Revisión bibliométrica de las principales metodologías para la evaluación del uso y cobertura del suelo

Vargas Becerra, Edison Fabian

Revisión bibliométrica de las principales metodologías para la evaluación del uso y cobertura del suelo

dc.contributor.advisor	Avellaneda Diaz, Elisa Maria
dc.contributor.author	Vargas Becerra, Edison Fabian
dc.contributor.corporatename	Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.coverage.campus	CRAI-USTA Tunja	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2024-04-24T19:33:37Z
dc.date.available	2024-04-24T19:33:37Z
dc.date.issued	2024-04-10
dc.description	Esta investigación presenta una revisión bibliométrica centrada en examinar las metodologías empleadas en la clasificación supervisada y no supervisada del uso y cobertura del suelo. Se realizaron búsquedas en Google Scholar, Science Direct y Scopus para seleccionar 31 artículos entre 2018 y 2024. Los artículos analizados utilizan metodologías de teledetección o sistemas de información geográfica (SIG) y presentan resultados relacionados con la precisión de las metodologías de evaluación de LULC. Se observó que la clasificación supervisada fue la más utilizada, mientras que las técnicas de clasificación más empleadas fueron el índice NDVI, seguido por el algoritmo de máxima verosimilitud. Estos hallazgos contribuyen a aumentar la precisión y fiabilidad de los análisis de uso y cobertura del suelo para abordar los desafíos ambientales y sociales asociados con el desarrollo urbano y rural.	spa
dc.description.abstract	This research presents a bibliometric review focused on examining the methodologies used in the supervised and unsupervised classification of land use and land cover. Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Scopus were searched to select 31 articles between 2018 and 2024. The articles analyzed use remote sensing or geographic information systems (GIS) methodologies and present results related to the accuracy of LULC assessment methodologies. It was observed that supervised classification was the most used, while the most used classification techniques were the NDVI index, followed by the maximum likelihood algorithm. These findings contribute to improving the accuracy and reliability of land use and land cover analyzes to address environmental and social challenges associated with urban and rural development.	spa
dc.description.degreelevel	Pregrado	spa
dc.description.degreename	Ingeniero Ambiental	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.identifier.citation	Vargas Becerra, E. (2024). Revisión bibliométrica de las principales metodologías para la evaluación del uso y cobertura del suelo. [Trabajo de Grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional	spa
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co	spa
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11634/54822
dc.language.iso	spa	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Ingeniería Ambiental	spa
dc.publisher.program	Pregrado de Ingeniería Ambiental	spa
dc.relation.references	Adugna, T., Xu, W., & Fan, J. (2022). Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Regional Land Cover Mapping Using Coarse Resolution FY-3C Images. Remote sensing, 14(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030574	spa
dc.relation.references	Chen, H., Song, J., Wu, C., Du, B., & Yokoya, N. (2023). Exchange means change: An unsupervised single-temporal change detection framework based on intra- and inter-image patch exchange. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 206, 87-105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.11.004	spa
dc.relation.references	Chopade, M. R., Mahajan, S., & Chaube, N. (2023). Assessment of land use, land cover change in the mangrove forest of Ghogha area, Gulf of Khambhat, Gujarat. Expert Systems with Applications, 212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118839	spa
dc.relation.references	Chowdhury, S. (2024). Comparison of accuracy and reliability of random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network and maximum likelihood method in land use/cover classification of urban setting. Environmental Challenges, 14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100800	spa
dc.relation.references	Chughtai, A. H., Abbasi, H., & Karas, I. R. (2021). A review on change detection method and accuracy assessment for land use land cover. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 22.	spa
dc.relation.references	da Silva, V. S., Salami, G., da Silva, M. I., & Silva, E. A. (2020). Methodological evaluation of vegetation indexes in land use and land cover (LULC) classification. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 4(2). https://doi.org/https://doi-org.crai-ustadigital.usantotomas.edu.co/10.1080/24749508.2019.1608409	spa
dc.relation.references	Dargains, A., & Cabral, P. (2021). A GIS-based methodology for sustainable farming planning: Assessment of land use/cover changes and carbon dynamics at farm level. Land Use Policy, 111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105788	spa
dc.relation.references	Darvishi, A., Yousefi, M., & Marullb, J. (2020). Modelling landscape ecological assessments of land use and cover change scenarios. Application to the Bojnourd Metropolitan Area (NE Iran). Land Use Policy, 99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105098	spa
dc.relation.references	Davis, F., & Balaji Bhaskar, M. S. (2022). Assessment of water, soil contamination and land cover changes in Sims and Vince Bayou urban watersheds of Houston, Texas. Watershed Ecology and the Environment, 4, 73-85. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.crai-ustadigital.usantotomas.edu.co/10.1016/j.wsee.2022.08.002	spa
dc.relation.references	Demarchi, L., Canters , F., Cariou, C., Licciardi , G., & Cheung-Wai Chan, J. (2018). Assessing the performance of two unsupervised dimensionality reduction techniques on hyperspectral APEX data for high resolution urban land-cover mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, 166-179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.10.012	spa
dc.relation.references	Du, L., Dong, C., Kang, X., Xinglong, Q., & Gu, L. (2023). Spatiotemporal evolution of land cover changes and landscape ecological risk assessment in the Yellow River Basin, 2015–2020. Journal of Environmental Management, 332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117149	spa
dc.relation.references	Edosa, B., & Nagasa, M. (2024). Spatiotemporal assessment of land use land cover change, driving forces, and consequences using geospatial techniques: The case of Naqamte city and hinterland, western Ethiopia. Environmental Challenges, 14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100830	spa
dc.relation.references	Espinoza Guzmán, M. A., Borrego, D. A., & Sahagún Sánchez, F. J. (2023). Evaluation of recent land-use and land-cover change in a mountain region. Trees, Forests and People, 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100370	spa
dc.relation.references	Geta Bihonegn, B., & Gebeyehu Awoke , A. (2023). Evaluating the impact of land use and land cover changes on sediment yield dynamics in the upper Awash basin, Ethiopia the case of Koka reservoir. Heliyon, 12(9). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23049	spa
dc.relation.references	Haque, I., & Basak, R. (2017). Land cover change detection using GIS and remote sensing techniques: A spatio-temporal study on Tanguar Haor, Sunamganj, Bang. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.12.003	spa
dc.relation.references	Hasmadi, M., HZ, P., & MF, S. (2009). Evaluating supervised and unsupervised techniques for land cover mapping using remote sensing data. Journal of Society and Space, 5, 1-10.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jing, Q., He, J., Li, Y., Yang, X., Peng, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, X. (2024). Analysis of the spatiotemporal changes in global land cover from 2001 to 2020. Science of The Total Environment, 908.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jung, M., & Chang, E. (2019). NDVI-based land-cover change detection using harmonic analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing (36). https://doi.org/https://doi-org.crai-ustadigital.usantotomas.edu.co/10.1080/01431161.2015.1007252	spa
dc.relation.references	Kumar, A., & Kumar Gorai, A. (2023). A comparative evaluation of deep convolutional neural network and deep neural network-based land use/land cover classifications of mining regions using fused multi-sensor satellite data. Advances in Space Research, 72(11). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.08.057	spa
dc.relation.references	Long Feng, Q., Liu, J., & Gong, J. (2018). Urban Flood Mapping Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing and Random Forest Classifier—A Case of Yuyao, China. Water, 74, 1437-1455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/w7041437	spa
dc.relation.references	Long, X., Lin, H., An, X., Chen, S., Qi, S., & Zhang, M. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of ecosystem service value based on land use/cover change in Dongting Lake wetland. Ecological Indicators, 136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108619	spa
dc.relation.references	Matsa, M., Mupepi, O., Musasa, T., & Defe, R. (2020). A GIS and remote sensing aided assessment of land use/cover changes in resettlement areas; a case of ward 32 of Mazowe district, Zimbabwe. Journal of Environmental Management, 276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111312	spa
dc.relation.references	Meng, Y., Yang, M., Liu, S., Mou, Y., Peng, C., & Zhou, X. (2021). Quantitative assessment of the importance of bio-physical drivers of land cover change based on a random forest method. Ecological Informatics, 61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101204	spa
dc.relation.references	Ngadi Scarpetta, Y., Lebourgeois, V., Laques, A. E., dieye, M., Bourgoin, J., & Bégué, A. (2023). BFASTm-L2, an unsupervised LULCC detection based on seasonal change detection – An application to large-scale land acquisitions in Senegal. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103379	spa
dc.relation.references	Paradis, E. (2022). Probabilistic unsupervised classification for large-scale analysis of spectral imaging data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102675	spa
dc.relation.references	Prasad, P., Loveson, V. J., Chandra, P., & Kotha , M. (2022). Evaluation and comparison of the earth observing sensors in land cover/land use studies using machine learning algorithms. Ecological Informatics, 68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101522	spa
dc.relation.references	Purwanto, Latifah, S., Yonariza, Akhsani , F., Sofiana, E. I., & Riski Ferdiansah, M. (2023). Land cover change assessment using random forest and CA markov from remote sensing images in the protected forest of South Malang, Indonesia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101061	spa
dc.relation.references	Rash, A., Mustafa, Y., & Hamad, R. (2023). Quantitative assessment of Land use/land cover changes in a developing region using machine learning algorithms: A case study in the Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21253	spa
dc.relation.references	Ruggeri, S., Henao Cespedes, V., Garcés Gómez, Y., & Parra Uzcátegui, A. (2021). Optimized unsupervised CORINE Land Cover mapping using linear spectral mixture analysis and object-based image analysis. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 24(3), 1061-1069. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.10.009	spa
dc.relation.references	Sisay, G., Gitima, G., Mersha , M., & Alemu, A. (2021). Assessment of land use land cover dynamics and its drivers in Bechet Watershed Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100648	spa
dc.relation.references	Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H., & Mostafavi, H. (2021). Simulation and impact assessment of future land use and land cover changes in two protected areas in Tehran, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.crai-ustadigital.usantotomas.edu.co/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103296	spa
dc.relation.references	Tnag, X., Woodcock, C., Olofsson, P., & Hutyra, L. (2021). Spatiotemporal assessment of land use/land cover change and associated carbon emissions and uptake in the Mekong River Basin. Remote Sensing of Environment, 256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112336	spa
dc.relation.references	Tola, B., & Deyassa, G. (2024). A modeling approach for evaluating and predicting the impacts of land use land cover changes on groundwater recharge in Walga Watershed, Upper Omo Basin, Central Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101659	spa
dc.relation.references	Tolessa, T., Kidane, M., & Bezie, A. (2021). Assessment of the linkages between ecosystem service provision and land use/land cover change in Fincha watershed, North-Western Ethiopia. Heliyon, 7(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07673	spa
dc.relation.references	Traore, M., Son Lee, M., Rasul, A., & Balew, A. (2021). Assessment of land use/land cover changes and their impacts on land surface temperature in Bangui (the capital of Central African Republic). Environmental Challenges, 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100114	spa
dc.relation.references	Trujillo-Jiménez, M., Liberoff, A. L., Pessacg, N., Pacheco, C., & Flaherty, S. (2020). Uso de Métodos de Aprendizaje Automático y teledetección para clasificación de uso y cobertura del suelo en un valle semiárido de la Patogonia.	spa
dc.relation.references	Velastegui Montoya , A., Escandón-Panchana, P., Peña-Villacreses, G., & Herrera-Franco, G. (2023). Land use/land cover of petroleum activities in the framework of sustainable development. Cleaner Engineering and Technology(15). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100659	spa
dc.relation.references	Zhao, S., Tu, K., Ye, S., Tang, H., Hu, Y., & Xie, C. (2023). Land Use and Land Cover Classification Meets Deep Learning: A Review. Sensors, 23(21). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218966	spa
dc.relation.references	Zhao, Z., Islam, F., Waseem, L. A., Tariq, A., Nawaz , M., Islam, I. U., Hatamleh, W. (2024). Comparison of Three Machine Learning Algorithms Using Google Earth Engine for Land Use Land Cover Classification. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 92, 129-137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2023.10.007	spa
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia	*
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2	spa
dc.rights.local	Abierto (Texto Completo)	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/	*
dc.subject.keyword	Land use	spa
dc.subject.keyword	Systematic review	spa
dc.subject.keyword	Plant cover	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Uso del suelo	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Cobertura vegetal	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Revisión sistemática	spa
dc.title	Revisión bibliométrica de las principales metodologías para la evaluación del uso y cobertura del suelo	spa
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.drive	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.local	Trabajo de Grado	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion