Gestión del cambio para la adopción de tecnologías emergentes en Colsubsidio
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cueto Fuentes, Eduardo Nicolás | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oda Melo, Stephanie | |
| dc.contributor.corporatename | Universidad Santo Tomás | |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000860930 | |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=WnQLGoUAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-6828 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-16T16:58:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-16T16:58:13Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-09-16 | |
| dc.description | La transformación digital emprendida por Colsubsidio desde 2023 enfrentó importantes dificultades para la adopción de la inteligencia artificial (IA), principalmente debido a barreras humanas y organizacionales. La investigación abordó esta problemática analizando cómo influye la gestión del cambio organizacional en la adopción de tecnologías emergentes (IA) en Colsubsidio en el período 2023–2026. Metodológicamente, se optó por un enfoque mixto, combinando análisis cualitativo (revisión documental y encuestas abiertas a líderes y usuarios) con un estudio cuantitativo basado en una encuesta estructurada a 82 colaboradores de diversas áreas. Los resultados revelan que solo una cuarta parte de los empleados percibió una estrategia formal de gestión del cambio en los proyectos de IA, mientras que aproximadamente la mitad de la muestra no identificó acciones claras de acompañamiento, reflejando una brecha significativa en el apoyo al personal. Este déficit en la gestión del cambio se asoció con altos niveles de resistencia inicial y baja adopción de las nuevas herramientas. Entre las principales barreras destacaron la resistencia cultural al cambio (~30% de menciones) y la falta de capacitación/alfabetización digital (~16%). Al mismo tiempo, la capacitación emergió como la acción de cambio más valorada: cerca del 47% de los encuestados reconoció que la formación recibida les facilitó comprender el impacto de la IA en sus funciones. En síntesis, el estudio confirma el rol crítico de la gestión del cambio en la apropiación sostenible de tecnologías emergentes: cuando existen estrategias sólidas de cambio (comunicación, formación y participación), la adopción de la IA aumenta sustancialmente, mientras que su ausencia ralentiza o compromete el éxito de la transformación digital. | |
| dc.description.abstract | The digital transformation undertaken by Colsubsidio since 2023 encountered significant difficulties in the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), mainly due to human and organizational barriers. The research addressed this problem by analyzing how organizational change management influences the adoption of emerging technologies (AI) at Colsubsidio during the period 2023–2026. Methodologically, a mixed approach was chosen, combining qualitative analysis (documentary review and open-ended surveys of leaders and users) with a quantitative study based on a structured survey of 82 employees from various areas. The results reveal that only one quarter of the employees perceived a formal change management strategy in the AI projects, while approximately half of the sample did not identify clear support actions, reflecting a significant gap in support for staff. This deficit in change management was associated with high levels of initial resistance and low adoption of the new tools. Among the main barriers identified were cultural resistance to change (approximately 30% of mentions) and lack of training/digital literacy (approximately 16%). At the same time, training emerged as the most valued change initiative: about 47% of respondents acknowledged that the training they received helped them understand the impact of AI on their roles. In summary, the study confirms the critical role of change management in the sustainable adoption of emerging technologies: when robust change strategies (communication, training, and participation) are in place, AI adoption increases substantially, whereas their absence slows or compromises the success of the digital transformation. | |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría | spa |
| dc.description.degreename | Magister en Inteligencia de Negocios | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Oda Melo, S. (2026). Análisis estratégico acerca de gestión del cambio para la adopción de tecnologías emergentes en Colsubsidio: el caso de la inteligencia artificial (2023-2026). [Trabajo de Maestría, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional. | |
| dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad Santo Tomás | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co | spa |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11634/74172 | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Santo Tomás | spa |
| dc.publisher.branch | CRAI-USTA Medellín | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial | spa |
| dc.publisher.program | Maestría en Inteligencia de Negocios | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Aderibigbe, N., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and its role in shaping organizational work practices and culture. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120316 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá D. C. (2021). Estrategia de gobierno digital y agendas de transformación digital. https://bogota.gov.co/gobierno-abierto-de-bogota/alcaldia-bogota-lanza-la-estrategia-agendas-de-transformacion-digital | |
| dc.relation.references | Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá D. C. (2025). Bogotá define cómo se debe usar la inteligencia artificial en las entidades públicas. https://bogota.gov.co/mi-ciudad/gestion-publica/bogota-define-como-usar-inteligencia-artificial-en-entidades-publicas | |
| dc.relation.references | Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500303 | |
| dc.relation.references | Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169–183. | |
| dc.relation.references | Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703. | |
| dc.relation.references | Ashforth, B. E., & Lee, R. T. (1990). Defensive behavior in organizations: A preliminary model. Human Relations, 43(7), 621–648. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. | |
| dc.relation.references | Beck, K., et al. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Agile Alliance. https://agilemanifesto.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133–141. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bennis, W. G., Benne, K. D., & Chin, R. (1961). The planning of change. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. | |
| dc.relation.references | Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977–1002. | |
| dc.relation.references | Burnes, B. (2017). Managing change (7th ed.). Pearson Education. | |
| dc.relation.references | Cámara de Comercio Colombo Americana – AmCham Colombia. (2026). Transformación inteligente: IA y la nueva carrera por la competitividad. https://amchamcolombia.co/business-mail/edicion-214-inteligencia-artificial-el-nuevo-motor-de-la-competitividad-empresarial-2026/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2021). Diagnóstico de transformación digital en empresas de Bogotá. https://www.ccb.org.co | |
| dc.relation.references | Chhatre, A., & Singh, R. (2024). AI and organizational change: Dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Emerging Technology in New Research, 2(5). | |
| dc.relation.references | Coch, L., & French, J. R. P., Jr. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674800100408 | |
| dc.relation.references | 110 Colsubsidio. (2024). Informes internos sobre adopción tecnológica y transformación digital. Área de Tecnología e Innovación. [Documento interno no publicado]. | |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | David, F. R. (2013). Conceptos de administración estratégica (14.ª ed.). Pearson Educación. | |
| dc.relation.references | David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach (16th ed.). Pearson Education. | |
| dc.relation.references | DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 | |
| dc.relation.references | Deloitte. (2024). Global Digital Transformation Report 2024. https://www2.deloitte.com | |
| dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2019). Documento CONPES 3975: Política Nacional de Transformación Digital e Inteligencia Artificial. | |
| dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional de Planeación, MinTIC & MinCiencias. (2025). Documento CONPES 4144: Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/4144.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ecopetrol S. A. (2022). Informe de innovación y transformación digital 2022. | |
| dc.relation.references | Gartner. (2023). Digital maturity model: Five levels of digital transformation. | |
| dc.relation.references | Handley, L. (2025). AI and change management: What the future holds. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com | |
| dc.relation.references | Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. | |
| dc.relation.references | Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci. | |
| dc.relation.references | IBM. (2025). How AI is used in change management. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-change-management | |
| dc.relation.references | Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. Simon & Schuster. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103 | |
| dc.relation.references | McKinsey & Company. (2023). The state of digital transformation. https://www.mckinsey.com | |
| dc.relation.references | Microsoft Corporation. (2020). Empowering employees through AI. Microsoft Research. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD skills outlook 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en | |
| dc.relation.references | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). OECD AI principles. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles | |
| dc.relation.references | Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92. | |
| dc.relation.references | Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI). Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. | |
| dc.relation.references | Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Free Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93. | |
| dc.relation.references | Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. | |
| dc.relation.references | Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good. Science, 361(6404), 751–752. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5991 | |
| dc.relation.references | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. | |
| dc.relation.references | Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital. Harvard Business Review Press. | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombia | en |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.local | Abierto (Texto Completo) | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Change management | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Technology adoption | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Artificial intelligence | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Digital transformation | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Organizational culture | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Inteligencia de Negocios | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Cambio organizacional | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Alfabetización digital | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Gestión del cambio | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Adopción tecnológica | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Inteligencia artificial | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Transformación digital | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Cultura organizacional | |
| dc.title | Gestión del cambio para la adopción de tecnologías emergentes en Colsubsidio | |
| dc.type | master thesis | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | spa |
| dc.type.drive | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis | spa |
| dc.type.local | Tesis de maestría | spa |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Bloque de licencias
1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 807 B
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- 2026cartadefacultad.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 551.27 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Carta de facultad
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- 2026cartaderechosdeautor.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 286.51 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Carta derechos de autor

