Narrativas de jóvenes universitarios sobre sus interacciones con inteligencia artificial desde las dimensiones del bienestar psicológico de Ryff

dc.contributor.advisorFigueroa Ángel , Melba Ximena
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Lasso, Brahian Smider
dc.contributor.authorAcosta García, Angie Natalia
dc.contributor.authorMora Aguirre, Ana Sofía
dc.contributor.authorRobayo León, Natalia Andrea
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-1590
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-11T13:28:06Z
dc.date.available2026-09-11T13:28:06Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-10
dc.descriptionLa inteligencia artificial (IA) ha trascendido su función instrumental para convertirse en un espacio de interacción que genera experiencias de compañía, escucha y conexión afectiva. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo comprender las narrativas de jóvenes universitarios sobre sus interacciones con la IA en relación con las dimensiones del bienestar psicológico propuestas por Ryff: autoaceptación, relaciones positivas, autonomía, dominio del entorno, propósito en la vida y crecimiento personal. Se desarrolló un estudio con enfoque cualitativo y diseño narrativo, mediante 13 entrevistas semiestructuradas a estudiantes de la Universidad Santo Tomás (Colombia), con edades entre 18 y 28 años. El análisis se realizó en los niveles textual, contextual y metatextual, empleando la matriz narrativa de Quintero Mejía (2018). Los hallazgos evidenciaron que las narrativas se configuran como tramas paradójicas y ambivalentes, donde la IA es percibida tanto como una herramienta que favorece el aprendizaje y el desempeño académico como una amenaza para la autonomía, la autenticidad de las relaciones y el proyecto de vida. Se identificaron cuatro tipos de trama: aprendizaje y transformación, amenaza latente, deshumanización relacional y empoderamiento crítico. Se concluye que el bienestar psicológico en la era digital depende de un uso reflexivo y crítico de la IA, promoviendo la autonomía, la creatividad y el juicio ético.
dc.description.abstractArtificial intelligence (AI) has evolved beyond its instrumental function to become a space for interaction that fosters experiences of companionship, attentive listening, and emotional connection. This study aimed to understand university students’ narratives about their interactions with AI in relation to the dimensions of psychological well-being proposed by Ryff: self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. A qualitative study with a narrative design was conducted through 13 semi-structured interviews with students from Universidad Santo Tomás (Colombia), aged 18 to 28 years. Data were analyzed at the textual, contextual, and metatextual levels using Quintero Mejía’s (2018) narrative matrix. The findings revealed that participants’ narratives were characterized by paradoxical and ambivalent plots, in which AI was perceived both as a tool that enhances learning and academic performance and as a potential threat to autonomy, relational authenticity, and life purpose. Four narrative plots were identified: learning and transformation, latent threat, relational dehumanization, and critical empowerment. The study concludes that psychological well-being in the digital era depends on developing a reflective and critical relationship with AI, fostering autonomy, creativity, and ethical judgment.
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenamePsicólogospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAcosta García, A. N., González Lasso, B. S., Mora Aguirre, A. S. y Robayo León, N. A. (2026). Narrativas de jóvenes universitarios sobre sus interacciones con inteligencia artificial desde las dimensiones del bienestar psicológico de Ryff. [Trabajo de Grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/74124
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Psicologíaspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Psicologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesArea, M., & Pessoa, T. (2012). De lo sólido a lo líquido: Las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los cambios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar, 19(38), 13–20
dc.relation.referencesAriel, Y., & Nir, B. (2025). Beyond the metrics: A critical analysis of digital success in Western societies. Philosophy & Technology, 38, Article 132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00958-6
dc.relation.referencesArnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
dc.relation.referencesBerryman, C., Ferguson, C. J., & Negy, C. (2018). Social media use and mental health among young adults. Psychiatric Quarterly, 89(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-017-9535-6
dc.relation.referencesBolívar, A. (2002). “¿De nobis ipsis silemus?”: Epistemología de la investigación biográfico-narrativa en educación. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 4(1), 1–26.
dc.relation.referencesBourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de sociologie. Éditions de Minuit
dc.relation.referencesBowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesBruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCaza, B. B., Reid, E. M., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2025). Selling the self: Neo-normative control and the platform paradox. Journal of Management, 51(2), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2025.01.012
dc.relation.referencesChoudhury, A., Rane, P., & Kumar, V. (2025). From automation to augmentation: GenAI's role in promoting students' cognitive and ethical development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100234
dc.relation.referencesClandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.referencesCommon Sense Media. (2024). AI and teens: Human-AI interactions and the future of relationships. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/ai-and-teens
dc.relation.referencesCommon Sense Media. (2024). Teens and artificial intelligence: How young people interact with AI tools. Common Sense Media Research Report.
dc.relation.referencesCommon Sense Media. (2024). The role of AI companions in teen emotional life. Common Sense Research.
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2006, septiembre 6). Ley 1090 de 2006. Diario Oficial No. 46.383. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=66229
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2012, octubre 17). Ley 1581 de 2012. Diario Oficial No. 48.587. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=49981
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2013, abril 29). Ley 1622 de 2013. Diario Oficial No. 48.769. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=53091
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesErikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
dc.relation.referencesFlick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesFloridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Canclini, N. (2019). Ciudadanos reemplazados por algoritmos. Gedisa.
dc.relation.referencesGergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. Basic Book
dc.relation.referencesGiddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGoodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesHan, B.-C. (2017). La sociedad del cansancio. Herder.
dc.relation.referencesHan, B.-C. (2026). The paradox of retrieval: The Other, the authentic self, and the logical tensions in Byung-Chul Han's critique of digital capitalism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 523. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06891-z
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, W. (2026, April 2). Learning to think in the AI era. UNESCO Courier. https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/learning-think-ai-era
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
dc.relation.referencesIEEE. (2025). Behavioral modeling of Generation Z students' ChatGPT use and academic independence... 2025 IEEE International Conference on TALE, 1–6
dc.relation.referencesJain, G., Patole, E., & Pareek, S. (2026). Digital companionship... Acta Psychologica, 246, 104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.104698
dc.relation.referencesKallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965.
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand... Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.
dc.relation.referencesKhoudri, I. (2025). Learning with AI: Transformations of learner identity in digital educational environments. LIMES, 2(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.limes-vol2iss2.7402
dc.relation.referencesKlein, M. (1945). Enamoramiento y celos; y otros escritos sobre relaciones objetales.
dc.relation.referencesKrueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., Kim, J., Choi, Y., & Park, S. (2023). The Potential of Chatbots for Emotional Support... Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e51712. https://doi.org/10.2196/51712
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., Park, S., & Kim, H. (2023). Emotional resonance with chatbots... Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107762
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
dc.relation.referencesLuckin, R. (2017). Towards Artificial Intelligence-based Assessment Systems. UNESCO.
dc.relation.referencesMargulis, M., & Urresti, M. (1996). La juventud es más que una palabra. Editorial Biblos.
dc.relation.referencesMcAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. Guilford Press.
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. Dartmouth College.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud. (1993, octubre 4). Resolución 8430 de 1993. Diario Oficial No. 41.148. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/resolucion-8430-de-1 993.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (MinTIC). (2021). Marco Ético para la Inteligencia Artificial en Colombia. https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/marco-etico-ia-colombia-2021.pdf
dc.relation.referencesNilsson, N. J. (2010). The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesPolkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press.
dc.relation.referencesPramod, D. (2026). Human–AI co-creation among Gen Z to build knowledge and learning effectiveness. Scientific Reports, 16, Article 42105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52962-1
dc.relation.referencesProvoost, S., Lau, H. M., Ruwaard, J., & Riper, H. (2017). Embodied conversational agents in clinical psychology: A scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e151. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6553
dc.relation.referencesQuintero Mejía, M. (2018). Usos de las narrativas, epistemologías y metodologías: Aportes para la investigación.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, M. (2017). Narrativas, subjetividades y contextos: Perspectivas críticas para la investigación psicosocial. Editorial Universidad del Valle.
dc.relation.referencesRiessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesRosamond, E. (2025). Synthetic self-performance: AI personality as capitalist form. Historical Materialism Conference Proceedings. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/39968/
dc.relation.referencesRussell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
dc.relation.referencesRyff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it?... Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
dc.relation.referencesRyff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited... Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
dc.relation.referencesSarbin, T. R. (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. Praeger.
dc.relation.referencesSchueller, S. M., Hunter, J. F., Figueroa, C., & Aguilera, A. (2021). Use of digital mental health for depression and anxiety: A systematic review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 23(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-021-01262-8
dc.relation.referencesSeligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press
dc.relation.referencesSluzki, C. E. (1996). La red social: Fronteras de la práctica sistémica. Gedisa.
dc.relation.referencesTian, H., & Qin, R. (2026). 生成式人工智能的意识形态生产批判与主体性重构... Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition), (1). https://doi.org/10.12451/202603.02653
dc.relation.referencesTurkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2018). Youth Development Indicators. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
dc.relation.referencesValkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
dc.relation.referencesVan Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social Research Update, 35, 1–4
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y., Liu, J., & Zhang, X. (2024). Human-like intelligence in chatbots and its impact on user learning motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(3), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241234567
dc.relation.referencesWhite, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. W. W. Norton & Company.
dc.relation.referencesWu, Y., Wu, T., Zhu, K., Liu, X., Liu, J., Wang, Y., ... & Du, X. (2026). The impact of chatbots on adolescent mental health development... Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 19, 579872. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S579872
dc.relation.referencesZhang, L., Chen, R., & Hu, S. (2025). Artificial empathy: Users’ emotional disclosure and self-reflection... Frontiers in Psychology, 16(2219), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.02219
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Zhao, D., Hancock, J. T., Kraut, R., & Yang, D. (2025). The rise of AI companions... arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.12605
dc.relation.referencesZhou, L., Pathak, P., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2026). Creative personal identity in the age of generative AI... Computers in Human Behavior, 168, 108450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108450
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.subject.keywordArtificial intelligence
dc.subject.keywordpsychological well-being
dc.subject.keywordNarratives
dc.subject.keywordUniversity youth
dc.subject.keywordEmerging adulthood
dc.subject.keywordAutonomy
dc.subject.keywordAuthenticity
dc.subject.lembPsicología
dc.subject.lembInteligencia artificial -- Aspectos psicológicos
dc.subject.lembEstudiantes universitarios -- Aspectos psicológicos
dc.subject.proposalInteligencia artificial
dc.subject.proposalBienestar psicológico
dc.subject.proposalNarrativas
dc.subject.proposalJuventud universitaria
dc.subject.proposalAdultez emergente
dc.subject.proposalAutonomía
dc.subject.proposalAutenticidad
dc.titleNarrativas de jóvenes universitarios sobre sus interacciones con inteligencia artificial desde las dimensiones del bienestar psicológico de Ryff
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026brahiangonzalez.pdf
Tamaño:
1.55 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026cartadefacultad.pdf
Tamaño:
265.27 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2026cartaderechosdeautor.pdf
Tamaño:
376.6 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta derechos de autor