Evaluación comparativa del uso de softwares de cuantificación Bluebeam Revu y Autodesk Takeoff en procesos de estimación de elementos metálicos arquitectónicos aplicadas a la metodología BIM.

Abstract

The present work carries out a comparative evaluation between the software programs Autodesk Takeoff and Bluebeam Revu, which are used in the processes of quantity takeoff and material and/or element estimation, following the guidelines of the BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology. This analysis arises from the need to identify digital tools that offer high accuracy, efficiency, and reliability in quantity measurement, since errors in estimation are considered to have significant impacts on budgets, construction schedules, and overall project competitiveness. This study develops both a conceptual and practical analysis using a quantity takeoff exercise focused on architectural metal elements, based on PDF-format drawings, which are analyzed using both software programs. Subsequently, comparative parameters were established, focusing on accuracy, ease of use, report generation, and integration with BIM environments. The evaluation of the software shows that Autodesk Takeoff offers greater automation capabilities, accuracy, integration with other BIM environments, and efficiency in information management, whereas Bluebeam Revu provides greater flexibility and enhanced handling of 2D drawings, facilitating adaptability and quick learning curves through its intuitive interface. Although this analysis is oriented toward the estimation and quantity takeoff of architectural metal elements, it supports the appropriate selection of digital tools to optimize estimation and budgeting processes in the construction sector.