A damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learning

dc.contributor.authorTibaduiza, Diego
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Arredondo, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorVitola, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorAnaya, Maribel
dc.contributor.authorPozo, Francesc
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T19:41:22Z
dc.date.available2019-05-30T19:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-02
dc.description.abstractInspection strategies with guided wave-based approaches give to structural health monitoring (SHM) applications several advantages, among them, the possibility of the use of real data fromthe structure which enables continuousmonitoring and online damage identification. These kinds of inspection strategies are based on the fact that these waves can propagate over relatively long distances and are able to interact sensitively with and uniquely with different types of defects. The principal goal for SHM is oriented to the development of efficientmethodologies to process these data and provide results associatedwith the different levels of the damage identification process.As a contribution, thiswork presents a damage detection and classificationmethodology which includes the use of data collected froma structure under different structural states bymeans of a piezoelectric sensor network taking advantage of the use of guided waves, hierarchical nonlinear principal component analysis (h-NLPCA), andmachine learning.The methodology is evaluated and tested in two structures: (i) a carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) sandwich structure with some damages on the multilayered composite sandwich structure and (ii) a CFRP composite plate. Damages in the structures were intentionally produced to simulate different damage mechanisms, that is, delamination and cracking of the skin.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationTibaduiza, D., Torres-Arredondo, M. Á, Vitola, J., Anaya, M., & Pozo, F. (2018). A damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learning doi:10.1155/2018/5081283spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5081283spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/16990
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.relation.referencesK. Van Buren, J. Reilly, K. Neal, H. Edwards, and F. Hemez, “Guaranteeing robustness of structural conditionmonitoring to environmental variability,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 386, pp. 134–148, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Worden and C. R. Farrar, Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesD. Balageas, C. P. Fritzen, and A. G¨uemes, Structural Health Monitoring, Hermes Science Publishing, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Yarnold and F.Moon, “Temperature-based structural health monitoring baseline for long-span bridges,” Engineering Structures, vol. 86, pp. 157–167, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. M. Alamdari, T. Rakotoarivelo, and N. L. D. Khoa, “A spectral-based clustering for structural health monitoring of the Sydney Harbour Bridge,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 87, pp. 384–400, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. J. McCullagh, T. Galchev, R. L. Peterson et al., “Long-term testing of a vibration harvesting system for the structural health monitoring of bridges,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 217, pp. 139–150, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesD. A. Tibaduiza, Design and Validation of a Structural Health Monitoring System for Aeronautical Structures, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesR. K. Neerukatti,K. C. Liu, N. Kovvali, andA. Chattopadhyay, “Fatigue life prediction using hybrid prognosis for structural health monitoring,” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 211–231, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesV. Giurgiutiu, Structural Health Monitoring of Aerospace Composites, Academic Press - ELSEVIER, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Korobenko, M. Pigazzini, V. Singh et al., “Dynamic-Data- Driven Damage Prediction in Aerospace Composite Structures,” in Proceedings of the 17th AIAA/ISSMOMultidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesI. Antoniadou, N. Dervilis, E. Papatheou, A. E.Maguire, and K. Worden, “Aspects of structural health and conditionmonitoring of offshore wind turbines,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society AMathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Bogoevska, M. Spiridonakos, E. Chatzi, E. Dumova- Jovanoska, and R. H¨offer, “A data-driven diagnostic framework for wind turbine structures: A holistic approach,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 4, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Pozo and Y. Vidal, “Wind Turbine Fault Detection through Principal Component Analysis and Statistical Hypothesis Testing,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 3, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Torres-Arredondo, Acoustic Emission Testing and Acousto- Ultrasonics for Structural Health Monitoring, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. J. Shensa, “The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the ´A trous and Mallat algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2464–2482, 1992.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Graps, “An introduction to wavelets,” IEEE Computational Science & Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 50–61, 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Z.Hosseinabadi, B.Nazari, R.Amirfattahi, H. R.Mirdamadi, and A. R. Sadri, “Wavelet network approach for structural damage identification using guided ultrasonic waves,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1680–1692, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesX. Chen,X. Li, S.Wang, Z. Yang, B. Chen, andZ. He, “Composite damage detection based on redundant second-generation wavelet transform and fractal dimension tomography algorithmof lamb wave,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1354–1363, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Medda, E. Chicken, and V. DeBrunner, “Sigma-Sampling Wavelet Denoising for Structural Health Monitoring,” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/SP 14thWorkshop on Statistical Signal Processing, pp. 119–122, Madison,WI, USA,August 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Golub, A. Shpak, I. Buethe, C. Fritzen, H. Jung, and J. Moll, “Continuous wavelet transformapplication in diagnostics of piezoelectric wafer active sensors,” International Conference Days on Diffraction, vol. 2013, pp. 59–64, 2013.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordMachine learningspa
dc.subject.keywordStructural health monitoringspa
dc.subject.keywordDamage detectionspa
dc.titleA damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learningspa
dc.type.categoryGeneración de Nuevo Conocimiento: Artículos publicados en revistas especializadas - Electrónicosspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
A damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learning.pdf
Tamaño:
3.93 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo WOS

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: