Analyzing teacher’s assessment practices using formative assessment supported by Web 2.0 tools

dc.contributor.advisorHerrera Mateus, Catalina
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pérez, Ross Bell
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001490469
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=es&user=4ah2ZUwAAAAJ
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-8608
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T15:50:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-16T15:50:52Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionLa evaluación formativa es crucial en contextos educativos, ya que mejora el rendimiento de los estudiantes. Durante muchos años, apliqué métodos de evaluación tradicionales con resultados pobres, lo que me llevó a darme cuenta de la necesidad de transformar mis prácticas de evaluación hacia un enfoque formativo, reconociendo al mismo tiempo el valor de las herramientas web como apoyo en esta transición. El propósito de esta investigación es analizar cómo han evolucionado mis prácticas de evaluación tras implementar la evaluación formativa basada en herramientas Web 2.0. Hoy en día, el concepto de evaluación ha cambiado. Los autores argumentan que la evaluación auténtica es formativa porque permite tanto a los estudiantes como a los docentes aprender; pueden aprender de los errores, fomentando la mejora continua. La metodología de investigación empleada fue cualitativa, utilizando un enfoque de estudio de caso, con instrumentos de recolección de datos que incluyen diarios y observaciones, y análisis temático para la interpretación de los datos. Los resultados indicaron que, durante esta implementación, mis prácticas de evaluación cambiaron de cuatro maneras significativas. Mis estudiantes se beneficiaron de la evaluación al recibir retroalimentación sobre sus fortalezas y áreas de mejora, lo que les permitió mejorar su rendimiento. Este proceso también facilitó mi propio aprendizaje y reflexión sobre mis prácticas de enseñanza. Además, el uso de criterios de evaluación, de los cuales mis estudiantes estaban al tanto desde el inicio de las actividades, contribuyó a este cambio. Asimismo, mi evaluación se volvió continua, lo que significa que se integró a lo largo de todo el proceso de enseñanza, y utilicé herramientas web para apoyar mis prácticas. En conclusión, la evaluación formativa me ha permitido reflexionar sobre cómo mejorar mi enseñanza y ha guiado a mis estudiantes en la comprensión de cómo mejorar su rendimiento.spa
dc.description.abstractFormative assessment is crucial in educational contexts as it enhances students' performance. For many years, have applied traditional assessment methods with poor results, leading to realize the necessity of transforming the assessment practices to a formative approach, while recognizing the value of Web tools as support in this transition. The purpose of this research is to analyze how the assessment practices have evolved after implementing formative assessment based on Web 2.0 tools. Today, the concept of assessment has shifted. The authors argue that authentic assessment is formative because it enables both students and teachers to learn; they can learn from mistakes, fostering continuous improvement. The research methodology employed was qualitative, utilizing a case study approach, with data collection instruments including diaries and observations, and thematic analysis for data interpretation. The results indicated that during this implementation, the assessment practices changed in four significant ways. The students benefited from the assessment as they received feedback on their strengths and areas for improvement, enabling them to enhance their performance. This process also facilitated the learning and reflection on the teaching practices. Additionally, the use of assessment criteria, which the students were aware of from the outset of the activities, contributed to this change. Furthermore, the assessment became continuous, meaning it was integrated throughout the entire teaching process and utilized Web tools to support the practices. In conclusion, formative assessment has allowed me to reflect on how to enhance the teaching and has guided the students in understanding how to improve their performance.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado en Lengua Extranjera - Inglésspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMartínez Pérez, R. B. (2024). Analyzing teacher’s assessment practices using formative assessment supported by Web 2.0 tools. [Trabajo de Grado, Universidad Santo Tomás] . Repositorio Institucional.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/58979
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Licenciatura en Lengua Extranjera - Inglésspa
dc.relation.referencesAliakbar, M., Yasini, A. and Sadeghi, S. (2023). Iranian EFL Teachers' Classroom Assessment Practices: Discrepancy between Theory and Practice. International Journal of Language Testing, 13(2), 149 – 169.spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez J.M. (2011). Evaluar para conocer, examinar para excluir. Ediciones Morata,spa
dc.relation.referencesArslan, R. Ş. And Üçok-Atasoy, M. (2020). An investigation into EFL teachers’ assessment of young learners of English: Does practice match the policy? International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(2), 468-484.spa
dc.relation.referencesÁvila, P. (2009) La importancia de la retroalimentación en los procesos de evaluación. Una revisión del estado del arte. Universidad del Valle de México. México.spa
dc.relation.referencesBahr, D. L., & DeGarcia, L. A. (2008). Elementary mathematics is anything but elementary: Content and methods from a developmental perspective. Cengage Learning.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102spa
dc.relation.referencesBozkurt, M. & Ozturk, F. (2022). Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: A Research Profiling Study. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research,17(1), 247-277. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1335923.pdfDOI: 10.29329/epasr.2022.248.13spa
dc.relation.referencesÇimen, S. (2021). Exploring EFL Assessment In Turkey: Curriculum And Teacher Practices. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(1), 531-550.spa
dc.relation.referencesConfrey, J., Toutkoushian, E., & Shah, M. (2019). A Validation Argument From Soup to Nuts: Assessing Progress on Learning Trajectories for Middle-School Mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2018.1544135spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesCumhur, F. & Çam, Ş. S. (2021). Digital transformation in assessment and evaluation course: The effects of Web 2.0 tools. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021370559spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Ramirez, L. L. (2010). Empower English language learners with tools from the web. Corwin Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEzer, F. & Aksüt, S. (2021). Opinions of Graduate Students of Social Studies Education About Qualitative Research Method. International Education Studies, 14(3), 15-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesFigueiredo, C. (2024). External school evaluation feedback and school self-evaluation: what feedback is provided? Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 9(1), 123-164. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1300512spa
dc.relation.referencesGezera, T. Wang, C. Pollyc, A. Martin, C. Pugale, D and Lambertf, R. (2021). The Relationship between Formative Assessment and Summative Assessment in Primary Grade Mathematics Classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13, 673-685.spa
dc.relation.referencesGiraldo, F. (2019). Language Assessment Language Practices Assessment And Beliefs: Implications for assessment language And literacy. HOW A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 26(1), 35-61.https://doi.org/10.19183/how.26.1.481 https://doi.org/10.19183/how.26.1.481spa
dc.relation.referencesHeale, R. & Twycross, A. (2017). What is a case study? Evid Based Nurs, 21, 7-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29146764/spa
dc.relation.referencesHeron, M., Medland, E., Winstone, N., & Pitt, E. (2023). Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 172-185. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1932735spa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera Díaz, L. E., Cruz Ramos, M., & Sandoval Sánchez, M. A. (2014). Using personal portable devices as learning tools in the English class. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 21(2), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.21.2.5spa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera, L. & Macías, D. (2015). A call for language assessment literacy in the education and development of teachers of English as a foreign language. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J., 17(2), 302- 312.spa
dc.relation.referencesIzgi, U. (2020). The Effects of Science Teaching Practice Supported With Web 2.0 Tools on Prospective Elementary School Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16, 91-110. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1249937spa
dc.relation.referencesLanger de Ramírez, Lori. (2009). Empower English Language Learners with Tools from the Web, pp. 1- 6. Corwin.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, H., & Brantmeier, C. (2019). “I know English”: Self-assessment of foreign language reading and writing abilities among young Chinese learners of English. System, 80, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.013spa
dc.relation.referencesOscarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language testing, 6(1), 1-13.spa
dc.relation.referencesPolly, D. Martin, C. Mraz, M. (2022). Examining Elementary School Teachers’ Perceptions of and Use of Formative Assessment in Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14, 417-425. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1338798.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesRoldan, A. (1994-1995). Por una reflexión en torno al concepto de EFL. Revista española de lingüística aplicada, 10, 205-212. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1958149spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero, R. M., Vidal Espinosa, L. O., & Ramírez Hernández, D. (2019). Organic chemistry basic concepts teaching in students of large groups at Higher Education and Web 2.0 tools. Revista Electrónica "Actualidades Investigativas en Educación", 19(1), 1- 31. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v19i1.35589spa
dc.relation.referencesSadler, Royce (1989) “Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems” En Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.spa
dc.relation.referencesTobon, S., Rial, A., Carretero, M., García, J. (2006). Competencias, calidad y educación superior. Coop. Editorial Magisterio.spa
dc.relation.referencesVo, T., & Nguyen, N. (2023). Students’ perceptions towards the application of peer assessment in a virtual English writing class. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 1-19. . https://doi.org/10.53761/spa
dc.relation.referencesWünsch, A. Araujo, L. (2019). Case study research: opening up research opportunities. RAUSP Management Journal, 55, 100-111. https://www.scielo.br/j/rmj/a/HsgJqXyP8yYcMnQMCcMb7Xt/?lang=enspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordEnglish as Foreign Languagespa
dc.subject.keywordFormative assessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordWeb tools 2.0spa
dc.subject.lembEducaciónspa
dc.subject.lembLicenciatura en Lengua Extranjeraspa
dc.subject.lembInglésspa
dc.subject.proposalInglés como lengua extranjeraspa
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación formativaspa
dc.subject.proposalHerramientas Web 2.0spa
dc.titleAnalyzing teacher’s assessment practices using formative assessment supported by Web 2.0 toolsspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024rossmartinez.pdf
Tamaño:
1.28 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
310.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024cartadederechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
3.08 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de derechos de autor

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: