Diferencias en la localización del porion en adultos con distintos marcos dentoesqueletales en el área de Bucaramanga

dc.contributor.advisorZableh Solano, Maria Emma
dc.contributor.authorSaavedra Velandia, Manuel Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-23T15:29:54Z
dc.date.available2022-03-23T15:29:54Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-05
dc.descriptionIntroducción: Ricketts, afirma que un Porion ubicado en un nivel inferior al borde superior del cóndilo, es indicativo de un patrón mesioesquelético. Por el contrario, un punto Porion observado en un nivel más superior que el cóndilo es indicativo de una distorelación esquelética. Objetivo: Identificar las diferencias en la localización del punto Porion en los distintos marcos dentoesqueletales de una población adulta del área metropolitana de Bucaramanga. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional analítico, de corte transversal, en el que se analizaron 120 radiografías laterales de 73 mujeres y 47 hombres con una edad media de 22 años: 32 neutro, 42 disto y 46 mesio. Género, edad, clasificación esquelética, inclinación del plano oclusal y medidas lineales maxilomandibulares fueron analizadas. La base de datos fue digitada en Microsoft Excel y exportada al paquete STATA 14.0 para su análisis. Se presentan medidas descriptivas de tipo frecuencia absoluta y porcentaje en variables cualitativas y mediana-promedio, así como desviación estándar-rango intercuartílico para las variables cuantitativas. El análisis de correlación se hizo con prueba de Spearman y T-test. Resultados: La altura del cóndilo respecto al plano de Fráncfort mostró significancia al ser correlacionada con la inclinación del segmento posterior del plano oclusal superior y el indicador de displasia del overbite en los tres marcos esqueletales. La distancia del Porion a la ATM mostró significancia al ser correlacionada con todas las variables. Conclusiones: La posición sagital y vertical del Porion presenta diferencias significativas en relación a la ATM y al cóndilo mandibular y la inclinación del segmento posterior del plano oclusal superior está asociado a la posición vertical y sagital del Porion en los sujetos estudiados.spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Ricketts states that a Porion located at a level lower than the superior border of the condyle is indicative of a mesioskeleton pattern. In contrast, a Porion point observed at a level more superior than the condyle is indicative of a skeletal distortion. Objective: To identify the differences in the location of the Porion point in the different dentoskeletal frameworks of an adult population of the Bucaramanga metropolitan area. Materials and methods: Analytical observational, cross-sectional, in which 120 lateral radiographs were analyzed, a study of 73 women and 47 men with a mean age of 22 years: 32 neutral, 42 disto and 46 mesio. Gender, age, skeletal classification, occlusal plane inclination and maxillomandibular linear measurements were analyzed. The database was digitized in Microsoft Excel and exported to the STATA 14.0 package for analysis. Descriptive measures of absolute frequency type and percentage are presented in qualitative variables and median-average, as well as standard deviation-interquartile range for quantitative variables. The analysis of achievements was done with Spearman's test and T-test. Results: The height of the condyle with respect to the Frankfurt plane showed significance when correlated with the inclination of the posterior segment of the superior occlusal plane and the indicator of overbite dysplasia in the three skeletal frameworks. The distance from the Porion to the TMJ showed significance when correlated with all the variables. Conclusions: The sagittal and vertical position of the Porion presents significant differences in relation to the TMJ and the mandibular condyle and the inclination of the posterior segment of the upper occlusal plane is associated with the vertical and sagittal position of the Porion in the subjects studied.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Ortodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationSaavedra Velandia, M. F., (2022). Diferencias en la localización del porion en adultos con distintos marcos dentoesqueletales en el área de Bucaramanga [Tesis de especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/43759
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Ortodonciaspa
dc.relation.references1. Tanaka EM, Sato S. (2008). Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 134(5), 602.spa
dc.relation.references2. Ishizaki K, Suzuki K, Mito T, Tanaka EM, Sato S. (2010). Morphologic, functional, and occlusal characterization of mandibular lateral displacement malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(4),454.spa
dc.relation.references3. Halazonetis DJ. (2002). Estimated natural head position and facial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,121(4), 364–8.spa
dc.relation.references4. Lundström A. (1953). Cephalometric registrations as an aid in diagnosing malocclusions. Acta Odontol Scand, 11(2),100–10.spa
dc.relation.references5. Barbera AL, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC. (2014). Variation in natural head position and establishing corrected head position. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol, 65(3), 187–200spa
dc.relation.references6. Míguez-Contreras M, Jiménez-Trujillo I, Romero-Maroto M, López-de-Andrés A, Lagravère MO. (2017). Cephalometric landmark identification consistency between undergraduate dental students and orthodontic residents in 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 151(1), 157–66.spa
dc.relation.references7. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Dalloca LL, DeFranco DJ. (1996). Assessment of facial form modifications in orthodontics: proposal of a modified computerized mesh diagram analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 109(3), 263–70.spa
dc.relation.references8. González V, Tordecilla L, Sanjuan M, Prada S, Concha S. (2019). Tendencias bibliométricas en las investigaciones publicadas en las memorias de la Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Odontología entre 2000-2009. Ustasalud, 17(1),64.spa
dc.relation.references9. Broadbent B. (1931). A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod, 1, 45–60.spa
dc.relation.references10. Kharbanda OP. (2020). Errors in cephalometrics. In: Orthodontics: Diagnosis of & management of malocclusion & dentofacial deformities 3e. Third, 329–32.spa
dc.relation.references11. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. (1997). Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112(2), 165–70.spa
dc.relation.referencesBimler HP. (1975). Medidas lineales en imágenes radiográficas. Fortsch Kieferorthop, 36, 34–45.spa
dc.relation.references13. Simoes WA. (2010).Ortopedia funcional de los maxilares vista a través de la rehabilitación neuroclusal. Nike srl, Ortobello, 5ta edic, 1, 390-2spa
dc.relation.references14. McNamara JA, Ellis E. (1988). Cephalometric analysis of untreated adults with ideal facial and occlusal relationships. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 3(4), 221–31.spa
dc.relation.references15. Tweed CH. (1954). The Frankfort-Mandibular Incisor Angle (FMIA) In Orthodontic Diagnosis, Treatment Planning and Prognosis. Angle Orthod, 24(3), 121–69spa
dc.relation.references16. Tweed CH. (1946).The frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 32(4), 175–230.spa
dc.relation.references17. David P Madsen, Wayne J Sampson, Grant C Townsend. (2008). Craniofacial Reference Plane Variation and Natural Head Position. Eur J Orthod, 30(5), 532–40.spa
dc.relation.references18. Ricketts RM. (1981). Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod, 51(2), 115–50spa
dc.relation.references19. Bimler HP. (1985). Bimler Therapy. Part 1. Bimler Cephalometric Analysis. J Clin Orthod, 19(7), 501–23spa
dc.relation.references20. McNamara JA. (1973). Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations to altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod, 64(6), 578–606spa
dc.relation.references21. McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. (1984). Am J Orthod, 86(6), 449–69spa
dc.relation.references21. McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. (1984). Am J Orthod, 86(6), 449–69.spa
dc.relation.references22. Hopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA. (1968). The Cranial Base as an Aetiological Factor in Malocclusion. Angle Orthod, 38(3), 250–5.spa
dc.relation.references23. Ricketts RM. (1976). Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs Part I. Am J Orthod, 70(3), 241–68.spa
dc.relation.references24. Snodell SF, Nanda RS, Currier GF. (1993). A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 104(5), 471–83spa
dc.relation.references25. Brodie A. Downs W, A G, Myer E. (1938). Cephalometric appaisal of orthodontics results; a preliminary report. Angle Orthod, 8, 261–351.spa
dc.relation.references26. Adams JW. (1940). Correction of Error in Cephalometric Roentgenograms. Angle Orthod, 10(1), 3–13spa
dc.relation.references27. Broadbent BH, William HG. (1975). Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth. St. Luois, C.V. Mosby.spa
dc.relation.references28. Bimler HP. (2018). 60 años de la cefalometría. Rev Anu AAOFM, 42, 20–5.spa
dc.relation.references29. Bimler HP. (2003). In Memoriam. Rev Esp Ortod, 33(4), 280.spa
dc.relation.references30. Zableh ME. (2002). Aplicabilidad clínica de los estudios de cresimiento y desarrollo craneofacial I parte. Ortousta, 1(1), 13–7.spa
dc.relation.references31. Montúfar J, Romero M, Scougall-Vilchis RJ. (2018). Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 153(3), 449–58.spa
dc.relation.references32. Zou B, Zhou Y, Lowe AA, Li H, Pliska B. (2015). Changes in anteroposterior position and inclination of the maxillary incisors after surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg, 43, 1986-1993.spa
dc.relation.references33. Choi JW, Jung SY, Kim H-J, Lee S-H. (2015). Positional symmetry of porion and external auditory meatus in facial asymmetry. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 37(1), 1–9.spa
dc.relation.references34. Bjehin R. (1957). A comparison between the frankfort horizontal and the sella turcica -nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis. Acta Odontol Scand, 15(1), 1–12.spa
dc.relation.references35. Kumar S, Maheshwari S, Gautam SN, Prabhat KC. (2012). Natural head position: key position for radiographic and photographic analysis and research of craniofacial complex. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res, 2(1), 46–9.spa
dc.relation.references36. Bjork A. (1951). Some Biological Aspects of Prognathism and Occlusion of the Teeth. Angle Orthod, 21(1), 3–27.spa
dc.relation.references37. Macnamara J. (1981). Components of Class II Malocclusion in Children 8-10 Years of Age. Angle Orthod, 51(3).spa
dc.relation.references38. Fjellvang H, Solow B. (1986). Craniocervical postural relations and craniofacial morphology in 30 blind subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 90(4), 327–34.spa
dc.relation.references39. Behlfelt K. (1990). Enlarged tonsils and the effect of tonsillectomy. Characteristics of the dentition and facial skeleton. Posture of the head, hyoid bone and tongue. Mode of breathing. Swed Dent J Suppl, 72, 1–35.spa
dc.relation.references40. Cuccia AM, Lotti M, Caradonna D. (2008). Oral breathing and head posture. Angle Orthod., 78(1), 77–82.spa
dc.relation.references41. Solow B, Ovesen J, Nielsen PW, Wildschiødtz G, Tallgren A. (1993). Head posture in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod, 15(2), 107–14.spa
dc.relation.references42. Foster TD, Howat AP, Naish PJ. (1981). Variation in Cephalometric Reference Lines. Br J Orthod, 8(4), 183–7.spa
dc.relation.references43. Lundström A, Lundström F, Lebret LM, Moorrees CF. (1995). Natural Head Position and Natural Head Orientation: Basic Considerations in Cephalometric Analysis and Research. Eur J Orthod, 17(2), 111–20.spa
dc.relation.references44. Usumez S, Uysal T, Orhan M, Soganci E. (2006). Relationship between static natural head position and head position measured during walking. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 129(1), 42–7.spa
dc.relation.references46. Özbek MM, Köklü A. (1993). Natural cervical inclination and craniofacial structure. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 104(6), 584–91spa
dc.relation.references47. Festa F, Tecco S, Dolci M, Ciufolo F, Di Meo S, Filippi MR, et al. (2003). Relationship between cervical lordosis and facial morphology in Caucasian women with a skeletal class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study. Cranio, 21(2), 121–9.spa
dc.relation.references48. Vélez AL, Restrepo CC, Peláez-Vargas A, Gallego GJ, Alvarez E, Tamayo V, et al. (2007). Head posture and dental wear evaluation of bruxist children with primary teeth. J Oral Rehabil, 34(9), 663–70.spa
dc.relation.references49. AlKofide EA, AlNamankani E. (2007). The association between posture of the head and malocclusion in Saudi subjects. Cranio - J Craniomandib Pract, 25(2), 98–105.spa
dc.relation.references50. Braun S, Marcotte MR. (1995). Rationale of the segmented approach to orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 108(1), 1–8.spa
dc.relation.references51. Hedayati Z, Paknahad M, Zorriasatine F. (2013). Comparison of natural head position in different anteroposterior malocclusions. J Dent (Tehran), 10(3), 210–20.spa
dc.relation.references52. Restrepo C, Quintero Y, Tamayo M, Tamayo V. (2008). Efecto de la posición craneocervical en las funciones orales fisiológicas, 21(1), 71–5.spa
dc.relation.references53. Ricketts RM. (1976). Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs Part II. Am J Orthod, 70(4), 359–97.spa
dc.relation.references54. Kusnoto B, Kaur P, Salem A, Zhang Z, Galang-Boquiren MT, Viana G, et al. (2015). Implementation of ultra-low-dose CBCT for routine 2D orthodontic diagnostic radiographs: Cephalometric landmark identification and image quality assessment. Semin Orthod, 21(4), 233–47.spa
dc.relation.references55. Björk A. (1963). Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: Longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res, 42(1), 399–411.spa
dc.relation.references56. Moss ML, Salentijn L. (1969).The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod, 55(6), 566–77spa
dc.relation.references57. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P. (1998). “Effective condylar growth” and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114(4), 437–46.spa
dc.relation.references58. Kim J, Hiyama T. (2006). Longitudinal study regarding relationship among vertical dimension of occlusion, cant of occlusal plane and antero-posterior occlusal relation. Bull Kanagawa Dent Coll, 34(2), 130–2.spa
dc.relation.references59. Stutzmann JJ, Petrovic AG. (1990). Role of the lateral pterygoid muscle and meniscotemporomandibular frenum in spontaneous growth of the mandible and in growth stimulated by the postural hyperpropulsor. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 97(5), 381–92.spa
dc.relation.references60. López P. (2004). Población muestra y muestreo. Punto cero, 69-74.spa
dc.relation.references61. Miyajima K, McNamara JA, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T. (1996). Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 110(4), 431–8.spa
dc.relation.references62. Türkdönmez CO, Taner L, Uzuner FD, Güngör K. (2013).Craniofacial Evaluation of Class I Turkish Adults: Bimler Analysis. Undefined, 26(4), 169–76.spa
dc.relation.references63. Steiner CC. (1959). Cephalometrics In Clinical Practice. Angle Orthod, 29(1), 8–29.spa
dc.relation.references64. Steiner CC. (1960). The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Report of a case. Am J Orthod, 46(10), 721–35.spa
dc.relation.references65. Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP. (1998). Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasians and African Americans in Birmingham. Angle Orthod, 68(6), 503–12spa
dc.relation.references66. Oktay H. (1991). A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 99(2), 122–8.spa
dc.relation.references67. Farronato M, Maspero C, Abate A, Grippaudo C, Connelly ST, Tartaglia GM. (2020). 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements. Eur Radiol, 30(11), 6295–302.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordCephalometryspa
dc.subject.keywordDiagnosisspa
dc.subject.keywordOrthodonticsspa
dc.subject.keywordCraniofacial developmentspa
dc.subject.lembOrtodoncia preventivaspa
dc.subject.lembCraneometriaspa
dc.subject.lembOclusión (odontología)spa
dc.subject.lembMaloclusiónspa
dc.subject.lembPrognatismospa
dc.subject.proposalCefalometríaspa
dc.subject.proposalDiagnósticospa
dc.subject.proposalOrtodonciaspa
dc.subject.proposalDesarrollo cráneofacialspa
dc.titleDiferencias en la localización del porion en adultos con distintos marcos dentoesqueletales en el área de Bucaramangaspa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022SaavedraManuel.pdf
Tamaño:
821.1 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022SaavedraManuel1.pdf
Tamaño:
141.81 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022SaavedraManuel2.pdf
Tamaño:
212.39 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Acuerdo de publicación

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: