Informe de vigilancia competitiva como apoyo de la propuesta de creación de un programa de Especialización en Economía Regenerativa para la Innovación de la Construcción de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorIdárraga-Ortiz, Sergio Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCervantes Díaz, Martha
dc.contributor.authorVargas Leal, Viviana Marcela
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002015271
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001268198
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001681897
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com.co/citations?user=tmSdGUAAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com.co/citations?user=MGPd7sYAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com.co/citations?user=tY5Iy0oAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-0766
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-6872
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-3239
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-04T20:28:46Z
dc.date.available2026-08-04T20:28:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-13
dc.descriptionEl Informe de vigilancia competitiva para la creación de la Especialización en Economía Regenerativa para la Innovación de la Construcción analiza la pertinencia académica, laboral y científica de esta propuesta formativa mediante la revisión de la oferta nacional, indicadores de empleabilidad, capacidades de investigación y tendencias internacionales del campo. Los resultados muestran un escenario favorable para su desarrollo, dado que la oferta académica afín se concentra en Bogotá y Antioquia, sin programas equivalentes en Santander o el nororiente colombiano, lo que abre una oportunidad estratégica para una propuesta con enfoque diferenciador en economía regenerativa aplicada al sector de la construcción. El estudio identifica además una demanda sostenida en programas relacionados y altos niveles de inserción laboral, con tasas de empleabilidad superiores al 90 % en la mayoría de las especializaciones analizadas. Paralelamente, evidencia la existencia de sólidas capacidades nacionales de investigación en sostenibilidad, construcción, ambiente, energía y desarrollo territorial, así como un ecosistema académico propicio para la articulación entre formación avanzada, investigación e innovación. Desde la perspectiva científica, el análisis de 436 publicaciones indexadas en Web of Science confirma el rápido crecimiento de la investigación en economía circular y regenerativa aplicada a la construcción. Temas como análisis de ciclo de vida, valorización de residuos, materiales de bajo impacto, BIM, Digital Twin, inteligencia artificial, gobernanza territorial y modelos de transición sostenible emergen como áreas de especial relevancia. En conjunto, estos hallazgos permiten reconocer oportunidades para consolidar una oferta académica orientada a la transformación del entorno construido, la innovación tecnológica y la regeneración de los territorios desde una perspectiva interdisciplinaria y de alto valor estratégico.
dc.description.abstractThe Competitive Intelligence Report for the Creation of the Specialization in Regenerative Economy for Construction Innovation examines the academic, labor market, and scientific relevance of this proposed graduate program through an analysis of the national educational landscape, employability indicators, research capacities, and international trends in the field. The findings reveal a favorable environment for its development, as comparable academic offerings are concentrated in Bogotá and Antioquia, with no equivalent programs identified in Santander or northeastern Colombia. This creates a strategic opportunity for a differentiated program focused on regenerative economy applied to the construction sector. The study also identifies sustained demand for related programs and high levels of labor market integration, with employability rates exceeding 90% in most of the comparable specializations analyzed. In parallel, it highlights the existence of strong national research capacities in sustainability, construction, environmental studies, energy, and territorial development, as well as an academic ecosystem conducive to the integration of advanced education, research, and innovation. From a scientific perspective, the analysis of 436 publications indexed in Web of Science confirms the rapid growth of research on circular and regenerative economy applied to construction. Topics such as life cycle assessment, waste valorization, low-impact materials, BIM, Digital Twins, artificial intelligence, territorial governance, and sustainable transition models emerge as areas of particular relevance. Collectively, these findings highlight opportunities to consolidate an academic program aimed at transforming the built environment through technological innovation, interdisciplinary approaches, and the regeneration of territories.
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationIdárraga-Ortiz, S. A., Cervantes-Díaz, M. y Vargas Leal, V. M.  (2026). Informe de vigilancia competitiva como apoyo de la propuesta de creación de un programa de Especialización en Economía Regenerativa para la Innovación de la Construcción de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga. CRAI Universidad Santo Tomás. Bucaramanga, Colombia.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15332/li.ivt.2026.00001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73814
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramanga
dc.relation.referencesAbad, F. (2026). Understanding barriers to circular economy design in mass timber construction: An innovation diffusion theory perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(15). https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2025-0383
dc.relation.referencesAbdolmaleki, H., Ahmadi, Z., Hashemi, E., & Talebi, S. (2025). A review of the circular economy approach to the construction and demolition wood waste: A 4R principle perspective. Cleaner Waste Systems, 11, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100248
dc.relation.referencesAbiodun, O. (2026). Transitioning to smart circular construction: A conceptual framework for circular economy implementation through Construction 4.0 technologies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108260
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2018). Gestión de la I+D+i: Sistema de vigilancia e inteligencia (UNE 166006:2018). Asociación Española de Normalización.
dc.relation.referencesAjisomo, T. O. (2026). Investigating circular economy barriers for construction and demolition waste in the construction industry: A Delphi and interpretive structural modelling approach. Construction Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-01-2026-0006
dc.relation.referencesAkanbi, L. A., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, A. O., Davila Delgado, M., Bilal, M., & Bello, S. A. (2018). Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026
dc.relation.referencesAwodele, I. A. (2025). Advancing circular economy transition in the Nigeria construction industry through digital twin technology adoption. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 3(3), 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100201
dc.relation.referencesBalasbaneh, A. T., Sher, W., & Ashour, A. (2025). Combining the circular economy and bio-based materials for alternative waste wood applications for the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2024-0033
dc.relation.referencesBesiktepe, D. (2025). Regulatory barriers of circular economy adoption in construction industry: A perspective from Türkiye. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2025-0278
dc.relation.referencesÇimen, Ö. (2021). Construction and built environment in circular economy: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, 127180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127180
dc.relation.referencesClarivate. (2026). Advanced search. Web of Science Core Collection. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/basic-search
dc.relation.referencesCore of Science. (2026). Grown your own tree. Tree of Science. https://tos.coreofscience.com/
dc.relation.referencesEissa, R. (2026). Managing and accelerating the circular economy transitions within the construction value chain using network governance and game theory systems perspectives. Journal of Management in Engineering, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6985
dc.relation.referencesEl Aabbas, M. (2026). Sustainable 3D printed clay bricks incorporating coffee waste: Toward circular economy in construction. Construction and Building Materials, 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.145010
dc.relation.referencesGálvez-Martos, J.-L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., & Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2018). Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016
dc.relation.referencesGeissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
dc.relation.referencesGhisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(3), 799–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9678-2
dc.relation.referencesHaigh, R. (2026). Decade review of modular construction systems in the building and construction industry: Research trends toward the development and utilisation of timber materials within the context of a circular economy. Wood Material Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2025.2611132
dc.relation.referencesHamedani, S. S. (2025). Advancing the circular economy in construction through circular business models. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, 1629769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1629769
dc.relation.referencesHosseini, Z., Blanchet, P., Laratte, B., & Cogulet, A. (2025). Evaluating circular economy strategies at the end-of-life stage of a mass timber building: Pathways for sustainable construction. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2025.2482676
dc.relation.referencesKirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
dc.relation.referencesLee, S. H. (2026). Assessing circular economy performance in medium-span bridge construction: A hierarchical, material-centred framework with life cycle perspective. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2026.2617176
dc.relation.referencesLeising, E., Quist, J., & Bocken, N. (2018). Circular economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Q. H. (2026). Assessing the carbon emission reduction impact of circular economy practices in construction supply chain: A ridge regression approach. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2026.2623071
dc.relation.referencesLópez Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X., & Gassó Domingo, S. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector: A review and an integrative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238
dc.relation.referencesMahpour, A., & Mortaheb, M. M. (2018). Financial-based incentive plan to reduce construction waste. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5), 04018029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001461
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2026a). Consulta de programas. Sistema Nacional de Información de la Educación Superior (SNIES). https://hecaa.mineducacion.gov.co/consultaspublicas/programas
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2026b). Observatorio Laboral para la Educación. https://ole.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/
dc.relation.referencesMorganti, L. (2025). Wood-for-construction supply chain digital twin to drive circular economy and actor-based LCA information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 520, 146074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146074
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas. (2026). Objetivos y metas de desarrollo sostenible. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/sustainable-development-goals/
dc.relation.referencesNguyen, T. T. (2025). Unveiling systemic barriers to circular economy in construction for sustainability: A structural-causal network perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2025-0770
dc.relation.referencesNodehi, M., & Taghvaee, V. M. (2022). Sustainable concrete for circular economy: A review on use of waste glass. Glass Structures & Engineering, 7, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-021-00155-9
dc.relation.referencesNourjalili, S. (2025). The role of BIM in sustainable construction project delivery methods with focus on circular economy. Engineering Reports, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70146
dc.relation.referencesPomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055
dc.relation.referencesRashidian, S., Hossain, S. K. T., Volz, K., & Teo, M. (2025). Enabling circularity in construction: A technology-phase alignment of Construction 4.0 and circular economy principles. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 60, 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.004
dc.relation.referencesShen, S. F. (2026). Developing a three-level circular economy framework to measure circularity for meso-level assessment in pavement construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 542, 147557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.147557
dc.relation.referencesWeerakoon, T. G. (2025). Integrating circular economy (CE) principles into construction waste management (CWM) through multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM). Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 33(17), 148. https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2025.23569
dc.relation.referencesWuni, I. Y. (2022). Mapping the barriers to circular economy adoption in the construction industry: A systematic review, Pareto analysis, and mitigation strategy map. Building and Environment, 223, 109453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109453
dc.relation.referencesYan, K., Lan, H., Li, Q., Ge, D., & Li, Y. (2022). Optimum utilization of recycled aggregate and rice husk ash stabilized base material. Construction and Building Materials, 348, 128627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128627
dc.rightsAttribution 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga
dc.subject.keywordMetrics report
dc.subject.keywordScopus
dc.subject.keywordVOSviewer
dc.subject.keywordVantagePoint
dc.subject.keywordAENOR UNE 166066:2018
dc.subject.keywordScientific production
dc.subject.keywordScientometrics
dc.subject.lembEstudios métricos de la información
dc.subject.lembProductividad científica
dc.subject.lembAnálisis de citas bibliográficas
dc.subject.lembBibliometría
dc.subject.lembCienciometría
dc.subject.lembÍndices de citas bibliográficas
dc.subject.lembIndización por citas bibliográficas
dc.subject.proposalUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga
dc.subject.proposalInforme métrico
dc.subject.proposalScopus
dc.subject.proposalVOSviewer
dc.subject.proposalVantagePoint
dc.subject.proposalAENOR UNE 166066:2018
dc.subject.proposalVigilancia tecnológica
dc.subject.proposalTechnological surveillance
dc.subject.proposalProducción científica
dc.subject.proposalCienciometría
dc.titleInforme de vigilancia competitiva como apoyo de la propuesta de creación de un programa de Especialización en Economía Regenerativa para la Innovación de la Construcción de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga
dc.type.categoryApropiación Social y Circulación del Conocimiento: Documento de trabajo (working papers)

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
VT Esp. en Economía Regenerativa para la Innovación de la Construcción.pdf
Tamaño:
1.21 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Informes Bibliométricos