El activismo y progresismo judicial de la corte constitucional vs la materialización real y efectiva de sus decisiones

Abstract

A constitutional courts were assigned the main role of being guardians of the constitution through the protection of fundamental rights and constitutional guarantees in order to preserve the balance of powers and the supremacy of the constitution, against any attempt to violate it. In this sense, the Constitutional Court of Colombia in recent years has recognized the protection and recognition of rights of minority groups; on decisions such as abortion, euthanasia, LGBTI minority, personal dose of dope and displacement. Such decisions are made through the constitutional control tool tutela and constitutional abstract control on situations which in principle should be safeguarded by the legislature and the executive. Despite this, it is evident that these decisions in some territories generally peripheral areas of the country, there are not effective, this decisions are not informed and they are unknown by the population groups for has been decided, is positive Judicial activism and progressive materialized in a sentence, but known by his addressees, causing not royal and effective execution of the failures.