Evaluación de la reparación integral de víctimas en Colombia: analisis del proceso maariv y modelos comparados de Perú

Abstract

This paper examines how the MAARIV Model works and compares it with the Comprehensive Reparations Plan used in Peru. The goal is to test whether, beyond what the rules state, these models allow people affected by the problem to recover their rights and live a better life. In the case of Colombia, we see that although there is a strong rule and a clear desire to help those affected, there are problems such as referrals, complicated procedures, and a lot of focus on monetary funds, leaving aside aspects such as going to the doctor, studying, or owning a home. On the one hand, Peru has been able to combine common and symbolic compensations more closely, strengthening the social fabric and the memory of the communities' past. From this contrast, we offer some ideas for making Colombia's system more effective, accessible, and consummated, thus ensuring a true return of victims' rights. This study examines how the Method of Care, Assistance, and Comprehensive Settlement for Victims (MAARIV) works in Colombia and combines it with the Total Settlement Plan (PIR) in Peru. The idea is to see if, in addition to what the regulations state, these methods do protect victims of the conflict, as well as restore their rights and help them recover their lives. In the Colombian case, we see that while there is a strict law and a stoic desire to help victims, in real life there are complications such as delays, complicated paperwork, and a great deal of use for money, forgetting other significant things like going to the doctor, studying, or owning a home. On the one hand, Peru has been able to better link corporate and allegorical compensation, strengthening the social fabric and the memory of the communities' past. Based on this distinction, we present some ideas to make the Colombian system faster, more accessible, and more fulfilling, so that victims can enjoy a true restoration of their rights.