Comparación in vitro de la resistencia a la fractura ante fuerzas compresivas, entre una restauración en silicato de litio reforzado con zirconio cementado sobre esmalte y esmalte-dentina en dientes premolares

dc.contributor.advisorMesa Gómez, Bernardo Enriquespa
dc.contributor.authorAscanio Roa, Maryali Andreinaspa
dc.contributor.authorCamargo Matajira, Carlos Albertospa
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado Contreras, Maria Teresa del Pilarspa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-31T19:35:34Zspa
dc.date.available2020-01-31T19:35:34Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-01-28spa
dc.descriptionIntroducción: En esta investigación se busca identificar la resistencia a la fractura ante fuerzas compresivas del material silicato de litio reforzado con zirconio cementado sobre solo esmalte y una restauración en silicato de litio reforzado con zirconio cementado sobre esmalte-dentina. Objetivo: Evaluar la resistencia a la fractura ante fuerzas compresivas, entre una restauración de silicato de litio reforzado con zirconio cementado sobre esmalte y esmalte- dentina en dientes premolares. Metodología: Para el estudio se define fractura, como el momento en que el equipo interrumpe la aplicación constante de fuerzas, es el momento en que el cuerpo pierde resistencia. Experimental in vitro, se refiere a una técnica para realizar un determinado experimento en un ambiente controlado fuera de un organismo vivo. Para este caso se realizó un experimento en un órgano de un ser humano. 38 dientes premolares permanentes superiores sanos naturales, se toman 19 dientes para el grupo cementado solo en esmalte y 19 para el grupo cementado en dentina y esmalte; y una muestra de 6 dientes para realizar prueba piloto. Conclusión: Las carillas oclusales cementadas sobre dentina mostraron un menor registro en el tiempo de la fractura, pero no presento estadísticamente diferencias significativas que el cementado sobre esmalte. De acuerdo a la desviación standard no se puede tomar la decisión de cementar las carillas oclusales exclusivamente sobre un tejido evaluados en función de los variables tiempo y desplazamiento. Palabras claves: Comparación in vitro, Dientes premolares, Esmalte-dentina, Fuerzas compresivas, Resistencia, Silicato de litio, Zirconio cementadospa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This investigation seeks to identify the resistance to fracture against compressive forces of the lithium silicate material reinforced with cemented zirconium on only enamel and a restoration in lithium silicate reinforced with cemented zirconium on enamel-dentine. Objective: To evaluate the resistance to fracture against compressive forces, between a restorations of lithium silicate reinforced with cemented zirconium on enamel and enamel-dentine in premolar teeth. Methodology: Fracture is defined for the study, as the moment when the team interrupts the constant application of forces, is the moment when the body loses resistance. Experimental in vitro, refers to a technique to perform a certain experiment in a controlled environment outside a living organism. For this case an experiment was performed on an organ of a human being. 38 natural healthy upper permanent premolar teeth, 19 teeth are taken for the cemented group only in enamel and 19 for the cemented group in dentin and enamel; and a sample of 6 teeth for pilot testing. Conclusion: The occlusal veneers cemented on dentin showed a lower record at the time of the fracture, but did not show statistically significant differences than the cemented on enamel. According to the standard deviation, the decision cannot be made to cement the occlusal veneers exclusively on a tissue evaluated according to the time and displacement variables. Keywords: In vitro comparison, Premolar teeth, Dentin enamel, Compressive forces, Resistance, Lithium silicate, Cemented zirconiumspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Rehabilitación Oralspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationAscanio Roa, M. A., Camargo Matajira, C. A., y Maldonado Contreras, M. T. (2019). Comparación in vitro de la resistencia a la fractura ante fuerzas compresivas, entre una restauración en silicato de litio reforzado con zirconio cementado sobre esmalte y esmalte-dentina en dientes premolares [tesis de Especialización ]. Universidad Santo Tomas, Bucaramanga, Colombia.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/21343
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Rehabilitación Oralspa
dc.relation.referencesKelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway?. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139 Suppl 1: 4S - 7S.spa
dc.relation.referencesHunt PR. The future of esthetic dentistry. JADA. 1987; Special Issue: 106E - 112E.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurke FJ, Kelleher MG, Wilson N, Bishop k. Introducing the concept of pragmatic esthetics, with special reference to the treatment of tooth wear. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23: 277 – 93.spa
dc.relation.referencesKim JH, Lee S, Park JS, Ryu JJ. Fracture Load of Monolithic CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns and Veneered Zirconia Crowns as a Posterior Implant Restoration. Implant Dent. 2013; 22: 66 – 70.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl-Meliegy E, van Noort R. Glasses and Glass Ceramics for Medical Applications. New York: Springer, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesMagne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri NL. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104:149 - 157.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaroon R., Zeeshan SS., Misbahuddin, MRK. Sameer Q., Muhammad ZU. Advancements in all-ceramics for dental restorations and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition. Eur J Dent. 2016 Oct – Dec; 10(4): 583 – 588.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 1235 – 1242.spa
dc.relation.referencesENSAB IV, 2013-2014.IV estudio nacional de salud bucal ensab IV, 2013-2014, Ministerio de Salud, Republica de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaladhandayutham B, Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015; 114 (2), 266 - 271.spa
dc.relation.referencesConrad HJ, Seong WK, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007; 98 (5), 389 - 404.spa
dc.relation.referencesD’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De Angelis F, Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel, J Prosthet Dent. 2015, Mar; 115 (3): 350 - 355spa
dc.relation.referencesGuess PC, Schultheis S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2013; 110 (4), 264 - 273.spa
dc.relation.referencesFages M, Slangen P, Raynal J, Corn S, Turzo K, Margerit J, et al. Comparative mechanical behavior of dentin enamel and dentin ceramic junctions assessed by speckle interferometry (SI). Dental Materials. 2012; 28 (10), E229 - E238.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Dijken JWV, Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin–enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dental Materials. 2010; 26 (9), 929 - 939.spa
dc.relation.referencesVasconcelos AF, Barreto A, Miranda G, Pérez CR. Effect of prior silane application on the bond strength of a universal adhesive to a lithium disilicate ceramic. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2017 nov.; 118 (5): 666 - 671.spa
dc.relation.referencesPassia N, Lehmann F, Freitagt S, Kern M. Tensile bond strength of different universal adhesive systems to lithium disilicate ceramic. The Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA). 2015-10-01, Volúmen 146, Número 10, Páginas 729 - 734.spa
dc.relation.referencesArif R, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019 Aug;122 (2): 160 - 166.spa
dc.relation.referencesBadawya R, El-Mowafyb O, Tamb LE, Dental materials. 2016 Jul; 32 (7): 847 - 852.spa
dc.relation.referencesMagne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior oclusal veneres, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2010 Sep;104 (3): 149 - 157spa
dc.relation.referencesPeumans W, Valjakova EB, Munck JD, Mishevska CB, Meerbeek BV. Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials. 2016;18 (4): 289 - 302.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelvey G. A History of Dental Ceramics. 2010. Compendium, 31, 310 - 312.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohta A. Evaluation of the marginal fitness of tetragonal zirconia polycrystal all-ceramic restorations. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2003 Jun;70 (2):114 - 123spa
dc.relation.referencesGracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva N, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all ceramic and ceramic like restorative materials. 2015. The International journal of prosthodontics 28 (3): 227 - 235spa
dc.relation.referencesPiemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive Fracture Resistance of Porcelain Laminates Bonded to Enamel or Dentin with Four Adhesive Systems. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2007. 16, No 6 457- 464.spa
dc.relation.referencesBakke M. Bite force and occlusion. Semin Orthod. 2006; 12: 120 - 126spa
dc.relation.referencesCraig´s restorative dental materials, 13th Edition. 2011. pages 30 - 34.spa
dc.relation.referencesZaslansky P, Friesem AA, Weiner S. Structure and mechanical properties of the soft zone separating bulk dentin and enamel in crowns of human teeth: Insight into tooth function. Journal of Structural. 2006. 153: 188 –199.spa
dc.relation.referencesLa Fontaine A, Zavgorodniy A, Liu H, Zheng R, Swain M, et al. Atomic-scale compositional mapping reveals Mg-rich amorphous calcium phosphate in human dental enamel. Science Advances. 2016. 07 Sep: Vol. 2, no. 9.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeruel JD, Alcolea A, Hernandez A, Ortiz AJ. Comparison of chemical composition of enamel and dentine in human, bovine, porcine and ovine teeth. Archives of oral biology. 2015; 60 768 – 775spa
dc.relation.referencesMontoya C, Arango S, Peláez A, Arola D, Ossa EA. Effect of aging on the microstructure, hardness and chemical composition of dentin. Archives of oral biology. 2015; 60 1811 – 1820spa
dc.relation.referencesDentsply Sirona. [Internet]. Argentina. Dentsply Argentina.spa
dc.relation.referencesRampf M, Dittmer M, Ritzberger C, Schweiger M, Höland W. Properties and crystallization phenomena in li2si2O5–ca5(PO4)3F and li2si2O5–sr5(PO4)3F glass–ceramics via twofold internal crystallization. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2015; September, Volume 3, Article 122.spa
dc.relation.referencesSato TP, Anami LC, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effects of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and a New Zirconiareinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Operative Dentistry. 2016 May - Jun; 41 (3): 284 - 292.spa
dc.relation.referencesRinke s, Rödiger M, Ziebolz D,d Schmidt AK. Fabrication of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Restorations Using a Complete Digital Workflow. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Dentistry. 2015; 162 - 178.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlichting LH, Resende TH, Rodrigues K, Magne P.. Simplified treatment of severe dental erosion with ultrathin CAD-CAM composite occlusal veneers and anterior bilaminar veneers. journal of prosthetic dentistry.2016; 116: 474 - 482.spa
dc.relation.referencesDentsply Sirona. [Internet]. Alemania, Celtra Duo_Processing Guidelines, EN, 50539990, 0318.indd 1.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic oclusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2011; Apr; 105 (4): 217 - 226.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Akhali M, Chaar MS, Elsayed A, Samran A, Kern M. Fracture resistance of ceramic and polymer-based occlusal veneer restorations. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017 Oct; 74: 245 - 250.spa
dc.relation.referencesYazigi C, Kern M, Chaar MS. Influence of various bonding techniques on the fracture strength of thin CAD/CAM-fabricated occlusal glass-ceramic veneers. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017 Nov;75: 504 - 511.spa
dc.relation.referencesSasse M, Krummel A, Klosa K, Kern M. Influence of restoration thickness and dentalbonding surface on the fracture resistance offull-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic. Dental materials. 2015 Aug; 31 (8): 907- 915.spa
dc.relation.referencesMagne P, Magne M, Belser UC. Adhesive restorations centric relation and de Dahl principle: minimally invasive approaches to localized anterior tooth erosion. The European Journal Esthetic Dentistry. 2007; 2: 260 - 273.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee WC, Eakle WS. Stress induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Den.t 1996; 75 (5): 487- 494.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson GH, Lepe X, Patterson A, Schäfer., Simplified cementation of lithium disilicate crowns: Retention with various adhesive resin cement combinations. the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018 mayo; 119 (5): 826 - 832.spa
dc.relation.referencesWendlera M, Bellia R, Petschelta A, Mevecc D, Harrerc W, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing. Dental Materials. 2017 Jan; 33 (1): 99 - 109.spa
dc.relation.referencesZieden K, Acar J, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. Wear and Fracture Strength of New Ceramic Resins for Chairside Milling. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 January/February; 31 (1): 74 – 76.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro JB, Riquieria H, Prochnowb C, Guilardib LF, Pereira GK, et al. Fatigue failure load of two resin-bondedzirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics:Effect of ceramic thickness. Dental Materials. 2018 Jun; 34 (6): 891 – 900.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Maltzahn NF, Meniawy OI, Breitenbuecher N, Kohorst P, Stiesch M, et al. Fracture Strength of Ceramic Posterior Occlusal Veneers for Functional Rehabilitation of an Abrasive Dentition. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Sep/Oct;31(5):451-452.spa
dc.relation.referencesStappert C, Att W, Gerds T, Strub J. Fracture resistance of different partial coverage ceramic molar restorations An in vitro investigation. JADA. 2006 Apr; 137 (4): 514 - 522.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerraris F. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR): preparation designs and adhesthetics clinical protocol. The International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2017;12(4):482-502.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordIn vitro comparisonspa
dc.subject.keywordPremolar teethspa
dc.subject.keywordDentin enamelspa
dc.subject.keywordCompressive forcesspa
dc.subject.keywordResistancespa
dc.subject.keywordLithium silicatespa
dc.subject.keywordCemented zirconiumspa
dc.subject.lembMateriales dentalesspa
dc.subject.lembOdontología-materialesspa
dc.subject.lembDientesspa
dc.subject.lembCemento dentalspa
dc.subject.proposalComparación in vitrospa
dc.subject.proposalDientes premolaresspa
dc.subject.proposalEsmalte-dentinaspa
dc.subject.proposalFuerzas compresivasspa
dc.subject.proposalResistenciaspa
dc.subject.proposalSilicato de litiospa
dc.subject.proposalZirconio cementadospa
dc.titleComparación in vitro de la resistencia a la fractura ante fuerzas compresivas, entre una restauración en silicato de litio reforzado con zirconio cementado sobre esmalte y esmalte-dentina en dientes premolaresspa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2019CamargoCarlos.pdf
Tamaño:
6.12 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2019CamargoCarlos1.pdf
Tamaño:
77.45 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta Aprobación Programa
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
2019CamargoCarlos2.pdf
Tamaño:
181.66 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Autorización de publicación

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: