Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics

dc.contributor.authorRojas, Leidy J.
dc.contributor.authorFausto, Agnes M.F.
dc.contributor.authorMol, Anderson W.
dc.contributor.authorVelasco, Fermin G.
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, P.O.S.
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, G.
dc.contributor.authorFurquim, T.A.C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T20:56:17Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T20:56:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Optimization studies in digital mammography aid to assure the image quality and radiological protection of the patient. The aim of this work is to test effectiveness and applicability of a method based on a Figure of Merit (FOM = (IQFinv)2/AGD) to improve all the exposure parameters (Target/Filter combination, kVp and mAs) in order to improve the image acquisition technique that will provide the best compromise between image quality and the average glandular dose (AGD). Methods: A contrast-detail analysis, employing the test object CDMAM, was carried out for the digital mammography unit manufactured by Lorad Hologic – model Selenia. We simulated two breast thicknesses using phantoms and a Figure of Merit as optimization tool, which includes an indicator of image quality, the IQFinv and the average glandular dose. Images of the ACR and TORMAM phantoms were obtained with both, automatic and optimized exposure parameters. In order to compare the image quality, the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) was measured in each image. Results: In the two phantoms, for both 4.5 and 7.5 cm thicknesses, the AGDs obtained with the optimized parameters show a reduction. In addition, the images obtained with the optimized exposure parameters, had the same or a better image quality when compared to the images obtained using the automatic mode. Conclusions: The proposed optimization methodology proved to be an effective tool to improve the digital mammography unit, due to the use of objective metrics for evaluation and validation of the results.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationRojas, L. J., Fausto, A. M. F., Mol, A. W., Velasco, F. G., Abreu, P. O. S., Henriques, G., & Furquim, T. A. C. (2017). Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics. Bogotá: doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.001spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.001spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/17104
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization. Breast cancer: estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. GLOBOCAN 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/ Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx (accessed December 12, 2015).spa
dc.relation.referencesMichaelson J, Satija S, Moore R, Weber G, Halpern E, Garland A, et al. The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences. Cancer 2002;94:37–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10154.spa
dc.relation.referencesYaffe MJ, Mainprize JG, Jong RA. Technical developments in mammography. Health Phys 2008;95:599–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000327648. 42431.75.spa
dc.relation.referencesMackenzie A, Warren LM, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM, Cooke J, Dance DR, et al. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Phys Med 2016;32:568–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejmp.2016.03.004.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouwman RW, van Engen RE, Broeders MJM, den Heeten GJ, Dance DR, Young KC, et al. Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography? Phys Med 2016;32:1559–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ejmp.2016.11.109.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouwman RW, Goffi M, van Engen RE, Broeders MJM, Dance DR, Young KC, et al. Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography? Phys Med 2017;33:95–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.015.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen RC, Longo R, Rigon L, Zanconati F, De Pellegrin A, Arfelli F, et al. Measurement of the linear attenuation coefficients of breast tissues by synchrotron radiation computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:4993–5005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/008.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohns Paul C, Yaffe Martin J. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys Med Biol 1987;41:315.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan MP, Cooke MM, McCarthy GM. Microcalcifications associated with breast cancer: an epiphenomenon or biologically significant feature of selected tumors? J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2005;10:181–7. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10911-005-5400-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesCox RF, Hernandez-Santana A, Ramdass S, McMahon G, Harmey JH, Morgan MP. Microcalcifications in breast cancer: novel insights into the molecular mechanism and functional consequence of mammary mineralisation. Br J Cancer 2012;106:525–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.583.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker R, Rogers KD, Shepherd N, Stone N. New relationships between breast microcalcifications and cancer. Br J Cancer 2010;103:1034–9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605873.spa
dc.relation.referencesQian X. Fundamentals of digital mammography. In: Markey MK, editor. Phys. mammographic imaging. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2013. p. 3–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission. Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection on individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directi ve 84/466/Euratom; 1997:22.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorg M, Badr I, Royle G. The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) in digital mammography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012;151:81–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaldelli P, Phelan N, Egan G. Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector. Br J Radiol 2010;83:290–5. http://dx. doi.org/10.1259/bjr/60404532.spa
dc.relation.referencesKanaga KC, Yap HH, Laila SE, Sulaiman T, Zaharah MSA. A critical comparison of three full field digital mammography systems using figure of merit. Med J Malaysia 2010;65:119–22.spa
dc.relation.referencesSamei E, Dobbins JT, Lo JY, Tornai MP. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:220–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch562.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams MB, Raghunathan P, More MJ, Seibert JA, Kwan A, Lo JY, et al. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Med Phys 2008;35:2414–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2912177.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomal A, Perez AMMM, Silva MC, Poletti ME. Experimental evaluation of the image quality and dose in digital mammography: influence of X-ray spectrum. Radiat Phys Chem 2015;116:282–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. radphyschem.2015.04.019.spa
dc.relation.referencesFurquim TC, Nersissian DY. Estudos de otimização de dose e qualidade de imagem em processos de transição tecnológica em mamografia Studies of dose optimization and image quality in technological transition in mammography. Rev Bras Fis Médica 2011;4:11–4.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordDigital mammographyspa
dc.subject.keywordImage qualityspa
dc.subject.keywordContrast-detail analysisspa
dc.subject.keywordOptimizationspa
dc.titleOptimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metricsspa
dc.type.categoryGeneración de Nuevo Conocimiento: Artículos publicados en revistas especializadas - Electrónicosspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics.pdf
Tamaño:
717.65 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo WOS

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: