Reynolds number driven void fraction and ionic resistivity in a modular membraneless flow-by electrolyzer

dc.contributor.advisorZapata Saad, Andrés José
dc.contributor.authorAcevedo Rivillas, Esteban
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001494819
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002308136
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=U3ngiMwAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-3034
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-2017-7922
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-30T22:00:05Z
dc.date.available2026-07-30T22:00:05Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-25
dc.descriptionSe evaluó experimentalmente un electrolizador modular de flujo continuo sin membrana para determinar cómo el número de Reynolds (Re) rige la fracción de vacío y la resistividad iónica resultante del electrolito. El estudio abordó el desafío de las pérdidas óhmicas inducidas por burbujas, una limitación clave en los generadores de hidrógeno sin membrana. El objetivo fue cuantificar el acoplamiento entre el régimen de flujo, la retención de gas y el comportamiento resistivo bajo condiciones de operación controladas. La celda prototipo (volumen activo: X cm³, espacio entre electrodos: Y mm) se operó con KOH 1 M y se probó a caudales correspondientes a Re = A–B. La fracción de vacío se midió utilizando [método empleado, Directo → Análisis de video (Visualización óptica / PIV simplificada), Indirecto → A partir de conductividad efectiva], y la resistividad del electrolito se obtuvo a partir de datos de polarización a densidades de corriente de C–D A·cm⁻². Un aumento de Re de R₁ a R₂ redujo la fracción de vacío en un V%, y la resistividad iónica disminuyó en un W%, lo que resultó en una mejora de la eficiencia energética del E%. La tasa de generación de hidrógeno alcanzó F mmol·h⁻¹·cm⁻² con el Re más alto probado. Estas tendencias fueron consistentes con las predicciones de CFD, que mostraron un adelgazamiento de la capa límite iónica y una renovación convectiva mejorada cerca de las superficies de los electrodos. En general, los resultados demostraron que manipular el régimen de flujo es un mecanismo eficaz para mitigar la acumulación de burbujas y reducir las pérdidas óhmicas en sistemas sin membrana. Estos hallazgos respaldan el desarrollo de generadores de hidrógeno escalables y de bajo costo como alternativa a los dispositivos PEM, con pérdidas óhmicas potenciales reducidas hasta en un G% en relación con los sistemas de referencia basados ​​en membranas.
dc.description.abstractA modular membraneless flow-by electrolyzer was experimentally evaluated to determine how the Reynolds number (Re) governs the void fraction and the resulting ionic resistivity of the electrolyte. The study addressed the challenge of bubble-induced ohmic losses, a key limitation in membraneless hydrogen generators. The objective was to quantify the coupling between flow regime, gas holdup, and resistive behavior under controlled operating conditions. The prototype cell (active volume: X cm³, electrode gap: Y mm) was operated with KOH 1M and tested at flow rates corresponding to Re = A–B. Void fraction was measured using [método empleado, Directo  Análisis de video (Visualización óptica / PIV simplificada), Indirecto  A partir de conductividad efectiva], and electrolyte resistivity was obtained from polarization data at current densities of C–D A·cm⁻². An increase in Re from R₁ to R₂ reduced the void fraction by V%, and the ionic resistivity decreased by W%, leading to an improvement of energy efficiency of E%. Hydrogen generation rate reached F mmol·h⁻¹·cm⁻² at the highest Re tested. These trends were consistent with CFD predictions, which showed thinning of the ionic boundary layer and enhanced convective renewal near the electrode surfaces. Overall, the results demonstrated that manipulating the flow regime is an effective mechanism to mitigate bubble accumulation and reduce ohmic penalties in membraneless systems. These findings support the development of low-cost, scalable hydrogen generators as an alternative to PEM devices, with potential ohmic losses reduced by up to G% relative to reference membrane-based benchmarks.
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameIngeniero Mecánicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAcevedo Rivillas, E. (2026). Reynolds number driven void fraction and ionic resistivity in a modular membraneless flow-by electrolyzer. [Trabajo de Pregrado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73769
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería Mecánicaspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Ingeniería Mecánicaspa
dc.relation.referencesBard, A. J. , F. L. R. , & W. H. S. (2022). Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications (Third Edition).
dc.relation.referencesBongenaar-Schlenter, B. E., Janssen, L. J. J., Van Stralen, S. J. D., & Barendrecht, E. (1985). The effect of the gas void distribution on the ohmic resistance during water electrolytes. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 15(4), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059295
dc.relation.referencesBorah, R., Raj A.G., K., & Verbruggen, S. W. (2024). Flow-by membraneless electrolyzer designs: A macroporous flow dividing mesh enhances maximum allowable electrode length. Fuel, 377, 132779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132779
dc.relation.referencesBruggeman, D. A. G. (1935). Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen. Annalen Der Physik, 416(7), 636–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19354160705
dc.relation.referencesChang, B.-Y., & Park, S.-M. (2010). Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 3(1), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.102211
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. L., Volpe, D. J., & Abruña, H. D. (2007). Electrochemical determination of activation energies for methanol oxidation on polycrystalline platinum in acidic and alkaline electrolytes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/B612040G
dc.relation.referencesCui, Z. F., Chang, S., & Fane, A. G. (2003). The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science, 221(1–2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00246-1
dc.relation.referencesDavis, J. T. (2019). Membraneless Electrolyzers for Solar Fuels Production.
dc.relation.referencesDavis, J. T., Brown, D. E., Pang, X., & Esposito, D. V. (2019). High Speed Video Investigation of Bubble Dynamics and Current Density Distributions in Membraneless Electrolyzers. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 166(4), F312–F321. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0961904jes
dc.relation.referencesDe, B. S., Singh, A., Elias, A., Khare, N., & Basu, S. (2020). An electrochemical neutralization energy-assisted membrane-less microfluidic reactor for water electrolysis. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 4(12), 6234–6244. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SE01474E
dc.relation.referencesDeng, K., Feng, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, D., & Li, Q. (2023). Ampere-level membrane-less water electrolysis enabled by rose-petal-effect-mimetic interface. Joule, 7(8), 1852–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.010
dc.relation.referencesDeng, L., Jin, L., Yang, L., Feng, C., Tao, A., Jia, X., Geng, Z., Zhang, C., Cui, X., & Shi, J. (2025). Bubble evolution dynamics in alkaline water electrolysis. EScience, 5(4), 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2024.100353
dc.relation.referencesEl-Askary, W. A., Sakr, I. M., Ibrahim, K. A., & Balabel, A. (2015). Hydrodynamics characteristics of hydrogen evolution process through electrolysis: Numerical and experimental studies. Energy, 90, 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.108
dc.relation.referencesFranco, A., & Giovannini, C. (2023). Recent and Future Advances in Water Electrolysis for Green Hydrogen Generation: Critical Analysis and Perspectives. Sustainability, 15(24), 16917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416917
dc.relation.referencesGardenghi, Á. R., Filho, E. D. S., Chagas, D. G., Scagnolatto, G., Oliveira, R. M., & Tibiriçá, C. B. (2020). Overview of void fraction measurement techniques, databases and correlations for two-phase flow in small diameter channels. Fluids, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5040216
dc.relation.referencesGong, J., Li, Y., Tang, Z., Xie, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2002). Temperature-dependence of the lattice conductivity of mixed calcia/yttria-stabilized zirconia. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 76(2), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00522-3
dc.relation.referencesHadikhani, P., Hashemi, S. M. H., Schenk, S. A., & Psaltis, D. (2021). A membrane-less electrolyzer with porous walls for high throughput and pure hydrogen production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 5(9), 2419–2432. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE00255D
dc.relation.referencesHaynes, W. M. (2016). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (W. M. Haynes, D. R. Lide, & T. J. Bruno, Eds.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315380476
dc.relation.referencesKreysa, G., & Kuhn, M. (1985). Modelling of gas evolving electrolysis cells. voidage problem e. In JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY (Vol. 15).
dc.relation.referencesLing-Yu Gao, Lin Yang, Chen-Hui Wang, Gui-Xuan Shan, Xin-Yi Huo, Meng-Fei Zhang, Wei Li, & Jin-Li Zhang. (2023). Three-Dimensional Two-Phase CFD Simulation of Alkaline Electrolyzers. Journal of Electrochemistry.
dc.relation.referencesLuo, Y., Zhang, Z., Chhowalla, M., & Liu, B. (2022). Recent Advances in Design of Electrocatalysts for High‐Current‐Density Water Splitting. Advanced Materials, 34(16). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108133
dc.relation.referencesManzotti, A., Robson, M. J., & Ciucci, F. (2023). Recent developments in membraneless electrolysis. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 40, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100765
dc.relation.referencesMaxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism (Vol. 1). Clarendon press. Oxford at the Claredon Press
dc.relation.referencesMazloomi, S. K., & Sulaiman, N. (2012). Influencing factors of water electrolysis electrical efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 4257–4263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.052
dc.relation.referencesNewman, J. , & T.-A. K. E. (2012). Electrochemical Systems (Fourth Edition).
dc.relation.referencesO’Neil, G. D., Christian, C. D., Brown, D. E., & Esposito, D. V. (2016). Hydrogen production with a simple and scalable membraneless electrolyzer. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 163(11), F3012–F3019. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0021611jes
dc.relation.referencesPang, X., Davis, J. T., Harvey, A. D., & Esposito, D. V. (2020). Framework for evaluating the performance limits of membraneless electrolyzers. Energy and Environmental Science, 13(10), 3663–3678. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee02268c
dc.relation.referencesPanzer, R. E., & Elving, P. J. (1975). Nature of the surface compounds and reactions observed on graphite electrodes. Electrochimica Acta, 20(9), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(75)90061-4
dc.relation.referencesPhilippe, M., Jérôme, H., Sebastien, B., & Gérard, P. (2005). Modelling and calculation of the current density distribution evolution at vertical gas-evolving electrodes. Electrochimica Acta, 51(6), 1140–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.06.007
dc.relation.referencesRiegel, H., Mitrovic, J., & Stephan, K. (1998). Role of mass transfer on hydrogen evolution in aqueous media.
dc.relation.referencesTeuku, H., Alshami, I., Goh, J., Masdar, M. S., & Loh, K. S. (2021). Review on bipolar plates for low‐temperature polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(15), 20583–20600. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7182
dc.relation.referencesVogt, H. (1980). ON THE SUPERSATURATION OF GAS IN THE CONCENTRATION BOUNDARY LAYER OF GAS EVOLVING ELECTRODES.
dc.relation.referencesWong, X. Y., Zhuo, Y., & Shen, Y. (2021). Numerical Analysis of Hydrogen Bubble Behavior in a Zero-Gap Alkaline Water Electrolyzer Flow Channel. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(33), 12429–12446. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02554
dc.relation.referencesXue, L., Song, S., Chen, W., Liu, B., & Wang, X. (2024). Enhancing Efficiency in Alkaline Electrolysis Cells: Optimizing Flow Channels through Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Energies, 17(2), 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17020448
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordHydrogen production
dc.subject.keywordMembraneless flow-by electrolyzer
dc.subject.keywordReynolds number
dc.subject.keywordVoid fraction
dc.subject.keywordIonic resistivity
dc.subject.keywordElectrochemical performance
dc.subject.lembIngeniería mecánica
dc.subject.lembProducción de hidrógeno -- Innovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subject.lembElectrolizadores -- Diseño y construcción
dc.subject.proposalProducción de hidrógeno
dc.subject.proposalElectrolizador sin membrana de flujo continuo
dc.subject.proposalNúmero de Reynolds
dc.subject.proposalFracción de vacío
dc.subject.proposalResistividad iónica
dc.subject.proposalRendimiento electroquímico
dc.titleReynolds number driven void fraction and ionic resistivity in a modular membraneless flow-by electrolyzer
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026estebanacevedo.pdf
Tamaño:
616.59 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026cartaderechosdeautor (1).pdf
Tamaño:
893.85 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta derechos de autor
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026cartadefacultad (1).pdf
Tamaño:
155.46 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de Facultad