Incidencia de la transferencia tecnológica en la productividad del cacao en Colombia en las zonas de Santander, Arauca y Antioquia
| dc.contributor.advisor | Díaz Valencia, Gustavo Adolfo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fuentes Benítez, Juan Carlos | |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000146749 | |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=gustavo+d%C3%ADaz+valencia&oq= | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9606-8223 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-13T19:10:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-10-13T19:10:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-05-14 | |
| dc.description | La contribución al cambio técnico del sector agropecuario a nivel mundial ha estado determinado por el desarrollo de nuevas tecnologías que involucran procesos de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación; estos procesos tienen como principal objetivo incrementar la productividad agropecuaria mediante la transferencia de tecnología. Sin embargo, es el productor agropecuario quien decide adoptar o no adoptar esos nuevos desarrollos tecnológicos ya que puede incidir directa o indirectamente en los costos de producción aumentando o disminuyendo el nivel de ingresos. Para este estudio se seleccionó la cadena del cacao en Colombia como un producto agrícola priorizado en el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Cacaotero 2012-2021, con el fin de evaluar los procesos de transferencia de tecnología y su relación con la productividad, donde se seleccionaron 21 fincas ubicadas en las zonas productoras de Santander, Arauca y Antioquia. Para tal fin se tomó como referencia las encuestas elaboradas por Fedecacao en el año 2013, siendo éste el año base del presente trabajo. Con los datos obtenidos se formuló un modelo de adopción e impacto que estime la probabilidad de aumentar la productividad cuando el productor adopta nuevas tecnologías, de esta manera se espera demostrar que los sistemas renovados de cacao tienen una probabilidad muy alta de adoptar tecnologías frente a un cultivo de sistema tradicional. | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | The contribution to technical change in the agricultural sector at the global level has been determined by the development of new technologies been determined by the development of new technologies that involve Research, Development and Research, Development and Innovation processes; these processes have as their main objective the main objective is to increase agricultural productivity through technology transfer. technology transfer. However, it is the agricultural producer who decides whether or not to adopt these new developments. However, it is the agricultural producer who decides whether or not to adopt these new technological developments, as it can directly or indirectly directly or indirectly affect production costs by increasing or decreasing the level of income. decreasing the level of income. For this study, the cocoa chain in Colombia was selected as an agricultural product. chain in Colombia was selected for this study as an agricultural product prioritised in the National Cocoa Development Plan 2012-2021. Development Plan 2012-2021, in order to assess the processes of technology transfer and its relationship with the technology transfer processes and their relationship with productivity. selected 21 farms located in the producing areas of Santander, Arauca and Antioquia. and Antioquia. For this purpose, reference was made to the surveys elaborated by Fedecacao in 2013, which was the base year for this study. With the data obtained was used to formulate a model of adoption and impact that estimates the probability of increasing productivity when the producer adopts new technologies. technologies, thus demonstrating that renewed cocoa systems have a very high probability of increasing productivity when new technologies are adopted. systems have a very high probability of adopting technologies compared to a traditional system. traditional system. | |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría | spa |
| dc.description.degreename | Magíster en Ciencias Económicas | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.15332/tg.mae.2020.0691 | |
| dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad Santo Tomás | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co | spa |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11634/9439 | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Santo Tomás | spa |
| dc.publisher.branch | CRAI-USTA Bogotá | spa |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Economía | spa |
| dc.publisher.program | Maestría Ciencias Económicas | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Technology transfer | |
| dc.relation.references | Cost of production | |
| dc.relation.references | Cocoa chain | |
| dc.relation.references | Correspondent banking | |
| dc.relation.references | Alvarado, J. 2010. El análisis post-optimal en programación lineal aplicada a la agricultura. Reflexiones. Universidad de Costa Rica. | |
| dc.relation.references | Andoseh, S., et al. 2013. The case for a real options approach to ex-ante costbenefit analyses of agricultural research projects. Food Policy. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.09.016 | |
| dc.relation.references | Araji, A., et al. 1978. Returns to agricultural research and extension programs: An ex-ante approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol 60, N° 5. USA, (Dec., 1978). Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1240129?uid=2&uid=4&sid=2110434594261 7 | |
| dc.relation.references | Artachinda, O. y Akratanakkul, P. 2010. Priority Setting for Agricultural Biotechnology Research in Thailand. ARE Working Paper No. 2553/3. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok. Recuperado ftp://ftp.repec.org/opt/ReDIF/RePEc/kau/wpaper/are201003.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Arriaza, M. y Nekhay, O. 2010. Evaluación social multicriterio del territorio agrícola: el caso del olivar de baja producción. Revista españolas de estudios agrosociales y pesqueros. N° 226. Recuperado de http://www.magrama.gob.es/ministerio/pags/biblioteca/revistas/pdf_REEAP%5Cre eap_226_completa.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Behzadiana, M. et al. 2010. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research. Volume 200, Issue 1, January. Recuperado de http://ac.elscdn.com/S0377221709000071/1-s2.0-S0377221709000071main.pdf?_tid=7db9eba4-0eb7-11e4-895900000aab0f27&acdnat=1405714378_8b47098fb27e0e8e60d2bf1ab2aaaee4 | |
| dc.relation.references | CEPEP. 2007. Apuntes sobre Evaluación social de proyectos. México. Recuperado de http://www.cepep.gob.mx/libro.html | |
| dc.relation.references | Diaz, F. y Sain, G. 2007. “Evaluación de impactos potenciales de proyectos financiados por FONTAGRO –IICA. Recuperado de http://www.fontagro.org/sites/default/files/evaluacion_impactos_2y3_convocatoria. pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Embrapa. Informação Tecnológica. p.85-101. Disponible http://bs.sede.embrapa.br/2009/metodologiareferenciaavalimpactoembrapa.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Evenson, R. 1987. Productivity Decomposition Methods for Evaluation of Agricultural Research Systems Impact. New Haven. Embrapa/Economic Growth Center. Yale University | |
| dc.relation.references | Godet, M. 2007. Prospectiva Estratégica: problemas y métodos. Instituto Europeo de Prospectiva y Estrategia. Cuadernos de LIPSOR, Paris. | |
| dc.relation.references | Griliches, Z. 1958. Research costs and social returns: Hybrid cron and related innovations. Journal of Political Economics. Vol. 66. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1826669?uid=2&uid=4&sid=2110434594261 7 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gutiérrez-Guzmán, N., et al. 2012. Priorización de factores críticos para implantar buenas prácticas agrícolas en pequeños productores. Cuadernos de desarrollo rural, 9 (69), 221-237. Recuperado de file:///C:/Users/sroa/Downloads/4374-157281-PB%20(1).pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Hazell, P. & Haddad, L. 2001. La investigación agrícola y la reducción de la pobreza. Documento de Discusión No. 34 de Visión 2020. IFPRI. Recuperado de http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/16341/1/br010070.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Kaimowitz; Et al 2012 Métodos de priorización en la investigación agropecuaria | |
| dc.relation.references | Khush, G. & Toenniessen, G. 1991. Rice Biotechnology. International Rice Research Institute. Biotechnology in Agriculture. N°. 6. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kislev, Y. & Hoffman, M. 1978. Research and productivity in wheat in Israel. Journal of Development Studies. Vol. 14. | |
| dc.relation.references | Leholm, A. et al. 1980. A Methodology for Measuring Potential Benefits from Drought-Oriented Research in Nebraska. Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop. Miscellaneous Publication 8, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station. Minneapolis. (May 12-13, 1980). Recuperado de http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1121&context=ageconfac pub | |
| dc.relation.references | Medina, H. 1991. Métodos y modelos para priorizar la investigación agropecuaria. Serie publicaciones misceláneas. IICA. San José, Costa Rica. Recuperado de http://orton.catie.ac.cr/repdoc/A9407E/A9407E.PDF | |
| dc.relation.references | Mortazavi, et al. 2011. The application of Multi Attribute Decision Methods (MADM) on prioritizing Iranian fisheries research projects. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences. 10(1) 47-66. Recuperado http://www.jifro.ir/files/site1/user_files_eb12be/admin-A-10-1-59-1882af6.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Mudahar, S, et al. 1998. Transforming Agricultural Research Systems in Traditional Economies: The Case of Russia. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 396. Banco Mundial, Washington. Recuperado de http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2000/02/24/0000 09265_3980928162812/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Norton, G. & Davis, J. 1981. Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 63, No. 4 (Nov., 1981). Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1241211?uid=2&uid=4&sid=2110434594261 7 | |
| dc.relation.references | Norton, G., et al. 1987. Potential benefits for agricultural research and extension in Peru. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 69. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1242274?uid=2&uid=4&sid=2110434594261 7 | |
| dc.relation.references | Norton, G. 1989. Methods to assist with agricultural research priority setting. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Virginia. | |
| dc.relation.references | Peña, D. 2002. Análisis de datos multivariados. Mac Graw Hill. Madrid. Recuperado de http://civil2011.bligoo.cl/media/users/15/791368/files/138227/An_lisis_de_Datos_M ultivariantes_-_Daniel_Pe_a.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Ramalho de Castro, J. & Schuh. G. 1974. An economic model for establishing priorities for agricultural research and a test for the Brazilian economy. Brasilia. | |
| dc.relation.references | Rodrigues, G. 2008. Avaliação dos Impactos de sociais de tecnologias agropecuárias en Avaliação dos Impactos de tecnologias geradas pela Embrapa: Metodologia de referência. Brasília, DF. Recuperado http://bs.sede.embrapa.br/2013/metodologiareferenciaavalimpactoembrapa.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Russell, D. 1975. Resourse allocation in agricultural research using socioeconomic evaluation and mathematical models. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol 23, N° 2. (Jul., 1975). | |
| dc.relation.references | Saaty, T. & Vargas, L. 2001. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the Hierarchy process. Kluwer academic. Massachusetts | |
| dc.relation.references | Schultz, T. 1953. The economic organization of agriculture. New York. McGraw Hill. Recuperado de http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/8823/1/21020141.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Scobie, G. & Posada, R. 1978. The impact of technical change of income distribution: the case of rice in Colombia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 60. http://impact.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/pdf/146.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Sierra, J.C., et al. 2013. Viabilidad financiera para la producción y exportación de gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims) hacia el mercado español. Revista Corpoica, ciencia y tecnología agropecuaria. Vol. 14. Bogotá. | |
| dc.relation.references | Sierra, J.C., et al. 2013. Viabilidad financiera para la producción y exportación de gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims) hacia el mercado español. Revista Corpoica, ciencia y tecnología agropecuaria. Vol. 14. Bogotá. | |
| dc.relation.references | Tosterud, R., et al. 1973. Benefit-cost evaluation of research relating to the development of Selkirk wheat and target rapeseed in Proceedings of 1971 Symposia on agricultural research. University of Manitoba. Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management. Vol 1. Canada. | |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.local | Abierto (Texto Completo) | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Transferencia de tecnología | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Costos de producción | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Cadena de cacao | spa |
| dc.title | Incidencia de la transferencia tecnológica en la productividad del cacao en Colombia en las zonas de Santander, Arauca y Antioquia | spa |
| dc.type | master thesis | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |
| dc.type.drive | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis | |
| dc.type.local | Tesis de maestría | spa |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 4 de 4
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- FuentesJuan2014.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.11 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- derechos de autor (6).pdf
- Tamaño:
- 228.89 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- carta facultad (4).pdf
- Tamaño:
- 247.4 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- entrega documentos (5).pdf
- Tamaño:
- 184.72 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 1.71 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:

