El impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la protección de los Derechos laborales: Análisis comparativo entre países latinoamericanos

dc.contributor.advisorMoreno Villamizar, Manuel Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorAmaya Culma, Lina Gabriela
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001519938
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=HDarMKcAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-6120
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-08T17:13:25Z
dc.date.available2025-04-08T17:13:25Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-07
dc.descriptionLa investigación sobre el impacto de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la protección de los derechos laborales en países latinoamericanos surge en un momento crucial de rápida transformación tecnológica y desafíos laborales. La IA ha irrumpido en múltiples aspectos de la sociedad, transformando cómo trabajamos, interactuamos y vivimos. Su influencia en el ámbito laboral plantea tanto oportunidades como desafíos para la protección de los derechos de los trabajadores. La adopción de la IA en la gestión de recursos humanos y en la toma de decisiones laborales ha generado preocupaciones sobre la posible pérdida de empleos y la precarización del trabajo. Existe el riesgo de sesgos algorítmicos y discriminación cuando las empresas recurren a algoritmos y sistemas automatizados para la contratación y evaluación del desempeño. Además, la rápida evolución de la IA plantea interrogantes éticos y legales sobre la responsabilidad y la rendición de cuentas en el entorno laboral. ¿Quién es responsable cuando un algoritmo toma decisiones discriminatorias o injustas? Estas son cuestiones urgentes que requieren investigación para garantizar que la IA no socave los avances en derechos laborales. En el contexto latinoamericano, esta investigación cobra relevancia debido a desigualdades y debilidades en la aplicación de leyes laborales. Si bien la tecnología puede ofrecer oportunidades para mejorar las condiciones laborales, también existe el riesgo de profundizar las disparidades existentes. La regulación laboral actual en muchos países latinoamericanos no está preparada para abordar los desafíos de la IA. Es necesario explorar cómo adaptar o crear nuevas normativas que protejan los derechos de los trabajadores. Esta investigación puede contribuir al desarrollo de políticas públicas que promuevan un uso ético y equitativo de la IA en el ámbito laboral. Al comprender los impactos potenciales de esta tecnología y las mejores prácticas para su implementación, se pueden diseñar marcos regulatorios que fomenten la innovación tecnológica sin comprometer los derechos de los trabajadores.
dc.description.abstractResearch on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the protection of labor rights in Latin American countries arises at a crucial time of rapid technological transformation and labor challenges. AI has disrupted multiple aspects of society, transforming how we work, interact and live. Its influence in the workplace poses both opportunities and challenges for the protection of workers' rights. The adoption of AI in human resource management and employment decision-making has raised concerns about potential job losses and job insecurity. There is a risk of algorithmic bias and discrimination when companies turn to algorithms and automated systems for hiring and performance evaluation. Additionally, the rapid evolution of AI raises ethical and legal questions about responsibility and accountability in the workplace. Who is responsible when an algorithm makes discriminatory or unfair decisions? These are urgent issues that require research to ensure that AI does not undermine advances in labor rights. In the Latin American context, this research becomes relevant due to inequalities and weaknesses in the application of labor laws. While technology can offer opportunities to improve working conditions, there is also a risk of deepening existing disparities. Current labor regulations in many Latin American countries are not prepared to address the challenges of AI. It is necessary to explore how to adapt or create new regulations that protect workers' rights. This research can contribute to the development of public policies that promote ethical and equitable use of AI in the workplace. By understanding the potential impacts of this technology and best practices for its implementation, regulatory frameworks can be designed that encourage technological innovation without compromising workers' rights.
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameAbogadospa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacion
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAmaya Culma, L. (2024). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la protección de los Derechos laborales: Análisis comparativo entre países latinoamericanos. [Trabajo de Grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/66936
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Villavicencio
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derechospa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Derechospa
dc.relation.referencesAbbatiello, A., Agarwal, D., Bersin, J., Lahiri, G., Schwartz, J., & Volini, E. (2018). El auge de la empresa social. Estudio "Tendencias Globales de Capital Humano 2018". Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ar/Documents/human-capital/Tendencias-Globales-de-Capital-Humano2018_El-auge-de-la-empresa-social-WEB_Julio%202018.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAbbott, N., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., . . . Ajith, P. J. (2016). GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO. General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.03839
dc.relation.referencesAgencia Española Protección Datos (AEPD). (2022). Supervision and Regulation of AI in the Labor Context. https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2022-03/guidelines-on-artificial-intelligence.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAllen, T., & Henn, G. (2007). he Organization and Architecture of Innovation: Managing the Flow of Technology. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesAtkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Bollegala, D. (2020). Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103387
dc.relation.referencesBenkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBessen, J. (2019). Automatización y empleo: cuando la tecnología impulsa el empleo. Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po, 34(100), 589-626. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa001
dc.relation.referencesBinns, R. (2018). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. En Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (págs. 149-159). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3813767
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. (2012). Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice. Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHolstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Hal, D., & Dudik, M. W. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.05239
dc.relation.referencesDanna, K., & Griffin, R. (1999). Health and Well-Being in the Workplace: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500305
dc.relation.referencesDeloitte Insights. (2019). Deloitte. (2019). Global Human Capital Trends 2019: Leading the Social Enterprise—Reinvent with a Human Focus. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/5136_HC-Trends-2019/DI_HC-Trends-2019.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDoshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608(v2). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.08608
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission. (2019). Ethics Guidelines For Trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60419
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
dc.relation.referencesGajendran, R., & Harrison, D. (2007). The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown About Telecommuting: MetaAnalysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
dc.relation.referencesGabriel, S., Bhagavatula, C., Shwartz, V., Le Bras, R., Forbes, M., & Choi, Y. (2021). Paragraph-level commonsense transformers with recurrent memory. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(14), 12857-12865. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i14.17521
dc.relation.referencesHadfiel, G. K. (2019). Rules for a Flat World. Why Humans Invented Law and How to Reinvent It for a Complex Global Economy. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGovernment of Canada. (2020). Responsible use of artificial intelligence in government. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai.html
dc.relation.referencesHuang, M.-H., & Rust, R. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research , 21(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459
dc.relation.referencesIBM Corp. (2020). Everyday Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. IBM Design Program Office. https://www.ibm.com/watson/assets/duo/pdf/everydayethics.pdf
dc.relation.referencesInternational Ergonomics Association. (2018). Definition and Domains of Ergonomics. https://iea.cc/definition-and-domains-of-ergonomics/](https://iea.cc/definition-and-domains-of-ergonomics/
dc.relation.referencesInternational Labour Organization. (2020). COVID-19 and the world of work: Impact and policy responses. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_738753.pdf
dc.relation.referencesKatz, D. (2017). Measuring the Impact of Legal Technology: How to Effectively Assess and Analyze Legal Technology Investments. American Bar Association.
dc.relation.referencesKeng, S. .., & Wang, W. (2018). Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Robotics. Cutter Business Technology Journal, 31(2), 47-53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324006061_Building_Trust_in_Artificial_Intelligence_Machine_Learning_and_Robotics
dc.relation.referencesKimbro, S. (2015). Virtual Law Practice: How to Deliver Legal Services Online. ABA Book Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesKossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. (2018). Creating a Life That Works in the Flexible Job Age. Wharton School Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesLessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books. https://lessig.org/images/resources/1999-Code.pdf
dc.relation.referencesLinkedin. (2018). Transparency in AI: A Guide to Explainable Artificial Intelligence. https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2018/01/transparency-in-ai
dc.relation.referencesMayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesO'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
dc.relation.referencesPersonal Data Protection Commission (PDPC). (2020). Odel Artificial Intelligence Governance Framewor. SG:D Empowering Possibilities, Infocomm Media Development Authority (Im). https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Resource-for-Organisation/AI/SGModelAIGovFramework2.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRaghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: evaluating claims and practices. En Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* '20) (págs. 469-481). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372828
dc.relation.referencesRaji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., . . . Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing. Computers and Society. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.00973
dc.relation.referencesSchein, E. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons. https://ia800805.us.archive.org/9/items/EdgarHScheinOrganizationalCultureAndLeadership/Edgar_H_Schein_Organizational_culture_and_leadership.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, S. (2015). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. En S. a. Brosch, Handbook of value (págs. 1-38). Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277718092_Schwartz_S_H_2015_Basic_individual_values_Sources_and_consequences_In_D_Sander_and_T_Brosch_Eds_Handbook_of_value_Oxford_UK_Oxford_University_Press
dc.relation.referencesSunstein, C. R. (2021). Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195145427.001.0001
dc.relation.referencesSusskind, R. (2008). The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesTambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910
dc.relation.referencesTheorell, T., & Karasek, R. A. (1996). Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 9-26. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.9
dc.relation.referencesToubiana, V., Narayanan, A., Boneh, D., Nissenbaum, H., & Barocas, S. (2010). Adnostic: Privacy Preserving Targeted Advertising. Proceedings Network and Distributed System Symposium, 1-23. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567076
dc.relation.referencesUK Govermment. (2021). National AI Strategy. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-ai-strategy
dc.relation.referencesUnited State Copyright Office. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Copyright. Comment Of The United States Federal Trade Commission. United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC). https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p241200_ftc_comment_to_copyright_office.pdf
dc.relation.referencesVadillo Bueno, G. (2020). Inteligencia artificial: un punto de encuentro para todos. Revista Digital Universitaria, 21(1). http://doi.org/10.22201/codeic.16076079e.2020.v21n1.a0
dc.relation.referencesWhittaker, M., Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Fried, G., Kaziunas, E., Mathur, V., . . . Schwartz, O. (2018). AI Now Report 2018 . AI Now Institute. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_now_2018_report.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2017). Accelerating Gender Parity in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. An Agenda for Leaders to Shape the Future of Education, Gender and Work. Committed To Inproving The State Of The World. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EGW_White_Paper_Gender_Parity_4IR.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization (WHO). (2019). Mental Health, Brain Health and Substance Use. https://www.who.int/mental_health/in_the_workplace/en/
dc.relation.referencesZarasky, T. (2015). The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making. Science, Technology, & Human Values,, 41(1), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575
dc.relation.referencesZittrain, J. (2009). The Future of the Internet--And How to Stop It. Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCooper, C. (2015). Handbook of Stress, Medicine, and Health. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039702
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commissión. (2021). Explanatory Memorandum. Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules On Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) And Amending Certain Union.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Colombiaen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordArtificial Intelligence
dc.subject.keywordLabor Rights
dc.subject.keywordLatin America
dc.subject.keywordRegulation
dc.subject.keywordEthics
dc.subject.lembInteligencia artificial - Derecho laborales
dc.subject.lembDerecho laboral - Ética
dc.subject.lembÉtica
dc.subject.lembLegislación - Regulación
dc.subject.lembDerecho - Investigaciones
dc.subject.lembTesis y Disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.proposalInteligencia Artificial
dc.subject.proposalDerechos Laborales
dc.subject.proposalAmérica Latina
dc.subject.proposalRegulación
dc.subject.proposalÉtica
dc.titleEl impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la protección de los Derechos laborales: Análisis comparativo entre países latinoamericanos
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Pregrado
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2025linaamaya
Tamaño:
419.52 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorizacion Facultad
Tamaño:
386.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorización Estudiante
Tamaño:
439.34 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones