“Relación entre el ancho de la tabla oclusal de los molares y premolares con el biotipo facial en los pacientes de la Clínica de Ortodoncia de la Universidad Santo Tomás de Bucaramanga”

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorAlvarez Rojas, Carlos Miguel
dc.contributor.authorGil León, Katerine María
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Dávila, Francy Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorRojas Mantilla, Paula Andrea
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-19T20:36:40Z
dc.date.available2026-08-19T20:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2026-08-19
dc.descriptionEl presente proyecto de investigación tuvo como objetivo principal determinar la relación entre el ancho de la tabla oclusal de molares y premolares con el biotipo facial en pacientes atendidos en la Clínica de Ortodoncia de la Universidad Santo Tomás de Bucaramanga durante el periodo 2024-2026. Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico de corte transversal con una muestra de 93 pacientes. El ancho de la tabla oclusal de molares y premolares fue evaluado mediante modelos de estudio, mientras que el biotipo facial y clasificación esquelética se determinaron mediante el análisis Vert de Ricketts y el análisis de Wits, respectivamente. Para el análisis estadístico se usó el software Stata versión 17, utilizando análisis estadísticos univariados y bivariados con valores de p < 0.05 como estadísticamente significativos. Los resultados evidenciaron una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el ancho de la tabla oclusal de los dientes 25 y 26 y el biotipo facial, mientras que en los demás dientes evaluados no se encontraron diferencias significativas. La clasificación esquelética y la edad no mostraron asociación significativa con el ancho de la tabla oclusal. En contraste, se presentó dimorfismo sexual en los dientes posteriores superiores, con mayores valores del ancho de la tabla oclusal en hombres. Asimismo, se observó una adecuada simetría bilateral entre dientes homólogos, excepto entre los dientes 16 y 26, donde se evidenció una diferencia significativa de pequeña magnitud. El estudio evidencio que las dimensiones de la tabla oclusal presentan un comportamiento estable en la mayoría de dientes evaluados, observándose asociaciones especificas con el biotipofacial y diferencias relacionadas con el sexo en los dientes posteriores superiores.
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this research project was to determine the relationship between the occlusal table width of molars and premolars and facial biotype in patients treated at the Orthodontic Clinic of Santo Tomás University in Bucaramanga during the 2024–2026 period. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on a sample of 93 patients. Occlusal table width was assessed on study casts, whereas facial biotype and skeletal classification were determined using the Ricketts VERT analysis and the Wits appraisal, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata® version 17, with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The results showed a significant association between the occlusal table width of teeth 25 and 26 and facial biotype, whereas no significant differences were found in the remaining teeth evaluated. Skeletal classification and age were not significantly associated with occlusal table width. In contrast, sexual dimorphism was observed in the upper posterior teeth, with males exhibiting greater occlusal table width values. Adequate bilateral symmetry was also observed between homologous teeth, except for teeth 16 and 26, where a small but significant difference was found. The study demonstrated that occlusal table dimensions remained stable in most of the teeth evaluated, with specific associations with facial biotype and sex-related differences observed in the upper posterior teeth.
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Ortodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationGil León, K.M; Rojas Mantilla, P.A; Rodríguez Dávila, F. A. (2026) Relación entre el ancho de la tabla oclusal de los molares y premolares con el biotipo facial en los pacientes de la Clínica de Ortodoncia de la Universidad Santo Tomás de Bucaramanga. [Tesis de posgrado] Universidad Santo Tomás Bucaramanga, Colombia
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73921
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramanga
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Ortodonciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAggarwal, I., Mallik, A., Mittal, S., Bhullar, M., Singla, D., & Goyal, M. (2019). Cephalometric Evaluation of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion in Varying Malocclusions. Dental Journal of Advance Studies, 7(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698357
dc.relation.referencesAguilar-Perez, F. J., Bataller-Mendez, E. B., Colome-Ruiz, G. E., Chuc-Gamboa, M. G., Aguilar-Perez, D. A., & Herrera-Atoche, J. R. (2024). Agreement Between Two Cephalometric Analyses of Facial Growth Direction and Biotype. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 26(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.58334
dc.relation.referencesAlonso, A. A., Albertini, J. S., & Bechelli, A. H. (1999). Oclusión y diagnóstico en rehabilitación oral (1a ed.). Editorial Médica Panamericana.
dc.relation.referencesAndrews, L. F. (1972). The six keys to normal occlusion. American Journal of Orthodontics, 62 (3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90268-0
dc.relation.referencesAnitua, E., Ochoa, L., Larrazabal, N., & Eguía, A. (2026). Maximum bite forces in healthy adults with complete natural dentition: A systematic review. En Journal of Prosthodontics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70157
dc.relation.referencesArboleda-Ariza, N., Schilling, J., Arriola-Guillén, L. E., Ruíz-Mora, G. A., Rodríguez-Cárdenas, Y. A., & Aliaga-Del Castillo, A. (2018). Maxillary transverse dimensions in subjects with and without impacted canines: A comparative cone-beam computed tomography study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 154(4), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.017
dc.relation.referencesAriza Ramírez, M. X. (2018). Cefalometría de Ricketts para la estimación de la inclinación del plano oclusal en pacientes jóvenes con diferentes biotipos faciales atendidos en los centros radiológicos de la ciudad de Huánuco, 2017 [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad de Huánuco]. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huánuco.
dc.relation.referencesArriola-Guillén, L. E., & Flores-Mir, C. (2014). Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 145(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.001
dc.relation.referencesAshok, S., Batra, P., Sharma, K., Raghavan, S., Talwar, A., Srivastava, A., & Duggal, I. (2023). An assessment of masticatory efficiency and occlusal load distribution in adolescent patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with functional jaw orthopedics: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 124(6), 101570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101570
dc.relation.referencesBaba, K., Tsukiyama, Y., & Clark, G. T. (2000). Reliability, validity, and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 83(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70092-8
dc.relation.referencesBaumgaertel, S., Palomo, J. M., Palomo, L., & Hans, M. G. (2009). Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 136(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016
dc.relation.referencesBoushell, L. W., & Sturdevant, J. R. (2018). Clinical significance of dental anatomy, histology, physiology, and occlusion. En Ritter, A. V., Boushell, L. W., & Walter, R. (Eds.). Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry (Seventh Ed). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-47833-5.00001-0
dc.relation.referencesBuschang, P. H. (2006). Masticatory Ability and Performance: The Effects of Mutilated and Maloccluded Dentitions. Seminars in Orthodontics, 12(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2006.01.002
dc.relation.referencesCerny, R., Lwigale, P., Ericsson, R., Meulemans, D., Epperlein, H. H., & Bronner-Fraser, M. (2004). Developmental origins and evolution of jaws: New interpretation of “maxillary” and “mandibular”. Developmental Biology, 276(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.046
dc.relation.referencesCicvaric, O., Grzic, R., Simunovic Erpusina, M., Simonic-Kocijan, S., Bakarcic, D., & Ivancic Jokic, N. (2023). Association of Masticatory Efficiency and Reduced Number of Antagonistic Contacts Due to Extraction, Changing Dentition or Malocclusion in Children. Dentistry Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11030064
dc.relation.referencesClark, J. R., & Evans, R. D. (2001). Functional occlusion: I. A review. Journal of Orthodontics, 28(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/28.1.76
dc.relation.referencesCostea, M. C., Bondor, C. I., Muntean, A., Badea, M. E., Mesaroş, A. Ş., & Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. (2018). Proximity of the roots of posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus in different facial biotypes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 154(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.006
dc.relation.referencesCrăciunescu, E. L., Negruţiu, M.-L., Romînu, M., Novac, A. C., Modiga, C., Caplar, B.-D., & Pop, D.-M. (2023). Dental anatomy and morphology of permanent teeth. En Human Teeth - From Function to Esthetics (pp. 1–24). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110223
dc.relation.referencesDrage, N. (2018). Effective dose of dental CBCT – A meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 44(1), Art. No: 20140197. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140197
dc.relation.referencesFernández, J., & da Silva, O. (2009). Atlas de cefalometría y análisis facial (1ra ed.). Ripiano S.A. Fleming, P. S., Marinho, V., & Johal, A. (2011). Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: A systematic review. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
dc.relation.referencesGraber, L. W., Vanarsdall, R. L., Vig, K. W., & Huang, G. J. (2017). Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques (6th ed.). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesGregoret, J., Tuber, E., Escobar, L., & Matos, A. (2003). Ortodoncia y cirugía ortognática: diagnóstico y planificación (1.a). ESPAXS, S.A.
dc.relation.referencesGül Amuk, N., Karsli, E., & Kurt, G. (2019). Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning. International Orthodontics, 17(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.014
dc.relation.referencesHaralur, S. B., Majeed, M. I., Chaturvedi, S., Alqahtani, N. M., & Alfarsi, M. (2019). Association between preferred chewing side and dynamic occlusal parameters. Journal of International Medical Research, 47(5), 1908–1915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519827165
dc.relation.referencesHusain, M. A. (2018). Dental Anatomy and Nomenclature for the Radiologist. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 56(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2017.08.001
dc.relation.referencesInterlandi, S. (1996). Ortodoncia - Bases para la Iniciación (Ediciones medicas, Ed.; 1a ed.). Ediciones Médicas.
dc.relation.referencesJacobson, A. (1975). The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. American Journal of orthodontics, 67(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(75)90065-2
dc.relation.referencesKaravaka, S. M., Halazonetis, D. J., & Spyropoulos, M. N. (2008). Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 133(2), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.037
dc.relation.referencesKazimierczak, N., Kazimierczak, W., Serafin, Z., Nowicki, P., Nożewski, J., & Janiszewska-Olszowska, J. (2024). AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning—A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020344
dc.relation.referencesKhandakji, M. N., & Ghafari, J. G. (2020). Evaluation of commonly used occlusal indices in determining orthodontic treatment need. European Journal of Orthodontics, 42(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz042
dc.relation.referencesKoh, H., & Robinson, P. G. (2009). Occlusal adjustment for treating and preventing temporomandibular joint disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), Art. No: CD003812. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003812.pub2
dc.relation.referencesKong, J., Flores-Mir, C., & Goonewardene, M. (2024). Orthodontic treatment, craniofacial morphology and periodontal phenotype: A narrative review. Seminars in Orthodontics, 30(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2023.10.004
dc.relation.referencesKumar Khera, A., K Singh, G., P Sharma, V., & Singh, A. (2012). Relationship between Dental Arch Dimensions and Vertical Facial Morphology in Class I Subjects. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46, 316–324. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1113
dc.relation.referencesLaird, M. F., Vogel, E. R., & Pontzer, H. (2016). Chewing efficiency and occlusal functional morphology in modern humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 93, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.11.005
dc.relation.referencesLepidi, L., Suriano, C., Saleh, M. H. A., Ravidà, A., Mastrangelo, F., & Wang, H. L. (2019). Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients with Implants Based on Facial Profile Assessment: A Case Report. Implant Dentistry, 28(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000856
dc.relation.referencesLepley, C. R., Throckmorton, G. S., Ceen, R. F., & Buschang, P. H. (2011). Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139(5), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.025
dc.relation.referencesLin, T. H., Hughes, T., & Meade, M. J. (2023). The genetic and environmental contributions to variation in the permanent dental arch form: a twin study. European Journal of Orthodontics, 45(6), 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad054
dc.relation.referencesMa, Y., Li, Y., Liu, X., Gao, J., Wang, A., chen, H., Liu, Z., & Jin, Z. (2024). Future perspectives of digital twin technology in orthodontics. Displays, 85(July), 102818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2024.102818
dc.relation.referencesMakino, E., Nomura, M., Motegi, E., Iijima, Y., Ishii, T., Koizumi, Y., Hayashi, M., Sueishi, K., Kawano, M., & Yanagisawa, S. (2014). Effect of orthodontic treatment on occlusal condition and masticatory function. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 55(4), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.55.185
dc.relation.referencesManziuc, M. M., Savu, M. M., Almăşan, O., Leucuţa, D. C., Tăut, M., Ifrim, C., Berindean, D., Kui, A., Negucioiu, M., & Buduru, S. (2024). Insights into Occlusal Analysis: Articulating Paper versus Digital Devices. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154506
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, L., Lehmann, J., & Rueda, M. (2018). Asociación entre arcos dentarios con el perfil, biotipo facial y la clase esquelética en una población de Tabasco. Revista Tamé, 716–722.
dc.relation.referencesMorita, W., Morimoto, N., & Ohshima, H. (2016). Exploring metameric variation in human molars: a morphological study using morphometric mapping. Journal of Anatomy, 229(3), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12482
dc.relation.referencesOhshima, H. (2014). Dental and Oral Biology, Anatomy. En Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences (Third Edit). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.00034-9
dc.relation.referencesOwens, S., Buschang, P. H., Throckmorton, G. S., Palmer, L., & English, J. (2002). Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 121(6), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.122829
dc.relation.referencesPanayi, N. C., Efstathiou, S., Christopoulou, I., Kotantoula, G., & Tsolakis, I. A. (2024). Digital orthodontics: Present and future. AJO-DO Clinical Companion, 4(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xaor.2023.12.001
dc.relation.referencesPasmay Narvaez, J. D., Vaca Zapata, M. E., Aguirre Balseca, M., Freitas, K. M. S., & Galarza Maldonado, D. C. (2026). CBCT evaluation of mandibular retromolar space in adult patients according to skeletal Class and facial biotype: A cross-sectional study. International Orthodontics, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101088
dc.relation.referencesPepicelli, A., Woods, M., & Briggs, C. (2005). The mandibular muscles and their importance in orthodontics: A contemporary review. En American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (Vol. 128, Número 6, pp. 774–780). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.023
dc.relation.referencesPlaza, S. P., Reimpell, A., Silva, J., & Montoya, D. (2019). Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 24(4), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.063-072.oar
dc.relation.referencesPrakashchandra, M. (2016). Evaluation of occlusal force distribution and influence of muscles of mastication in young adults with different arch forms: An in vivo study. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences.
dc.relation.referencesPrema, A., Vimala, G., Rao, U., Shameer, A., & Gayathri. (2019a). Occlusal bite force changes during fixed orthodontic treatment in patients with different vertical facial morphology. Saudi Dental Journal, 31(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.044
dc.relation.referencesProffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., & Sarver, D. M. (2019). Development of the craniofacial complex. En Contemporary Orthodontics (6a ed., pp. 18–59). Elsevier
dc.relation.referencesProffit, W. R., Jackson, T. H., & Turvey, T. A. (2013). Changes in the pattern of patients receiving surgical-orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 143(6), 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.014
dc.relation.referencesPuerta Salazar, G. E., Herrera-Guardiola, S., & Martínez Cajas, C. H. (2016). Concordancia entre guía incisiva con patrones dentales, esqueléticos funcionales y del biotipo facial / Concordance between Incisal Pathway with Dental, Functional Skeletal, and Facial Biotype Patterns. Universitas Odontologica, 35(74). https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.uo35-74.cgip
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, M., Prieto, M., & Solano, L. (2021). Asociación entre índice de Bolton y biotipo facial en pacientes de ortodoncia de la Universidad Santo Tomás [Trabajo de grado de especialización, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Universidad Santo Tomás.
dc.relation.referencesQuiudini, P. R., Pozza, D. H., Pinto, A. dos S., de Arruda, M. F., & Guimarães, A. S. (2017). Differences in bite force between dolichofacial and brachyfacial individuals: Side of mastication, gender, weight and height. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 61(3), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.10.003
dc.relation.referencesRepublica de Colombia. (2012). LEY 1581 de 2012. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/RESOLUCI%C3%93N%208430%20DE%201993.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRepública de Colombia, M. de Salud. (1993, octubre 4). Resolución 8430 de 1993. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/RESOLUCI%C3%93N%208430%20DE%201993.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRicketts, R. (1981). Perspectives in the Clinical Application of Cephalometrics. The Angle Orthodontist, 51(2), 115–150. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0115:PITCAO>2.0.CO;2
dc.relation.referencesRoth, R. (1981). Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. Clinical Orthodontics, 15(1), 32–51.
dc.relation.referencesRueda, A., Jaimes, M., & Vivas, S. (2023). Relación entre la posición del incisivo central superior con el biotipo facial y la clasificación esquelética. Universidad Santo Tomás.
dc.relation.referencesSaafi, J., Nasri, S., Gassara, Y., Harzallah, B., & Cherif, M. (2024). Centric Relation: A Survey Study to Determine Whether a Consensus Exists Between Prosthodontists and Orthodontists. Dentistry and Oral Health Care, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.59657/2993-0863.brs.24.030
dc.relation.referencesSabel, N., Dietz, W., Lundgren, T., Nietzsche, S., Odelius, H., Rythén, M., Rizell, S., Robertson, A., Norén, J. G., & Klingberg, G. (2009). Elemental composition of normal primary tooth enamel analyzed with XRMA and SIMS. Swedish Dental Journal, 33(2), 75–83.
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, G. T., & Dean, M. C. (2005). Sexual dimorphism in modern human permanent teeth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128(2), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20211
dc.relation.referencesShahmoradi, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Elfallah, H. M., & Swain, M. (2014). Fundamental Structure and Properties of Enamel, Dentin and Cementum (B. Ben-Nissan, Ed.; Vol. 2, pp. 511–547). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53980-0__17
dc.relation.referencesSierpinska, T., Kropiwnicka, A., Kuc, J., Jacunski, P., & Gołębiewska, M. (2017). The influence of occlusal morphology on occlusion time. Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice, 35(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2016.1200282
dc.relation.referencesSocla, C. (2022). Relación entre el biotipo facial y la inclinación del plano oclusal según el análisis cefalométrico de Ricketts en desdentados parciales en la Clínica Arteaga & Oviedo 2021 [Universidad Alas Peruanas]. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9802-3184
dc.relation.referencesTanaka, E., Tanaka, M., Watanabe, M., Del Pozo, R., & Tanne, K. (2001). Influences of occlusal and skeletal discrepancies on biomechanical environment in the TMJ during maximum clenching: An analytic approach with the finite element method. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28(9), 888–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00763.x
dc.relation.referencesTherkildsen, N. M., & Sonnesen, L. (2022). Bite Force, Occlusal Contact and Pain in Orthodontic Patients during Fixed-Appliance Treatment. Dentistry Journal, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj
dc.relation.referencesTownsend, G., Bockmann, M., Hughes, T., & Brook, A. (2012). Genetic, environmental and epigenetic influences on variation in human tooth number, size and shape. En Odontology (Vol. 100, Número 1, pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-011-0052-z
dc.relation.referencesTownsend, G., Richards, L., & Hughes, T. (2003). Molar Intercuspal Dimensions: Genetic Input to Phenotypic Variation. J Dent Res., 82(5), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200507
dc.relation.referencesTsyhykalo, O. V., Kuzniak, N. B., Popova, I. S., Oliinyk, I. Y., Dmytrenko, R. R., Perebyinis, P. P., & Horytskyi, Y. V. (2017). Peculiarities of the Upper Lip Morphogenesis and Its Relation to Facial Development. Galician Medical Journal, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2017.2.17
dc.relation.referencesVelásquez, B., Rodríguez, M., Mosquera, V., Álvarez, E., Chauca, L., & Mena, A. (2023). Occlusal Analysis in Natural Dentition: Systematic Review. European Journal of Dentistry, 17(3), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755626
dc.relation.referencesVera, M. (2010). Discrepancia existente en el tamaño mesiodistal y vestíbulo-lingual del primer premolar y segundo premolar superior en modelos de pacientes que acudieron a recibir tratamiento al posgrado de ortodoncia. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
dc.relation.referencesYan, Z. Bin, Wan, Y. D., Xiao, C. Q., Li, Y. Q., Zhang, Y. Y., An, Y., & Xiong, X. (2022). Craniofacial Morphology of Orthodontic Patients with and without Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Research and Management, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9344028
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Y., Zheng, F., Gong, Y., Zhu, J., Yin, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). Effect of occlusal contact on TMJ loading during occlusion: An in silico study. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 178(174), 108725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108725
dc.rightsAttribution 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordFacial biotype
dc.subject.keywordOcclusal table
dc.subject.keywordDental morphology
dc.subject.keywordOrthodontics
dc.subject.proposalBiotipo facial
dc.subject.proposalTabla oclusal
dc.subject.proposalMorfología dental
dc.subject.proposalOrtodoncia
dc.title“Relación entre el ancho de la tabla oclusal de los molares y premolares con el biotipo facial en los pacientes de la Clínica de Ortodoncia de la Universidad Santo Tomás de Bucaramanga”
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026GilKaterine1.pdf
Tamaño:
200.86 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026GilKaterine.pdf
Tamaño:
1.06 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026GilKaterine2.pdf
Tamaño:
230.93 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Acuerdo de publicación
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Especialización Ortodoncia