Simulation of infrastructure options for urban water management in two urban catchments in Bogotá, Colombia

dc.contributor.authorPeña-Guzmán, Carlos Andrés
dc.contributor.authorMelgarejo, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Ortiz, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorMesa, Duvan Javier
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-06T21:16:14Z
dc.date.available2019-06-06T21:16:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-05
dc.description.abstractUrban areas are currently experiencing rapid growth, which brings with it increases in the population, the expansion of impervious surfaces, and an overall jump in the environmental and hydrological impact. To mitigate such an impact, different strategies proposed to tackle this problem often vary; for example, stormwater tanks, the reuse of wastewater and grey water, the installation of equipment to reduce water consumption, and education-based approaches. Consequently, this article presents the simulation and evaluation of implementing infrastructure options (stormwater harvesting, reuse of industrial waters, water-saving technology in residential sectors, and reuse of water from washing machines) for managing urban water in two urban catchments (Fucha and Tunjuelo) in Bogotá, Colombia, over three periods: baseline, 10 years, and 20 years. The simulation was performed using the software Urban Volume Quality (UVQ) and revealed a possible reduction in drinking water consumption of up to 47% for the Fucha Catchment and 40% for the Tunjuelo Catchment; with respect to wastewater, the reduction was up to 20% for the Fucha Catchment and 25% for the Tunjuelo Catchment. Lastly, two scenarios were evaluated in terms of potential savings related to water supply and sewage fees. The implementation of strategies 3 and 6 insofar as these two strategies impacted the hydric resources. Therefore, there would be a significant reduction in contaminant loads and notable economic benefits attributable to implementing these strategies.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationPeña-Guzmán, C. A., Melgarejo, J., Lopez-Ortiz, I., & Mesa, D. J. (2017). Simulation of infrastructure options for urban water management in two urban catchments in bogotá, colombia. Bogotá: doi:10.3390/w9110858spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w9110858spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/17050
dc.relation.referencesFletcher, T.D.; Andrieu, H.; Hamel, P. Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 51, 261–279. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, T.R. Urban water management for better urban life in Latin America. Urban Water 2000, 2, 71–78. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesMcIntyre, N.E.; Knowles-Yánez, K.; Hope, D. Urban Ecology as an Interdisciplinary Field: Differences in the use of “Urban” Between the Social and Natural Sciences. In Urban Ecology; Marzluff, J.M., Shulenberger, E., Endlicher, W., Alberti, M., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., Simon, U., ZumBrunnen, C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 49–65. ISBN 978-0-387-73411-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesWen, B.; van der Zouwen, M.; Horlings, E.; van der Meulen, B.; van Vierssen, W. Transitions in urban water management and patterns of international, interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration in urban water science. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2015, 15, 123–139. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesMakropoulos, C.K.; Natsis, K.; Liu, S.; Mittas, K.; Butler, D. Decision support for sustainable option selection in integrated urban water management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23, 1448–1460. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesFurlong, C.; Brotchie, R.; Considine, R.; Finlayson, G.; Guthrie, L. Key concepts for Integrated Urban Water Management infrastructure planning: Lessons from Melbourne. Util. Policy 2017, 45, 84–96. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, V.G. Applying Integrated UrbanWater Management Concepts: A Review of Australian Experience. Environ. Manag. 2006, 37, 589–605. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, R.R.; Keath, N.; Wong, T.H.F. Urban water management in cities: Historical, current and future regimes. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59, 847–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, T.A.; Gujer,W. The concept of sustainable UrbanWater Management. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35, 3–10. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesPrice, R.K.; Vojinovi´c, Z. Urban Hydroinformatics: Data, Models, and Decision Support for Integrated Urban Water Management; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-1-84339-274-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesFurlong, C.; De Silva, S.; Guthrie, L.; Considine, R. Developing a water infrastructure planning framework for the complex modern planning environment. Util. Policy 2016, 38, 1–10. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesFurlong, C.; Silva, S.D.; Guthrie, L. Planning scales and approval processes for IUWM projects; lessons from Melbourne, Australia. Water Policy 2016, 18, 783–802. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesAsano, T.; Levine, A.D. Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: Past, present, and future. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33, 1–14. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesBrodie, I. Stormwater harvesting and WSUD frequent flow management: A compatibility analysis. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 66, 612–619. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.referencesChristova-Boal, D.; Eden, R.E.; McFarlane, S. An investigation into greywater reuse for urban residential properties. Desalination 1996, 106, 391–397. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesFletcher, T.D.; Mitchell, V.G.; Deletic, A.; Ladson, T.R.; Séven, A. Is stormwater harvesting beneficial to urban waterway environmental flows? Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, 265–272. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.referencesGeller, E.S.; Erickson, J.B.; Buttram, B.A. Attempts to promote residential water conservation with educational, behavioral and engineering strategies. Popul. Environ. 1983, 6, 96–112. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.referencesMcArdle, P.; Gleeson, J.; Hammond, T.; Heslop, E.; Holden, R.; Kuczera, G. Centralised urban stormwater harvesting for potable reuse. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63, 16–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, V.G.; Deletic, A.; Fletcher, T.D.; Hatt, B.E.; McCarthy, D.T. Achieving multiple benefits from stormwater harvesting. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, 135–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.referencesStrecker, E.; Quigley, M.; Urbonas, B.; Jones, J.; Clary, J. Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2001, 127, 144–149. [CrossRef]spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordUrban water cyclespa
dc.subject.keywordUrban water managementspa
dc.subject.keywordSimulationspa
dc.subject.keywordUVQspa
dc.subject.keywordCost-benefit analysisspa
dc.titleSimulation of infrastructure options for urban water management in two urban catchments in Bogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.type.categoryGeneración de Nuevo Conocimiento: Artículos publicados en revistas especializadas - Electrónicosspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Simulation of infrastructure options for urban water management in two urban catchments in Bogotá, Colombia.pdf
Tamaño:
2.43 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo WOS

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: