Enhancing critical thinking for english learning by writing using digital literacy and virtual learning resources

dc.contributor.advisorYepes Landinez, Yury Andrea
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Gómez, Luz Irene
dc.contributor.authorValero Gómez, Yefer Yaith
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Rodríguez, Lizeth Marcela
dc.contributor.authorValle Reina, Julián Andrés
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001463208
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001733349
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002373160
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001823685
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002370064
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=szUZfYMAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-2383
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-3548-7580
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-5245-108X
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-1688-8397
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-9269-2285
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-18T20:51:36Z
dc.date.available2025-12-18T20:51:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-15
dc.descriptionEl presente estudio investiga el fortalecimiento del desarrollo del pensamiento crítico a través de la escritura en inglés en un entorno de alfabetización digital y uso de recursos virtuales. El estudio cualitativo empleó un estudio de caso, entrevistas semiestructuradas y observaciones de aula para analizar cómo los estudiantes de primer semestre universitario de la Universidad Santo Tomás, del programa de Licenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras, percibieron y reflexionaron sobre su experiencia con el aprendizaje mediado por la tecnología. Los hallazgos sugieren que factores como los desafíos tecnológicos, una pedagogía centrada en la gramática y en preguntas cerradas, así como emociones como la frustración y el aislamiento, limitan la capacidad de los estudiantes para desarrollar un pensamiento reflexivo y analítico. Sin embargo, los estudiantes también destacan que la alfabetización digital les brinda un poder equitativo para superar estos desafíos mediante una mejor evaluación de la información, el desarrollo de su aprendizaje autónomo y la preparación para pruebas internacionales como el TOEFL o el IELTS. En última instancia, el estudio argumenta que la integración significativa de herramientas digitales en la práctica pedagógica, junto con una formación docente adecuada, el uso de herramientas apropiadas, el acceso equitativo y una mayor conciencia de las condiciones emocionales de los estudiantes, fomenta que todos los estudiantes transiten entornos de aprendizaje del inglés de manera más crítica, inclusiva y participativa. La relevancia de este trabajo contribuye a repensar los modelos educativos en contextos bilingües y virtuales. En conclusión, la alfabetización digital crítica se perfila como una competencia capaz de transformar la educación superior de manera significativa tanto para docentes como para estudiantes.
dc.description.abstractAbstract The present study investigates the enhancing of critical thinking development through English writing in a digital literacy and virtual resource setting. The qualitative study employed a case study, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations to observe how first-year university students at Santo Tomas University from the Bachelor's degree in Foreign Languages program perceived and considered their experience with technology-enhanced learning. The findings suggest that factors such as technology challenges, pedagogy with a grammar focus and closed questions, and emotions such as frustration and isolation hold back students' capacity to develop reflective and analytical thinking. However, students also highlight that digital literacy gives them equitable power to overcome these challenges through improved evaluation of their information, developing their autonomous learning, and preparing them for international testing such as TOEFL or IELTS. Ultimately, the study argues how meaningfully embedding digital tools into pedagogical practice, with appropriate teacher training, appropriate tools, equitable access, and becoming more aware of students’ emotional conditions, encourages every student to navigate more critically, inclusively, and participatory English language learning settings. The significance of this work assists our rethinking of educational models in bilingual and virtual educational contexts. In conclusion, the relevance of critical digital literacies could be a competency that shapes higher education in a meaningful way for teachers and students.
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ambientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAlonso Gomez, I. A., Valero Gómez, Y.Y., Gonzalez Rodriguez, L. M. y Valle Reina, J. A. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking for english learning by writing using digital literacy and virtual learning resources. [Trabajo de Maestría, Universidad Santo Tomás] Repositorio Institucional
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/70817
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría Ambientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, J. C., Díaz-Ramírez, M., & Gómez-Sáenz, C. (2025). From Brick-and-Mortar to Cyberlearning: The evolution and impact of distance learning on ELT in Colombia. HOW, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.19183/how.32.2.856
dc.relation.referencesAkyuz, H., & Samsa, M. (2020). Mental flexibility and inquiry skills in educational settings. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 123–135.
dc.relation.referencesBazaluk, O., Tavlui, O., Hatsko, L., Ugorchuk, V., & Kucherenko, D. (2024). An interactive learning environment as a source of critical thinking skills for engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124000149
dc.relation.referencesBelova, T., Ivanova, M., & Petrova, L. (2020). Real-time interactive practice and feedback in language learning environments. Language Learning Journal, 38(2), 200–215.
dc.relation.referencesBravo Zambrano, J. (2023). The Promotion of Self-Regulated Learning in English Instruction at Colombian Universities (Doctoral dissertation)
dc.relation.referencesCarretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union.
dc.relation.referencesDe Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats. Little, Brown and Company.
dc.relation.referencesDeHartchuck, L. (2024). Reading beyond recognition: Comprehension and critical thinking in standardized tests. International Journal of Language Assessment, 12(1), 45–60.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, I. J., Salinas, C. I., & Medina, L. C. (2023). Shaping Better Futures: Inside-Out Colombian English Language Teachers’ gaps and practices. PROFILE Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 25(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n2.95969
dc.relation.referencesDel Toro, Z. P., Mercado, A. C., Manjarres, M. P., Noriega, L. F., Watts, W., & Sanchez, M. L. (2019). Challenges in English teaching and learning in Colombia. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 57. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p57
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, A. A., Steacy, L. M., Siegelman, N., Rigobon, V. M., Kearns, D. M., Rueckl, J. G., & Compton, D. L. (2022). Unpacking the unique relationship between set for variability and word reading development: Examining word- and child-level predictors of performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1242–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000696
dc.relation.referencesGilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación. (2023). Informe nacional de resultados del examen Saber Pro y Saber TyT – 2021 (ISBN: 978-958-11-1064-3). https://www.icfes.gov.co/wp- content/uploads/2024/11/Informe_Nacional_Resultados_Superior_2021.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2020, March 16). Estrategia “Aprender Digital: Contenidos para Todos” reúne contenidos digitales educativos en una misma plataforma para los niveles escolares en todas las áreas del conocimiento. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-printer-394002.html
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, J. a. Á., & Gómez, J. F. (2023). The impact of E-learning and ICT on English language learning: COVID-19 context. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2941
dc.relation.referencesNussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001
dc.relation.referencesLucero-Babativa, E., Samacá-Bohórquez, Y., & Castañeda-Trujillo, J. E. (2025). Navigating English Language teacher education in the Colombian context: between foreign influence and local tensions and transformations. HOW, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.19183/how.32.2.863
dc.relation.referencesMarin, M. A., & De La Pava, L. (2017). Conceptions of Critical Thinking from University EFL Teachers. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p78
dc.relation.referencesPaul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
dc.relation.referencesPérez, L., & Martínez, J. (2020). Competent argumentation skills in university settings. Higher Education Journal, 50(1), 75–90.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, M. (2023). Argumentative reading and writing challenges in higher education. Academic Writing Review, 22(3), 150–165.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, S. M. (2022). Características y condiciones particulares en los ambientes bilingües de aprendizaje: La interrelación de la educación bilingüe con factores educativos, sociales, políticos y económicos (Módulo 1). Oficina de Educación Virtual, Universidad Santo Tomás.
dc.relation.referencesRutledge, P. (2024, April 23). Are tweens too young for digital literacy? Dr. Pam: Living With Media. https://www.pamelarutledge.com/are-tweens-too-young-for-digital-literacy/
dc.relation.referencesRyan, J., & Poole, D. (2019). Mixing traditional and technological tools for meaningful learning experiences. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 100–115.
dc.relation.referencesSalazar, P. (2021). Interactive online tools for improving writing skills. Journal of Language Education, 40(3), 250–265.
dc.relation.referencesSeidman, I. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
dc.relation.referencesSoto, J. H. B. (2024). Technology-Enhanced Approaches for teaching English to law students: Innovations and best practices. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(5), 4567–4592. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i5.13914
dc.relation.referencesSeshan, R., Sharma, R., & Thomas, A. (2021). Narrative inquiry in virtual learning: Exploring student experiences in rural education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.2.04
dc.relation.referencesTech & Learning. (2025). 8 core digital literacy skills for 2030. https://www.techlearning.com/news/8-core-digital-literacy-skills-for-2030
dc.relation.referencesTorres, A., & Muñoz, L. (2021). Bilingual communication challenges in higher education. Journal of Bilingual Education, 18(2), 180–195.
dc.relation.referencesWinthrop, R., Ziegler, L., Handa, R., & Fakoya, F. (2019). How playful learning can help leapfrog progress in education. Center for Universal Education at Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/wp- content/uploads/2019/04/how_playful_learning_can_help_leapfrog_progress_in_education.pdf
dc.relation.referencesYepes Landinez, Y. A. (2025). Beneficios de la Neurodidáctica Interdisciplinaria para el alemán como LE en Colombia. Congreso Caribeño De Investigación Educativa, 5, 703–708. Recuperado a partir de https://congresos.isfodosu.edu.do/index.php/ccie/article/view/1754
dc.relation.referencesYüzgeç, A. Y., & Sütçü, S. S. (2020). The relationship between critical thinking dispositions of prospective English language teachers and their levels of new media literacy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1952–1967. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1280950.pdf
dc.relation.referencesZahroh, F., Kusumawati, I., & Hidayatullah, R. S. (2025). The impact of digital literacy programs on students' critical thinking skills. International Journal of Education. https://www.injoe.org/index.php/INJOE/article/download/252/259
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordCritical thinking
dc.subject.keyworddigital literacy
dc.subject.keywordEnglish learning
dc.subject.keywordvirtual education
dc.subject.keywordqualitative research
dc.subject.keywordpedagogical innovation
dc.subject.lembAmbientes Bilingües de Aprendizaje
dc.subject.lembPensamiento crítico
dc.subject.lembInglés -- Enseñanza
dc.subject.lembPedagogía crítica
dc.subject.proposalpensamiento crítico
dc.subject.proposalalfabetización digital
dc.subject.proposalaprendizaje del inglés
dc.subject.proposaleducación virtual
dc.subject.proposalinvestigación cualitativa
dc.subject.proposalinnovación pedagógica
dc.titleEnhancing critical thinking for english learning by writing using digital literacy and virtual learning resources
dc.typemaster thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesis de maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025,marcelarodriguezjulianvalleirenealonsoyefervalero.pdf
Tamaño:
1.09 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
665.92 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
15-12-2025cartaderechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
238.84 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta derechos de autor