medios de comunicación y política exterior en Colombia. Colombia Internacional, 28-37. doi:10.7440/colombiaint38.1997.03. https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/abs/10.7440/colombiaint38.1997.03spa
dc.relation.referencesCardoso, A. (2017). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior. https://www.academia.edu/34411772/Digital_Diplomacy_Theory_and_Practicespa
dc.relation.referencesChristodoulides, N. (2005). The internet & diplomacy. American Diplomacy. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1080/23311886.2017.1297175?scroll=topspa
dc.relation.referencesCiolek, M. (2010). “Understanding social media’s contribution to public diplomacy” how embassy Jakarta’s Facebook outreach illuminates the limitations and potential for the state department’s use of social media. University of Southern California Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School. http://stage.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/legacy/pdfs/mciolek_socialmedia_indonesia.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCLINTON, H. (2011). “Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices and Challenges in a Networked World”. http://blogs.state.gov/stories/2011/02/15/internet-rights-and-wrongs-choices-and-challenges-networked-world#sthash.4ImCv2o3.dpufspa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, R. (1998). Putting diplomatic studies on the map. Diplomatic Studies Program Newsletter. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-0-230-51104-0%2F1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCopeland, D. (2011). DIPLOMACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE. Essays in honour of Ambassador Allan gotlieb by Janice gross stein<br>. International Journal, 67(1), 255-260. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23265978spa
dc.relation.referencesCortes Dussan, A. (2017). Digital media in the recent dynamic of Colombia's public diplomacy and national security in the Uribe and Santos' governments. Estudios De Derecho, 74(164), 89-124. doi:10.17533/udea.esde.v74n164a05spa
dc.relation.referencesCull, N. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, doi:10.1177/0002716207311952spa
dc.relation.referencesCull, N. J. (2011). WikiLeaks, public diplomacy 2.0 and the state of digital public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7(1) doi:10.1057/pb.2011.2spa
dc.relation.referencesCancillería de Colombia. (2018). Principios y lineamientos. https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/principios-y-lineamientos-la-politica-exterior-colombianaspa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento de Asesoría Legal, OAS. (1964). Convención de Viena sobre relaciones diplomáticas, 18 de abril de 1961. http://www.oas.org/legal/spanish/documentos/ConvencionViena.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesDNP. (2014). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo: Todos por un nuevo país Tomo 2. En D. N. Planeación. Imprenta Nacional de Colombia. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/PND/PND%202014-2018%20Tomo%202%20internet.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDuncombe, C. (2018). Twitter and the challenges of digital diplomacy. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 38(2), 91-100. doi:10.1353/sais.2018.0019spa
dc.relation.referencesFaye, M. (2000). Developing national information and communication infrastructure (NICI) policies and plans in Africa. Paper presented at the Nigeria NICI workshop. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319456818_Information_and_Communication_Technologies_ICT_A_Tool_for_Good_Governancespa
dc.relation.referencesFraga, M., & Rodríguez-Moñino, R. (1977). Los fundamentos de la diplomacia. Barcelona, España: Planeta, Barcelona. http://792544833.paginasdondepodran.xyz/spa
dc.relation.referencesHanson, F. (2010). A digital DFAT: Joining the 21st century. Lowy Institute for International Policy, 1-16. http://lowyinstitute.richmedia-server.com/sound/A_digital_DFAT.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHanson, F. (2012, October 25). Baked in and wired: eDiplomacy@State, Foreign Policy Paper Series no 30 (pp. 1–41), Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005spa
dc.relation.referencesHocking, B., Melissen, J., Riordan, S., & Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for diplomacy: Integrative diplomacy in the 21st century. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations, 1-85. https://www.clingendael.org/publication/futures-diplomacy-integrative-diplomacy-21st-centuryspa
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, M. (2013). What is e-Diplomacy? 7th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Bordeaux. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/13be8e0e-c92e-4a16-a33d-7206a57a4fa6.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesIpu, C. J. (2013). E-diplomacy in East Africa: Case study of Kenya. University of Nairobi: Doctoral dissertation. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/60009/Ipu_E-diplomacy%20in%20East%20Africa%3A%20case%20study%20of%20Kenya.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yspa
dc.relation.referencesIttefaq, M. (2019). Digital diplomacy via social networks: A cross-national analysis of governmental usage of facebook and twitter for digital engagement.18, 49-69. doi:10.17477/jcea.2019.18.1.049spa
dc.relation.referencesLEAD and Mercator Capacity Building Center for Leadership & Advocacy. (2016). Networked foreign policy for the 21st century. How leaders can drive change in the digital age., 1-52. https://sanjanah.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/4500902.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLüfkens, M. (2017,). Twiplomacy study 2017. https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2017/spa
dc.relation.referencesManfredi, J. L. (2014). Taxonomy of digital diplomacy in the international affairs agenda. Historia Y Comunicación Social, 19, 341-354. doi:10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.47299spa
dc.relation.referencesManor, I. (2016a). Are we there yet: Have MFAs realized the potential of digital diplomacy? (BRILL ACADEMIC PUB Ed.) BRILL. doi:10.1163/9789004319790spa
dc.relation.referencesManor, I. (2016b). What is digital diplomacy, and how is it practiced around the world? A brief introduction. Diplomatist Magazine 2016 Annual Edition, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310952363_What_is_Digital_Diplomacy_and_how_is_it_Practiced_around_the_World_A_brief_introductionspa
dc.relation.referencesManor, I. (2017a). Digital diplomacy in 2016: Summary of Israel’s first digital diplomacy conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316191349_Digital_Diplomacy_in_2016_Summary_of_Israel's_First_Digital_Diplomacy_Conferencespa
dc.relation.referencesManor, I. (2017b). Palestine in Hebrew: Overcoming the limitations of traditional diplomacy. Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior, 163-183. https://www.academia.edu/37275526/Palestine_in_Hebrew_Overcoming_the_Limitations_of_Traditional_Diplomacyspa
dc.relation.referencesManor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). America’s selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesMelissen, J., & Keulenaar, E. (2017). The case for critical digital diplomacy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314243976_The_Case_for_Critical_Digital_Diplomacy:spa
dc.relation.referencesPastrana, E. (enero de 2012). Estrategias de la política exterior de Colombia en su calidad de potencia secundaria en Sudamérica. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316997963_Estrategias_de_la_politica_exterior_de_Colombia_en_su_calidad_de_potencia_secundaria_en_Sudamericaspa
dc.relation.referencesPamment, J. (2016). Digital diplomacy as transmedia engagement: Aligning theories of participatory culture with international advocacy campaigns. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2046-2062. doi:10.1177/1461444815577792spa
dc.relation.referencesPayne, G., Sevin, E., & Bruya, S. (2011). Grassroots 2.0: Public diplomacy in the digital age. Comunicação Pública, (vol.6 n10), 45-70. https://www.academia.edu/14354201/Grassroots_2.0_Public_Diplomacy_in_the_Digital_Agespa
dc.relation.referencesPouliot, V., & Cornut, J. (2015). Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda: Cooperation and Conflict, doi:10.1177/0010836715574913spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, A. (2015). Diplomacia digital, ¿adaptación al mundo digital o nuevo modelo de diplomacia? Opción: Revista De Ciencias Humanas Y Sociales, (Extra 2), 915-937. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5834789spa
dc.relation.referencesRashica, V. (2018). The benefits and risks of digital diplomacy. SEEU Review, 13, 75-89. doi:10.2478/seeur-2018-0008spa
dc.relation.referencesRobertson, J. (2018). Organizational culture and public diplomacy in the digital sphere: The case of South Korea. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(3), 672-682. doi:10.1002/app5.256spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarzenbach, B. (2015). Twitter and diplomacy: How social networking is changing foreign policy. http://thediplomaticenvoy.com/2015/10/12/ twitter-and-diplomacy-how-social-media-revolutionizedour- interaction-with-foreign-policy/spa
dc.relation.referencesSerna, R. (2012). Notoriedad de la comunicación institucional a través de la diplomacia. Icono 14, ISSN 1697-8293, Nº. 16, 2010 (Ejemplar Dedicado a: Nuevos Tiempos Para La Comunicación Empresarial E Institucional), 8 doi:10.7195/ri14.v8i2.259spa
dc.relation.referencesSevin, E., & Ingenhoff, D. (2018). Public diplomacy on social media: Analyzing networks and content. International Journal of Communication. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8726spa
dc.relation.referencesSevin, E., & Manor, I. (2019). From embassy ties to twitter links: Comparing offline and online diplomatic networks. Policy &amp; Internet, 11(3), 324. https://www.academia.edu/38396336/From_Embassy_Ties_to_Twitter_Links_Comparing_Offline_and_Online_Diplomatic_Networksspa
dc.relation.referencesSimunjak, M., & Caliandro, A. (2019). Twiplomacy in the age of Donald Trump: Is the diplomatic code changing? Information Society, 35(1), 13-25. doi:10.1080/01972243.2018.1542646spa
dc.relation.referencesSpry, D. (2018). Facebook diplomacy: A data-driven, user-focused approach to Facebook use by diplomatic missions: Media International Australia, 62-80. doi:10.1177/1329878X18783029spa
dc.relation.referencesStatista (2018a). Redes sociales con mayor número de usuarios activos a nivel mundial en enero de 2021. https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/600712/ranking-mundial-de-redes-sociales-por-numero-de-usuarios/spa
dc.relation.referencesTodhunter, J. P. (2013). The domestic fruits of diplomacy: Mediation and presidential approval (article).18, 195-217. doi:10.1163/15718069-12341253spa
dc.relation.referencesTwiplomacy. (2018, Jul 10). Twiplomacy study 2018. https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2018/spa
dc.relation.referencesTwiplomacy. (November 12, 2020). Why are U.S. Presidents not following other world leaders on social media?. https://twiplomacy.com/blog/tag/twiplomacy/spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld leaders on facebook. (2020, abril 23). World Leaders on Facebook 2020. https://twiplomacy.com/blog/world-leaders-on-facebook-2020spa
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordInternational relationsspa
dc.subject.keywordDigital diplomacyspa
dc.subject.keywordInformation And Communication Technologiesspa
dc.subject.keywordSocial Networksspa
dc.subject.keywordMinistry of Foreign Affairsspa
dc.subject.keywordChancelleryspa
dc.subject.keywordColombiaspa
dc.subject.lembRelaciones Internacionalesspa
dc.subject.proposalRelaciones internacionalesspa
dc.subject.proposalDiplomacia digitalspa
dc.subject.proposalTecnologías de la información y la comunicaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalRedes socialesspa
dc.subject.proposalMinisterio de relaciones exterioresspa
dc.subject.proposalCancilleríaspa
dc.subject.proposalColombiaspa
dc.titleDiplomacia digital, un nuevo modelo de acción exterior: Estudio de caso Colombiaspa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
2021paulamancera.pdf
Tamaño:
2.05 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de Grado
Descargar
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2021paulamancera1.pdf
Tamaño:
68.51 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Autorización Facultad
Descargar
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2021paulamancera2.pdf
Tamaño:
296.24 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Derechos de Autor
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Pregrado Negocios Internacionales