Evaluación de la Reserva de Carbono en el Suelo del Humedal El Charco-Oasis En Villavicencio, Meta

dc.contributor.advisorRomero Puentes, Raquel Beatriz
dc.contributor.advisorHerrera Peña, Martha Julieth
dc.contributor.authorParra Perez, Juan Diego
dc.contributor.authorGamarra Segura, Lesly Daniela
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tómás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001165879
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002103104
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=KNSgZBgAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-5327-9088
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-28T14:41:48Z
dc.date.available2026-07-28T14:41:48Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-12
dc.descriptionEl presente estudio evaluó la capacidad de almacenamiento de carbono orgánico en el suelo del humedal El Charco-Oasis, ecosistema urbano ubicado en Villavicencio, Meta, con el propósito de cuantificar su aporte como sumidero de carbono. Se establecieron siete puntos de muestreo mediante un diseño no probabilístico dirigido, considerando la heterogeneidad ambiental del ecosistema. En cada punto se implementó un transecto lineal de 10 m y se recolectaron submuestras hasta 60 cm de profundidad para conformar muestras compuestas. Se determinaron propiedades fisicoquímicas del suelo, incluyendo textura, densidad aparente, pH, nutrientes y materia orgánica. El carbono orgánico total se cuantificó mediante el método Walkley-Black, la reserva de carbono se estimó siguiendo las directrices del IPCC (2006), y los factores asociados a su distribución se evaluaron mediante análisis de correlación y análisis de componentes principales. La distribución espacial se representó mediante interpolación por Ponderación Inversa de la Distancia (IDW). Los resultados evidenciaron contenidos de carbono orgánico entre 0,46 % y 1,38 % (promedio: 0,92 %) y reservas entre 41,79 y 124,70 t C/ha (promedio: 83,8 t C/ha). El análisis de correlación mostró asociaciones principalmente con las bases totales, el pH y el aluminio intercambiable, mientras que los dos primeros componentes principales explicaron el 63,33 % de la variabilidad total. La distribución espacial presentó un patrón heterogéneo, con mayores reservas en la zona central del humedal y menores valores en sectores periféricos. A partir de la reserva promedio se estimó un almacenamiento de 341,74 t C para el área efectivamente estudiada (4,078 ha) y una reserva potencial de 537,57 t C para la superficie total del humedal. Estos resultados resaltan la importancia del humedal El Charco-Oasis como reservorio de carbono en un contexto urbano y como apoyo a estrategias locales de mitigación del cambio climático, en concordancia con los ODS 11 (Ciudades y comunidades sostenibles), ODS 13 (Acción por el clima) y ODS 15 (Vida de ecosistemas terrestres).
dc.description.abstractThis study assessed the soil organic carbon storage capacity of El Charco–Oasis wetland, an urban ecosystem located in Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia, in order to quantify its contribution as a carbon sink. Seven sampling sites were established through a purposive sampling design that accounted for the environmental heterogeneity of the ecosystem. At each site, a 10 m linear transect was established, and soil subsamples were collected to a depth of 60 cm and combined into composite samples. Soil physicochemical properties, including texture, bulk density, pH, nutrient content, and organic matter, were determined through laboratory analyses. Total organic carbon was quantified using the Walkley–Black method, carbon stocks were estimated following the IPCC (2006) guidelines, and the factors associated with carbon distribution were evaluated through correlation analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Spatial distribution patterns were represented using Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) interpolation. The results revealed soil organic carbon contents ranging from 0.46% to 1.38% (mean: 0.92%) and carbon stocks ranging from 41.79 to 124.70 t C ha⁻¹ (mean: 83.8 t C ha⁻¹). Correlation analysis indicated that organic carbon was primarily associated with total exchangeable bases, soil pH, and exchangeable aluminum, whereas the first two principal components explained 63.33% of the total variability. Spatial distribution exhibited a heterogeneous pattern, with higher carbon stocks concentrated in the central sector of the wetland and lower values recorded in peripheral areas. Based on the mean carbon stock, soil carbon storage was estimated at 341.74 t C for the effectively surveyed area (4.078 ha) and 537.57 t C for the total wetland area. These findings underscore the importance of El Charco–Oasis wetland as a strategic carbon reservoir within an urban landscape and highlight its contribution to local climate change mitigation efforts. Furthermore, the estimated carbon stock exceeds the institutional carbon footprint reported for 2020 (215.86 t CO₂) and 2023 (315.07 t CO₂), demonstrating its potential role in carbon offsetting. The ecosystem also contributes to the achievement of SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land).
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameIngeniero Ambientalspa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacion
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationGamarra Segura, L. D. & Parra Perez, J. D. (2026). Evaluación de la Reserva de Carbono en el Suelo del Humedal El Charco-Oasis En Villavicencio, Meta [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional USTA.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/73585
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Villavicencio
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería Ambientalspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado de Ingeniería Ambientalspa
dc.relation.referencesAponte, H., Corvacho, M. F., Lertora, G., & Ramírez, D. W. (2021). Reserva de carbono en un humedal del desierto costero de Sudamérica. Gayana. Botánica, 78(2), 184-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-66432021000200184
dc.relation.referencesBenavides, J. C., Vitt, D. H., & Wieder, R. K. (2013). The influence of climate change on recent peat accumulation patterns of Distichia muscoides cushion bogs in the high-elevation tropical Andes of Colombia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 118(4), 1627-1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002419
dc.relation.referencesBlake, G. R., & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. En A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (2nd ed., pp. 363-375). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13
dc.relation.referencesBolívar Gamboa, A., et al. (2021). Estimación de carbono orgánico del suelo en Colombia como herramienta de gestión del territorio. Ecosistemas, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2019
dc.relation.referencesBrady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2017). The nature and properties of soils (15th ed.). Pearson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301200878_The_Nature_and_Properties_of_Soils_15th_edition
dc.relation.referencesBridgham, S. D., Megonigal, J. P., Keller, J. K., Bliss, N. B., & Trettin, C. (2006). The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands, 26(4), 889-916. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227317573_The_Carbon_Balance_of_North_American_Wetlands
dc.relation.referencesBuitrago Amaya, J. S., & López Muñoz, S. K. (2021). Aporte del humedal el Charco-Oasis a la regulación térmica por medio del análisis de variables microclimáticas y de cobertura en Villavicencio [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional USTA. https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/33889
dc.relation.referencesBurrough, P. A., McDonnell, R. A., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Principles of geographical information systems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284311665_Principles_of_Geographical_Information_Systems
dc.relation.referencesChimner, R. A., Bourgeau-Chavez, L., Grelik, S., Hribljan, J. A., Planas Clarke, A. M., Polk, M. H., Lilleskov, E. A., & Fuentealba, B. (2019). Mapping mountain peatlands and wet meadows using multi-date, multi-sensor remote sensing in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru. Wetlands, 39(5), 1057-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01134-1
dc.relation.referencesCoral, E. M. (2022). Almacenamiento de carbono orgánico en suelos del humedal Ramsar Laguna de la Cocha [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81882
dc.relation.referencesCruz Mosquera, N., & Vásquez Parra, H. S. (2024). Evaluación del potencial como sumidero de carbono del humedal El Charco-Oasis en el municipio de Villavicencio, departamento del Meta [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional USTA. https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/ 11634/54554
dc.relation.referencesFernández Lucero, A., Ríos Patrón, E., & López Barrera, F. (2016). Caracterización de la acumulación de carbono en pequeños humedales andinos en la cuenca alta del río Barbas (Quindío, Colombia). Caldasia, 38(1), 129-145. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0366-52322016000100007
dc.relation.referencesFernández Martínez, F. (2020). Model development to determine the soil organic carbon stock based on diffuse reflectance: Case Carimagua–Meta [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358794482_Model_development_to_determine_the_soil_organic_carbon_stock_based_on_diffuse_reflectance_Case_Carimagua_-_Meta
dc.relation.referencesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2006). Guidelines for soil description (4th ed.). FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/a0541e/a0541e.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014: International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps (Update 2015). FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). Standard operating procedure for soil organic carbon: Walkley-Black method. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/ca7471en/ca7471en.pdf
dc.relation.referencesGardner, W. H. (1986). Water content. En A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (2.ª ed., pp. 493–544). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c21
dc.relation.referencesGarzón Cadena, M. J. (2021). Análisis del estado socio ambiental de los humedales en el perímetro urbano de la ciudad de Villavicencio - Meta [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia]. Repositorio Institucional UNAD. https://repository.unad.edu.co/handle/10596/47638
dc.relation.referencesGee, G. W., & Or, D. (2002). Particle-size analysis. En J. H. Dane & G. C. Topp (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 4. Physical methods (pp. 255-293). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12
dc.relation.referencesGrossman, R. B., & Reinsch, T. G. (2002). Bulk density and linear extensibility. En J. H. Dane & G. C. Topp (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 4. Physical methods (pp. 201-228). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c9
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Sabol, M. (2025). Overview of Multivariate Data Analysis, An. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392967329_Overview_of_Multivariate_Data_Analysis_An
dc.relation.referencesHåkansson, I., & Lipiec, J. (2000). A review of the usefulness of relative bulk density values in studies of soil structure and compaction. Soil and Tillage Research, 53(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00095-1
dc.relation.referencesHansen, V. D., & Nestlerode, J. A. (2014). Carbon sequestration in wetland soils of the northern Gulf of Mexico coastal region. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 22(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-013-9330-6
dc.relation.referencesHavlin, J. L., Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., & Beaton, J. D. (2014). Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management (8th ed.). Pearson.
dc.relation.referencesHillel, D. (2004). Introduction to environmental soil physics. Elsevier Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesHribljan, J. A., Suárez, E., Heckman, K. A., Lilleskov, E. A., & Chimner, R. A. (2016). Peatland carbon stocks and accumulation rates in the Ecuadorian páramo. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 24(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9482-2
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). (2017). NTC 6230. Calidad del suelo. Determinación del contenido de humedad en base seca (factor de corrección por humedad). Icontec.
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). (2021). NTC 5403. Calidad del suelo. Determinación del carbono orgánico. Icontec.
dc.relation.referencesInstituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. (2025). Inventario nacional de gases de efecto invernadero. IDEAM. http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/contaminacion-y-calidad-ambiental/inventario-nacional-y-departamental-de-gei
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC). (2024). Determinación de la densidad aparente del suelo por métodos terrón parafinado y/o cilindro (IN-AGR-PC01-04).
dc.relation.referencesIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. IPCC. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html
dc.relation.referencesIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
dc.relation.referencesIsaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(91)90055-I
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, L. J., Ramón, P., Sarango, J., Burneo, J. I., & Gusmán-Montalván, E. (2025). Long-term grazing exclusion enhances soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in tropical dry forests of southern Ecuador. Frontiers in Soil Science, 5, 1617798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2025.1617798
dc.relation.referencesJolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), Article 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
dc.relation.referencesLal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623-1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396
dc.relation.referencesLal, R. (2008). Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1492), 815-830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185
dc.relation.referencesLavelle, P., Bignell, D., Lepage, M., Wolters, V., Roger, P., Ineson, P., Heal, O. W., & Dhillion, S. (1997). Soil function in a changing world: The role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. European Journal of Soil Biology, 33(4), 159–193.
dc.relation.referencesLegendre, P., & Legendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology (3rd ed.). Elsevier
dc.relation.referencesLeifeld, J., & Menichetti, L. (2018). The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03406-6
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., & Heap, A. D. (2014). Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 53, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008
dc.relation.referencesMillennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinasny, B., McBratney, A. B., Malone, B. P., & Wheeler, I. (2013). Digital mapping of soil carbon. Advances in Agronomy, 118, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405942-9.00001-3
dc.relation.referencesMitsch, W. J., Bernal, B., Nahlik, A. M., Mander, Ü., Zhang, L., Anderson, C. J., Jørgensen, S. E., & Brix, H. (2013). Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landscape Ecology, 28(4), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9758-8
dc.relation.referencesMitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2015). Wetlands (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271643179_Wetlands_5th_edition
dc.relation.referencesMontgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362079778_Design_and_Analysis_of_Experiments_9th_Edition
dc.relation.referencesNelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. En A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd ed., pp. 539-579). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
dc.relation.referencesNyman, J. A., DeLaune, R. D., Roberts, H. H., & Patrick, W. H., Jr. (1993). Relationship between vegetation and soil formation in a rapidly submerging coastal marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 96, 269-279. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps096269
dc.relation.referencesOdum, E. P., & Barrett, G. W. (2006). Fundamentals of ecology (5th ed.). Thomson Brooks/Cole.
dc.relation.referencesOrozco-Hueje, D., Barreto-Rojas, D. M., Trujillo González, J. M., Silva-Parra, A., Serrano-Gómez, M., Castillo-Monroy, E. F., & Torres-Mora, M. A. (2023). Sumideros naturales de carbono: Un estudio de caso en morichales de la altillanura colombiana. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 14(1), 178-199. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.5531
dc.relation.referencesPage, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Banks, C. J. (2011). Global and regional importance of the tropical Peatland Carbon Pool. Global Change Biology, 17(2), 798-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.x
dc.relation.referencesParrado Parrado, F. H., & Caro Jiménez, R. S. (2020). Línea base de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) generadas por los desplazamientos regulares de la comunidad universitaria desde y hacia los campus de la USTA sede Villavicencio [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional USTA. https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/32028
dc.relation.referencesPoppiel, R. R., et al. (2025). Soil health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Communications Earth & Environment, 6, 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02021-w
dc.relation.referencesQuesada, C. A., Lloyd, J., Schwarz, M., Patiño, S., Baker, T. R., Czimczik, C., ... & Paiva, R. (2010). Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences, 7(5), 1515–1541.
dc.relation.referencesRamsar Convention Secretariat. (2018). Global wetland outlook: State of the world's wetlands and their services to people. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/gwo_e.pdf
dc.relation.referencesReddy, K. R., & DeLaune, R. D. (2008). Biogeochemistry of wetlands: Science and applications. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203491454
dc.relation.referencesSampieri, R. H., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesSaxton, K. E., & Rawls, W. J. (2006). Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1569-1578. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117
dc.relation.referencesSchlesinger, W. H., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2013). Biogeochemistry: An analysis of global change (3rd ed.). Academic Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282722563_Biogeochemistry_An_Analysis_of_Global_Change_Third_Edition
dc.relation.referencesShapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
dc.relation.referencesSix, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002). Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil, 241(2), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
dc.relation.referencesThomas, G. W. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. En D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chemical methods (pp. 475-490). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
dc.relation.referencesTorres Basto, M. F. (2023). Estimacion de la capacidad de captura de carbono de la especie Mimosa trianae Benth, en el Humedal el Charco oasis, a partir de la aplicación de ecuaciones alometricas para resaltar la importancia de conservación de los humedales urbanos [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional USTA. https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/52304
dc.relation.referencesUnited States Department of Agriculture. (2014). Soil survey field and laboratory methods manual (Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 51, Version 2.0). USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/SSIR51.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWalkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
dc.relation.referencesWiesmeier, M., Urbanski, L., Hobley, E., Lang, B., von Lützow, M., Marin-Spiotta, E., van Wesemael, B., Rabot, E., Ließ, M., Garcia-Franco, N., Wollschläger, U., Vogel, H. J., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2019). Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma, 333, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.026
dc.relation.referencesZar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordUrban wetlands
dc.subject.keywordcarbon stock
dc.subject.keywordWalkley–Black method
dc.subject.keywordmultivariate analysis
dc.subject.keywordspatial distribution
dc.subject.keywordecosystem services
dc.subject.lembEcosistema - Almacenamiento geológico del carbono
dc.subject.lembCarbono orgánico del suelo - Humedal El Charco-Oasis
dc.subject.lembHumedales - Reserva de carbono
dc.subject.lembIngeniería ambiental - Investigaciones
dc.subject.lembTesis y Disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.proposalHumedales urbanos
dc.subject.proposalReserva de carbono
dc.subject.proposalMétodo Walkley-Black
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis multivariado
dc.subject.proposalDistribución espacial
dc.subject.proposalservicios ecosistémicos
dc.titleEvaluación de la Reserva de Carbono en el Suelo del Humedal El Charco-Oasis En Villavicencio, Meta
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Pregrado
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de Gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026juanparra.pdf
Tamaño:
3 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorización Facultad
Tamaño:
1.17 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorización estudiantes
Tamaño:
233.93 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: