Evolución histórica de las reglas de subsanabilidad en Colombia

Abstract

This monograph highlights the importance of a solid justification to investigate the historical evolution of the remedial rules in Colombia, addressing its main reflections. This examines five main contributions to partially understand its evolution and consequences, also highlighting its historical importance, its analysis in the legal and administrative context, its impact on access to justice, and adaptation to new needs. Although the Colombian legal system has established rectifiable rules to correct errors in legal documents and procedures, the lack of exhaustive research on its history and development in the country motivates a detailed analysis. It seeks to identify regulatory and jurisprudential milestones, their impact on justice and the effectiveness of the legal system, in order to establish those relevant elements that allow identifying reflective patterns and possible legal improvement. The objectives of the monograph include analyzing the development of these rules, describing procedures and requirements to correct them, analyzing their legal effects, identifying challenges and areas for improvement, and providing recommendations to strengthen the regulatory framework, within which a hypothetical logical method will be applied. -deductive, seeking to deduce a relational hypothesis from collected data. The exhaustive study of the historical evolution of the remedial rules in Colombia represents a fundamental step to understand their impact on the legal system and propose improvements, in addition to contributing to theoretical-practical progress in legal matters, it can have significant implications in efficiency, equity and access to justice in the country.

Key Word- Rectability, State contracting, Qualifying requirements, Justice, Regulations.