Prevalencia de Asimetrías Mandibulares en Pacientes que asisten al Servicio de Ortodoncia de las Clínicas Odontológicas de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga

dc.contributor.advisorVillarreal Assaf, Maria Paula
dc.contributor.authorSolano Porras, Edna Milena
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomas
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-19T20:41:15Z
dc.date.available2026-08-19T20:41:15Z
dc.date.issued2026-08-19
dc.descriptionProblema: Las asimetrías mandibulares son diferencias en tamaño, forma o posición de la mandíbula que impactan significativamente la estética facial, función masticatoria y dinámica de la articulación temporomandibular. Su etiología es multifactorial, involucrando factores genéticos, ambientales y hábitos funcionales como la masticación unilateral. Para su diagnóstico, la radiografía panorámica digital combinada con el análisis de Thilander representa una herramienta de tamizaje accesible y reproducible. El presente estudio descriptivo transversal y tuvo como Objetivo determinar la prevalencia de asimetrías mandibulares en cóndilo, rama y altura total de rama mandibular en pacientes atendidos en el servicio de Ortodoncia de las Clínicas Odontológicas de la Universidad Santo Tomás, sede Bucaramanga, durante los años 2024-2025. Método: Se analizaron 150 radiografías panorámicas de pacientes entre 7 y 25 años mediante el análisis de Thilander. Los datos fueron procesados en Stata 16.0, realizando análisis descriptivo univariado y bivariado con pruebas de Chi-cuadrado y exacta de Fisher (p < 0,05). Resultados: Los resultados revelaron una prevalencia moderada de asimetrías mandibulares, siendo la altura total de la rama mandibular (Plano Co-Go) la dimensión más afectada (37,33%), seguida de la altura de la rama (29,33%) y la altura condilar (28,67%). La mayoría de las asimetrías fueron de grado leve. Se encontró una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el género y la asimetría en la altura de la rama mandibular (p = 0,020), con mayor proporción de simetría en el género femenino, mientras que no se observó asociación significativa con la edad. Conclusiones: Se concluye que existe una prevalencia moderada de asimetrías mandibulares en esta población, destacándose la utilidad del análisis de Thilander en radiografías panorámicas como método eficaz para el tamizaje inicial. Estos hallazgos permiten optimizar la planificación de tratamientos ortodóncicos preventivos e interceptivos durante las etapas de crecimiento activo y aportan información epidemiológica local relevante.
dc.description.abstractMandibular asymmetries are differences in the size, shape, or position of the mandible that significantly impact facial aesthetics, masticatory function, and temporomandibular joint dynamics. Their etiology is multifactorial, involving genetic and environmental factors, as well as functional habits such as unilateral chewing. Digital panoramic radiography combined with Thilander’s analysis serves as an accessible and reproducible screening tool for their diagnosis. These alterations occur frequently in orthodontic patients, affecting occlusal stability and psychosocial well-being. In Colombia, epidemiological studies on this topic are limited; particularly in Bucaramanga, there is a significant information gap regarding their prevalence in children and adolescents receiving orthodontic care, which hinders early diagnosis and timely intervention planning. Early detection during growth stages enables the implementation of interceptive treatments that can reduce the need for invasive procedures or orthognathic surgery in adulthood. Therefore, this study aimed to provide local epidemiological evidence to strengthen diagnostic processes at Santo Tomás University and contribute to academic training based on current regional data. A cross-sectional descriptive prevalence study was conducted on a census of 150 digital panoramic radiographs from patients aged 7 to 25 years treated at the Orthodontics Service of the Dental Clinics of Santo Tomás University (2024-2025). Data were processed in Stata 16.0, performing univariate descriptive analysis (frequencies and percentages) and bivariate analysis using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test to evaluate associations with gender and age (p < 0.05). The results showed a moderate prevalence of mandibular asymmetries, with the total ramus height (Co-Go) being the most affected dimension (37.33%), followed by ramus height (29.33%) and condylar height (28.67%). Most asymmetries were mild in severity. A statistically significant association was found between gender and ramus asymmetry (p = 0.020), with females showing a higher proportion of symmetry, while no significant association was observed with age. In conclusion, there is a moderate prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in the studied population, predominantly affecting the total ramus plane. Thilander analysis on panoramic radiographs proves to be an effective method for initial screening, allowing optimization of preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment planning during active growth stages.
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Ortodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationSolano Porras, E. M (2026). Prevalencia de Asimetrías Mandibulares.[Tesis de posgrado]. Universidad Santo Tómas, Bucaramanga, Colombia
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73922
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramanga
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Ortodonciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbd Rahman, A. N., Abdullah, N. A., y Othman, S. A. (2023). Measuring tooth size discrepancies using Bolton analysis: A comparative cross-sectional study among major ethnicity in Malaysia. BMC Oral Health, 23(1), Article 534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03185-7
dc.relation.referencesAbdelkarim, A. (2019). Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Dentistry Journal, 7(3), Article 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030089
dc.relation.referencesAguilar, O., Gallego, C., Iriarte-Agudelo, A. M., y Quintero, S. (2010). Prevalencia de hallazgos en radiografías panorámicas de rutina. Revista Nacional de Odontología, 5(9), 33-38.
dc.relation.referencesAlfaro, C., Ayala, R., Barrientos, S. S., y Rodríguez, C. A. (2016). Prevalencia de asimetrías mandibulares en radiografías panorámicas de población de Bogotá-Colombia. International Journal of Morphology, 34(4), 1203-1206. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022016000400004
dc.relation.referencesAmel Belkhiri, A., y Si Ahmed, F. (2023). Impact of mastication on maxillofacial morphology and occlusion. International Journal of Scientific Research Updates, 5(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0035
dc.relation.referencesBabczyńska, A., Kawala, B., y Sarul, M. (2022). Genetic factors affecting asymmetric mandibular growth: A systematic review. Symmetry, 14(3), Article 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14030490
dc.relation.referencesBal, B., Dikbas, I., Malkondu, O., y Oral, K. (2018). Radiological study on mandibular ramus asymmetry in young population. Folia Morphologica, 77(4), 724–729. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2018.0023
dc.relation.referencesBarreno Haro, K. M., y Macías Ceballos, S. M. (2018). Prevalencia de asimetrías mandibulares en pacientes de Quito Ecuador medidas mediante radiografías panorámicas. Universitas Odontologica, 37(79). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uo37-79.pamp
dc.relation.referencesBasal, E., Cevik, I., Acar, Y. B., y Özdemir, F. (2024). Does facial growth pattern affect perception of lower facial asymmetry? The Angle Orthodontist, 94(4), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.2319/092823-656.1
dc.relation.referencesBegazo Mamani, K. C., y Rodríguez Rojas, J. L. M. (2022). Determinación de asimetrías verticales mandibulares mediante la aplicación del índice cefalométrico de Habets en ortopantomografías de pacientes de un centro radiológico privado Arequipa 2021 [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Alas Peruanas]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12990/11408
dc.relation.referencesBishara, S. E., Burkey, P. S., y Kharouf, J. G. (1994). Dental and facial asymmetries: A review. The Angle Orthodontist, 64(2), 89–98.
dc.relation.referencesBotezatu, A. N., Cernei, E. R., y Zegan, G. (2024). Cross-sectional study on self-perception of dento-facial asymmetry. Medicina, 60(8), Article 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081291
dc.relation.referencesBottini, G. B., et al. (2024). Management of mandibular condyle fractures in pediatric patients: A multicentric retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(18), Article 5455. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185455
dc.relation.referencesDurão, A. R., et al. (2013). Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: A systematic review. Progress in Orthodontics. PMC3882109.
dc.relation.referencesEvangelista, K., et al. (2021). Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal malocclusions: A systematic review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 26(6), Article e212120.
dc.relation.referencesEvangelista, K., et al. (2022). Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry: A systematic review. Orthodontics y Craniofacial Research, 25(2), 123-135.
dc.relation.referencesEvangelista, K., Teodoro, A. B., Bianchi, J., et al. (2022). Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal sagittal patterns: A systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist, 92(1), 118–126.
dc.relation.referencesFerrario, V. F., Serrao, G., Dellavia, C., Caruso, E., y Sforza, C. (2002). Relationship between occlusal contacts and masticatory muscle activity. Cranio, 20(2), 91–98.
dc.relation.referencesGoulart, D. R., et al. (2023). Condylar hypoplasia and its implications in orthognathic surgery: A three-dimensional analysis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 34(5), 1425-1431.
dc.relation.referencesHlatcu, A. R., Galan, E., Milicescu, Ș., Jr., Teodorescu, E., y Ionescu, E. (2023). An evaluation of the ramus mandibular asymmetry on the panoramic radiography. Applied Sciences, 13(13), Article 7645. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137645
dc.relation.referencesImaizumi, T., Kocsis, J. D., y Waxman, S. G. (1997). Anoxic injury in the rat spinal cord: Pharmacological evidence for multiple steps in Ca(2+)-dependent injury of the dorsal columns. Journal of Neurotrauma, 14(5), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1997.14.299
dc.relation.referencesIshizaki, K., Suzuki, K., Mito, T., Tanaka, E. M., y Sato, S. (2010). Mandibular lateral displacement malocclusion: Morphologic and functional characteristics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 137(4), 454.e1–454.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.031
dc.relation.referencesIyer, J., Hariharan, A., Cao, U. M. N., y Tran, S. D. (2021). Acquired facial asymmetries: Diagnosis and management. Symmetry, 13(9), Article 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091661
dc.relation.referencesIzzetti, R., et al. (2021). Accuracy and reproducibility of cone-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of mandibular asymmetries. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 13(5), e472-e478.
dc.relation.referencesIzzetti, R., Nisi, M., Aringhieri, G., et al. (2021). Advances in panoramic radiography imaging techniques. Applied Sciences, 11(17), Article 7858. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11177858
dc.relation.referencesJiang, H., Li, C., Wang, Z., et al. (2015). Osseous morphology of TMJ in chewing-side preference patients. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 42(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12240
dc.relation.referencesJung, J., Kim, J. Y., Kim, J. W., et al. (2024). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of unilateral condylar hyperplasia and condylar hypoplasia. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 82(4), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.01.012
dc.relation.referencesKapila, S. D., y Nervina, J. M. (2015). CBCT in orthodontics: Assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 44(1), Article 20140282. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140282
dc.relation.referencesKjellberg, H., Ekestubbe, A., Kiliaridis, S., y Thilander, B. (1994). Condylar height on panoramic radiographs: A methodologic study with a clinical application. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 52(1), 43-50.
dc.relation.referencesKogou, T., Takaki, T., y Shibahara, T. (2018). Three-dimensional analysis in facial asymmetry orthognathic cases. Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 59(3), 147–161.
dc.relation.referencesLa Rosa, J. L., Restrepo, M., Torres, E. A., y Rodríguez, M. J. (2021). Asimetría mandibular en niños con y sin fisura labio palatina. Revista Estomatológica Herediana, 31(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v31i2.3967
dc.relation.referencesLangland, O. E., Langlais, R. P., y Preece, J. W. (2002). Principles of dental imaging (2nd ed.). Williams y Wilkins.
dc.relation.referencesLarheim, T. A., y Svanaes, D. B. (1986). Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: Mandibular linear dimensions and angles. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 90(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90026-0
dc.relation.referencesMa, J., Wang, J., Huang, D., Wang, Z., Hu, M., Liu, H., et al. (2021). Cone-beam computed tomographic assessment of the inclination of the articular eminence in patients with temporomandibular disorders and chewing side preference. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), Article 476. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01760-4
dc.relation.referencesMarques, F. B. C., et al. (2023). Mandibular morphology in asymmetrical patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 164(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.12.016
dc.relation.referencesMarques, R. B., et al. (2023). Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular asymmetry: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 52(4), 456-467.
dc.relation.referencesNelke, K., et al. (2024). Late outcomes of undiagnosed unilateral condylar hyperplasia and reoccurrence of mandibular asymmetry. Diagnostics, 14(10), Article 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101014
dc.relation.referencesObwegeser, H. L., y Makek, M. S. (1986). Hemimandibular hyperplasia-hemimandibular elongation. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 14(4), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(86)80233-9
dc.relation.referencesPadrón Castro, M. J., y Portillo Guerrero, G. (2009). Prevalencia de asimetrías faciales usando el análisis panorámico de Levandoski. Revista Odontológica Mexicana, 13(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2009.13.2.15607
dc.relation.referencesPeck, S., Peck, L., y Kataja, M. (1991). Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. The Angle Orthodontist, 61(1), 43–48.
dc.relation.referencesPinto-Wong, S., y Arriola-Guillén, L. E. (2024). Prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry in panoramic radiographs of adult individuals: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 16(11), e1332–e1338. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62144
dc.relation.referencesPirttiniemi, P., Kantomaa, T., y Lahtela, P. (1990). Relationship between craniofacial and condyle path asymmetry in unilateral cross-bite patients. European Journal of Orthodontics, 12(4), 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/12.4.408
dc.relation.referencesPirttiniemi, P., Raustia, A., Kantomaa, T., y Pyhtinen, J. (1991). Relationships of bicondylar position to occlusal asymmetry. European Journal of Orthodontics, 13(6), 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.6.441
dc.relation.referencesPlanas, P. (1986). Rehabilitación neuro-oclusal (2ª ed.). Salvat.
dc.relation.referencesPolizzi, A., Serra, S., y Leonardi, R. (2024). Use of CBCT in orthodontics: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22), Article 6941. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226941
dc.relation.referencesProffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., y Sarver, D. M. (2013). Contemporary orthodontics (5th ed.). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesRamirez-Yañez, G. O., Stewart, A., Franken, E., y Campos, K. (2011). Prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in growing patients. European Journal of Orthodontics, 33(3), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq057
dc.relation.referencesRenkema, A. M., Fudalej, P. S., Kiekens, R., y Katsaros, C. (2013). Gingival recessions in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 143(2), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.018
dc.relation.referencesRiechmann, M., Gellrich, N. C., Kress, B., et al. (2024). Clinical practice guideline: Condylar hyperplasia of the mandible—Diagnosis and treatment. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 121(23-24), 816-823. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0210
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Caicedo, A. S., Hernández González, R. R., Sánchez, L. K., Rodríguez Ciódaro, A., y Barrientos Sánchez, S. (2011). Frecuencia de la asimetría condilar, rama y cuerpo mandibular por medio de un análisis de Thilander en dos mil (2000) radiografías panorámicas [Trabajo de grado, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana]. Repositorio Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
dc.relation.referencesRomito, M., Nota, A., Ferrini, F., et al. (2024). Gingival dimensional changes with aligners vs fixed appliances. Journal of Dentistry, 151, Article 105335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105335
dc.relation.referencesRossi, M., Ribeiro, E., & Smith, R. (2003). Craniofacial asymmetry in development: An anatomical study. The Angle Orthodontist, 73(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0381:CAIDAA>2.0.CO;2
dc.relation.referencesSora, B. C., y Jaramillo, P. M. (2005). Diagnóstico de asimetrías faciales y dentales. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, 16, 15–25.
dc.relation.referencesSun, R., Sun, L., y Sun, Z., et al. (2019). Hemimandibular hyperplasia and condylar osteoma analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 47(11), 1665–1675.
dc.relation.referencesSun, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2019). Three-dimensional condylar morphology and position in patients with mandibular asymmetry. Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(12), 4225-4233.
dc.relation.referencesThiesen, G., Freitas, M. P., Gribel, B. F., et al. (2018). Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. The Angle Orthodontist, 88(5), 545-551.
dc.relation.referencesThiesen, G., Gribel, B. F., Kim, K. B., et al. (2017). Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in adults. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 28(3), e199–e203.
dc.relation.referencesThiesen, G., Gribel, B. F., Kim, K. B., et al. (2018). Craniofacial characteristics in mandibular asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 154(1), 91–98.
dc.relation.referencesWhite, S. C., y Pharoah, M. J. (2014). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (7th ed.). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesYadav, V. S., Gumber, B., Makker, K., et al. (2023). Global prevalence of gingival recession: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Diseases, 29(8), 2993–3002.
dc.relation.referencesYe, G., Abdullah, N. A., y Othman, S. A. (2024). Comparative evaluation of transverse width indices for diagnosing maxillary transverse deficiency. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), Article 808.
dc.rightsAttribution 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordmandibular asymmetry
dc.subject.keywordprevalence
dc.subject.keywordpanoramic radiograph
dc.subject.proposalasimetría mandibular
dc.subject.proposalprevalencia
dc.subject.proposalradiografía panorámica
dc.titlePrevalencia de Asimetrías Mandibulares en Pacientes que asisten al Servicio de Ortodoncia de las Clínicas Odontológicas de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026SolanoEdna.pdf
Tamaño:
823.28 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026SolanoEdna1.pdf
Tamaño:
191.6 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026SolanoEdna2.pdf
Tamaño:
172.06 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Acuerdo de publicación

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: