Incorporación de la inteligencia artifical como medio de prueba en el sistena jurìdico colombiano: Retos y perspectivas.

Abstract

Every previous human invention has served to empower humans, but we must emphasize that they do not make decisions for themselves, as they lack the criteria to make independent decisions. However, AI does have the ability to process information on its own and can therefore replace humans in decision-making. Yuval Noah Hararu (2024) states, "AI is not a tool, it is an agent." Given the importance of Artificial Intelligence, this topic is of interest to everyone, especially law students and judicial officials. In Colombia, the law of evidence faces the challenge of adapting to these innovations, thus raising the need to include AI systems or their results as evidence in judicial proceedings. It is vitally important to analyze and study the advancement of topics that develop technology and law, even more so in a country like Colombia, where the administration of justice has flaws and weaknesses in its structure (Suárez Manrique et al., 2023). The evidentiary regime in Colombia is largely regulated by two laws, the CGP and the CPP. (Villamizar, 2024) and although it is not exhaustive with them, the research seeks to explore whether the Colombian legal framework is prepared for this transformation and whether the inclusion of AI as a means of evidence would guarantee due process and substantive justice, contributing to the strengthening of the administration of justice.