La potestad exhorbitante de la jurisdicción coactiva ¿garantía de los derechos de los administrados?

Abstract

This article aims to test the thesis that the regulatory model governing the “Jurisdicción Coactiva” in Colombia after the enactment of Law 1066 of 2006, is a development of Article 116 of the Constitution of 1991, but by Conversely violates some fundamental constitutional principles embodied in the letter. For this author, takes a tour of the regulatory changes arising from the 1821 at which it was applied is contained in the Colombian legislation, raising the presentations made by the high courts about the indoctrinators that have analyzed the issue and finally studied from the current model and concluded that the current system partially answers the normative reality, respecting the rights of the governed, under the concept of direct action execution but that the validity of the rule is preached.