Impacto de las transferencias condicionadas del programa más familias en acción en el municipio de Bucaramanga y su incidencia en el ahorro de cada familia beneficiaria

Arciniegas Roman, Sergio Mauricio

Impacto de las transferencias condicionadas del programa más familias en acción en el municipio de Bucaramanga y su incidencia en el ahorro de cada familia beneficiaria

dc.contributor.author	Arciniegas Roman, Sergio Mauricio
dc.coverage.campus	CRAI-USTA Bogotá	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2017-06-15T21:52:25Z
dc.date.accessioned	2017-06-24T16:14:40Z
dc.date.available	2017-06-15T21:52:25Z
dc.date.available	2017-06-24T16:14:40Z
dc.date.issued	2015-04-16
dc.description	El presente trabajo pretende mostrar los cambios que ha generado en las familias que son beneficiadas con el auxilio recibido, y los cambios que internamente ha tenido el programa. En sus inicios el programa familias en acción se vio como una iniciativa del Gobierno Nacional era Programa bandera del Gobierno del Doctor Álvaro Uribe Vélez (presidente de Colombia), formaba parte de la Agencia Presidencial para la Acción Social y la Cooperación Internacional “Acción Social”, que consistía en la entrega de subsidios económicos de nutrición y educación condicionados al cumplimiento de una verificación realizada bimensualmente, cumplido este requerimiento la familia cobrada el incentivo mediante la modalidad de una carta cheque que le era entrega a la madre titular y debía ser cobrada en el entidad financiera autorizada la cual no era acumulable, no se podían guardar estos títulos de cobro si la titular no cobraba esto se veía reflejado a los dos meses en el cobro siguiente; El auxilio va cambiando con la edad del beneficiario y era entregado hasta que cumpliera la mayoría edad (18 años).	spa
dc.description.abstract	This paper aims to show the changes that the programme has generated in the families that benefit from the aid received, and the changes that the programme has undergone internally. In its beginnings, the Families in Action Programme was seen as an initiative of the National Government, it was a flagship programme of the Government of Dr. Álvaro Uribe Vélez (President of Colombia), it was part of the Presidential Agency for Social Action and International Cooperation "Acción Social", which consisted in the delivery of economic subsidies for nutrition and education conditioned to the fulfilment of a verification carried out bimonthly, once this requirement was met, the family received the incentive. Once this requirement was fulfilled, the family collected the incentive by means of a cheque letter that was given to the mother and had to be cashed at the authorised financial entity, which could not be accumulated. The benefit changed with the age of the beneficiary and was delivered until the beneficiary reached the age of majority (18 years old).
dc.description.degreelevel	Maestría	spa
dc.description.degreename	Magíster en Ciencias Económicas	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.identifier.doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.15332/tg.mae.2020.0729
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co	spa
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/11634/2488
dc.language.iso	spa	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Economía	spa
dc.publisher.program	Maestría Ciencias Económicas	spa
dc.relation.references	Alderman, H. & C. Paso. 1994. “Do the poor insure? A Synthesis of the Literature on Risk and Consumption in Developing Countries”, International Economics Association Moscow, vol.4.
dc.relation.references	Attanasio, Orazio, and Katja Kaufmann. 2008. “Educational Choices, Subjective Expectations and Credit Constraints.” Unpublished manuscript, University College, London.
dc.relation.references	Behrman, J.R., Sengupta, P. and Todd, P.E., (2005). Progressing through PROGRESA - An Impact Assessment of a School Subsidy Experiment in Rural Mexico. Economic Development and Cultural Change 54 (1), 237–75
dc.relation.references	Behrman, J.R., Sengupta, P. and Todd, P.E. (2000). The Impact of PROGRESA on Achievement Test Scores in the First Year. Unpublished Manuscript, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
dc.relation.references	Deaton, A. 1991. “Savings and Liquidity Constraints”, Econometrica, vol.59, no.5, 1221-48.
dc.relation.references	Deaton, A. 1992. “Household Saving in LDCs: Credit Markets, Insurance and Welfare.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94 (1992): 253-73.
dc.relation.references	Dercon, S. 1996. “Risk, Crop Choice and Savings: Evidence from Tanzania”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(3):485-514.
dc.relation.references	Dercon, S. 2002. “Income risk, coping strategies and safety nets”. The World Bank Research Observer, 17(2): 141-166.
dc.relation.references	De Janvry, A., Finan, F, Sadoulet, E., Vakis, R. (2006). Can conditional cash transfer programs serve as safety nets in keeping children at school and from working when exposed to shocks? Journal of Development Economics 79, 349 - 373.
dc.relation.references	Glewwe, P. and Olinto, P. (2004). Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Schooling - An Experimental Analysis of Honduras. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
dc.relation.references	Jensen, Robert. 2006. “Do the Perceived Returns to Education Affect Schooling Decisions? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
dc.relation.references	Hernandez sampiere; Roberto; Fernandez Collado, Carlos Baptista Lucio, Pilar (2010)Metodologia de la Investigaciòn . Mc Graw Hill, Quinta Ediciòn , Mexico
dc.relation.references	Levy, D. and Ohls, J. (2010). Evaluation of Jamaica’s PATH conditional cash transfer programme. Journal of Development Effectiveness 2 (4), 421-441.
dc.relation.references	Macours, K. Schady and Vakis, R. (2008). Changing Households’ Investments and Aspirations through Social Interactions - Evidence from a Randomized Transfer Program in a Low-Income Country. Unpublished Manuscript, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD, and World Bank, Washington, DC
dc.relation.references	Maluccio, J.A. and Flores, R. (2005). Impact Evaluation of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program - The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. Research Report 141, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
dc.relation.references	Morduch, J. 1995. “Income Smoothing and Consumption Smoothing.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9: 103-14.
dc.relation.references	Rawlings, Laura. 2004. “Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Experimenting with Service Delivery Alternatives. World Bank, Latin America and Caribbean Region, Human Development Department, Washington, D.C.
dc.relation.references	Rawlings, L. B., & Rubio, G. M. (2005). Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 29-55.
dc.relation.references	Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 70 (1), 41-55.
dc.relation.references	Rosenzweig, M. & H. Binswanger. 1993. “Wealth, Weather Risk and the Composition and Profitability of Agricultural Investments”, Economic Journal, 103: 56-78.
dc.relation.references	Schady, N. and Araujo, M.C. (2008). Cash Transfers, Conditions, and School Enrollment in Ecuador. Economía 8 (2), 43–70.
dc.relation.references	Schultz, T. Paul. 2000. “Final Report: The Impact of Progresa on School Enrollments. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
dc.relation.references	Schultz, T.P. (2004). School Subsidies for the Poor - Evaluating the Mexican PROGRESA Poverty Program. Journal of Development Economics 74 (1), 199–250.
dc.relation.references	Skoufias, E. 2001. “Progresa and Its Impacts on the Human Capital and Welfare of Households in Rural Mexico: A Synthesis of the Results of an Evaluation by IFPRI. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
dc.relation.references	World Bank. 2010. “Brazil: An Assessment of the Bolsa Escola Programs. Human Development Department, Latin America and Caribbean Region, Washington, D.C.
dc.relation.references	Yap, Yoon-Tien, Guilherme Sedlacek, and Peter Orazem. 2001. “Limiting Child Labor through Behavior- Based Income Transfers: An Experimental Evaluation of the PETI Program in Rural Brazil. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia	*
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.local	Abierto (Texto Completo)	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/	*
dc.subject.keyword	Savings capacity
dc.subject.keyword	Strategic development
dc.subject.keyword	Families in action
dc.subject.proposal	Capacidad de ahorro	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Desarrollo estrategico	spa
dc.subject.proposal	Familias en acciòn	spa
dc.title	Impacto de las transferencias condicionadas del programa más familias en acción en el municipio de Bucaramanga y su incidencia en el ahorro de cada familia beneficiaria	spa
dc.type	master thesis
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.drive	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.local	Tesis de maestría	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion