Ecuaciones de Estimación Generalizada para Modelar el Efecto Inward-Outward en Español

dc.contributor.advisorOrtiz Rico, Andres Felipe
dc.contributor.authorMacías Bohórquez, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Rico, Andres Felipe
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000650579spa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001821332spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xDebiZgAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=aospa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-8756spa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T18:43:29Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T18:43:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.descriptionEl efecto Inward-Outward plantea que los movimientos articulatorios orales pueden influir en los procesos psicológicos, como la percepción y la confianza, particularmente en el contexto de comercio electrónico. Este estudio replicó y amplió los hallazgos de Silva y Topolinski (2018) para investigar si los consumidores perciben como más confiables a los proveedores cuyos nombres generan movimientos articulatorios “inward” (hacia dentro de la boca) en comparación con los nombres “outward” (hacia fuera). Se diseñó un experimento en el que participaron 156 estudiantes seleccionados por conveniencia, de pregrado y posgrado universitario (91 mujeres, 65 hombres, con una edad media de 26.13 años y una desviación estándar de 7.77 años). Los participantes eligieron entre parejas de nombres Inward-Outward y luego evaluaron la confiabilidad de los vendedores asociados. Los resultados, modelados con Ecuaciones de Estimación Generalizada (GEE), mostraron que los nombres inward fueron percibidos como significativamente más confiables que los outward (p < 0.001). Sin embargo, no se halló una relación directa entre la preferencia inicial y las elecciones finales, lo que sugiere que el efecto Inward-Outward podría operar como un heurístico basado en la fluidez articulatoria y el orden de presentación, más que en un proceso consciente de toma de decisiones. Se discuten implicaciones ergonómicas y se sugieren futuras investigaciones para explorar el papel de factores como el posicionamiento en la interfaz y el tiempo de respuesta en la percepción de confianza.spa
dc.description.abstractThe Inward-Outward effect suggests that oral articulatory movements can influence psychological processes, such as perception and trust, particularly in the context of e-commerce. This study replicated and extended the findings of Silva and Topolinski (2018) to investigate whether consumers perceive providers with names that generate “inward” articulatory movements (into the mouth) as more trustworthy compared to those with “outward” movements (out of the mouth). An experiment was designed involving 156 university undergraduate and graduate students selected by convenience sampling (91 women, 65 men, with a mean age of 26.13 years and a standard deviation of 7.77 years). Participants chose between pairs of Inward-Outward names and then evaluated the trustworthiness of the associated sellers. The results, modeled using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE), showed that inward names were perceived as significantly more trustworthy than outward names (p < 0.001). However, no direct relationship was found between initial preference and final choices, suggesting that the Inward-Outward effect may function as a heuristic based on articulatory fluency and presentation order, rather than a conscious decision-making process. Ergonomic implications are discussed, and future research is suggested to explore the role of factors such as interface positioning and response time in the perception of trust.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Estadística Aplicadaspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.identifier.citationMacías Bohórquez, R., y Ortiz Rico, A. F. (2024). Ecuaciones de estimación generalizada para modelar el efecto Inward-Outward en español. [Trabajo de Maestría, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/59411
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Estadísticaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría Estadística Aplicadaspa
dc.relation.referencesAlter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 985-990. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.985spa
dc.relation.referencesAlter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 985-990. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.985spa
dc.relation.referencesAnsary, A., & Hashim, N. M. H. (2018). Brand image and equity: The mediating role of brand equity drivers and moderating effects of product type and word of mouth. Review of Managerial Science, 12(4), 969-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0235-2spa
dc.relation.referencesAraos, K. B., & Vergara, M. L. M. (2015). Relación entre confianza, cooperación y redes sociales: Evidencia experimental en Chile. Redes: Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 26(2), 118-157. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.558spa
dc.relation.referencesArrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. Norton.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnet, T., Pham, M. T., & Stephen, A. T. (2012). Consumers’ trust in feelings as information. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 720-735. https://doi.org/10.1086/664978spa
dc.relation.referencesBaier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231-260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745spa
dc.relation.referencesBahník, Š., & Vranka, M. A. (2017). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it might not be risky: The effect of fluency on judgment of risk does not generalize to new stimuli. Psychological Science, 28(4), 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616685770spa
dc.relation.referencesBatba, R. (1986). Affective advertising: Role, processes, and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1086/209086spa
dc.relation.referencesBauer, P. C. (2021). Clearing the jungle: Conceptualising trust and trustworthiness. Social Science Research, 85, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102355spa
dc.relation.referencesDakduk, S., Ter Horst, E., Santalla, Z., Molina, G., & Malavé, J. (2017). Customer behavior in electronic commerce: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000200002spa
dc.relation.referencesDerbaix, C., & Abeele, P. V. (1985). Consumer inferences and consumer preferences: The status of cognition and consciousness in consumer behavior theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(3), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(85)90003-5spa
dc.relation.referencesFaul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146spa
dc.relation.referencesGerten, J., & Topolinski, S. (2020). Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in-out preference effect. Psychological Research, 84(3), 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1095-3spa
dc.relation.referencesGodinho, S., & Garrido, M. V. (2020). The “ins” and “outs” of product and services marketing: The influence of sentient wanderings in consumer decision-making. Psychology and Marketing, 37(10), 1352-1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21384spa
dc.relation.referencesGodinho, S., Garrido, M. V., & Horchak, O. V. (2019a). Oral approach avoidance: A replication and extension for Slavic and Turkic phonations. Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000459spa
dc.relation.referencesGodinho, S., Garrido, M. V., Zurn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2019b). Oral kinematics: Examining the role of edibility and valence in the in-out effect. Cognition and Emotion, 33(5), 1094-1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1570601spa
dc.relation.referencesGoyal, R. K., & Mashimo, H. (2006). Physiology of oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal motility. GI Motility Online. https://doi.org/10.1038/gimo1spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185spa
dc.relation.referencesLaverde-Rojas, H., Martínez, C. A., Camargo, O. J., Rojas-Matute, G., Sandoval-Escobar, M. C., & Correa, J. C. (2019). The consistency of trust-sales relationship in Latin-American e-commerce. arXiv: Computers and Society. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01280spa
dc.relation.referencesLaham, S. M., Koval, P., & Alter, A. L. (2012). The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 752-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLindau, B., & Topolinski, S. (2018). The influence of articulation dynamics on recognition memory. Cognition, 179, 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.021spa
dc.relation.referencesMaschmann, I. T., Körner, A., Boecker, L., & Topolinski, S. (2020). Front in the mouth, front in the word: The driving mechanisms of the in-out effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(4), 792-807. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000196spa
dc.relation.referencesRachlin, H. (1989). Judgment, Decision and Choice: A Cognitive/Behavioral Synthesis. Freeman and Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2010). Comportamiento del consumidor. Pearson Educación.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, R., Koch, M.-L., Rickers, K., Kreuzer, G., & Topolinski, S. (2019). The Tinder™ stamp: Perceived trustworthiness of online daters and its persistence in neutral contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.041spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, R., & Topolinski, S. (2018). My username is IN! The influence of inward vs. outward wandering usernames on judgments of online seller trustworthiness. Psychology & Marketing, 35(4), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21120spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1978). On how to decide what to do. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003595spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. (1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSnijders, C., & Keren, G. (1999). Determinants of trust. In G. Keren (Ed.), Games and behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 355-383). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327524ijrbc01013spa
dc.relation.referencesSong, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20(2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.xspa
dc.relation.referencesStatista. (2019). E-commerce sales in Latin America from 2017 to 2023 (in billion U.S. dollars). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/804022/latin-america-e-commerce-sales/spa
dc.relation.referencesThaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Un pequeño empujón: El impulso que necesitas para tomar mejores decisiones sobre salud, dinero y felicidad. Taurus.spa
dc.relation.referencesTopolinski, S., & Bakhtiari, G. (2016a). Sequential approach-avoidance movements: The case of inward and outward articulation. Social Psychology, 47(2), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000256spa
dc.relation.referencesTopolinski, S., Bakhtiari, G., & Erle, T. M. (2016b). Can I cut the Gordian knot? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams. Cognition, 146, 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.010spa
dc.relation.referencesTopolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016). Minimal conditions of motor inductions of approach-avoidance states: The case of oral movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1589-1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000230spa
dc.relation.referencesTopolinski, S., Boecker, L., Erle, T. M., Bakhtiari, G., & Pecher, D. (2017). Matching between oral inward–outward movements of object names and oral movements associated with denoted objects. Cognition and Emotion, 31(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1139062spa
dc.relation.referencesTopolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach–avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 885-896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036477spa
dc.relation.referencesTopolinski, S., Zurn, M., & Schneider, I. K. (2015). What’s in and what’s out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion, 14(1), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151spa
dc.relation.referencesZajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151spa
dc.relation.referencesZiegler, A., Kastner, C., Blettner, M., & Kieser, M. (2010). The generalized estimating equations: An annotated bibliography. Biometrical Journal, 52(4), 436-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200900274spa
dc.relation.referencesZurn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2017). When trust comes easy: Articulatory fluency increases transfers in the trust game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.016spa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subject.keywordInward-Outwardspa
dc.subject.keywordE-commercespa
dc.subject.keywordGeneralized Estimating Equations (GEE)spa
dc.subject.lembEstadísticaspa
dc.subject.lembEstadística Aplicadaspa
dc.subject.lembComerciospa
dc.subject.proposalInward-Outwardspa
dc.subject.proposalE-commercespa
dc.subject.proposalEcuaciones de Estimación Generalizadas (GEE)spa
dc.titleEcuaciones de Estimación Generalizada para Modelar el Efecto Inward-Outward en Españolspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesis de maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2024ricardomacias.pdf
Tamaño:
2.45 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2024cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
28.19 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2024cartadederechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
887.29 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: