Evaluación clínica de pilares con base de titanio Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis

dc.contributor.advisorLadino Montenegro, Luis Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorSalas Mendoza, Katiuska Lilieth
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez Sanguino, Andrea Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorGuzman Vargas, Lina Alexandra
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T19:28:49Z
dc.date.available2025-09-10T19:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-04
dc.descriptionIntroducción: La pérdida dental impacta la función, la estética y la salud general, requiriendo tratamientos que consideren estos factores. Los implantes dentales han demostrado alta eficacia en la rehabilitación oral, con tasas de éxito elevadas. El titanio es el material estándar debido a su osteointegración y durabilidad, aunque la zirconia ofrece ventajas estéticas. Sin embargo, pueden presentarse complicaciones mecánicas, biológicas y estéticas. La selección del pilar y la conexión adecuada influyen en la estabilidad funcional y la longevidad de la restauración. Objetivo: Evaluar el comportamiento clínico de los implantes con base de titanio en términos de supervivencia, pérdida ósea marginal y periimplantitis mediante una revisión sistemática de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados publicados entre 2020 y 2024, sintetizando la literatura a través de un metaanálisis. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis sobre pilares Ti Base con 12 meses de seguimiento. La población de estudio incluyó ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en bases de datos como PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase y Google Scholar. Se usó RoB 2 para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y RevMan para el análisis estadístico. Se incluyeron 16 estudios en la revisión sistemática y 3 en el metaanálisis. La recolección de datos se organizó en Excel y se descartaron documentos irrelevantes. Conclusiones: Los pilares de titanio presentan altas tasas de supervivencia (98,7% - 100%), baja incidencia de periimplantitis y pérdida ósea marginal no significativa. La menor profundidad de sondaje observada a los 4 y 5 años sugiere mayor estabilidad periimplantaria. Se recomienda seguimiento prolongado para evaluar la evolución ósea y la salud periimplantaria
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Tooth loss impacts function, aesthetics, and overall health, requiring treatments that consider these factors. Dental implants have proven highly effective in oral rehabilitation, with high success rates. Titanium is the standard material due to its osseointegration and durability, although zirconia offers aesthetic advantages. However, mechanical, biological, and aesthetic complications may arise. The selection of the abutment and the appropriate connection influence the functional stability and longevity of the restoration. Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of titanium-based implants in terms of survival, marginal bone loss, and peri-implantitis through a systematic review of randomized clinical trials published between 2020 and 2024, synthesizing the literature through a meta-analysis. Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on Ti Base abutments with 12 months of follow-up. The study population included randomized clinical trials in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. RoB 2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and RevMan was used for statistical analysis. Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review and three in the meta-analysis. Data collection was organized in Excel, and irrelevant documents were discarded. Conclusions: Titanium abutments have high survival rates (98.7%–100%), low incidence of peri-implantitis, and insignificant marginal bone loss. The lower probing depth observed at 4 and 5 years suggests greater peri-implant stability. Long-term follow-up is recommended to evaluate bone evolution and peri-implant health
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Rehabilitación Oralspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationSalas Mendoza, K . L., Gutierrez Sanguino, A . F. y Guzman Vargas, L . A . (2025). Evaluación clínica de pilares con base de titanio Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. [Tesis de posgrado]. Universidad Santo Tomas, Bucaramanga, Colombia
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/69535
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramanga
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Rehabilitación Oralspa
dc.relation.referencesAbduo, J., & Lyons, K. (2013). Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. In International Journal of Dentistry (Vol. 2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/768121
dc.relation.referencesAbraham, C. M. (2014). A Brief Historical Perspective on Dental Implants, Their Surface Coatings and Treatments. The Open Dentistry Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010050
dc.relation.referencesAgustín-Panadero, R., Serra-Pastor, B., Roig-Vanaclocha, A., Fons-Font, A., & Solá-Ruiz, M. F. (2019). Fracture resistance and the mode of failure produced in metal-free crowns cemented onto zirconia abutments in dental implants. PLoS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220551
dc.relation.referencesAndreiotelli, M., Wenz, H. J., & Kohal, R. J. (2009). Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. In Clinical Oral Implants Research (Vol. 20, Issue SUPPL. 4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x
dc.relation.referencesBuser, D., Sennerby, L., & De Bruyn, H. (2017). Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12185
dc.relation.referencesCarpentieri, J., Greenstein, G., & Cavallaro, J. (2019). Hierarchy of restorative space required for different types of dental implant prostheses. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 150(8), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2019.04.015
dc.relation.referencesChen, Z., Lin, C.-Y., Li, J., Wang, H.-L., & Yu, H. (2019). Influence of abutment height on peri- implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(1), 14-21.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.003
dc.relation.referencesChrcanovic, B. R., Kisch, J., & Larsson, C. (2020). Analysis of technical complications and risk factors for failure of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12927
dc.relation.referencesMedeiros, R. A., Pellizzer, E. P., Vechiato Filho, A. J., dos Santos, D. M., da Silva, E. V. F., & Goiato, M. C. (2016). Evaluation of marginal bone loss of dental implants with internal or external connections and its association with other variables: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(4), 501-506.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.027
dc.relation.referencesDerksen, W., Joda, T., Chantler, J., Fehmer, V., Gallucci, G. O., Gierthmuehlen, P. C., Ioannidis, A., Karasan, D., Lanis, A., Pala, K., Pjetursson, B. E., Roccuzzo, M., Sailer, I., Strauss, F. J., Sun, T. C., Wolfart, S., & Zitzmann, N. U. (2023). Group 2 <scp>ITI</scp> Consensus Report: Technological developments in implant prosthetics. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(S26), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14148
dc.relation.referencesElleuch, S., Jrad, H., Wali, M., & Dammak, F. (2023). Agglomeration effect on biomechanical performance of CNT-reinforced dental implant using micromechanics-based approach. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 145, 106023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106023
dc.relation.referencesGalindo-Moreno, P., Catena, A., Pérez-Sayáns, M., Fernández-Barbero, J. E., O’Valle, F., & Padial-Molina, M. (2022). Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13122
dc.relation.referencesGehrke, P., Pietruska, M. J., Korth, A., Schöttler, T., Jenatschke, R., Fischer, C., Sader, R., & Weigl, P. (2024). Retrospective, Multi-center, Cohort Study Evaluating Clinical, Technical, Biological, and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant Supported Zirconia Single Crowns Cemented on Titanium-base Abutments: 7-year Mean Follow-up. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11
dc.relation.referencesHalim, F. C., Pesce, P., De Angelis, N., Benedicenti, S., & Menini, M. (2022). Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. In Journal of Clinical Medicine (Vol. 11, Issue 17). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175052
dc.relation.referencesHämmerle, C. H. F., & Glauser, R. (2004). Clinical evaluation of dental implant treatment. Periodontology 2000, 34(1), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.003434.x
dc.relation.referencesHeitz-Mayfield, L. J. A. (2024). Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: key features and differences. British Dental Journal, 236(10), 791–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024- 7402-z
dc.relation.referencesHelal, E., Gierthmuehlen, P. C., Bonfante, E. A., Campos, T. M. B., Prott, L. S., Langner, R., & Spitznagel, F. A. (2023). Influence of straight versus angulated screw channel titanium bases on failure loads of two‐piece ceramic and titanium implants restored with screw‐retained monolithic crowns: An in‐vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(11), 1217–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14157
dc.relation.referencesHicklin, S. P., Sailer, I., Todorovic, A., Mojon, P., Worni, A., & Strasding, M. (2024). Immediately versus early placed bone-level-tapered implants supporting all-ceramic crowns on titanium base abutments: 1-year radiographic and pink esthetic outcomes of a multicenter pilot RCT. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 36(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13206
dc.relation.referencesHoque, M. E., Showva, N. N., Ahmed, M., Rashid, A. Bin, Sadique, S. E., El-Bialy, T., & Xu, H. (2022). Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: current trends, recent developments, and future prospects. In Heliyon (Vol. 8, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11300
dc.relation.referencesKalghoum, I., Othmen, I. Ben, Boudabous, E., Salem, L. Ben, & Hadyaoui, D. (2023). Tooth Shade and Blood Type: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study in Tunisia. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 24(8). https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3538
dc.relation.referencesKim, W. H., Song, E. S., Ju, K. W., Lim, D., Han, D. W., Jung, T. G., Jeong, Y. H., Lee, J. H., & Kim, B. (2020). Mechanical assessment of fatigue characteristics between single-and multi- directional cyclic loading modes on a dental implant system. Materials, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071545
dc.relation.referencesKoch, L., Hahnel, S., Rauch, A., & Rosentritt, M. (2025). Polishing of 4Y- and 5Y- zirconia: effects on roughness, color and gloss. Clinical Oral Investigations, 29(3), 154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06244-1
dc.relation.referencesLadino, L. G., Sanabria, A., & Cruz, M. (2020). Titanium Bases in Implant Dentistry: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Scientific Archives of Dental Sciences , 3(9).
dc.relation.referencesLiu, M., Wang, S., Chen, H., & Liu, Y. (2022). A pilot study of a deep learning approach to detect marginal bone loss around implants. BMC Oral Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02035-8
dc.relation.referencesLu, X., Wu, Z., Xu, K., Wang, X., Wang, S., Qiu, H., Li, X., & Chen, J. (2021). Multifunctional Coatings of Titanium Implants Toward Promoting Osseointegration and Preventing Infection: Recent Developments. In Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.783816
dc.relation.referencesMallick, S., Murali, P. S., Kuttappa, M. N., Shetty, P., & Nair, A. (2021). Optimal sites for mini‐ implant insertion in the lingual or palatal alveolar cortical bone as assessed by cone beam computed tomography in South Indian population. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 24(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12415
dc.relation.referencesMandurino, M., Di Domenico, G. L., Baldani, S., Collivasone, G., Gherlone, E. F., Cantatore, G., & Paolone, G. (2023). Dental Restorations. Bioengineering, 10(7), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070820
dc.relation.referencesMühlemann, S., Lakha, T., Jung, R. E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Benic, G. I. (2020). Prosthetic outcomes and clinical performance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia versus porcelain- fused-to-metal implant crowns in the molar region: 1-year results of a RCT. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13631
dc.relation.referencesMüller, F., Srinivasan, M., Krause, K., & Schimmel, M. (2022). Periodontitis and peri‐implantitis in elderly people experiencing institutional and hospital confinement. Periodontology 2000, 90(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12454
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, M., Vilarrasa, J., Ruíz-Magaz, V., Albertini, M., & Nart, J. (2023). Influence of the abutment height on marginal bone level changes around two-piece dental implants: Meta- analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. In Clinical Oral Implants Research (Vol. 34, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14025
dc.relation.referencesOshida, Y., Tuna, E. B., Aktören, O., & Gençay, K. (2010). Dental Implant Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 11(4), 1580–1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11041580
dc.relation.referencesPamato, S., Honório, H. M., da Costa, J. A., Traebert, J. L., Bonfante, E. A., & Pereira, J. R. (2020). The influence of titanium base abutments on peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parametersand marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12900
dc.relation.referencesPitta, J., Bijelic-Donova, J., Burkhardt, F., Fehmer, V., Närhi, T., & Sailer, I. (2020). Temporary Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using Titanium Base Abutments: An In Vitro Study on Bonding Stability and Pull-out Forces. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 33(5), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6778
dc.relation.referencesRathe, F., Junker, R., Heumann, C., Blumenröhr, J., Auschill, T., Arweiler, N., & Schlee, M. (2022). Long-term effects of titanium-base abutments on peri-implant health: A 5-year randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Oral Implantology (Berlin, Germany), 15(2).
dc.relation.referencesSailer, I., Karasan, D., Todorovic, A., Ligoutsikou, M., & Pjetursson, B. E. (2022). Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy. Periodontology 2000, 88(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12416
dc.relation.referencesSharma, S., Ravi Kiran, S., Kumar, P., Shankar, R., & Kumar Upadhyay, A. (2024). Per-Ingvar Brånemark (1929–2014): A Homage to the Father of Osseointegration and Modern Dentistry. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68655
dc.relation.referencesVazouras, K., Gholami, H., Margvelashvili-Malament, M., Kim, Y. J., Finkelman, M., & Weber, H. P. (2022). An Esthetic Evaluation of Different Abutment Materials in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Using a Crossover Design. Journal of Prosthodontics, 31(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13520
dc.relation.referencesVerma, A., Singh, S. V., Arya, D., Shivakumar, S., & Chand, P. (2023). Mechanical failures of dental implants and supported prostheses: A systematic review. In Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (Vol. 13, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.02.009
dc.relation.referencesWalter, N., Stich, T., Docheva, D., Alt, V., & Rupp, M. (2022). Evolution of implants and advancements for osseointegration: A narrative review. Injury, 53, S69–S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.057
dc.relation.referencesWang, J. Q., Zhang, Y., Pang, M., Wang, Y. Q., Yuan, J., Peng, H., Zhang, W., Dai, L., & Li, H. W. (2022). Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis. Frontiers in Genetics, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.915679
dc.relation.referencesWolfart, S., Rittich, A., Groß, K., Hartkamp, O., von der Stück, A., Raith, S., & Reich, S. (2021). Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13849
dc.relation.referencesZhao, X., You, L., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Ding, L., Li, J., Xiao, C., Han, F., & Li, B. (2020). Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants by surface modification with silicon-doped titania nanotubes. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 15. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S270311
dc.rightsAttribution 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordTitanium base
dc.subject.keywordTi-base abutment
dc.subject.keywordMeta-analysis
dc.subject.keywordDental implants
dc.subject.keywordDental abutment
dc.subject.lembOdontología especializada
dc.subject.lembDientes postizos
dc.subject.lembAnálisis de información
dc.subject.lembEnsayos clínicos
dc.subject.proposalBase de titanio
dc.subject.proposalPilar Ti-base
dc.subject.proposalMetaanálisis
dc.subject.proposalImplantes dentales
dc.subject.proposalPilar dental
dc.titleEvaluación clínica de pilares con base de titanio Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025salaskatiuska,gutierrezandrea,guzmanlina1.pdf
Tamaño:
232.01 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025salaskatiuska,gutierrezandrea,guzmanlina2.pdf
Tamaño:
162.64 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Acuerdo de publicación
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025salaskatiuska,gutierrezandrea,guzmanlina3.pdf
Tamaño:
202.98 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Apéndices
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025salaskatiuska,gutierrezandrea,guzmanlina.pdf
Tamaño:
800.18 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: