Modelo de lealtad a partir de un análisis de ecuaciones estructurales

dc.contributor.advisorBabativa Márquez, Giovanny
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Gil Robert
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T14:21:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T19:31:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-24T16:19:03Z
dc.date.available2015-12-01T14:21:59Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T19:31:02Z
dc.date.available2017-06-24T16:19:03Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionPara una compañía siempre ha sido importante la relación con sus clientes, por ello en diferentes trabajos se han planteado patrones para describir dicha asociación, en esta búsqueda ha cobrado relevancia el uso de modelos estadísticos que permiten establecer la forma en que interactúan las distintas variables que determinan el comportamiento de un cliente. Adicionalmente, también se ha analizado la causalidad y se ha encontrado un ciclo en el comportamiento de compra, así, cuando un cliente es más leal a una marca, mayor es su grado de recomendación y recompra hacia ésta. Así mismo, se ha buscado establecer la relación entre satisfacción y lealtad ya que no necesariamente un alto grado de satisfacción causa lealtad ni tampoco un alto grado de lealtad causa satisfacción.eng
dc.description.abstractFor a company, the relationship with its customers has always been important; therefore, different studies have proposed patterns to describe this association. In this search, the use of statistical models that allow establishing the way in which the different variables that determine the behavior of a customer interact has gained relevance. In addition, causality has also been analyzed and a cycle in purchasing behavior has been found; thus, the more loyal a customer is to a brand, the greater the degree of recommendation and repurchase towards it. Likewise, we have sought to establish the relationship between satisfaction and loyalty, since a high degree of satisfaction does not necessarily cause loyalty, nor does a high degree of loyalty cause satisfaction.
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationRomero, Gil Robert. (2015). Modelo de lealtad a partir de un análisis de ecuaciones estructurales. Universidad Santo Tomas. Bogotá
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11634/468
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Estadísticaspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Estadísticaspa
dc.relation.referencesAish, A.M., Joreskog, K.G., Apanel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: an application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares Qual Quant. 24, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson,JamesC.Gerbing,DavidW.,StructuralequationmodelinginpracticePsychological Bulletin, 1988.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, James C. Gerbing, David W., Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models Sage Periodical Press, 1992.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, James C. Gerbing, David W., The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis Psychometrica, 1984.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, James C. Gerbing, David W., The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis Psychometrica, 1984.
dc.relation.referencesBatista F. Joan M., Coenders G. Germá, Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Editorial La Muralla, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesBentler, P. M. Bonett, D. G., Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures Psychological Bulletin, 1980.
dc.relation.referencesBollen,KennethA.,StructuralequationswithlatentvariablesPsychologicalBulletin, 1980.
dc.relation.referencesBrowne,M.W.,Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1984
dc.relation.referencesByrne Barbara, Structural equation modeling with AMOS Routledge, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesChan Wai, Comparing indirect effects in SEM-A sequential model fitting method using covariance equivalent specifications Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007.
dc.relation.referencesFoxJ., Effect analysis in structural equation models II-Calculation of specific indirect effects Sociological Methods & Research, 1985
dc.relation.referencesGelin, M.N.,Beasley, T.M., y Zumbo,B.D., Whatistheimpactonscalereliabilityand exploratory factor analysis of a Pearson correlation matrix when some respondents are not able to follow the rating scale?. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), 2003.
dc.relation.referencesGelin, M.N.,Beasley, T.M., y Zumbo,B.D., Whatistheimpactonscalereliabilityand exploratory factor analysis of a Pearson correlation matrix when some respondents are not able to follow the rating scale?. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), 2003.
dc.relation.referencesGermà Coenders , Albert Satorra & Willem E. Saris, Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: AMultidisciplinary Journal, 4:4, 1997
dc.relation.referencesHancock Gregopry & Mueller Ralph, Structural Equation Modeling a second course IAP, 2006.
dc.relation.referencesHeuchenne, Christian, A sufficient rule for identification in structural equation modeling icluding the null B and recursive rules as extreme cases Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesHolgerBrandt,AugustinKelava&AndreasKlein,ASimulationStudyComparingRecent Approaches for the Estimation of Nonlinear Effects in SEM Under the Condition of Nonnormality Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2014
dc.relation.referencesHoyle,RickH.,HandbookofStructuralEquationModeling.TheGuilfordPress,2012.
dc.relation.referencesField, A., Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. Sage publications, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesKennethA.Bollen&WalterR.Davis,TwoRulesofIdentificationforStructuralEquation Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesJöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D., LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program andApplications SPSS Publications, 1989.
dc.relation.referencesKennethA.Bollen&WalterR.Davis,TwoRulesofIdentificationforStructuralEquation Model Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
dc.relation.referencesKline Rex B., Principles and practices of Structural Equation Modeling The Guilford Press, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesLoehlin, John C., Latent Variable Models Laurence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesLyhagen,J., Ornstein, P., A Rank Based estimator of the Polychoric Correlation Uppsala University, 2011.
dc.relation.referencesMarcoulides George A., Schumacker Randall E., New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001
dc.relation.referencesMuthén,B.,Ageneralstructuralequationmodelwithdichotomous,orderedcategorical, and continuous latent variable indicators Psychometrika 49, 1984.
dc.relation.referencesOlsson, Ulf Henning, Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, Volume 44, 1979.
dc.relation.referencesOlsson, Ulf Henning,FossTron,TroyeSigurdV.&HowellRoyD.,ThePerformanceof ML,GLS,andWLSEstimationinStructuralEquationModelingUnderConditionsof Misspecification and Nonnormality Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
dc.relation.referencesOry David, Mokhtarian Patricia, The impact of non-normality,sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-t measures in structural equation modeling: evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior Springer Science+Business Media, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesPui-Wa Lei, Evaluating estimation methods for ordinal data in structural equation modeling Springer Science + Business Media, 2007.
dc.relation.referencesPui-Wa Lei, Qiong Wu, Introduction to structural equation modeling-Issues and practical considerations Pennsylvania State University, 2007
dc.relation.referencesRaudenbushS.W., SampsonR.,Assessing direct and indirect effects in multilevel designs with latent variables Sociological Methods & Research, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesRaykov Tenko &Marcoulides George, A first course in Structural Equation Modeling Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesRevelle, W. & Rocklin, T., Very Simple Structure: an Alternative Procedure for Estimating the Optimal NumberofInterpretable Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1979.
dc.relation.referencesRietveld, T. &VanHout,R.,Statistical Techniques for the StudyofLanguageandLanguage Behaviour. De Gruiter Mouton, 1993.
dc.relation.referencesRigdonEdwardE.,Calculatingdegreesoffreedomforastructuralequationmodeling Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, 1994.
dc.relation.referencesRosseel Yves, lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more Version 0.3-1 (BETA) Ghent University, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesRosseel Yves, The lavaan tutorial Ghent University, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesSatorra Albert, Robustness issues in structural equation modeling Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesSaurina C., Evaluación de un modelo de medida de la calidad en el sector servicios. Estadística Española, 1997.
dc.relation.references¸Sim¸sek Gülhayat G. & Noyan Fatma, Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study Yildiz Technical University, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesSkrondalAnders,Rabe-HeskethSophia,Generalizedlatentvariablemodeling Chapman&Hall/CRC,2004.
dc.relation.referencesSörbom,Dag, Model Modification Uppsala University, 1989.
dc.relation.referencesStreiner D., Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of personality assessment, 2003
dc.relation.referencesXitao Fan, BruceThompson&LinWang,Effectsofsamplesize,estimationmethods, andmodelspecificationonstructuralequationmodelingfitindexesStructuralEquation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordStatistics
dc.subject.keywordEquations
dc.subject.keywordLinear Models (Statistics)
dc.subject.keywordStatistics
dc.subject.proposalEstadísticaeng
dc.subject.proposalEcuacioneseng
dc.subject.proposalModelos lineales (Estadística)eng
dc.titleModelo de lealtad a partir de un análisis de ecuaciones estructuraleseng
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2015RobertRomero.pdf
Tamaño:
2.21 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
196.24 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
cartaderechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
230.02 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descripción: