Developing lexical competence through teaching materials: a pedagogical proposal.

dc.contributor.advisorGuzmán Bejarano, Dayan Ariadna
dc.contributor.authorAguilar Silva, María José
dc.contributor.authorBueno Rojas, Hugo Ferney
dc.contributor.authorPalencia Rojas, María Camila
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-28T16:17:46Z
dc.date.available2026-01-28T16:17:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-19
dc.descriptionEsta investigación aborda el desarrollo de la competencia léxica a través del diseño e implementación de materiales didácticos contextualizados en un entorno de educación bilingüe rural en Colombia. Enmarcado en el paradigma interpretativo y sustentado en un enfoque cualitativo de estudio de caso, el estudio propone una estrategia pedagógica que responde a las realidades socioculturales y lingüísticas de los estudiantes de noveno grado de la Institución Educativa Plácido Retamoza. El problema central que se aborda es la limitada competencia léxica de los aprendices rurales, condicionada por la insuficiencia y descontextualización de los recursos pedagógicos disponibles. La recolección de datos se realizó mediante la aplicación de cuestionarios, encuestas, pruebas diagnósticas, observaciones de aula y una entrevista semiestructurada a un docente de inglés. El análisis la información reveló que el aprendizaje del vocabulario en contextos rurales se configura a partir de tres dimensiones interrelacionadas: la competencia lexical, las prácticas de enseñanza y las prácticas de aprendizaje. Los hallazgos evidencian que las metodologías comunicativas, lúdicas y multimodales potencian la motivación estudiantil, la retención léxica y el uso funcional del vocabulario cuando se adaptan al contexto. Este estudio concluye que el desarrollo de la competencia léxica en contextos bilingües rurales requiere integrar dimensiones cognitivas, afectivas y socioculturales en la práctica docente. Los materiales contextualizados, anclados en las realidades del estudiantado, no solo fortalecen la adquisición del vocabulario, sino que también promueven la identidad cultural y el empoderamiento comunicativo. En consecuencia, esta investigación aporta una propuesta pedagógica estratégica como puente entre la teoría y práctica, ofreciendo un marco para una enseñanza del inglés inclusiva, transformadora y sensible al contexto en las zonas rurales de Colombia.
dc.description.abstractThis research explores the development of lexical competence through the design and implementation of contextualized teaching materials within a rural bilingual education setting in Colombia. Anchored in the interpretative paradigm and a case study design, the study aims to propose a pedagogical strategy that responds to the sociocultural and linguistic realities of ninth-grade students at the Institución Educativa Plácido Retamoza. The central problem addressed is the limited lexical proficiency among rural learners, often exacerbated by insufficient and decontextualized instructional resources. Data were collected through a combination of instruments, including questionnaires, surveys, initial tests, classroom observations, and a semi-structured interview with an English teacher. The analysis revealed that vocabulary learning in rural contexts is shaped by three interrelated dimensions: lexical competence, teaching practices and learning strategies. The findings demonstrate that communicative, playful, and multimodal methodologies enhance students’ motivation, retention, and ability to use vocabulary purposefully when they are adapted to the context. This study concludes that developing lexical competence in rural bilingual contexts requires integrating cognitive, affective, and sociocultural dimensions into teaching practice. Contextualized materials grounded in students’ realities not only foster vocabulary acquisition but also strengthen their cultural identity and communicative empowerment. Consequently, this research contributes a strategic pedagogical proposal as a bridge between theory and practice, offering a framework for inclusive, transformative, and context-sensitive English language education in rural Colombia.
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ambientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationSilva Aguilar, M. J. Bueno Rojas, H. F. y Palencia Rojas, M. C (2025). Developing lexical competence through teaching materials: a pedagogical proposal. [Trabajo de Maestría, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/71232
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría Ambientes Bilingües de Aprendizajespa
dc.relation.referencesAlejos, L. (2017). *Lexical competence and academic success in higher education contexts*. [Artículo académico].
dc.relation.referencesArcila, M. (2018). *English instruction in rural schools: Challenges and pedagogical implications*. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia].
dc.relation.referencesArcila, M. (2018). La enseñanza del inglés en contextos rurales: retos y oportunidades. Bogotá: Universidad de La Salle.
dc.relation.referencesBarreto, D. (2022). Integrating ICTs in rural English classrooms: A pedagogical innovation approach. Revista Educación y Tecnología, 12(3), 55–72.
dc.relation.referencesBonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University.
dc.relation.referencesBrinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, H. D. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, H. D. (2015). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.relation.referencesCaicedo, J. (2020). Teaching English in rural Colombia: Strategies for inclusive and contextualized education. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 78(1), 145–168.
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, M. L., & Miranda, N. (2021). Contextualized pedagogy in English language teaching in Colombia: Local perspectives for meaningful learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 23(2), 247–263.
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, C., Pereira, M., & Gómez, A. (2021). *Strategic leadership and educational innovation: A systematic review*. *Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 9*(2), 115–132.
dc.relation.referencesCassany, D., Luna, M., & Sanz, G. (1998). Enseñar lengua. Barcelona: Graó.
dc.relation.referencesCastro, E. (2020). Designing contextualized materials for English teaching in rural schools. HOW Journal, 27(2), 113–129.
dc.relation.referencesCheng, Y. C. (2010). *Educational leadership and contextualized strategies in Chinese schools*. *Asia Pacific Education Review, 11*(3), 283–294.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesCummins, J. (2008). *Bilingual and immersion programs*. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), *Encyclopedia of language and education* (Vol. 5, pp. 65–75). Springer.
dc.relation.referencesDavies, B., & Davies, B. J. (2006). *Strategic leadership*. *School Leadership & Management, 26*(1), 37–38.
dc.relation.referencesDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
dc.relation.referencesDíaz Barriga, F., & Hernández Rojas, G. (2010). *Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista* (3.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesDolz, J., & Schneuwly, B. (2004). *Géneros orales y escritos en la escuela*. Graó.
dc.relation.referencesDunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company.
dc.relation.referencesEacott, S. (2011). *Preparing educational leaders in managerialist times: An Australian story*. *Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43*(1), 43–59.
dc.relation.referencesEmerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesFleming, N. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch, New Zealand: N. D. Fleming.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, O., & Wei, L. (2014). *Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education*. Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesGardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, K. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
dc.relation.referencesLewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
dc.relation.referencesMayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMEN (Ministerio de Educación Nacional). (2016). Derechos Básicos de Aprendizaje: Inglés. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesMorrison, M. (2018). Understanding research methods in education. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesNation, I. S. P. (2013). *Learning vocabulary in another language* (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesNation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesNation, P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz, D., & López, C. (2022). Project-based learning for vocabulary development in rural Colombian schools. HOW Journal, 29(1), 45–63.
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz, J., & López, C. (2022). *Contextualized didactic sequences to enhance vocabulary acquisition and communicative performance in rural bilingual classrooms*. [Artículo académico].
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesParra, D. (2021). *Rural bilingual programs in Meta: Challenges and opportunities for contextualized language teaching*. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de los Llanos].
dc.relation.referencesParra, L. (2021). Aprendizaje significativo y enseñanza del inglés en comunidades rurales colombianas. Revista de Investigación Educativa y Pedagógica, 13(2), 89–102.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, L. (2022). *Lexical competence development in rural contexts: A sociocultural approach*. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional].
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, L. (2022). Contextualized English teaching in rural Colombia: A decolonial approach. HOW Journal, 29(1), 120–135.
dc.relation.referencesReid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. C. (2017). *Approaches and methods in language teaching* (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesRiffo Ocares, C., Rivera, L., & Soto, M. (2018). *Lexical competence, reading comprehension, and academic achievement among Chilean students*. *Revista Latinoamericana de Educación, 48*(2), 85–104.
dc.relation.referencesRobles García, A. (2019). *Lexical competence as a foundation for communicative development in EFL classrooms*. *Revista Iberoamericana de Lingüística Aplicada, 12*(1), 67–82.
dc.relation.referencesRojas, C. (2023). Challenges and innovations in rural English teaching in Colombia. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 25(2), 77–94.
dc.relation.referencesSalinas, J. (2004). *Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en la enseñanza universitaria*. *Revista Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 1*(1), 1–16.
dc.relation.referencesSamsudin, A., Sukarismanti, N., & Rasmin, R. (2024). The use of materials based on local wisdom in improving students’ vocabulary and motivation. International Journal of Language Education and Teaching, 8(1), 45–56.
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesSoler Pardo, B., Ruiz, A., & Mendoza, M. (2013). *Didactic sequences for foreign language instruction: Adaptability and effectiveness*. *Revista de Didáctica de las Lenguas, 6*(2), 21–39.
dc.relation.referencesThornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.
dc.relation.referencesTorres, J. (2022). Implementing project-based learning for vocabulary development in rural Colombian contexts. Enletawa Journal, 15(1), 97–115.
dc.relation.referencesVega, A. (2020). Developing lexical competence through communicative tasks in rural classrooms. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(1), 33–48.
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWei, X. (2014). Developing vocabulary competence through digital storytelling in EFL contexts. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Journal, 27(5), 765–784.
dc.relation.referencesWilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses: A taxonomy and its relevance to foreign language curriculum development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (2006). Games for language learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordlexical competence
dc.subject.keywordbilingual education
dc.subject.keywordrural contexts
dc.subject.keywordcontextualized materials
dc.subject.keywordcommunicative approach
dc.subject.lembAmbientes Bilingües de Aprendizaje
dc.subject.lembMateriales didácticos
dc.subject.lembAdquisición de vocabulario
dc.subject.proposalcompetencia léxica
dc.subject.proposaleducación bilingüe
dc.subject.proposalcontextos rurales
dc.subject.proposalmateriales contextualizados,
dc.subject.proposalenfoque comunicativo.
dc.titleDeveloping lexical competence through teaching materials: a pedagogical proposal.
dc.typemaster thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesis de maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025mariaaguilarhugobuenomariapalencia.pdf
Tamaño:
730.7 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025Cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
617.56 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta Facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025Cartadederechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
1.11 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta Autorización de Datos