Preservación alveolar, cuatro materiales utilizados como injerto de alvéolo posterior a la extracción dental: una revisión sistemática

dc.contributor.advisorSerrano Arciniegas, Jorge Enrique
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Serna, María Camila
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Castillo, Mildreth Yarley
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Silva, Ángela Patricia
dc.contributor.authorRamírez Umaña, Ruddy Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-11T14:14:52Z
dc.date.available2023-09-11T14:14:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-08
dc.descriptionIntroducción: Se han propuesto diferentes técnicas de preservación de la cresta alveolar para mantener la arquitectura de los tejidos duros y blandos, con el objetivo final de evitar una cirugía de aumento adicional, una de ellas es la utilización de un injerto óseo, el cual se clasifica en aloinjerto, xenoinjerto, aloplástico y autoinjerto. Objetivo: Analizar la evidencia disponible en la literatura científica sobre la preservación alveolar de cuatro materiales utilizados como injerto posterior a la extracción de dientes sin colgajo publicados en los últimos cinco años. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de fuente secundaria, una revisión sistemática de ensayos clínicos publicados en inglés entre el 2019 y 2023 por medio de las bases de datos: Pudmed, Dentistry and oral science source, Web of science, Science direct, Scielo y Scopus. Se incluyeron artículos que incluyan al menos dos tipos de injertos óseos y se realizó una evaluación del riesgo de sesgo con la guía de la Colaboración Cochrane. Resultados: En general las diferentes investigaciones utilizaron poblaciones similares, pero variaban según los tipos de injerto óseo evaluado y el tipo de medición de la preservación alveolar, la cual se dio en tres formas, una por medio de un análisis histológico, otra gracias a una sonda periodontal o un calibrador que media directamente las dimensiones de la cresta alveolar y otra consistió en un análisis radiográfico. Conclusiones: Todos los materiales utilizados como injertos óseos ayudan a la preservación alveolar posterior a una exodoncia, sin embargo, es necesaria mayor evidencia científica que pueda determinar con cuál de los materiales se obtiene un mejor resultado.spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Different alveolar crest preservation techniques have been proposed to maintain the architecture of hard and soft tissues, with the ultimate goal of avoiding additional augmentation surgery, one of which is the use of a bone graft, which is classified as allograft, xenograft, alloplastic, and autograft. Objective: To analyze the evidence available in the scientific literature on the alveolar preservation of four materials used as grafts after tooth extraction without flaps published in the last five years. Materials and methods: Secondary source study, a systematic review of clinical trials published in English between 2019 and 2023 through the databases: Pudmed, Dentistry and oral science source, Web of science, Science direct, Scielo and Scopus. Articles including at least two types of bone grafts were included and a risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration guideline. Results: In general, the different investigations used similar populations, but they varied according to the types of bone graft evaluated and the type of measurement of alveolar preservation, which occurred in three ways, one through a histological analysis, another thanks to a periodontal probe or a caliper that directly measures the dimensions of the alveolar crest, and another consisted of a radiographic analysis. Conclusions: All the materials used as bone grafts help alveolar preservation after an extraction, however, more scientific evidence is needed to determine which of the materials obtains a better result.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialización Periodonciaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationÁlvarez Serna, M.C. Díaz Castillo, M.Y. Martínez Silva, A.P y Ramírez Umaña, R.E. (2023). Preservación alveolar, cuatro materiales utilizados como injerto de alvéolo posterior a la extracción dental: una revisión sistemática [Tesis de posgrado]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/52018
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización Periodonciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbellán, D., Barallat, L., Vilarrasa, J., Cabezas, M., Pascual La Rocca, A., Valles, C., & Nart, J. (2022). Ridge preservation in molar sites comparing xenograft versus mineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33(5), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13911spa
dc.relation.referencesAmler, M. H. (1969). The time sequence of tissue regeneration in human extraction wounds. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 27(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90357-0spa
dc.relation.referencesAraujo, M. G., & Lindhe, J. (2005). Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBadylak, S. F., Brown, B. N., Gilbert, T. W., Daly, K. A., Huber, A., & Turner, N. J. (2011). Biologic scaffolds for constructive tissue remodeling. Biomaterials, 32(1), 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.018spa
dc.relation.referencesBaltazar-Ruiz, A., Rodriguez-Pulido, J., Garza-Enriquez, M., & Martínez-Sandoval, G. (2020). Clasificaciones de alvéolos postextracción - Revisión de literatura. Implantología actual, 15(37), 14–24spa
dc.relation.referencesCanullo, L., Del Fabbro, M., Khijmatgar, S., Panda, S., Ravidà, A., Tommasato, G., Sculean, A., & Pesce, P. (2022). Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04248-1spa
dc.relation.referencesCardaropoli, G., Araújo, M., & Lindhe, J. (2003). Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. Journal of clinical periodontology, 30(9), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCastaño Granada, M. C., Roldán Tamayo, N., Arismendi Echavarría, J. A., & Calle Muñoz, S. C. (2016). Cambios dimensionales de los tejidos duros y blandos en sitios post-exodoncia. Evaluación de dos biomateriales. Revista Facultad de Odontología, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v28n1a1spa
dc.relation.referencesCenicante, J., Botelho, J., Machado, V., Mendes, J. J., Mascarenhas, P., Alcoforado, G., & Santos, A. (2021). The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041853spa
dc.relation.referencesChappuis, V., Engel, O., Reyes, M., Shahim, K., Nolte, L.-P., & Buser, D. (2013). Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. Journal of dental research, 92(12 Suppl), 195S-201S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513506713spa
dc.relation.referencesLey 599 de 2000, Pub. L. No. 599, Por la cual se expide el Código Penal (2000).spa
dc.relation.referencesDarby, I., Chen, S., & De Poi, R. (2008). Ridge preservation: what is it and when should it be considered. Australian dental journal, 53(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00008.xspa
dc.relation.referencesDief, S., Veitz-Keenan, A., Amintavakoli, N., & McGowan, R. (2019). A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Dento maxillo facial radiology, 48(7), 20180396. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180396spa
dc.relation.referencesDimitriou, R., Mataliotakis, G. I., Calori, G. M., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2012). The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC medicine, 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-81spa
dc.relation.referencesDinatale, E., & Guercio, E. (2008). Regeneración osea guiada (GBR). Revisión de la literatura. Acta Odontológica Venezolana, 46(4), 554–561.spa
dc.relation.referencesDi Stefano, D. A., Orlando, F., Ottobelli, M., Fiori, D., & Garagiola, U. (2022). A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 44(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3spa
dc.relation.referencesEley, B. M., Soory, M., & Manson, J. D. (2010). Periodoncia Sexta Edición (6a ed.). Elsevierspa
dc.relation.referencesElgali, I., Omar, O., Dahlin, C., & Thomsen, P. (2017). Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. European journal of oral sciences, 125(5), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364spa
dc.relation.referencesElian, N., Cho, S.-C., Froum, S., Smith, R. B., & Tarnow, D. P. (2007). A simplified socket classification and repair technique. Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD, 19(2), 99–104; quiz 106spa
dc.relation.referencesFukuba, S., Okada, M., Nohara, K., & Iwata, T. (2021). Alloplastic Bone Substitutes for Periodontal and Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: Current Status and Prospects. Materials, 14(5), 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051096spa
dc.relation.referencesGluckman, H., Salama, M., & Du Toit, J. (2017). Partial Extraction Therapies (PET) Part 2: Procedures and Technical Aspects. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 37(3), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3111spa
dc.relation.referencesGuadilla, Y., Benito-Garzón, L., Quispe-López, N., & Montero, J. (2022). Histologic Outcomes of the Use of Different Biomaterials for Socket Regeneration in Fresh Extraction Sockets: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 37(5), 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9422spa
dc.relation.referencesGurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008). Wound repair and regeneration. Nature, 453(7193), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07039spa
dc.relation.referencesHämmerle, C. H. F., Araújo, M. G., Simion, M., & Osteology Consensus Group 2011. (2012). Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clinical oral implants research, 23 Suppl 5, 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.xspa
dc.relation.referencesHämmerle, C. H. F., & Tarnow, D. (2018). The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review. Journal of Periodontology, 89, S291–S303. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0810spa
dc.relation.referencesHaugen, H. J., Lyngstadaas, S. P., Rossi, F., & Perale, G. (2019). Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13058spa
dc.relation.referencesHorowitz, R., Holtzclaw, D., & Rosen, P. S. (2012). A Review on Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 12(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70029-5spa
dc.relation.referencesHorváth, A., Mardas, N., Mezzomo, L. A., Needleman, I. G., & Donos, N. (2013). Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clinical oral investigations, 17(2), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5spa
dc.relation.referencesHutmacher, D. W., Goh, J. C., & Teoh, S. H. (2001). An introduction to biodegradable materials for tissue engineering applications. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 30(2), 183–191.spa
dc.relation.referencesJambhekar, S., Kernen, F., & Bidra, A. S. (2015). Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 113(5), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009spa
dc.relation.referencesJambhekar, S., Kernen, F., & Bidra, A. S. (2015). Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 113(5), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009spa
dc.relation.referencesJung, R. E., Philipp, A., Annen, B. M., Signorelli, L., Thoma, D. S., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Attin, T., & Schmidlin, P. (2013). Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology, 40(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12027spa
dc.relation.referencesKrnic Martinic, M., Pieper, D., Glatt, A., & Puljak, L. (2019). Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0spa
dc.relation.referencesLindhe, J., & Lang, N. (2009). Periodontología Clínica e Implantología Odontológica (5a ed., Vol. 2). Panamericanaspa
dc.relation.referencesLindhe, J., Lang, N., & Karring, T. (2017). Periodontología clínica e implantología odontológica (6a ed.). Panamericanaspa
dc.relation.referencesLizarazo Rozo, M. A. (2021). Regeneración tisular guiada con barreras de titanio y estabilización de coágulo. Gaceta dental: Industria y profesiones, 333, 30–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesMajzoub, J., Ravida, A., Starch-Jensen, T., Tattan, M., & Suárez-López Del Amo, F. (2019). The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research, 10(3), e6. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10306spa
dc.relation.referencesMardas, N., Trullenque-Eriksson, A., MacBeth, N., Petrie, A., & Donos, N. (2015). Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods. Clinical oral implants research, 26 Suppl 11, 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12639spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de justicia y del derecho. (2006). ley 1032 de 2006. suin-Juriscol. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?id=1672937spa
dc.relation.referencesRojon, C., Okupe, A., & McDowall, A. (2021). Utilization and development of systematic reviews in management research: What do we know and where do we go from here? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 191–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12245spa
dc.relation.referencesScarfe, W. C., Farman, A. G., & Sukovic, P. (2006). Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Journal (Canadian Dental Association), 72(1), 75–80.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeliktar, D., Nerem, R. M., & Galis, Z. S. (2001). The role of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in the remodeling of cell-seeded vascular constructs subjected to cyclic strain. Annals of biomedical engineering, 29(11), 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1415522spa
dc.relation.referencesSeyssens, L., Eghbali, A., Christiaens, V., De Bruyckere, T., Doornewaard, R., & Cosyn, J. (2019). A one‐year prospective study on alveolar ridge preservation using collagen‐enriched deproteinized bovine bone mineral and saddle connective tissue graft: A cone beam computed tomography analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 21(5), 853–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12843spa
dc.relation.referencesSoardi, C., Barootchi, S., Soardi, B., Tavelli, L., Zaffe, D., & Wang, H.-L. (2022). Cortical Versus Cancellous Solvent-Dehydrated Bone Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Histologic Study. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 42(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.5563spa
dc.relation.referencesStumbras, A., Galindo‐Moreno, P., Januzis, G., & Juodzbalys, G. (2021). Three‐dimensional analysis of dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation with bone substitutes or plasma rich in growth factors: Randomized and controlled clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 23(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12950spa
dc.relation.referencesStumbras, A., Kuliesius, P., Januzis, G., & Juodzbalys, G. (2019). Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Tooth Extraction Using Different Bone Graft Materials and Autologous Platelet Concentrates: a Systematic Review. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research, 10(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10102spa
dc.relation.referencesTroiano, G., Zhurakivska, K., Lo Muzio, L., Laino, L., Cicciù, M., & Lo Russo, L. (2017). Combination of Bone Graft and Resorbable Membrane for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.170241spa
dc.relation.referencesValdespino-Gómez, V. M., Valdespino-Castillo, P. M., & Valdespino-Castillo, V. E. (2014). Estrategias para la regeneración de tejidos: células, inductores bioquímicos, bionanomateriales y bioconstrucciones. Alcances clínicoquirúrgicos. Cirugía y Cirujanos, 82, 578–589spa
dc.relation.referencesVargas, L., Serrano, C. A., & Estrada, J. H. (2012). Preservación de alvéolos postexodoncia mediante el uso de diferentes materiales de injerto. Revisión de la literatura. Práctica Clínica, 31(66), 45–183.spa
dc.relation.referencesWessels, R., Vervaeke, S., Seyssens, L., Eghbali, A., & Cosyn, J. (2020). A 5‐year cohort study on early implant placement with guided bone regeneration or alveolar ridge preservation with connective tissue graft. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 22(6), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12948spa
dc.relation.referencesYang, Y., Yang, H., Pan, H., Xu, J., & Hu, T. (2015). Evaluation and New Classification of Alveolar Bone Dehiscences Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography in vivo. International Journal of Morphology, 33(1), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000100057spa
dc.relation.referencesZampara, E., Alshammari, M., De Bortoli, J., Mullings, O., Gkisakis, I. G., Benalcázar Jalkh, E. B., Tovar, N., Coelho, P. G., & Witek, L. (2022). A Histologic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of an Allograft, Xenograft, and Alloplast Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Oral Implantology, 48(6), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00012spa
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordDental Socketspa
dc.subject.keywordAlveolar Bone Graftspa
dc.subject.keywordPreservation of Alveolar Ridgespa
dc.subject.keywordSystematic Reviewspa
dc.subject.keywordAllograftspa
dc.subject.keywordXenograftspa
dc.subject.keywordAlloplasticspa
dc.subject.keywordAutograftspa
dc.subject.lembEndodonciaspa
dc.subject.lembCirugía odontológicaspa
dc.subject.lembRayos x - odomntologíaspa
dc.subject.lembInjertos óseos - odontologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalAlveolo Dentalspa
dc.subject.proposalInjerto de Hueso Alveolarspa
dc.subject.proposalPreservación Alveolarspa
dc.subject.proposalRevisión Sistemáticaspa
dc.subject.proposalAloinjertospa
dc.subject.proposalXenoinjertospa
dc.subject.proposalAloplásticospa
dc.subject.proposalAutoinjertospa
dc.titlePreservación alveolar, cuatro materiales utilizados como injerto de alvéolo posterior a la extracción dental: una revisión sistemáticaspa
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023DíazMildreth.pdf
Tamaño:
466.23 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de Grado
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023DíazMildreth1.pdf
Tamaño:
179.58 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Aprobación Facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023DíazMildreth2.pdf
Tamaño:
110.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Acuerdo de publicación
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023DíazMildreth3.pdf
Tamaño:
130.48 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Apéndices

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: