Comparative Study of three non-destructive techniques for metal loss inspection in pipe walls

dc.contributor.authorQuiroga, J L
dc.contributor.authorQuiroga, J E
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, P P
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=yGtyebAAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T17:29:13Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T17:29:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-19
dc.description.abstractIdentifying and describing metal loss defects in pipe walls is an indispensable task in transporting operations, this abnormal condition mainly appears as a result of corrosion and gouging. These metal losses can lead the pipeline to unsafe conditions originating leaks, rupture of the structure and associated hazards. In this work is presented a comparative study to assess the capabilities of detecting and describing the metal loss in a pipe wall based on three nondestructive techniques: Magnetic Flux Leakage, Eddy Current Testing, and Guided Waves. These are compared by revising their physical principle and presenting a brief review of results obtained in metal loss inspection by considering some criteria as its sensitivity, depth of penetration, the range of inspection, and implementation easiness. Finally, the discussion is focused on of establishing which technique is most adequate for the inspection according to some characteristics of the metal loss defect.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/578/1/012097spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/23304
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.relation.annexedhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.relation.referencesShi Y, Zhang C, Li R, Cai M and Jia G, 2015, Sens. 15, 31036-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesKopp G and Willems H, 2013, NDT & E Int. 55, 75-81.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu B, He L, Zhang H, Cao Y and Fernandez H, 2017, Meas. 103, 275-82.spa
dc.relation.referencesLayouni M, Salah Hamdi M and Tahar S, 2017, Appl. Soft Comp. 52, 247-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesJian F, Jun-Feng Z, Sen-Xiang L, Hong-Yang W and Rui-Ze M, 2013, Chin. Phys. B, 22, 018103.spa
dc.relation.referencesWu D, Liu Z, Wang X and Su L, 2017, NDT & E Int. 91, 148-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson J, Kaba M, and Tian G, 2008, 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, (Shanghai/NDT Internet Publishing)spa
dc.relation.referencesJaimes C and Roa S, 2016, Prosp. 14, 22-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesSorabh, Raghav V and Sengar S, 2017, Materials Today: proc. (Elsevier/ Hyderabad, India) 4, 2665-72.spa
dc.relation.referencesGloria N, Areiza M, Miranda I and Rebello J, 2009, NDT & E Int. 42, 669-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerson N, 2012, Nondestruct. Aust. 49, 48-51.spa
dc.relation.referencesTatarinov A, Barkanov E N, Davydov E and Mihovski M, 2018, Non-destructive Testing and Repair of Pipelines, Springer, Cham, p 15-29.spa
dc.relation.referencesRose J, 2014, Ultrasonic guided waves in solid media, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK.spa
dc.relation.referencesLui Z, He C, Wu B, Wang X and Yang S, 2006, Ultrason. 44, 1135-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesLowe M, Alleyne D, David N and Cawley P, 1998, Ultrason. 36, 147-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesNakamura N, Ogi H and Hirao M, 2017, NDT & E Int. 87, 78-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesLowe P, Sanderson R, Pedram S, Boulgourin N, and Mudge P, 2015, Phys. Proced. 70, 338-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesCheong Y, Kim S, Lee D, Jung H, and Kim Y, 2004, World Conference on NDT, Montreal, Canada.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmjad U, Yadav S and Kundu T, 2015, Ultrason. 62, 223-36.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogelaar B and Golombok M, 2016, Mechanical Systems and Signal Proc. 78, 107-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiaz A, Doctor S, Hixon J and Mathews R, 2006, U. S. NRC. Washington, U.S.spa
dc.relation.referencesUlapane N, Alempijevic A, Vidal T, and Valls J, 2017, Sens. 17, 2208.spa
dc.relation.referencesMachado M, Rosado L, Pedrosa N, Vostner A, Miranda R, Piedade M and Santos T, 2017, NDT & E Int. 87, 111-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi Y, Yan B, Li W, Jing H, Chen Z, and Li D, 2017, NDT & E Int. 88, 51-8.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordInspection in pipe wallsspa
dc.subject.keywordMetal lossspa
dc.titleComparative Study of three non-destructive techniques for metal loss inspection in pipe wallsspa
dc.type.categoryGeneración de Nuevo Conocimiento: Artículos publicados en revistas especializadas - Electrónicosspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
760.pdf
Tamaño:
945.98 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: